A Prospective Multicenter Study of Nonmyeloablative Conditioning with TBI or Fludarabine/TBI for HLA-Matched Related Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies with Post Grafting Immunosuppression with Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil: 10-Year Experience

Abstract Background: Nonmyeloablative conditioning with 2-Gy TBI alone or in combination with fludarabine (FLU/TBI) and HLA-matched related donor peripheral blood allografts followed by cyclosporine (CSP) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an effective therapy for many hematologic malignancies with reliable engraftment and moderate toxicity. The major causes of non-relapse mortality (NRM) are the development of acute and chronic GVHD. Several studies have demonstrated that tacrolimus may offer advantages compared with CSP for the prevention of GVHD in patients treated with myeloablative conditioning. The combination of tacrolimus and MMF, which has been used for GVHD prophylaxis after myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), was well tolerated with low toxicity. Pilot data suggested an improved and perhaps superior GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus/MMF compared to our extensive historical experience using CSP/MMF with nonmyeloablative HCT. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of grade III-IV and II-IV acute GVHD, extensive chronic GVHD, along with the rate of NRM, relapse/progression, and overall survival after nonmyeloablative conditioning and post-grafting immunosuppression with tacrolimus and MMF. Methods: In a phase II multicenter clinical trial we evaluated the effect of post grafting immunosuppression with tacrolimus and MMF for the prophylaxis of GVHD following nonmyeloablative conditioning with 2-Gy TBI alone or in combination with 90mg/m2 FLU (FLU/TBI) for patients with hematologic malignancies. Patients at low risk of graft rejection (preceding autologous HCT within 6 months) received TBI alone (n=50) while the remaining patients received FLU/TBI conditioning (n=100). Tacrolimus was administered orally (0.06 mg/kg, Q12 hr) from days -3 to +56 and in the absence of GVHD tapered off by day +180. Tacrolimus was targeted to 15-20 ng/ml for the first 28 days and 10-20 ng/ml subsequently while on full dose. MMF was given orally (15 mg/kg, Q12 hr) from day 0 until day 27. Results: 150 patients were enrolled from 2004 to 2013 and received peripheral blood stem cells (median doses of 8.1×106 CD34+ cells/kg and 3.5×108 CD3+ cells/kg) from HLA-matched related donors. Diagnosis at transplant included AML (n=42), ALL (n=6), CLL (n=2), MDS/MPD (n=12), NHL (n=25), HL (n=8), and MM (n=55). Median patient age was 56 (range 19-74) years. Sixty-one percent of patients had an HCT comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score of greater than 2. Five percent of patients had failed a prior autologous HCT in FLU/TBI group. Median follow-up was 5.2 years. One graft failure was observed in the FLU/TBI group and no patients rejected their graft. The early NRM at day 100 was 1%. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at 120 days were 26% (FLU/TBI 25%; TBI 28%) and 4% (FLU/TBI 2%; TBI 8%), respectively. Only one patient developed grade IV acute GVHD. Forty-eight percent of patients had chronic GVHD by 5 years (FLU/TBI 44%; TBI 54%). Five-year NRM was low at 12%. The overall cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 5 years was 52%. Five-year overall and progression-free survivals were 51% and 37%, respectively. Conclusions: Post-grafting immunosuppression and GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus/MMF resulted in a low risk of acute and chronic GVHD, which compares favorably with our experience in a concurrent trial using CSP/MMF with FLU/TBI conditioning (46% grades II-IV acute and 72% chronic GVHD with CSP/MMF, respectively; BBMT, 2013, 19: 1340-1347). Furthermore, we recently reported that the active metabolite of MMF (MPA) concentration at steady state (MPA Css) was lower in patients who received concomitant CSP than patients receiving tacrolimus. Low total MPA Css was associated with an increased risk of severe acute GVHD following nonmyeloablative HCT (BBMT 2013, 19: 1159-1166). Together these data warrant consideration of a randomized phase III trial to investigate the role of tacrolimus/MMF versus CSP/MMF in nonmyeloablative HCT. Figure 1. Cumulative incidences of grade II to IV acute GVHD (A) and chronic GVHD (B) Figure 1. Cumulative incidences of grade II to IV acute GVHD (A) and chronic GVHD (B) Disclosures Maloney: Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Cyclosporine (CSP) and Tacrolimus (TAC) for Methotrexate (MTX)-Free Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis after Allogeneic Transplantation from a Matched Related Donor (MRD) with a Reduced-Intensity Regimen Containing Cladribine and Busulfan

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.1170.1170 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 1170-1170 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sung-Won Kim ◽

Takahiro Fukuda ◽

Shotaro Hagiwara ◽

Tsunehiko Komatsu ◽

Tetsuya Goto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Whole Blood ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Trough Level ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Starting Dose ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Reduced Intensity ◽

Grade Iii ◽

Neutrophil Engraftment

Abstract Background: Although GVHD prophylaxis without MTX might enhance a graft-versus-leukemia effect, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) of GVHD prophylaxis has investigated this possibility in a reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST) setting. Therefore, we conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare CSP and TAC without MTX as GVHD prophylaxis in RIST from a MRD. Methods: Patients with hematological malignancies in complete remission or with a chemosensitive status were eligible for this study if they were either older than 50 years or had significant medical contraindications for conventional transplantation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on day 100. Regimen-related toxicities (RRT) between day −8 and day 28 were assessed by NCI-CTC ver 2.0. The conditioning regimen consisted of cladribine (0.11 mg/kg × 6 days) and oral busulfan (4 mg/kg × 2 days). All patients received unmanipulated G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from a MRD. CSP (starting dose 3 mg/kg/day, target whole blood conc. 250–350 ng/mL, target trough level 150–250 ng/mL) or TAC (starting dose 0.03 mg/kg/day, target whole blood conc. 10–20 ng/mL, target trough level 5–10 ng/mL) was given as GVHD prophylaxis from day −1. G-CSF was administered from day +6 until neutrophil engraftment. Results: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled between 2/2003 and 2/2008, but 3 were removed before transplant because of disease progression or infection. The diagnoses included lymphoma (n=27; 10 FL, 6 DLBCL, 6 PTCL and 5 HL), AML (n=14), MDS (n=12), MM (n=5), MPD (n=4) and ALL (n=3). The median age of the patients (56 y vs. 55 y) and the median number of CD34+ cells infused (3.7 ×106/kg vs. 3.1 ×106/kg) were similar in the CSP and TAC arms. The median day of neutrophil engraftment in both arms was day 11. The proportion of patients in the CSP or TAC arm who achieved complete chimerism in CD3+ cell fraction on days 28, 56 and 90 was, respectively, 61% vs. 48%, 80% vs. 76% and 80% vs. 97%. Grade 4 RRT was hepatic disease (n=1, CSP arm), and grade 3 RRT included cardiac (n=1, CSP), renal (n=1, CSP), hepatic (n=2, CSP), oral mucosal (n=1, TAC) and gastrointestinal disease (n=4, CSP vs. n=3, TAC). The incidence of grade II–IV acute GVHD in the TAC arm was significantly lower than that in the CSP arm (Table & Figure). The incidences of grade III–IV acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD were not significantly different between the two arms. The non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the TAC arm was significantly lower than that in the CSP arm. The causes of death that contributed to NRM were infection in 6 (CSP arm), GVHD in one (CSP), ARDS in one (TAC) and lung cancer in one (CSP). The relapse rate and relapse-related mortality were not significantly different between the two arms. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 1295 days (169–1954). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the TAC arm tended to be higher than those in the CSP arm. Figure Figure Conclusions: A regimen with TAC alone without MTX as GVHD prophylaxis was associated with significantly lower rates of grade II–IV acute GVHD and NRM compared to a regimen with CSP alone after RIST from a MRD. OS and PFS with TAC alone tended to be higher than those with CSP alone. Nevertheless, these results must be considered with care due to the small number of patients, and the optimal use of both drugs is still under investigation. A large-scale RCT to identify suitable GVHD prophylaxis in the RIST setting is warranted. Table: Study Outcomes CSP arm (n=33) TAC arm (n=32) P P value was evaluated with logrank test or Wilcoxon test*. Grade II–IV acute GVHD 64% 39% 0.040 Grade III–IV acute GVHD 30% 23% N.S Extensive chronic GVHD 63% 61% N.S 1-year/3-year NRM 26%/38% 0%/5% 0.008 1-year/3-year relapse 35%/43% 25%/49% N.S 1-year/3-year relapse mortality 27%/33% 10%/42% N.S 1-year/3-year OS 57%/45% 90%/56% 0.135 (0.039*) 1-year/3-year PFS 48%/35% 75%/48% 0.120 (0.047*)

Download Full-text

A Randomized 3-Arm Phase II Study to Determine the Most Promising Postgrafting Immunosuppression for Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) After Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) Using Nonmyeloablative Conditioning for Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Multi-Center Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.348.348 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 348-348 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Brenda M. Sandmaier ◽

Michael Maris ◽

Barry Storer ◽

Lars Vindelov ◽

Amelia Langston ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Sequential Trials

Abstract Abstract 348 We previously reported results of 3 sequential trials of GVHD prophylaxis with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) BID/TID and cyclosporine (CSP) BID with various taper schedules in patients (pts) with advanced hematologic malignancies given unrelated G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts after fludarabine 90 mg/m2 and 2 Gray total body irradiation. Cumulative incidences of grades II-IV acute GVHD in the 3 trials were 52, 53 and 77%, respectively. The goal of the current protocol was to evaluate, in a phase II randomized 3-arm study, which drug combination or schedule was most promising in preventing acute GVHD. Tacrolimus (Tac) was used in place of CSP and each of the 3 arms used MMF TID until day 30 and then BID, but the subsequent duration of MMF varied. In Arm1, pts received Tac until day 180 and MMF until day 96. In Arm2, Tac was given until day 150 and MMF until day 180. In Arm3, Tac was given until day 150 and MMF until day 180 with the addition of rapamycin from days -3 through 80. One hundred seventy-five pts ineligible for myeloablative conditioning were enrolled on this multi-institutional study between Jan/05 and Aug/09, and results on the first 159 pts (Arm1 n=56; Arm2 n=51; Arm3 n=52) are reported here with a median follow-up of 18.4 months for surviving pts. The median age of pts was 60 (range 13-75) yrs. Sixty-six (42%) had previous autologous (n=55) or allogeneic (n=11) HCT. All pts were matched for HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 at the allele level: 16 had single allele mismatches at HLA-A, -B or –C and the remainder (n=143) were fully HLA-matched. Diagnoses included AML (n=72), NHL (n=36), MM (n=19), ALL (n=10), CLL (n=9), MDS (n=8), HL (n=4), and CML (n=1). Randomization was based upon transplant center (FHCRC vs other), number of prior chemotherapy treatments (0-2 vs 3+), and age (<55 vs 55+ years). The pts received PBSC grafts containing a median of 7.9 ×106 CD34 and 2.8 × 108 CD3 cells/kg. Sustained donor engraftment occurred in 99.4% of pts. The day-150 cumulative incidences of grades II-IV (figure 1) and III-IV acute GVHD were as follows: Arm1: 56%, 9%; Arm2: 52%, 12%; and Arm3: 45%, 10%, respectively. Chronic GVHD requiring therapy was as follows: Arm1: 44%, Arm2: 35%, and Arm3: 55% of pts. The 6-month nonrelapse mortality was 6% in Arm1, 8% in Arm2, and 2% Arm3. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (figure 2) were as follows: Arm1: 27%, 24%; Arm2: 39%, 19%; and Arm3: 30%, 15%, respectively (overall 32% and 20%, respectively). The 2-year overall and progression-free survivals were as follows: Arm1: 49%, 41%; Arm2: 42%, 37%; Arm3: 55%, 41%, respectively (overall 48% and 40%, respectively). The addition of rapamycin to MMF and Tac (Arm3) resulted in the lowest incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD (p=0.09 compared to reference Arm1), without a significant difference in chronic GVHD. While the phase II design of the study was not powered to show statistical differences between the 3 arms, the lower incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD combined with the low morbidity and nonrelapse mortality in Arm3 using MMF, Tac and rapamycin is encouraging and warrants further study. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Fludarabine - conditioning prior to HCT. Mycophenolate mofetil - immunosuppression after HCT. Tacrolimus - immunosuppression after HCT. Rapamycin - immunosuppression after HCT..

Download Full-text

Outcomes after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Children: A Survey on Behalf of Eurocord and PDWP-EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.2570.2570 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 2570-2570

Author(s):

Federica Giannotti ◽

Annalisa Ruggeri ◽

Gerard Michel ◽

Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽

Tracey O'Brien ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Single Unit ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Median Number ◽

Cell Dose ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract Double UCBT (dUCBT) has been used in adults to reach an acceptable cell dose. For most children a single unit with a total nucleated cell (TNC) dose >3x107/Kg can be easily identified, but that is not always the case for heavier patients (pts). Use of dUCBT might decrease relapse and increase graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). Data on dUCBT in children are scarce in the literature. A recent randomized study in children has described similar outcomes after double compared to single UCBT. Our study provides an overview of the use of dUCBT in the pediatric population reported to Eurocord. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of unrelated dUCBT in 177 children transplanted between 2002 and 2012 in 61 EBMT centres. Analysis was performed separately for pts with malignant (n=139) and non-malignant (NM, n=38) diseases. Among pts with malignancies, 76 had ALL, 40 AML, 6 MDS, 2 CML, 11 NHL, 3 Hodgkin Lymphoma and 1 Multiple Myeloma. Median age at dUCBT was 15 years (1.3-17.9) and median weight was 55 kg (13-97). Disease status at dUCBT was 1st complete remission (CR) (36%), ≥2nd CR (34%) or advanced (25%), and missing in 5% of the pts. In this group, 117pts received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 22 a reduced intensity regimen (RIC). Cyclophosphamide+fludarabine+TBI was administered to 41% of the pts; 55% received ATG in the conditioning. Median number of collected TNC was 5.7x107/kg (3,6-12,8). Considering the unit with the higher number of HLA incompatibilities with the recipient, 56% had 2 mismatches. GvHD prophylaxis was cyclosporine-A (CSA) based in 93% of the pts (58% received CSA + mycofenolate mofetil). Median follow-up was 31 months. Cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil (PMN) and platelet (PLT) engraftment was 88% at 60 days and 64% at 180 days after dUCBT, and it was achieved with a median time of 24 and 45 days, respectively. Among the 122 pts with PMN engraftment, 85/94 with available data on chimerism were full donor and, of these, 20% had dual chimerism. CI of acute GvHD grade II-IV and grade III-IV at 100 days was 51% and 26%, respectively; it was significantly higher in pts who did not receive ATG (grade II-IV: 35% vs 67%, p=0.004; grade III-IV: 12% vs 37%, p=0.0075). Chronic GvHD was observed in 24/104 pts at risk (60% extensive; 2-year (yr) CI: 18%). The 2-yr CI of relapse was 31%. In univariate analysis, RIC, advanced stage at transplantation and a collected TNC dose lower than the median, were significantly associated with higher rates of relapse.The 2-yr CI of transplant related mortality (TRM) was 27%. Overall, 73 pts died: 35 of relapse, 15 of infections, 9 of GvHD and 14 of other causes. The 2-yr disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 42% and 45%, respectively. Among pts with NM disorders, 24 had bone marrow failure syndrome (BMFS) (10 Fanconi Anemia, 13 Acquired Aplastic Anemia and 1 other inherited BMFS), 2 hemoglobinopathies, 7 immune deficiencies and 5 metabolic disorders. Median age at dUCBT was 11 years (0.7-17.9) and the median weight was 40 kg (13-70). In this group, 27 pts received a RIC (40% TBI based), 10 a MAC (90% busulfan based), and 1 no conditioning regimen. ATG was administered to 82% of the pts and GvHD prophylaxis was CSA-based in 77%. The median number of collected TNC was 8.4x107/kg (1,2-11,2) and 60% of the grafts had ≥2 HLA mismatches with the recipient. Median follow-up was 39 months. Overall, 28 pts achieved PMN engraftment and 16 PLT engraftment, with a median time of 23 and 61 days, respectively. In univariate analysis, pts with BMFS compared to others had a significantly lower CI of PMN engraftment (58% vs 100%, p=0.002). Among the 10 pts who did not engraft, 3 had autologous reconstitution and 3 had a subsequent allogeneic HSCT. Forteen pts developed acute GvHD grade II-IV and 10/25 pts at risk had chronic GvHD (3 extensive). Overall 21 pts died (17 with BMFS): 9 of infections, 5 of GvHD and 7 of other causes. The 2-yr OS was 42% and it was significantly lower in pts with BMFS compared to those affected by other NM disorders (28% vs 70%, p=0.03). In pts with malignancies, despite a higher incidence of acute GvHD, DFS and OS seem to be comparable to those reported in the literature for single UCBT or HSCT from other alternative stem cell sources. In the NM disorders group, despite the high cell dose, dUCBT did not seem to improve results in pts with BMFS. This survey suggests that dUCBT is feasible in children and should be considered when a single unit with an adequate cell dose is not available. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Donor-Derived CIK Cell Infusion As Consolidative Therapy after Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplant in Patients with Myeloid Neoplasms

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3232.3232 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3232-3232

Author(s):

Rupa Narayan ◽

Jonathan Benjamin ◽

Ginna Laport ◽

Lu Tian ◽

Keri Tate ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Blood ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Intention To Treat ◽

Cik Cells ◽

Myeloid Neoplasms ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Low Incidence ◽

One Year ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract Introduction: Non-myeloablative conditioning combining total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has been shown to have a low incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) for patients with myeloid neoplasms (Benjamin Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014). As with other reduced intensity conditioning regimens, relapse remains the primary cause of treatment failure following allo-HCT using TLI-ATG conditioning. Cytokine induced killer (CIK) cells derived from peripheral blood culture with interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-2, and anti-CD3, have demonstrated anti-tumor effects in vitro, and have been safely administered in a phase I/II study of patients with post-transplant relapse with low incidence of acute GVHD (Laport Biol of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2011). In an effort to promote conversion to full donor chimerism and reduce the risk of relapse following TLI/ATG conditioning for patients with myeloid neoplasms, we evaluated the addition of donor derived cytokine induced killer (CIK) cells post-HCT. Methods: Here we report interim results for 37 patients enrolled to date in an unplanned analysis. Day+90 full donor chimerism (FDC) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include overall survival and incidence of acute GVHD. Median age is 64 years (range 37-74) with primary disease of de novo MDS (19, 51.3%), secondary AML (6, 16.2%), MPN (2, 5.4%), and therapy (t-) related myeloid neoplasm (10, 27%; including 4, t-MDS; 4, t-AML; 2, t-MDS/MPN overlap). Of patients with MDS or MDS/MPN overlap, 54% had intermediate-2 IPSS risk classification. Fifteen (40.5%) patients had a morphological complete remission at the time of HCT. Twenty-three (62%) donors were unrelated. Results: Median CD34+ dose was 7.2e6/kg (range 2.3-17e6/kg). Ten patients (27%) did not receive CIK cells; causes included CD34+ cell dose below the threshold for culture inoculation (n=4), acute graft versus host disease (n=2), fever with concern for active infection at the time of scheduled infusion (n=1), or logistical reasons (n=3, including lack of donor consent for CIK infusion, transplant delay, and reagent unavailability). Of the 27 patients receiving CIK cells, 23 received the target dose of 1e8/kg CD3+ CIK product, at a median time of 26 days (range 24-31) post peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion. The median CD3+, CD3+CD56+, CD3+CD8+NKG2D+, CD8+CD45RO+ cell culture content was 97%, 13%, 51%, and 41%, respectively. Median followup time for living patients is 420 days. Day+90 FDC, defined by 95% or greater donor-type peripheral blood CD3+ cells, was 29%. The incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and grade III-IV in the total cohort is 21.6% and 5.4%, respectively. The incidence of chronic GVHD is 19%. Of the 27 patients receiving CIK product, the incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV is 7.4% with no acute grade III or IV events to date and 22% chronic GVHD. On an intention to treat analysis of enrolled patients, one year NRM 10.5% (95% CI: 0.8%-22.1%) and one year cumulative incidence of relapse 46.3% (95% CI: 28.4%-64.1%) are not significantly different compared to our historical cohort (5.2%, 95%CI: 2.0%-8.4% and 53%, 95%CI: 45.9%-60.1%) respectively. The 1-year OS by intention to treat of 68.6% (95%CI: 54%-87%) is similar to our historical control, 60.8% (95%CI: 54.3%-68.2%, p=0.76). The 1-year OS in the 27 CIK recipients is 75% (95%CI: 59.3%-94.7%). Conclusion: CIK infusion was found to be safe and feasible. There was no increase in grade III-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD risk. There was a statistically non-significant trend towards increased one-year survival in our cohort. The potential benefit on overall survival remains to be further evaluated with additional patient enrollment and longer followup. However, given the favorable safety profile of CIK cells, future strategies to enhance efficacy such as repeat dosing or modification of CIK cells are worth potential exploration. Disclosures Benjamin: Amgen, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rezvani:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Unmanipulated Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma Using Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide Anti-Gvhd Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3475.3475 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3475-3475 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Luca Castagna ◽

Alberto Mussetti ◽

Raynier Devillier ◽

Alida Dominietto ◽

Magda Marcatti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis

Abstract Backgrounds: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for fit patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). When a HLA-identical donor is not available, haploidentical HCT (haploHCT) represents an acceptable therapeutic option, especially when post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is used as anti-GVHD prophylaxis. Patients and methods: Twenty-nine patients (median age 56 years, range 47-70) undergoing myeloablative (n=15) or reduced-intensity (n=14) haploHCT from February 2011 to November 2015 are included in this retrospective analysis. The median number of previous lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-7) with 27 (93%) of patients having previously performed an autologous HCT. Both bortezomib and lenalidomide were used in 27 (92%) patients before haploHCT. Eighteen patients (62%) had chemosensitive disease at time of haploHCT (CR=4, VGPR=9, PR=5) and 11 (38%) had chemorefractory disease (PD=7, SD=4). Graft source was marrow-derived in 59% (n=17) and peripheral blood in 41% (n=12) of patients. Standard post-transplant cyclophosphamide anti-GVHD prophylaxis (50mg/mq day +3 and +4 or +5) plus mycophenolate and cyclosporine (n=24) or tacrolimus (n=3) or rapamycine (n=2) was used for the whole study cohort. Overall survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Neutrophil and platelets engraftment, acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, Non-Relapse-Mortality (NRM) and Relapse Incidence/Progression of Disease (RI/POD) were obtained with competing risk analysis. Results: At day +30, neutrophil and platelets engraftments were 86% (95%CI:65-95) and 59% (95%CI:38-74), respectively. Acute GVHD grade >2 at days +100 and +180 were 38% (95%CI: 20-55%) and 41% (95%CI: 23-59%), respectively. All grade chronic GVHD at 12 and 18 months was 21% (95%CI: 8-37. At 18 months, RI/POD was 39% (95%CI:20-58%) and NRM 15% (CI95%:5-32). With a median follow-up in survivors of 16 months (range 5-55 months), the 18-month OS and PFS were 68% (95%CI: 47-82%) and 34% (95%CI: 15-54%), respectively. Chemorefractory disease at transplant was associated with a worse 18-month RI/POD (70% vs 18%, p=<0.01) and a markedly reduced PFS (9% vs 57%, p=0.04) and OS (53% vs 78%, p=<0.01) (Figure 1). Survival outcomes were similar between marrow-derived and peripheral blood graft source cohorts. Conclusions: HaploHCT is a feasible and effective strategy in patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk multiple myeloma. Chemorefractory disease at transplant was the only prognostic factor associated with a significant reduced RI/POD, PFS and OS. Figure Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression free survival from time of transplant of the chemosensitive and chemorefractory disease. Figure. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression free survival from time of transplant of the chemosensitive and chemorefractory disease. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

HLA-DP Mismatches Increase the Risk of Acute GVHD after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Transplantation (UDT).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.3125.3125 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 3125-3125 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Marcos de Lima ◽

Simrit Parmar ◽

Ping Liu ◽

Poliana A. Patah ◽

Pedro Cano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Free Survival ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Reduced Intensity ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract The HLA class II DP locus encode for both subunits of DPB1 heterodimers, which have low levels of expression on the cell surface of antigen presenting cells. We hypothesized that donor-recipient HLA-DP mismatch would lead to an increased incidence of acute (a) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and that 2 mismatches would likely be even more significant. Methods: We studied 84 consecutive patients (pts) with myeloid leukemias in complete remission (CR) transplanted from 01/02 to 02/06. Preparative regimens were ablative IV Busulfan-based (n=58) or Cy/TBI (n=2), and reduced intensity (Fludarabine (Flu)/Bu 130 mg/m2/2 doses plus Gleevec (n=8), and Flu/Melphalan 140 mg/m2 (n=16). Stem cell (SC) source was bone marrow (n=70) or peripheral blood (n=14). ATG was given in 78 cases. GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus and mini-methotrexate in all cases, with additional pentostatin in 31 pts. High-resolution typing was sequence-based for HLA-A, B, DRB1; SSP was used for DRB3/4/5, DQB1 and DPB1, and SBT/SSOP for HLA-C. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to study aGVHD-free and relapse-free (RFS) survival. Variables with a p-value <0.25 by univariate analysis were included in the multiple regression analysis (MV). Variables were age, gender, weight, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, diagnosis, cytogenetics, SC source, ABO group, infused CD34 and CD3 cell dose, and HLA matching. AGVHD-free survival was calculated from transplant date to date of development of grade II–IV GVHD or completion of 100 days of follow-up. Results: Median age was 48 yrs (range, 14–72). Diagnoses were MDS (n=5), AML (n=58), and CML (n=21). 54 pts (64%) were beyond 1st CR; all CML pts were in >1st chronic phase (CP). Sixty-one pts were 10/10 HLA match (A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1), and 23 had one or more mismatches. All but one pt engrafted neutrophils at a median of 13 days. 33 pts (39%) and 13 pts (15%) developed grade II–IV and III–IV aGVHD, respectively. Chronic GVHD incidence was 51%. With a median follow-up of 18 mo. (range,1.3–52) 60 pts are alive; 40 pts have relapsed or died. Median survival has not been reached. Number of DP mismatches and incidence of aGVHD is shown in the table. The following covariates influenced aGVHD-free survival by MV analysis: Flu-based regimen (P=0.005; HR 0.25 (95%CI 0.1–0.66), reduced intensity regimens (p=0.02; HR 0.35 (95%CI 0.15–0.83) and presence of 2 DPB1 mismatches (p=0.02; HR 3.07 (95%CI 1.19–7.95). Presence of 1 DPB1 mismatch was not significantly associated with aGVHD. There was no statistically significant correlation between presence of 2 DP mismatches and RFS (P=0.17;HR 0.3 (95%CI 0.06–1.65);HR 0.75 for 1 mismatch) or with cGVHD. Actuarial 2-yr survival for 10/10 matched pts without DP mismatches (12/12) versus those with DP mismatches is 82% versus 71%(P=0.6). In the 10/10 matched group, GVHD was the cause of death only among recipients of 2 DP mismatches transplants (n=4). Conclusion: Mismatching at HLA-DPB1 may increase the risk of aGVHD following UDT. The role of DP in the development of GVHD and GVL effects merits future study. Incidence of acute GVHD 10 of 10 matches number of DP mismatches grade II–IV grade III–IV 0 8% 0% 1 23% 8% 2 45% 18% < 10 of 10 matches number of DP mismatches grade II–IV grade III–IV 0 45% 15% 1 82% 36% 2 80% 40%

Download Full-text

Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) After Double-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation (DCBT) Is Associated with Unique Clinical Features Including a Higher Incidence of Grade III-IV Acute GVHD in Children

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3044.3044 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3044-3044

Author(s):

Doris M Ponce ◽

Anne Marie Gonzales ◽

Marissa N Lubin ◽

Hugo Castro-Malaspina ◽

Sergio A Giralt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽

Treatment Response ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

High Rate ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Systemic Corticosteroids ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Unit Unit ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract Abstract 3044 While the GVHD incidence after unrelated donor CBT is lower than expected for the degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatch, GVHD can be a serious complication and at our center has been the second most common cause of transplant-related mortality after DCBT. However, relatively little is known about DCBT GVHD manifestations, treatment response, and risk factors. Therefore, we evaluated 108 DCBT recipients (median 37 years, range 0.9–69) transplanted for hematologic malignancies. The majority had acute leukemia and high-risk disease. Patients received either myeloablative (n = 81) or non-myeloablative (n = 27) conditioning and 4–6/6 HLA-matched grafts. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of a calcineurin-inhibitor with mycophenolate mofetil, and no patient received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 9–64), the cumulative incidences of day 180 grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) were 52% (95%CI :42–62) and 24% (95%CI :15–32), respectively. The median onset was 40 days (range 14–161); the gut was most commonly affected (43/54, 80%) followed by skin (35/54, 65%). Twenty-five patients with mainly grade II gut aGVHD were treated with budesonide alone, 26 patients with predominantly grade III-IV aGVHD received systemic corticosteroids, and complete or partial treatment response was achieved in over 80% by day 56 of therapy. However, 41 patients had active GVHD after day 100 with the majority (25/41, 61%) having aGVHD (persistent, recurrent or late onset), particularly of the gut. Overlap syndrome and classical chronic GVHD were uncommon. Only 1 patient had oral ulceration, and no patient had moderate or severe ocular or sclerotic skin involvement, joint, or pulmonary GVHD manifestations. Univariate analysis of the association between patient/ graft characteristics and grade III-IV aGVHD showed the only significant factor associated with a higher severe aGVHD incidence was age 0–15 years (Figure). Diagnosis, patient ancestry, cytomegalovirus seropositivity, conditioning intensity, and infused cell doses/kg (total graft and engrafting-unit nucleated cell, CD34+ and CD3+) were not significant. A higher engrafting unit-recipient HLA-match of 8–9/10 was associated with a lower incidence of severe aGVHD, and a better unit-unit HLA-match of 6–10/10 was associated with a higher incidence of severe aGVHD, although these differences were not significant (p = 0.128 and 0.266, respectively). To further investigate these findings multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed (Table). Younger age was independently associated with a higher incidence of severe aGVHD (p = 0.042) whereas better engrafting unit-recipient match at 8–9/10 HLA-alleles was protective (p = 0.053). There was a trend toward better unit-unit HLA-match being associated with a higher incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD, but, surprisingly, total infused TNC/kg had no relationship. The 2-year PFS of 72% (95%CI :51–94) in children was higher than the 56% (95%CI :45–66) in adults despite their greater incidence of severe aGVHD. Nine patients (all adult) have died of GVHD including 5 patients initially treated with systemic corticosteroids and 4 with budesonide. We conclude that aGVHD after DCBT is common in the absence of ATG, predominantly affects the gut, and has a high rate of treatment response. Furthermore, GVHD after day 100 frequently has acute features. While the GVHD incidence does not preclude a high rate of survival, improved prophylaxis and treatment are needed. Notably, in contrast to single-unit CBT and adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, children receiving DCBT are at a higher risk for severe disease. A possible approach to reduce aGVHD in pediatric DCBT recipients with adequate CB units doses would be to prioritize high resolution HLA-match. Moreover, our data does not currently support an upper limit of infused TNC/kg in DCBT recipients. Further investigation of the biology underlying these unique observations (including the role of specific cellular subsets) should be a major priority. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Mycophenolate Mofetil as GvHD prophylaxis.

Download Full-text

Megadose CD34-Selected Haplocompatible Donor Stem Cell Transplantation in Children.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.5417.5417 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 5417-5417

Author(s):

Barbara S. Sleight ◽

Morton J. Cowan ◽

Biljana Horn ◽

Jennifer Jaroscak ◽

Joseph McGuirk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Overlap Syndrome ◽

Malignant Diseases ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract We report a retrospective review of 18 children receiving haplocompatible related donor hematopoietic peripheral blood SCT and consecutively enrolled at four U.S. transplant centers. The median age was 8 yrs (range 1–20). Patients with malignancy (n=13) included: AML-CR1 (primary induction failure, failed cord blood transplant) [1], CR2 [3]; MDS-RA/RARS [2], RAEB [2]; AML and Fanconi anemia [1]; CML-CP2 [1]; ALL-CR3 [2]; NHL-CR2 [1]. Patients with non-malignant diseases included severe aplastic anemia [n=4] and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome [n=1]. Thirteen donors were a 3/6 HLA match and 5 were a 4/6 match. CD34 positive selection was used to select stem cells and deplete T lymphocytes. Conditioning for 13 of the patients consisted of TBI 12–14 Gy in 6 fractions, thiotepa, fludarabine and ATG. Fractionated TBI was replaced by single fraction TBI (n=2) or melphalan (n=3). Cyclophosphamide replaced thiotepa for 1 patient with FA. No post-transplant graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was given. Patients received a median of 18 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 6–28) and 3 × 104 CD3+ cells/kg (range 0.3–11). Sustained primary engraftment occurred in 15/18 (83%) patients. Primary graft failure occurred in one patient. Two patients had immunological rejection following HHV-6 reactivation. Both engrafted after a second transplant; therefore the overall engraftment success was 94%. The median time to an ANC >0.5 × 109/L was 12 days (range 9–21). Platelet recovery occurred in 16/18 at a median of 17 days (range 9–22). Primary (occurring after SCT but prior to DLI) grade II acute GVHD was seen in 4/17 patients (24%). Grade III-IV GVHD was seen in 1 patient (6%) manifest as overlap syndrome in association with HHV-6 reactivation. One pt had primary extensive chronic GVHD. Of nine patients who received DLI and/or stem cell boosts, 4 had grade II GVHD (3/4 had prior acute GVHD), none had grade III-IV GVHD, 2 developed chronic GVHD and 1 developed overlap syndrome. Infections were common but manageable. All patients were at risk for CMV reactivation based on CMV serology: recipient/donor +/+ (9), +/− (3), −/+ (6). Seven patients (39%) reactivated CMV. All cases were responsive to anti-viral therapy and/or DLI. No CMV disease was seen. Seven patients had adenovirus reactivation and 6 had HHV-6 reactivation. EBV reactivation occurred in 5/18 (28%) patients. Rituximab (5) and DLI (2) yielded rapid resolution of EBV in all patients. Four of 13 (31%) at risk patients have relapsed: 1 pt with cytogenetic relapse remains in CR2 > 6 mo later and another who recently relapsed is undergoing salvage therapy. The 100 day and 1 year transplant-related mortality was 11% and 19%, respectively. The overall survival is 72% with a median follow-up of 31 months (range 7–89). Among patients transplanted for malignant diseases (13) and non-malignant diseases (5), overall survival is 69% and 80%, respectively. The K-M 2 year survival was 70% +/− 22%. All survivors were complete donor chimeras by DNA methods. The use of megadose CD34-selected PBSC without post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis yielded rapid engraftment, low 100-day mortality and incidence of severe GVHD, and excellent survival. The overall survival compares favorably with MSD and MUD HSCT.

Download Full-text

T Cell Replete HLA- Haploidentical Donor Transplantation (HIDT) with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (pTcy) Is an Effective Salvage for Patients Relapsing after a Matched Sibling or a Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1960.1960 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1960-1960

Author(s):

Melhem Solh ◽

Katelin Connor ◽

Xu Zhang ◽

Stacey Brown ◽

Lawrence E. Morris ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Matched Unrelated Donor ◽

Matched Sibling ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Matched Donor ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract Objective: Relapse of high risk hematologic malignancies remains the major cause of mortality after matched sibling and matched unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A second transplantation using the same donor or another fully matched donor yielded similar results with no clear advantage of choosing a newly matched donor (1). The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of HIDT with pTcy as a second HSCT among patients with high risk hematologic malignancies relapsing after a matched sibling or a matched unrelated donor. Methods and Population: All consecutive patients (n=20) who underwent a HIDT using ptCy at our center as a second allogeneic transplant for relapse of malignancy following a prior HLA-matched transplant were included in this retrospective analysis. Patient, disease and transplant related data was obtained from our institutional BMT database where it had been prospectively documented. Survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, Relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were treated as competing risks. GVHD was prospectively documented and graded. Results: Patients (male n=13, female n=7) had a median age of 54 years (range 21-64). The median time from the first to the second HSCT was 20.7 months (range 2.7-65.8 months). 10 patients had AML/MDS, 6 ALL, 2 CLL and 2 myeloproliferative syndrome. Grafts from the first HSCT were 50% matched related (n=10) and 50% matched unrelated (n=10). The median number for HLA mismatches among HIDT recipients was 5/10 (range 4/10-8/10). All patients received cytoreductive therapy prior to the HIDT with 12 (60%) achieving a CR and 8 (40%) with active disease at the time of conditioning regimen initiation for HIDT. The conditioning regimen for HIDT was myeloablative in 3 patients (15%) with fludarabine/high dose TBI/pTcy in 2 (10%) patients and flu/busulfan/Cytoxan in 1 patient (5%) and non-ablative/reduced intensity (flu/low dose TBI/Cytoxan n=17; in 18 (90%) patients. All patients received pTcy and tacrolimus plus mycophenolate for graft versus host disease prophylaxis. All patients achieved sustained engraftment with median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment of 17.5 (14-44) days and 32 (15-99) days respectively. The cumulative incidences (CI) of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at 180 days were 36% and 10% respectively. The CI of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was 13% at 1 year post HIDT. At a median follow-up of X months, The probability of overall survival, DFS, NRM and relapse post HIDT were 52%, 39%, 29% and 33% at 1 year and 34%, 31%, 29% and 40% at 3 years respectively. Conclusions: HIDT is an effective strategy to treat relapsed hematologic malignancies after a matched sibling or matched unrelated donor HSCT. Further and larger cohorts to confirm these observations are warranted. Table 1. Survival Estimates 6 months 1 year 3 years OS 72% 52% 34% DFS 53% 39% 31% NRM 22% 29% 29% Relapse 25% 33% 40% Mod-severe chronic GVHD 5% 13% 13% Grade II-IV acute GVHD 36% Grade III-IV acute GVHD 10% 1. Christopeit M, Kuss O, Finke J, Bacher U, Beelen DW, Bornhauser M, et al. Second allograft for hematologic relapse of acute leukemia after first allogeneic stem-cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors: the role of donor change. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(26):3259-71. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Post-Transplantation High Dose Cyclophosphamide As Gvhd Prophylaxis in 9/10 HLA-Matched Unrelated Donors Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3135.3135 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3135-3135 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽

Rima M Saliba ◽

Julianne Chen ◽

Gabriela Rondon ◽

Aimee E Hammerstrom ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Hla Class I ◽

Conventional Group ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Post Transplantation ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract Background: Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an effective strategy to prevent GVHD after haploidentical or HLA-matched related or unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Our study aim was to determine its efficacy in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HSCT. Methods: We included 113 consecutive adult patients with high risk hematological malignancies who underwent one-antigen MMUD (9/10-matched) bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) HSCT after myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning at our institution from 2009-2013. Outcomes were compared between (a) conventional GVHD group (n=71) that received in-vivo T-cell depletion with ATG, tacrolimus and methotrexate and (b) PTCy group (n=41) that received PTCy (50 mg/kg/day IV on days 3 and 4) with tacrolimus and MMF. After exclusion of 29 patients with isolated HLA-DQ mismatches, a separate analysis was performed in 84 patients with 7/8 HLA-MUD HSCT; 38 patients received PTCy while 46 patients received conventional prophylaxis. Results: Patients in the conventional group were marginally older (median 54 years; range 19-74) than those in the PTCy group (median 50 years; range 20-64). PB was used more frequently as a graft source in the conventional group (38% vs 17%, p=0.02). PTCy group included more patients with HLA class-I mismatches (87.8%) compared to conventional group (56.9%). There were no other differences between the groups. Incidence of grade II-IV (37% vs 36%, p=0.8) or grade III-IV (17% vs 12%, p=0.5) acute GVHD at day 100 post-transplant was not different between the groups. [Figure 1] Incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 30 was significantly lower after PTCy compared with conventional prophylaxis (0% vs 15%, p <0.001). Correspondingly, incidence of grade III-IV GVHD at day 30 was 0% in the PTCy group and 8% in the conventional group (p=0.08). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was similar between the two groups at 6 months (20% vs 15%), 1-year (30% vs 31%) or 2-years (30% vs 42%). Risk factors analysis showed that use of PTCy was the sole independent predictor of lower risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 30 (p=0.01). None of the risk factors evaluated, including PTCy use, were shown to predict the rate of grade II-IV acute GVHD within day 100. Two-year cumulative incidences of NRM (35% vs 25%), disease progression (20% vs 31%), DFS (42% vs 38%) and OS (52% vs 40%) were similar in the PTCy and the conventional groups, respectively. [Figure 1] Median times to neutrophil (18 vs. 12 days, p<0.001) and platelet (25.5 vs. 18 days, p=0.05) engraftment were prolonged in PTCy group. Disease recurrence/persistence was the leading cause of death in both groups, accounting for about 46% of all deaths. Subgroup analysis restricting to patients with BM grafts produced similar findings. In patients with HLA class-I mismatch, PTCy was associated with significantly reduced risk of grade II-IV, but not grade III-IV, acute GVHD at day 30 (p=0.01). However, there were no differences in acute grade II-IV GVHD (HR 1.1, 95% C.I. 0.5-2.5, p=0.7) or acute grade III-IV GVHD (HR 1.5, 95% C.I. 0.4-5.4, p=0.5) by day 100 between the groups. Comparing patients with 7/8-HLA-MUD HSCT, no patient in PTCy group developed acute GVHD at day 30 compared with 8 patients in conventional group (p=0.005). There were no differences in incidence of grade II-IV (HR 1, 95% C.I. 0.5-2.1, p=0.9) or grade III-IV (HR 1.1, 95% C.I. 0.3-3.3, p=0.9) acute GVHD at day 100, chronic GVHD at 6 months (HR 0.8, 95% C.I. 0.2-2.9, p=0.7), 1-year (HR 0.8, 95% C.I. 0.3-2.2, p=0.6) or 2-years (HR 0.7, 95% C.I. 0.2-1.9, p=0.5) between the groups. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that PTCy, tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis is safe and produced similar results as conventional prophylaxis in patients with one antigen HLA-MMUD HSCT. Disclosures Alousi: Therakos, Inc: Research Funding.

Download Full-text