scholarly journals Personalized Daily Doses of Imatinib By Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Increase the Rates of Molecular Responses in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Final Results of the Randomized OPTIM Imatinib Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 133-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Hyacinthe Johnson-Ansah ◽  
Françoise Huguet ◽  
Laurence Legros ◽  
Martine Escoffre-Barbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Dose Adjustment ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Daily Dose

Abstract Background Imatinib mesylate (IM) at 400 mg/d remains a standard for first line therapy in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML (CP-CML). A sub analysis of the IRIS study (Larson et al. Blood, 2008) demonstrated that pts with high IM trough levels achieved higher rates of major molecular response (MMR). The level of 1000 ng/ml was established as the [C]min value threshold to predict molecular response (Picard et al. Blood, 2007). We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the value of IM dose optimization based on the monitoring of [C]min levels in newly diagnosed CP-CML pts (OPTIM-imatinib trial, EudraCT number 2008-006854-17). Patients and Methods Pts diagnosed with CP- CML for less than 3 months, not previously treated or treated with IM for less than 3 months were eligible and treated with IM 400 mg/d. IM [C]min was determined by chromatography-tandem mass-mass spectrometry 15 days after enrollment. Pts with a [C]min < 1000 ng/ml were randomized between a dose-increase strategy aiming to reach the threshold of 1000 ng/ml (arm A1) versus standard IM management (arm A2). Pts with [C]min levels ≥1000 ng/ml were observed (arm A3). All pts were managed according to the ELN 2009 recommendations (amended with ELN 2013 recommendations). IM [C]min levels were assessed monthly in A1 and A2 and every 3 months in A3. BCR-ABLIS was assessed every 3 months. The primary end-point was MMR rates at 12 months. Results One hundred thirty nine pts were enrolled. Median follow-up was 31 months. Median age was 64y (25 to 88y), sex ratio (M/F) was 1.4 and Sokal score distribution was 21%, 41% and 38% for high, intermediate and low categories respectively, equally distributed in the 3 arms. In 6 pts the initial [C]min was not assessed (3 were intolerant and 3 declined the dosage). Thus 133 pts were studied. In 86 pts (65%), initial [C]min value was < 1000 ng/ml. These pts were randomized between A1 (43 pts) and A2 (43 pts). [C]min was ≥1000 ng/ml in the 47 remaining pts followed in A3. Table 1 shows the significant improvement of the median IM [C]min after dose adjustment in A1 (p<0.0001) as compared to standard management in A2. Correspondingly, IM daily dose increased in A1 (p<0.0001) to reach a mean value of 600 mg/d. In the experimental A1 arm, the distribution of IM doses at 12 months was 13% for 500 mg/d, 30% for 600 mg/d, 34% for 800 mg/d whereas 16% of the pts remained at 400 mg/d and 7% were dose decreased at 300 mg/d. During follow-up, a similar proportion of pts with AE was observed in A1 (58%) and A2 (51%). Eight SAE related to IM were equally distributed in A1, A2 and A3. Cumulative incidences of treatment discontinuation were comparable in the 3 arms (overall, 18.8% by 12 months and 34.1% by 24 months). Reasons for discontinuation were not similar in A1 and A2 with a trend for more treatment failures in A2 as compared to A1 (60% versus 18%, p=0.08). At 12 months, MMR was achieved in 27 out of 43 pts (63%; 95%CI 49-77) in A1 as compared to 16 out 43 pts (37%; 95%CI 23-51) in A2 (p=0,031). The rates of MMR were not statistically different between A1 and A3 (p=0.12). Conclusions Only 1/3 of pts on IM400 were correctly dosed and may not require systematic high dose IM. Two-thirds of the pts were not exposed enough to IM at standard dose and may benefit from individualized strategies. A tailored dose adjustment based on pharmacology resulted in higher MMR rate at 12 months (63% vs 37%), a magnitude in line with the results previously reported with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors or high dose IM front line. Our results may provide a strong rational to early personalize the use of IM and IM generic formulations in order to optimize the outcome for each patient. This study was supported by a grant from the French Department of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique). Table 1. Median [C]min (ng/ml; (95% CI)) Initial Assessment M3 M6 M9 M12 A1 591; (508-654) 838; (746-922) 1001; (748-1261) 1062; (918-1221) 1013; (830-1277) A2 651; (558-797) 605; (487-786) 591; (517-722) 605; (460-720) 646; (576-894) A3 1314; (1199-1514) 1032; (899-1143) 1002; (784-1205) 935; (737-1073) 1000; (846-1098) Mean IM daily dose (mg/d; (95% CI)) Inclusion M3 M6 M9 M12 A1 400 538; (508-568) 611; (563-658) 607; (545-668) 600; (535-665) A2 400 395; (387-402) 392; (383-401) 391; (381-401) 391; (381-401) A3 400 400; (400-400) 398; (385-410) 389; (376-402) 382; (370-395) Disclosures Rousselot: BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Johnson-Ansah:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Hybrigenics SA: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Huguet:PFIZER: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Legros:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Gardembas:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Deau:BMS: Honoraria. Mahon:ARIAD: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Occurrence, Management, and Outcomes In Patients with Pleural Effusion During Dasatinib Treatment for Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) In the First-Line Setting: Analysis of the DASISION Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2282-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimmo Porkka ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Satu Mustjoki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2282 Background: The Phase 3 DASISION trial comparing dasatinib 100 mg once daily with imatinib 400 mg once daily as initial treatment in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP has demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable safety of dasatinib after a minimum of 12 months of follow-up (Kantarjian, H, et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2260). While fluid retention was more frequent with imatinib than with dasatinib, pleural effusion was seen only with dasatinib. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of pts experiencing pleural effusion, a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction. Methods: 519 pts with newly diagnosed, treatment-naive CML-CP (median disease duration of 1 month) were randomly assigned to either dasatinib 100 mg once daily (259 pts) or imatinib 400 mg one daily (260 pts). Key endpoints included complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and safety. All pts were assessed by chest x-ray at baseline and at 6 months after randomization, or more frequently, if indicated clinically. Pts with pleural effusion at baseline were excluded. Pleural effusion was graded according to CTCAE version 3 (grade 1, asymptomatic; grade 2, symptomatic, up to 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 3, symptomatic requiring supplemental oxygen, < 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 4, life-threatening, hemodynamic instability). Results: After a minimum follow-up of 12 months with median treatment duration of 14.3 months (range, 0.3–25.8), 26 (10%, median age, 60 years) of the 258 dasatinib-treated pts (median age, 46 years) experienced pleural effusion. Of the pts with pleural effusion, 6 (23%) had low, 17 (65%) had intermediate and 3 (12%) had high Hasford risk scores. There were no grade 3 or 4 pleural effusion events. All events were grade 1(2%) or grade 2 (8%). Most events (n = 22, 85%) occurred more than 8 weeks after the start of study drug. In pts who had a pleural effusion, the median time to the event was 28 weeks (range, 4–88). Lymphocytosis (defined as peripheral blood lymphocyte count > 3.6 × 109/L) was noted in 11 (42%) of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, as compared to 46 (20%) of 232 pts with no pleural effusion. Pleural effusion was managed by dose modification and/or medical intervention. Therapy was interrupted in 19 pts, and the dose of dasatinib was reduced in 8 pts (4 pts, to 80 mg; 1 pt, to 70 mg; 3 pts, to 50 mg). Twelve pts received diuretics, 7 received corticosteroids, and only 1 pt underwent therapeutic thoracentesis. Only 3 pts (1.2%) discontinued therapy due to pleural effusion (grade 2). Eleven pts who continued dasatinib had resolution of their pleural effusion. Five pts had recurrent effusions. Of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, 24 (92%) achieved a CCyR and 17 (65%) achieved a MMR by 12 months of treatment; the corresponding CCyR and MMR rates in the total pt population were 83% and 46%, respectively Seven of the 8 pts with pleural effusion who reduced their dose achieved CCyR and MMR. Conclusion: In pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with dasatinib as initial therapy, pleural effusion was mild to moderate in severity, and was manageable with dose interruption and/reduction and/or a short course of diuretics and/or corticosteroids. The occurrence of pleural effusion and management interventions did not negatively affect the achievement of CCyR or MMR. These findings are in line with data reported previously for second-line dasatinib in CML pts resistant or intolerant to imatinib (Porkka, K, et al. Cancer 2010;116:377). Furthermore, pleural effusion and peripheral lymphocytosis may be indicative of immune-mediated antitumor activity of dasatinib. Disclosures: Porkka: BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baccarani: Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian: BMS, Pfizer and Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Mustjoki: BMS, Novartis: Honoraria. Bradley-Garelik: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Cortes: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis and Wyeth: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Prediction for Sustained Deep Molecular Response of BCR-ABL Levels in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1224-1224
Author(s):  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Marina Konopleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Deep Molecular Response ◽  
Best Fit ◽  
Time Point

Abstract Introduction Initial treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) induces excellent response in the majority of patients with CML-CP. Current guidelines recommend periodic monitoring of BCR-ABL1 levels to monitor response. During the course of treatment, recognizing early predictors of deeper response and longer-term outcomes can help guide treatment. This is relevant not only at the specified fixed time point typically reported (i.e., 3, 6, 12 months) but at any other time point when an assessment is made. Achievement of sustained deep molecular response is a goal of increasing relevance as it opens the possibility of treatment discontinuation. The objective of this study is suggest optimal BCR-ABL transcript levels at any given time, and to suggest a prediction model for sustained molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) (BCR-ABL ≤0.0032%) for at least 2 years according to BCR-ABL levels achieved within the first 12 months of TKI therapy. Methods Response data for 630 patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP in consecutive prospective clinical trials of frontline imatinib (n=73; NCT00048672), high-dose imatinib (n=208; NCT00038469 and NCT00050531), nilotinib (n=148; NCT00129740), dasatinib (n=150; NCT00254423), and ponatinib (n=51; NCT01570868) were analyzed. Real-time PCR analysis was performed at approximately 3 month intervals during the first year and 6 month intervals thereafter. The "best fit average" molecular response was defined by robust linear regression models, with which the estimated molecular level in patients with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) within 1 year, major molecular response (MMR) within 1 year, and sustained MR4.5 at any point were defined. The acceptable molecular response was defined by quantile regression for the 95th percentile, with which the worst 5% BCR-ABL levels in patients with CCyR within 1 year, MMR within 1 year, and sustained MR4.5 at any point were identified. Results In 630 patients, 2512 data points of BCR-ABL levels within 1 year of TKI were identified. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 106 months (range, 0.3-177.8). The regression equations for best fit average PCR for CCyR within 1 year was Log10(PCR) = -0.2159 x (Months) + 0.1957; for MMR within 1 year, Log10(PCR) = -0.2304 x (Months) + 0.1046; for sustained MR4.5 at any point, Log10(PCR) = -0.2154 x Months -0.1161. The regression equations for acceptable PCR for CCyR within 1 year was Log10(PCR) = -0.15796 x (Months) + 1.54839; for MMR within 1 year, Log10(PCR) = -0.20999 x (Months) + 1.54839; for sustained MR4.5, Log10(PCR) = -0.22476 x (Months) + 1.50516 (Figure 1). The best fit average PCR (i.e., estimated levels achieved by the average responder in each category) for CCyR within 1 year was 0.353%, 0.079%, 0.017%, and 0.004% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively; for MMR within 1 year was 0.259%, 0.053%, 0.011%, and 0.002% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively; for sustained MR4.5 at any point was 0.295%, 0.067%, 0.015%, and 0.003% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively (Table 1). To achieve CCyR within 1 year, the acceptable PCR (i.e., levels achieved by 95% of all those who eventually reach the said endpoint) response was 11.872%, 3.987%, 1.339%, and 0.450% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively; to achieve MMR within 1 year, 8.287%, 1.943%, 0.455%, and 0.107% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively; to achieve sustained MR4.5 at any time, 6.774%, 1.434%, 0.304%, and 0.064% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Of 289 patients who eventually achieved sustained MR4.5, 288 (99%) achieved CCyR within 1 year; 268 (93%), MMR within 1 year; 201 (70%), MR4 within 1 year; 162 (56%), MR4.5 within 1 year; 72 (25%), CMR within 1 year. Of 359 patients who achieved MMR within 1 year with a minimum follow-up of 48 months, 256 (71%) achieved sustained MR4.5; of 180 patients who achieved MR4.5 within 1 year, 151 (84%); of 72 patients who achieved CMR within 1 year, 65 (90%). Conclusion Proper interpretation of early transcript levels at any time during the course of therapy may help predict later response and outcome. Such models can be built to guide therapy for patients in a continuous basis. To achieve sustained MR4.5 for at least 2 years, deeper responses are required at each time point. Our model proposes optimal values that predict the highest probability of reaching such goal. At a minimum, CCyR within 1 year is required to achieve sustained MR4.5. Disclosures Kantarjian: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Ravandi:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Konopleva:AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Wierda:Novartis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Daver:Ariad: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jabbour:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Final Study Results of Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Patients Receiving Radotinib 300 Mg BID or Imatinib: Rerise 48 Months Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1733-1733
Author(s):  
Young Rok Do ◽  
Jae-Yong Kwak ◽  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Jeong-A Kim ◽  
Hyeoung-Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Study Results

Abstract Background: In RERISE phase 3 study, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of major molecular response (MMR) than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. By 36 months follow up, MMR (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.1%) and MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.0032%) in radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) were higher than imatinib group. Also, early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months could predict better long term outcomes in both radotinib and imatinib groups. Here, authors updated 48 months long-term benefits and risks of 300mg bid and imatinib 400mg qd from RERISE phase 3 study (NCT01511289). Methods: RERISE study was randomized trial of radotinib 300 mg bid (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81) in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. We evaluated long-term MMR and MR4.5, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) including safety data by 48 months. Results: At the study completion, 53% of patients with radotinib and 44% of patients with imatinib treated were remained. MMR and MR4.5 continued to be higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid compared with imatinib 400mg qd (Table). Especially, MMR rate by 48 months was significantly higher for radotinib compared to imatinib (76% vs 56%; P=0.0070, Figure). Also, early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months were observed in 86% of patients in the radotinib 300 mg bid group and 68% in the imatinib group (P = 0.0179). More patients treated with radotinib 300mg bid who had EMR at 3 months achieved MMR and MR4.5 by 48 months: 84% and 53% in the radotinib 300 mg bid group and 71% and 44% in the imatinib group, respectively. 48 months estimated OS and PFS rate were not significantly different in two groups (99% vs 94%; P=0.3224, 97% vs 94%; P=0.4328). Treatment failure was lower in radotinib group compared with imatinib group (Table). The safety profiles were consistent with those previously reported and most of adverse events (AEs) developed within 12 months. No new or unexpected safety events were reported in both arms by 48 months and no serious CVE related with radotinib reported. Conclusions: With a minimum 48 months follow-up, radotinib continued to demonstrate higher rates of MMR and MR4.5 than imatinib in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Also, these responses with radotinib were earlier and deeper compared with imatinib. Up to 48 months, no new and serious safety events related with radotinib reported. These results demonstrate that radotinib may have higher possibility of treatment- free remission (TFR) on frontline therapy as well as it can be one of the standards of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Bunworasate: IL-YANG: Research Funding. Comia:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Mun:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Caguioa:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding.

Imatinib Mesylate (IM) Versus IM + Low Dose of Pegylated Interferon Alfa 2a (Peg-IFN 2a) In Newly-Diagnosed Chronic-Phase (CP) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4497-4497
Author(s):  
Luis Antonio Meillon ◽  
Salvador Campos-Cabrera ◽  
Nancy Delgado-Lopez ◽  
Angel A. Fernandez-Martinez ◽  
Jesus Medrano-Contreras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Initial Report

Abstract Abstract 4497 Background: IM 400mg daily is the current standard of treatment of CP CML. Almost 70% of patients achieve complete cytogenetic response (CCR) at 12 months (mo) (IRIS Trial) and the rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) is 40% with IM 400mg daily (TOPS Trial). On the other hand, low doses of Peg-IFN 2a has the same efficacy and lower toxicity profile and cost as high dose, mainly when it is combined with other drugs (MRC and Hovon groups, Blood 2004; 103:4408). Combination of IM + Peg-IFN 2a or Cytarabine could increase the rate of response in CML. Aims: To evaluate the rates of CCR and MMR at 12 mo in Mexican patients with newly-diagnosed CP-CML treated with IM versus IM + Peg-IFN 2a. Methods: Between 2006 and 2008, 10 patients were randomized 1:1 and stratified by Sokal and Hasford risk groups. Cytogenetic and Molecular assesments were available for all patients. In the arm A of the study IM 400 mg daily was delivered. In the Arm B IM + Peg-IFN 2a was delivered at 400 mg daily + 90 μ g per week respectively. Peg-IFN 2a was started in the 7th week of treatment (Hochhaus A, et al ASCO 2003. Abstract #2287). Results: For this initial report, 10 patients were analyzed, median age was 35 years (25-55), 50% males; Sokal score was: low risk 70%, and high risk 30%. Hasford score was: low risk 40%, intermediate 30% and high risk 30%. All patients are alive with a median follow-up of 41 mo (30-48). CCR at 12 mo was obtained in 80% in both arms of treatment. MMR was obtained in 10% in patients with IM alone and 30% in patients with IM + Peg-IFN 2a. Overall the rate of primary resistance was 10% and the rate of suboptimal response was 10%. IM 400 mg was well tolerated. Peg-IFN 2a was tolerated in most patients, but needed discontinuation because increased cytopenias or other non hematologic toxicities. The median time of duration of treatment with Peg-IFN 2a was 6 mo (3-12). Conclusions: IM 400 mg and IM 400 mg + Peg-IFN 2a obtained similar rates of CCR. IM 400 mg + Peg-IFN 2a obtained a higher rate of MMR. The combination of IM 400 mg + Peg-IFN 2a is feasible. There is a slight increase in toxicity with this combination. Further follow-up is warranted for these patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Impact of Treatment with Frontline Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) on Sustained Deep Molecular Response (MR) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2781-2781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Lilia Taningco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Event Analysis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Consolidation Phase ◽  
Time Point

Abstract Background: For pts with CML-CP treated with frontline IM, achievement of a sustained deep MR is one of the major criteria associated with successful treatment-free remission (TFR); other factors, including long duration of IM therapy and favorable Sokal risk score, have also been shown to be important. Factors affecting successful TFR in pts treated with frontline NIL are under investigation. Ongoing studies are evaluating TFR in pts who have received different durations of TKI treatment and achieved different durations of sustained MR4 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.01% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS ]) or MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.0032%). Here, 6-y data from the ENESTnd trial of frontline NIL vs IM were analyzed to evaluate rates of MR4 and MR4.5 with each agent and estimate pts' rates of sustained response for ≥ 1 y while on NIL or IM treatment. Methods: ENESTnd (NCT00471497) is an ongoing, randomized trial of NIL 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282) or NIL 400 mg BID (n = 281) vs IM 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283) in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Data from ENESTnd based on a minimum follow-up of 6 y for pts remaining on treatment were analyzed. Rates of deep MR were reported as cumulative incidence, with pts who achieved a response at or before each time point considered responders by that time point. Rates of sustained MR4 and MR4.5 on treatment among pts who achieved each response were estimated in each arm using a time-to-event analysis. In an exploratory analysis, the MR and treatment duration criteria for entering and attempting TFR in the ENESTfreedom trial (NCT01784068; a single-arm trial of pts with CML-CP who received ≥ 2 y of frontline NIL and achieved MR4.5 prior to enrollment) were applied a posteriori to determine the proportion of pts in each NIL arm of ENESTnd who were potential candidates for TFR, per the ENESTfreedom design (in the ENESTfreedom treatment consolidation phase, pts must maintain deep MR for 1 y [with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assessments every 12 weeks, and with no assessment above MR4, ≤ 2 assessments between MR4 and MR4.5, and MR4.5 in the last assessment] on NIL 300 mg BID prior to attempting TFR). Results: With a minimum follow-up of 6 y in ENESTnd, 151 (53.5%), 155 (55.2%), and 127 (44.9%) pts in the NIL 300 mg BID, NIL 400 mg BID, and IM arms, respectively, remained on study treatment; median time on treatment was 5.8, 5.9, and 5.3 y, respectively. Cumulative rates of MR4 and MR4.5 by 6 y were higher with NIL vs IM; more pts achieved MR4.5 with NIL vs IM in all Sokal risk groups (Table). Among evaluable pts at 3 mo, more achieved BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 10% at 3 mo with NIL vs IM (NIL 300 mg BID, 234/258 [90.7%]; NIL 400 mg BID, 232/260 [89.2%]; IM, 176/264 [66.7%]); within each arm, rates of MR4.5 by 6 y were higher among pts who achieved BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 10% at 3 mo vs those with BCR-ABL1IS > 10% at 3 mo. Estimated rates of sustained MR4 and MR4.5 for ≥ 1, ≥ 2, and ≥ 3 y in pts achieving each response were high in all 3 arms; estimated rates of sustained MR4.5 for ≥ 1 y were 81.5%, 84.3%, and 84.4% in the NIL 300 mg BID, NIL 400 mg BID, and IM arms, respectively. By the data cutoff, 54.3% (153/282) and 54.8% (154/281) of pts in the NIL 300 mg BID and NIL 400 mg BID arms, respectively, had received ≥ 2 y of NIL treatment and achieved MR4.5 (the treatment duration and MR criteria for entering the ENESTfreedom treatment consolidation phase). In the 2 NIL arms, 37.9% (107/282) and 34.2% (96/281) of pts, respectively, had received ≥ 3 y of NIL treatment with sustained MRD for ≥ 1 y (the criteria for attempting TFR in ENESTfreedom). Conclusion: In ENESTnd, NIL resulted in higher rates of MR4 and MR4.5 than IM. Once achieved, these deep MRs were durable in all 3 treatment arms, with > 80% of pts who achieved MR4.5 maintaining this response for ≥ 1 y. The higher rates of deep MR achieved with frontline NIL vs IM may enable more pts to qualify to attempt experimental TFR in a clinical trial. After a minimum follow-up of 6 y, 37.9% of pts (107/282) treated with NIL 300 mg BID in ENESTnd had the treatment duration and sustained deep MR equivalent to those required for attempting TFR in ENESTfreedom. Disclosures Hochhaus: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Larson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Taningco:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Deng:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Menssen:Novartis Pharma Basel Switzerland: Employment.

Association of Peripheral Regulatory T Cells with Achievement of Deep Molecular Response in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Dasatinib - the Final Results of D-First Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1916-1916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chikashi Yoshida ◽  
Noriyoshi Iriyama ◽  
Yuho Najima ◽  
Shin Fujisawa ◽  
Hisashi Wakita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Cumulative Rate ◽  
Dasatinib Treatment

Abstract Introduction Achievement of deep molecular response (DMR) has become an important treatment goal for patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) since it is considered to be necessary for the challenge of stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. However, prognostic marker for prediction of DMR has not been established. We have previously reported the results of D-First study that shorter having time of BCR-ABL1 transcripts and early cytotoxic lymphocyte expansion were associated with achievement of DMR in newly diagnosed CP-CML patients treated with dasatinib. Here, the long-term follow-up results of the study were analyzed after a minimum 36 months follow-up. In this analysis, we mainly focus on dynamics of regulatory T cells (Treg) influencing patients' clinical course, as well as immunoprofiles during dasatinib treatment. Methods: A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML who were enrolled between June 2011 and June 2012 and treated with dasatinib 100 mg once daily on an open-label, multicenter, prospective phase II clinical trial (NCT01464411). All patients were followed-up for minimum of 36 months. Patients were assessed for molecular response before and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 36 months after starting dasatinib by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of BCR-ABL1 transcripts standardized on an international scale (BCR-ABL1 IS). A DMR was defined as less than 0.01% BCR-ABL1IS (MR4). The analysis of immunophenotyping of lymphocyte fractions in the peripheral blood samples was performed by flow cytometry before and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 36 months after starting dasatinib treatment at a centralized laboratory (BML). Results: Patients' characteristic at diagnosis has been reported previously. Briefly, the median age was 52 years. High Sokal risk score was seen in 12% patients. With a minimum follow-up of 36 months, 12 (23%) patients have discontinued therapy. Reasons for treatment discontinuation includes: pleural effusion (N=3), pericardial effusion (1), proteinurea and systemic edema (1), pulmonary hypertension (1), malaise (1), elevation of intraocular pressure (1), interstitial pneumonia (1), and patient's requests (3). A cumulative rate of MMR was 75% by 12 months, 80% by 18 months, 86% by 24 months and 88% by 36 months. A cumulative rate of DMR was 49% by 12 months, 59% by 18 months, 59% by 24 months, and 65% by 36 months. Two patients died because of reasons unrelated to CML. No patients progressed to accelerated or blastic phase. Three-year overall survival was 96%. Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood revealed that average number of CD4+ T lymphocytes did not change over the course of 36 months. In contrast, ratio of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg among CD4+ T cells decreased in a time-dependent manner during the follow-up. The ratio of Treg at 12 months of dasatinib treatment was associated with achievement of DMR, which was especially significant at 18 months (p<0.05). Differentiated NK cell represented a trend of increasing during the period of observation according to the analysis of CD3-57+/CD3-56+ ratio. In addition, differentiation degree in NK cells assessed by CD3-57+/CD3-56+ ratio was negatively associated with the probability of Treg through the treatment period, suggesting a critical role of Treg inhibition by dasatinib for the induction of NK cell differentiation. Conclusion: The long term results from this study of dasatinib as frontline treatment of newly diagnosed CP-CML showed the excellent results of achieving DMR. Inhibition of Treg in peripheral blood, possibly induced by dasatinib, was associated with the achievement of DMR, which could be one of the prognostic markers for predicting the important treatment goal. Disclosures Yoshida: Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Iriyama:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Okamoto:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Shionogi & Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Teijin Pharma Limited: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Kumagai:Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Ohyashiki:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy. Morita:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Sakamoto:Takeda Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Yakult: Other: Remuneration. Inokuchi:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Radotinib Compared with Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: 12 Months Result of Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 476-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Yong Kwak ◽  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Jeong A Kim ◽  
Young Rok Do ◽  
Hyeoung Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Radotinib is a second generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed by IL-YANG Pharm. Co., Ltd (Seoul, South Korea) and approved by the Korea FDA for the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who have failed prior TKIs. We conducted the randomized, open-label, phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of radotinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP. Methods Based on baseline demographics and Sokal risk score, 241 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81). The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months and molecular response was assessed by RQ-PCR at baseline and every 3 months. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MR4.5 by 12 months, and the rate of progression to accelerate phase or blast crisis. Results All three study groups were well balanced with baseline age, gender, race and Sokal risk score. With minimum follow-up of 12 months, the proportions of patients receiving a study drug were 86.3% (69/79) in radotinib 300 mg bid group, 71.6% (58/81) in radotinib 400 mg bid group, and 81.5% (66/81) in imatinib 400 mg qd group. By 12 months, rates of MMR were significantly higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid (51.9%, P = .0044) and radotinib 400 mg bid (45.7%, P = .0342) compared with imatinib (29.6%). The median time to MMR among responders were shorter on radotinib 300 mg bid (5.7 months) and radotinib 400 mg bid (5.6 months) than imatinib group (8.2 months). The MR4.5 rates by 12 months were also higher for both radotinib 300 mg bid (15.2%) and 400 mg bid (13.6%) compared to imatinib (8.6%). The CCyR rates by 12 months were also higher for radotinib 300 mg bid (91.1%, P = .0120) compared with imatinib (76.5%). There was no progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis in all groups by 12 months. Discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) or laboratory abnormalities occurred in 7 (8.8%), 16 (19.8%), and 5 (6.2%) patients for radotinib 300 mg bid, radotinib 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 16.5% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid, in 13.6% for radotinib 400 mg bid, and in 19.8% receiving imatinib. And grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19.0%, 23.5%, and 29.6% for radotinib 300 mg bid, 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. The most common any grade non-laboratory AEs were skin rash (35.4% and 33.3%), nausea/vomiting (22.8% and 23.5%), headache (19.0% and 30.9%), and pruritus (19.0% and 30.0%) in radotinib 300 mg bid and radotinib 400 mg bid, respectively; AEs in the imatinib group were edema (34.6%), myalgia (28.4%), nausea/vomiting (27.2%), and skin rash (22.2%). Overall, grade 3/4 non-laboratory AEs were uncommon in all groups. Conclusions With minimum 12 months follow-up, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of CCyR and MMR than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. The safety profiles of the radotinib and imatinib were different, and most AEs were manageable with optimal dose reduction. The results of this trial support that radotinib can be one of the standard of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Table. Baseline Characteristics, Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Rates Radotinib 300mg BID Radotinib 400mg BID Imatinib 400mg QD (N=79) (N=81) (N=81) Age, median (range), years 45 (20-75) 43 (18-84) 45 (18-83) Gender, n (%) Male 52 (65.8) 47 (58.0) 52 (64.2) Female 27 (34.2) 34 (42.0) 29 (35.8) Sokal risk, n (%) Low 21 (26.6) 22 (27.2) 22 (27.2) Intermediate 38 (48.1) 38 (46.9) 39 (48.2) High 20 (25.3) 21 (25.9) 20 (24.7) MMR by 12 months, % 51.9 45.7 29.6 P = .0044 P = .0342 Cumulative Incidence of MMR by 12 months¢Ó, % 57.0 58.0 35.0 P = .0040 P = .0037 MR4.5 by 12 months, % 15.2 13.6 8.6 CCyR by 12 months, % 91.1 81.5 76.5 ¢Ó Kaplan-Meier estimates of MMR Disclosures Kim: IL-YANG Pharm. Co. Ltd: Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Chung:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Choi:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Nilotinib Front-Line

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽  
Stephanie Dulucq ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Nilotinib (NIL) 600 mg daily has demonstrated its superiority over Imatinib 400 mg daily in terms of response and incidence of deep molecular response in the front-line chronic phase (CP) CML setting. In this observational study we have retrospectively analyzed the outcome of in- and out-study 202 patients (pts) treated in this setting with NIL 600 mg front-line, in "real-life" conditions. All pts with newly diagnosed adult CP-CML receiving NIL 300 mg BID alone front-line between 10/2007 and 06/2020, were eligible for this study. Data were retrospectively collected according to the current French regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2003, 2006, and 2009 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) in case of TFR. In this regard, a TKI was resumed if loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. The primary endpoints were the rate of molecular responses in the long-term and the (vascular) safety of Nilotinib. Secondary endpoints were the kinetics of molecular response, survival and safety of Nilotinib. Survival (OS, PFS & EFS) was defined according to ELN (J. Guilhot et al. Blood 2012). Two hundred and two patients were reported with 44% females and 56% males with a median age at diagnosis of 50.4 (17.5-83) years, and 26% of them had cardiovascular risk factors at onset (tobacco abuse 11%, hypercholesterolemia 9.3%, diabetes 1.45%, none with past history of cardiovascular events [CVE]). ELTS scores were high in 14%, intermediate in 31% and low in 55% of pts. Twenty-four (12%) pts harboured additional chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis. The median follow-up after NIL initiation was 61.5 (1-147.5) months. At last follow-up 113 pts (55%) are not on NIL anymore for toxicities, TFR or resistance reasons. Twenty-eight (14%) pts present an arterial event on NIL (18% PAOD, 14% angina pectoralis, 7% myocardial infarction, 14% stroke, 47% others such as atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy...), that occurred after a median of 26 (0.6-98.5) months on NIL. Forty-six (22.5%) pts reached TFR criteria and stopped NIL after a median of 58.5 (27-126) months. The cumulative incidence (CI) rates of MMR at 1, 2 and 5 years were 64 (57-71)%, 79.4 (75.45-83.35)% and 95 (92-98.5)% respectively. For MR4, those were 35.5 (29-42)%, 60 (52-67)% and 82 (74.5-89)% respectively; and for MR4.5, were 14 (9-19)%, 31 (24-28)% and 62 (54-70.5)% respectively. The CI of sustained MR4.5 (i. e. patients eligible for TFR: MR4.5 ≥2 years) was observed in 30 (23-37)% at 3 years, 45.5 (36-55)% at 5 years and 52.5 (41.5-64)% at 6 years (Figure). The CI of patients entering TFR was 16.75 (10.5-23)% at 5 years and 51.94 (37.31-66.57)% at 10 years with a survival without MMR loss of 70.7 (58- 86)% at 1 year and 65.26 (50.6-84)% at 5 years. Nine (4.5%) pts progressed towards accelerated phase (4 pts) or BC (2 lymphoid, 3 myeloid) responsible for 5 deaths at latest follow-up. Among NIL resistant patients screened, 15 were harbouring ABL1 mutations (5 Y253H, 3 E255K, 3 T315I, 1 M244V, 1 G250E, 1 F359V, 1 V299L). Overall, 10 patients died (5 from CML, 5 from unrelated causes). The probability of OS was 95.75 [95%CI: 92.9-98.7]% at 2 years and 94.8 [91.5-98.3]% at 5 years, for PFS it was 94.92 [91.7-98.2]% at 2 years and 89.5 [84.7-94.6]% at 5 years, and EFS it was 78 [72.3-84]% at 2 years and 60.25 [53.3-68.1]% at 5 years. Regarding sustained MR4.5, univariate analysis showed that female gender (HR=2.46 [1.50-4.02], p&lt;0.001) and low ELTS (HR=0.41 [0.22-0.76], p&lt;0.004) had a significant impact, while multivariate analysis confirmed the role of these 2 factors (HR=2.31 [1.41- 3.79], p=0.001 and HR= 0.52 [0.30- 0.90], p=0.02) in addition to high ELTS (HR= 0.28 [0.14- 0.58], p&lt;0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that only age impacted on the CI of CVE (HR= 1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001, and HR=1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001). NIL first-line efficiently limits progression of newly diagnosed CP-CML patients and provides high rates of sustained MR4.5, allowing TFR in a substantial proportion of pts. However, the onset of arterial occlusive events, especially in the elderly is a matter of concern in the choice of this compound at treatment initiation. Disclosures Nicolini: Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Dulucq:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cayuela:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:ARIAD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Etienne:Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Title: 12 Versus 8 Prophylactic Intrathecal (IT) Chemotherapy Administration Decrease Incidence of Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia (Ph)-Positive Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3810-3810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpa Paul ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
J Michael Savoy ◽  
Adam Dipippo ◽  
Nadya Jammal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Leptomeningeal Disease ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: The addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors to hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone, vincristine, and doxorubicin alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine (HCVAD) for the treatment of Ph-positive ALL has significantly improved outcomes. However, with the increased median survival, an increased incidence of CNS relapses were documented over time, thus suggesting an increased risk among pts with Ph-positive disease (Ravandi et al, Cancer 2015).In order to reduce this incidence, treatment protocols for Ph-positive ALL were amended in 2012 to increase prophylactic IT chemotherapy from 8 to 12 at our institution. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of CNS relapses in pts with Ph-positive ALL treated with 8 versus 12 ITs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 156 pts with newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL treated with Rituximab (R)± HCVAD plus imatinib (n=35), dasatinib (n=68), or ponatinib (n=53) between July 2001 and January 2019. Pts with CNS disease at initial diagnosis were excluded. Complete molecular response (CMR) at 3 months was defined as absence of a quantifiable BCR-ABL1 transcript. CNS relapse was identified by detection of blasts or rare atypical cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in at least 2 successive evaluations and/or findings of leptomeningeal disease on imaging. Landmark analysis was performed at 6 months at the approximate time of completion of both systemic and IT therapy. Poor risk cytogenetic abnormality was defined as the presence of +der(22)t(9;22) and/or −9/9p in the absence of high hyperdiploidy (51‐65 chromosomes). CNS relapse-free survival (RFS) was defined from the start of therapy to the time of CNS relapse. Patients who died or relapsed in bone marrow were censored at the time of death and systemic relapse, respectively. Survival was assessed with and without the censoring of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Results: Pt characteristics are summarized in Figure A. One hundred and twelve pts (72%) received a median of 8 ITs (range, 2-8) and 44 pts (28%) received a median of 12 (range, 9-15). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in regards to baseline characteristics with the exception that more patients in the > 8 ITs cohort received ponatinib (66% vs 21%) and thus achieved a higher rate of 3-month CMR (70% vs 52%; p=0.04). CNS relapses were identified in 11 pts overall (7%, 4 treated with imatinib and 7 with dasatinib) and all of them received 8 or less prophylactic ITs (IT ≤8, 10% vs IT >8, 0%; p=0.023). The median follow-up of the entire population was 81 months, and 97 and 43 months for pts who received ≤8 and >8 ITs, respectively. The 3 and 6-year CNS RFS was 89% and 88% in pts with ≤8 ITs and 100% in pts with >8 Its, respectively (overall P=0.041; 3-yr CNS RFS P=0.049; 6-yr CNS RFS P=0.045) (Figure B). The outcomes remained statistically significant even after censoring for ASCT (P=0.048) (Figure C). In a multivariate analysis and after adjusting for the follow-up time, a median of 12 prophylactic IT chemotherapies was a prognostic factor significantly associated with a decrease rate of CNS relapses (P=0.03; HR=0.64 95%, CI: 0.43-0.96) (Figure D). Conclusion: In pts with newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL, incorporation of 12 prophylactic IT chemotherapy in addition to systemic therapy is a very effective strategy to reduce the long-term incidence of CNS relapses. Figure Disclosures Paul: Pfizer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Sasaki:Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kadia:BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioline RX: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Ravandi:Macrogenix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Research Funding; Selvita: Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. Kantarjian:BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jabbour:AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Excellent Outcomes at 3 Years with Nilotinib 800 Mg Daily In Early Chronic Phase, Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Results of a Phase 2 GIMEMA CML WP Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 359-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Luciano Levato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Cumulative Rate

Abstract Abstract 359 Background: Nilotinib is a potent and selective inhibitor of BCR-ABL. In the phase 3 ENESTnd trial, nilotinib demonstrated superior efficacy to imatinib with higher and faster molecular responses. With a median follow-up of 18.5 months (ASCO/EHA 2010), the rates of progression to accelerated or blast phase (AP/BC) were 0.7% and 0.4% with nilotinib 300 mg and 400 mg BID, respectively, and significantly lower in comparison to imatinib (4.2% P = .006 and .003, respectively). Based on the results of the ENESTnd trial, nilotinib has been approved (FDA) for the frontline treatment of Ph+ CML. With imatinib 400 mg (IRIS trial), the rate of any event and the rate of progression to AP/BC were higher during the first 3 years on treatment (15.6% and 6.1%, respectively). Consequently, a confirmation of the durability of nilotinib responses at 3 years is extremely important. Aims: To evaluate responses (either cytogenetic and molecular) and to investigate outcomes of patients treated for 3-years with nilotinib 400 mg BID as frontline therapy. Outcomes evaluated include Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Failure-Free Survival (FFS) and Event-Free Survival (EFS). Method: A multicentre phase 2 trial (nilotinib 400 mg BID) was conducted by the GIMEMA CML Working Party (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT00481052). The median follow-up is currently 30 months (3 years by November 2010). Definitions: Major Molecular Response (MMR): BCR-ABL/ABL ratio < 0,1% IS; Complete Molecular Response (CMR): undetectable transcript levels and nested PCR negative; failures: no CHR at 3 months, no CgR at 6 months, no PCgR at 1 year, no CCgR at 18 months, loss CHR or CCgR, progression and death (according to the revised European LeukemiaNet recommendations); events: failures and treatment discontinuation for any reason. All the analysis has been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Result: 73 patients have been enrolled; median age 51 years (range 18–83); 45% low, 41% intermediate and 14% high Sokal risk. The cumulative CCgR rate (primary endpoint) at 12 months was 100%. CCgR at each milestone: 78% at 3 months, 96% at 6, 12 and 18 months, 92% at 24 months. The cumulative rate of MMR was 96%, while the rates of MMR at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 52%, 66%, 85%, 81% and 82%, respectively. The cumulative rate of CMR was 41%, while the rates of CMR at 12 and 24 months were 7% and 12%, respectively. None of the patients who achieved a MMR progressed to AP/BC. Only one patient progressed at 6 months to AP/BC: a 63 years old female with a high Sokal risk disease in CCgR at 3 months, who developed a T315I mutation. During the first 12 months, the mean daily dose was 600–800 mg, 400–599 mg, and less than 400 mg in 74%, 18% and 8% of patients, respectively. The nilotinib last daily dose was as follows: 800 mg in 48 (71%) patients, 400 mg in 19 (28%) patients and 200 mg in 1 (1%) patient. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly grade 1 or 2 and manageable with appropriate dose adaptations. Two patients (3%) showed a prolongation of the QTcF above 450 msec (none above 50 msec). Four events lead to permanent discontinuation of nilotinib: 3 patients discontinued after 9, 15 and 27 months on treatment for recurrent episodes of amylase and/or lipase increase (no pancreatitis) and 1 patient after 25 months due to atrial fibrillation, unrelated to study drug. Three of them are currently on imatinib second-line and 1 on dasatinib third-line. Overall, 5 events have been recorded so far (1 progression to AB/BC and 4 permanent discontinuation of nilotinib due to AEs). At 30 months the OS, PFS and FFS are 99% and the EFS is 92%. Conclusion: The rate of failures was very low during the first 3 years. Responses remain stable. The very high rates of responses achieved during the first 12 months on treatment are being translated into optimal outcome for most of the patients. Acknowledgments: European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures: Rosti: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Castagnetti:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Gugliotta:Novartis: Honoraria. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; pfizer: Consultancy. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wyeth: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document