scholarly journals Lower Use of DLI Post Relapse of Malignancy May Result in Shorter Post-Relapse Survival (PRS) in Patients Undergoing T Cell Replete Haploidentical Donor Transplantation (HIDT) Versus Matched Related (MRD) or Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1967-1967
Author(s):  
Melhem Solh ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Stacey Brown ◽  
Lawrence E. Morris ◽  
H. Kent Holland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Time To Relapse

Abstract Relapse of hematologic malignancies remains a major cause of treatment failure and mortality among patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Patients relapsing after a matched related or unrelated donor transplantation may benefit from donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) as part of their post relapse therapy. DLI post-relapse has less frequently been utilized among recipients of HIDT presumably due to the potential for severe GVHD if high T-cell doss are administered without immunosuppression. However, reluctance to administer DLI may limit the possibility of remission following disease relapse in HIDT. We compared the frequency of use of DLI and survival outcomes for patients relapsing after HIDT using post-transplant cyclophosphamide to those relapsing after MRD or MUD HCT at our institution. 195 consecutive HCT recipients with relapse of hematologic malignancy occurring after HIDT (N=35), MUD (N=74) and MRD (N=81) between 1998 and 2014 were included in this analysis. The median age was 50 years (19-77 years) and median time to relapse was 159 days (25-2465 days) post HCT. Patients receiving HIDT had similar median time to relapse (5.1 vs 5.2 vs 5.2 months, p=0.638), Dana-Farber/CIBMTR disease risk index (DRI), comorbidity index (CMI) scores, longer times to neutrophil engraftment (17 vs 14 vs 14 days, p<0.001), and platelet engraftment (28 vs 19 vs 18 days, p<0.001) when compared to MUD and MRD recipients respectively. Post-relapse survival at 1 year was worse among HIDT recipients when compared to MRD (9% versus 41%, p=0.008) and MUD (9% vs 35%, p=0.025). DLI was used in 3 (8%) relapsed HIDT patients, 48 MRD patients (59%) and 28 (38%) MUD recipients. Among patients relapsing post MRD and MUD HCT, use of DLI was associated with a better post relapse survival (p=0.04). In a multivariate analysis, donor type (HIDT), time to relapse (<3 months versus > 3months post-transplant) and comorbidity index (CMI score >= 3) were all predictive of worse post relapse survival. This analysis shows that relapse post HIDT carries a worse prognosis than relapse post MRD and MUD. Efforts such as post-transplant maintenance and haploidentical DLI infusions should be investigated further in the HIDT setting. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Refined Disease Risk Index (DRI) and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) Predict Survival after Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: A Comparative Study with EBMT Risk Score in 220 Consecutive Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4400-4400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Lupo-Stanghellini ◽  
Elisa Sala ◽  
Simona Piemontese ◽  
Mara Morelli ◽  
Raffaella Greco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background Optimization of pre-transplant risk assessment is a crucial issue to improve the allo-HSCT decision making process. Actually 3 major algorithms are in use in clinical practice: the EBMT risk score, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score and - more recently introduced - the refined Disease Risk Index (DRI). DRI was defined to calibrate HSCT outcome across studies and centers. It was developed as a tool to assign patients into risk groups based on disease type and status at the time of transplantation. The aim of the DRI is to provide a robust tool that can be used for prognostication, for the analysis and interpretation of retrospective data, whether conducted in single-center, multicenter, or registry settings, or within the context of the federally mandated center outcome reporting. The DRI can also be used for the stratification of patients entering prospective HCT clinical trials. DRI is not a fixed tool but instead it was conceived to be refined by the transplant community as new information becomes available. Here we are presenting the results of a retrospective study designed to evaluate the 3 aforementioned score in stratification and prognostication of transplant outcome after a haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT). Patients and Methods We included 220 adult patients (pts - 138 male, 82 female) who underwent a haplo-HSCT for hematologic malignancies, between 2006 and 2014 and were reported to our Institutional database. Risk assessment score and outcome analysis included all consecutive pts receiving an haplo-HSCT as 1st allogeneic transplantation. Pts receiving haplo-HSCT as 2nd or 3rd HSCT were excluded from the present analysis. Median age was 49 years (range, 15-77). The cohort included a broad representation of diseases (138/220 acute leukemia, 30 Hodgkin lymphoma); 62 pts were in complete remission at transplant, 158 were presenting active disease. Conditioning regimens mostly rely upon the combination of treosulfan plus fludarabine (201/220) and total body irradiation (range 200 - 400 cGy) was utilized in 52 patients. GVHD prophylaxis consisted mostly of an mTor inhibitor (rapamycin) combined with mycophenolate mofetil. The majority of patients received peripheral blood stem cells from a family haploidentical donor as stem cell source, while only 4 patients received bone marrow transplant. A written consent was given by pts allowing the use of medical records for research in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results The median follow-up for survivors was 37 months (r 6-107). The overall survival (OS) at 2-y was 35% and the transplant related mortality at 100-days 23%. The 2y OS according to EBMT / HCT-CI / DRI risk score are reported in table 1.a and figure 1. The evaluation of the HCT-CI impact after DRI stratification was able to show a significant difference in outcome showing better survival for pts with low DRI score and low HCT-CI score as expected (table 1.b). Discussion Refined DRI score and HCT-CI score predict survival after haplo-HSCT. The integrated application of refined DRI and HCT-CI may improve the definition of transplant eligibility for pts candidate to allogeneic HSCT form alternative donors including family haploidentical source. Table 1a. EBMT score 0-3 % pts 4-5 %pts > 5 %pts p 51% 17 34% 51 27% 32 0.07 HCT-CI score 0-2 3-4 >/= 5 48% 59 36% 31 0% 10 0.0001 DRI score Low-Intermediate High Very-High 61% 32 27% 51 5% 17 0.0001 Table 1b. HCT-CI 0-4 HCT-CI >/=5 p DRILow-Intermediate 64% 0% 0.0001 DRIHigh-Very High 29% 0% Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Late Effects of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HDT-AHCT) in Elderly Patients with Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4620-4620
Author(s):  
Parastoo B. Dahi ◽  
Chikaodi Obioha ◽  
Sheila Kenny ◽  
Patrick Hilden ◽  
Molly Maloy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HDT-AHCT) is an established treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Incidence of NHL is highest in patients over 60 years of age, however, limited data is available on long-term effects of HDT-AHCT in older patients. This study is conducted to evaluate the late cardiopulmonary effects and overall outcomes of HDT-AHCT in older patients. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study examining late cardiopulmonary effects, and overall outcomes of HDT-AHCT in 41 patients age 70 years and older, with NHL, between January 2000 and December 2016. Clinical data and comorbidities were correlated with outcomes. Pre- and post-transplant pulmonary function tests (PFT) and echocardiograms were compared. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed according to age, gender, disease histology, disease stage at diagnosis, number of lines of treatment, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), hemoglobin adjusted diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) at the time of HDT-AHCT. Results: A total of 41 patients underwent HDT-AHCT for follicular or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (FL / DLBCL n=18 44%), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL n=15 37%) and T-cell or other NHL subtypes (n=8 19%). The median age was 72 (range 70-77). Eight (19%), 6 (15%) and 27 (66%) patients had a low (0), intermediate (1-2) and high (≥3) HCT-CI score, respectively, at transplant. All patients except 1, had received anthracycline as part of initial treatment. BEAM and RR-BEAM were the most common conditioning regimens (n=38 93%). Pre-transplant LVEF was within normal range in all patients except 1 (45%). The median (range) pre- and post-transplant LVEF was 63% (45-74%) and 64% (39-71%), respectively. Of the 23 patients who had a post-transplant echocardiogram (median time between the pre- and post-transplant echocardiogram was 423 days), a mild decrease in LVEF was noted in 3. Only 1 patient had a significant decline of 19% in LVEF. Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was within normal range pre- and post-transplant in all. The median (range) of pre-transplant DLCO, FEV1 and FVC were 70% (48-125%), 97% (83-141%), and 98% (57-123%), respectively. Of the 10 patients who underwent post-transplant PFT (median time between the pre- and post-transplant PFT was 405 days), DLCO decline of >10% was the most common abnormality, and developed in 4 out of 10 patients. In 5 patients DLCO improvement of >10% was observed. A greater than 15% improvement in FEV1 and FVC was observed in 5 of 10 and 4 of 10 patients respectively. The median improvements in FVC, FEV1 and DLCO were 4%, 6% and 10%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 58 months (range 5-123) for survivors, PFS and OS at 3 years were 84% (95% CI, 67-92%) and 94% (95% CI, 80-99%), respectively. In a univariate analysis, age, gender, histology, disease stage, number of lines of treatment, DLCO, LVEF, and HCT-CI score did not affect OS or PFS. However, KPS ≥90 was associated with worse OS (p=0.008). The small sample size may have been a contributor to this unexpected finding. Relapse occurred in 11 patients (27%), 8 of whom died. Median time to relapse was 38 months (range 26-100). Secondary malignancies developed in 4 patients (8%) which included acute myeloid leukemia in 2, melanoma in 1, and esophageal cancer in 1, and led to death in 3. Conclusion: In this cohort of elderly patients with NHL who underwent HDT-AHCT, the late declines in cardiopulmonary function were minimal, and none resulted in mortality. Secondary malignancy was the only cause of non-relapse mortality. This can be explained by age being the biggest single risk factor for cancer development in general, in addition to the effects of HDT. We show that the most common cause of long-term mortality after HDT-AHCT continues to be lymphoma recurrence. Our data though limited by small number of patients and its retrospective nature, suggest that age alone is not predictive of post-transplant late effects and outcomes, and therefore should not be used to preclude HDT-AHCT in elderly. While prospective studies with larger number of patients are needed to evaluate long-term effects of HDT-AHCT on different organ functions in older adults, strategies to mitigate risk of relapse remain the most important area to improve outcomes. Disclosures Sauter: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy.

HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 2021-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Maris ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Brenda M. Sandmaier ◽  
Barry Storer ◽  
Monic Stuart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Human Leukocyte ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Matched Unrelated Donor ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

Abstract A hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) approach was developed for elderly or ill patients with hematologic malignancies that employed nonmyeloablative conditioning to avoid common regimen-related toxicities and relied on graft-versus-tumor effects for control of malignancy. Eighty-nine patients, median age 53 years, were given fludarabine (90 mg/m2) and 2 Gy total body irradiation. Marrow (n = 18) or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (G-PBMCs; n = 71) were transplanted from unrelated donors matched for human leukocyte antigen A (HLA-A), -B, -C antigens and -DRB1 and -DQB1 alleles. Postgrafting immunosuppression included mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine. Donor T-cell chimerism was higher for G-PBMCs compared with marrow recipients. Durable engraftment was observed in 85% of G-PBMCs and 56% of marrow recipients. Cumulative probabilities of grade II, III, and IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 42%, 8%, and 2%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality at day 100 and at 1 year was 11% and 16%, respectively. One-year overall survivals and progression-free survivals were 52% and 38%, respectively. G-PBMC recipients had improved survival (57% vs 33%) and progression-free survival (44% vs 17%) compared with marrow recipients. HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT after nonmyeloablative conditioning is feasible in patients ineligible for conventional HCT. G-PBMCs conferred higher donor T-cell chimerism, greater durable engraftment, and better progression-free and overall survivals compared with marrow.

scholarly journals Does Early T Cell Chimerism Predict Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ?

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3360-3360
Author(s):  
Tania Jain ◽  
Luke Mountjoy ◽  
Katie L. Kunze ◽  
Pierre Noel ◽  
Nandita Khera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Donor Chimerism ◽  
Time To Relapse

Abstract Introduction: Donor T cell chimerism is tested frequently early after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the predictive ability of testing this early after HCT, i.e. at day +30 or day +60, has not been well described, outside of smaller single center studies. Herein, we evaluate the correlation of early donor T cell chimerism with clinical outcomes of overall survival (OS) and relapse in patients undergoing HCT for various hematological malignancies. Methods: We identified patients who received HCT with 8/8 matched unrelated donors at our center between 2007 and 2016 and obtained the clinical data retrospectively. Chimerism studies were included for patients who had testing done at day+30 and/ or day +60. Chimerism is tested using PCR based technique. Due to limited variability in chimerism levels <100% donor chimerism, a cut-off of 100% was used for analysis. Hence, patients were divided into those who achieved full donor chimerism in CD3 fraction (100%) and those in whom CD3 donor chimerism was < 100% at the respective time points. Clinical outcomes evaluate for this abstract were OS and time to relapse. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used using variables of interest, the later adjusted for age at HCT, use of ATG, conditioning regimen and disease risk index (DRI). Results: Baseline patient and HCT data: There were 209 patients who met the selection criteria of which 4 died within 30 days from HCT and hence, were not included in the analysis. Among the 205, 87 (42%) were women and median age at HCT was 55 (range, 18 - 74) years. The hematological malignancy diagnosis was acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/ myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in 112 (55%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in 35 (17%), chronic leukemias in 13 (6%), lymphomas in 13 (6%) and myeloproliferative neoplasm in 20 (10%); with DRI being very high in 9 (5%), high in 53 (27%), intermediate in 120 (60%) and low in 17 (9%) patients. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 81 (40%) and reduced intensity conditioning in 124 (60%). Graft versus host disease prophylaxis used was calcineurin inhibitor with methotrexate of mycophenolate in all patients while anti-thymocyte globulin was used in 125 (61%) patients. All patients received a peripheral blood graft. Outcomes: Median follow-up for all included patients was 615 (range, 30 - 3147) days. At day +30, 138 patients had achieved 100% donor CD3 chimerism of 189 patients in whom this data was available (73%) while at day +60, 131 (76%) out of 173 had 100% donor CD3 chimerism. In the univariate model, CD3 donor chimerism level at day +30 as well as day +60, was not predictive of OS (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.82 - 2.9; p = 0.18 for day +30, HR 1.8, 95% CI 0.81 - 4.0, p = 0.15 for day +60). As for time to relapse, CD3 chimerism did not significantly affect the risk of relapse at these time points (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17 - 1.1, p = 0.08 for day +30; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.18 - 1.6, p = 0.28 for day +60). In the multivariate model also, after adjustment as described above, CD3 at day +30 or at day +60 was not significantly associated with the risk of OS or time to relapse (Figure 1). Kaplan Meier curves for OS for CD3 chimerism at day +30 and day +60 are shown in Figure 2. Conclusions: In this study, T cell chimerism as early as day +30 or day +60 does not seem to predict OS or relapse in patients undergoing HCT for various hematological malignancies. Given the limitations of a smaller retrospective design, this must be validated in a larger study, possibly using registry data. If these findings are indeed confirmed, then the practice of testing chimerism early and frequently, that adds additional expense to the overall cost of HCT, must be reconsidered. Disclosures Palmer: Novartis: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness of Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide Versus Busulfan/Fludarabine Myeloablative Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3365-3365
Author(s):  
Sagar S. Patel ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Arden Emrick ◽  
Victoria Winslow ◽  
Jamie Starn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) is a standard approach for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), but is associated with risks of morbidity and mortality. As regimen intensity affects post-transplant outcomes, assessment of pre-transplant cytogenetics and somatic mutations may refine which acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients benefit the most. We compared the effectiveness of two approaches: busulfan/cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) and the MAC, but reduced toxicity regimen busulfan/fludarabine (Bu/Flu). Moreover, it is unclear whether somatic mutations in AML may differentially affect post-transplant outcomes between these regimens. We hypothesized that despite relative differences with these regimens, they may result in comparable outcomes. Methods We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis of adult AML patients in CR1 or CR2 who underwent a first T-cell replete HLA-8/8 matched related or unrelated donor alloHCT. Patients received either parenteral Bu (12.8 mg/kg total over 4 days) with Cy (120 mg/kg total over 2 days) or parenteral Bu (400 mg/m2 total over 4 days) with Flu (160 mg/m2 total over 4 days). Bu dose adjustment was not used in either cohort. In addition to cytogenetic risk group stratification by European LeukemiaNet criteria (Döhner H, et al, Blood 2016), a subset of patients had a 36-gene somatic mutation panel assessed prior to alloHCT by next-generation sequencing. Pre-transplant characteristics were compared between regimens with Chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Differing characteristics were included in a multivariable Fine and Gray regression model with results as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results From 2008 - 2017, 76 AML patients receiving Bu/Cy and 50 receiving Bu/Flu were identified meeting inclusion criteria (Bu/Flu used starting in 2010). Median age at transplant was 51 (21-61) years for Bu/Cy vs. 64 (34-74) for Bu/Flu (P<0.001). The cohorts were otherwise comparable in regards to gender, race, performance status, HCT-CI, and disease status at alloHCT. Bu/Cy vs. Bu/Flu patients had 16% vs. 10% favorable, 66% vs. 50% intermediate, and 18% vs. 40% adverse-risk cytogenetics (P=0.033). The most common somatic mutations in the Bu/Cy cohort were FLT3 (20%), NPM1 (18%), DNMT3A (16%), TET2 (9%), CEBPA (5%), and IDH1 (5%). In the Bu/Flu cohort, these were FLT3 (20%), NPM1 (18%), NRAS (12%), TET2 (12%), and DNMT3A (10%). There were no significant differences in somatic mutations between the cohorts, except for a higher incidence of NRAS in the Bu/Flu cohort (12% vs. 4%, P=0.029). Bu/Flu patients were more likely to have an unrelated donor (70% vs. 47%, P=0.012) and receive a peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft (94% vs. 17%, P<0.001). As such, Bu/Flu patients had more rapid neutrophil (median 13 vs. 14 days, P=0.009) and platelet (median 15 vs. 20 days, P<0.001) recovery and a shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (median 22 vs. 27 days, P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, Bu/Flu patients trended towards more chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD; any stage) (HR 0.42, CI 0.16-1.11, P=0.08), but there were no other differences in CMV infections, other infections, acute GvHD, relapse, relapse mortality (RM), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse-free (RFS), and overall survival (OS). 58% of Bu/Cy and 56% of Bu/Flu patients remain alive with median follow-up of 59 and 22 months, respectively (P=0.003). The most common causes of death for these respective cohorts were relapse (50% vs. 41%) and infection (16% vs. 27%). Conclusion Bu/Cy and Bu/Flu in alloHCT for AML results in comparable incidences of infection, GvHD, RM, NRM, RFS, and OS. This was despite Bu/Flu patients being older and more likely to have adverse cytogenetics and an unrelated donor. Bu/Flu is better tolerated with less toxicity. Faster hematopoietic recovery and shorter LOS with Bu/Flu reflects PBSC graft use and has implications for health care resource utilization. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts and cost-effectiveness analyses comparing these conditioning strategies are warranted. In this analysis, no mutations appeared to be sensitive to use of the more intensive regimen, Bu/Cy. Further investigation of pre-transplant or post-transplant persistence of somatic mutations may risk stratify those who may benefit from more intensive or innovative approaches to prevent relapse after transplant. Disclosures Gerds: Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Majhail:Incyte: Honoraria; Atara: Honoraria; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document