scholarly journals High-Throughput Genotyping of Haemophilia A and B Using Next-Generation Sequencing Technology in Lille University Hospital

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2273-2273
Author(s):  
Fanny Lassalle ◽  
Antoine Rauch ◽  
Benedicte Wibaut ◽  
Christine Vinciguerra ◽  
Mathilde Fretigny ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The identification of molecular defects in haemophilia is essential for the optimization of patient treatment and the formal characterization of female carriers. The Sanger method is the gold standard for sequencing F8 and F9 genes but is time-consuming and expensive. We aimed to develop a high-throughput method to genotype haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) patients using the Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology for an exhaustive and less expensive analysis of F8 and F9 genes. Material & Methods We developed a small panel containing F8 and F9 for exons and introns/exons junctions sequencing. We used two different methods for library preparation (AmpliSeq™, Life Technologies™ and HaloPlex™, Agilent™), performed in the same PCR emulsion system (Ion One Touch 2™, Life Technologies™) and sequenced with a Ion 316™ chip in a PGM™ Ion Torrent sequencer, or a Ion PI™ chip in a Proton™ sequencer (Life Technologies™) respectively. The promoter and 3' regions of F8 and F9 were always studied by Sanger. NGS analysis was first performed in 62 samples (HA: n= 42; HB: n=13; carriers: n=7) previously characterized for F8 or F9 mutations by Sanger method or Multiplex Ligation-Probe Amplification (MLPA). All types of mutations were studied (nonsense, missense, splice, small insertion/deletion and exons deletion/duplication) and were distributed in all exons of F8 and F9. NGS analysis was further performed in 42 haemophilia patients (HA: n=31, HB: n=11; of which 36 presented a mild phenotype), with unknown mutation status. All patients were included by the local Comprehensive Care Haemophilia Center of Lille University Hospital after written informed consent. Data were analyzed with SeqNext™ software (JCI Medical System™). A Normalized Reads Depth (NRD) ratio was used to detect exons deletion/duplication. Results All exons were well covered by AmpliSeq™ (average number of reads, ANR = 300) and overall by HaloPlex™ (ANR = 15000, except small parts of exons 14 and 19 in F8). The average quality value for mutation detection was 60 (risk of false result <0.0001%). In previously-genotyped patients, 92% (57/62) of F8 and F9 mutations were detected by AmpliSeq™ and 85% (53/62) by HaloPlex™. The detection rate of small insertion/deletion in homopolymers of exon 14 in F8 was only 20% (1/5) with both methods and 71% (5/7) in other exons of F8. Four deletions and one duplication of exons accounting for a severe haemophilia phenotype were identified (3 HA, 1 HB and 1 HA-carrier). In 5 uncharacterized patients by Sanger method, neither AmpliSeq™ nor HaloPlex™ were able to find a mutation suggesting that the molecular defect is located in introns of F8 or F9. In never-genotyped patients, a mutation was detected in 90% (38/42) of cases (including 34 missense, 2 nonsense and 2 splice mutations in both F8 and F9). A duplication of exons 10 to 14 was also detected in a severe HA patient and was confirmed by MLPA. In NGS negative patients, no mutation was found in promoter or 3' regions. Of the ten candidate mutations identified in our cohort, seven were predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis and/or co-segregation studies. No mutation was found in 10% (4/42) of never-genotyped patients with mild haemophilia A, in consistence with the available data for the mild phenotype. The technical development and laboratory protocol was easier and less expensive ($530 vs $602 including reagents and technical/medical staff) with AmpliSeq™ than HaloPlex™. Conclusion We confirmed that NGS is able to detect the main types of mutations in F8 and F9 genes, albeit with a lower mutation detection rate with HaloPlex™ compared to AmpliSeq™. These detections were associated with an important depth of reads and high Quality Values, except for exons 14 and 19 in F8 with HaloPlex™. AmpliSeq™ seems also an interesting screening method for the detection of exons deletion/duplication using the NRD ratio. However, both strategies fail to detect small insertion/deletion located in homopolymers of exon 14 in F8, whom identification will still rely on Sanger sequencing. AmpliSeq™ protocol performed in the PGM™ sequencer appears as a new interesting tool in genotyping of HA and HB patients of the Lille University Hospital. Disclosures Zawadzki: Pfizer Pharmaceutical Company: Research Funding.

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (31) ◽  
pp. 3350-3357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Tripathi ◽  
Jyotsna Singh ◽  
Jonathan A. Lal ◽  
Vijay Tripathi

Background: With the outbreak of high throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS), the biological research of drug discovery has been directed towards the oncology and infectious disease therapeutic areas, with extensive use in biopharmaceutical development and vaccine production. Method: In this review, an effort was made to address the basic background of NGS technologies, potential applications of NGS in drug designing. Our purpose is also to provide a brief introduction of various Nextgeneration sequencing techniques. Discussions: The high-throughput methods execute Large-scale Unbiased Sequencing (LUS) which comprises of Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) or NGS technologies. The Next geneinvolved necessarily executes Largescale Unbiased Sequencing (LUS) which comprises of MPS or NGS technologies. These are related terms that describe a DNA sequencing technology which has revolutionized genomic research. Using NGS, an entire human genome can be sequenced within a single day. Conclusion: Analysis of NGS data unravels important clues in the quest for the treatment of various lifethreatening diseases and other related scientific problems related to human welfare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn T. Sussman ◽  
Amanda R. Oran ◽  
Carmela Paolillo ◽  
David Lieberman ◽  
Jennifer J. D. Morrissette ◽  
...  

Context.— Next-generation sequencing is a high-throughput method for detecting genetic abnormalities and providing prognostic and therapeutic information for patients with cancer. Oncogenic fusion transcripts are among the various classifications of genetic abnormalities present in tumors and are typically detected clinically with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, FISH probes only exist for a limited number of targets, do not provide any information about fusion partners, cannot be multiplex, and have been shown to be limited in specificity for common targets such as ALK. Objective.— To validate an anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction–based panel for the detection of fusion transcripts in a university hospital–based clinical molecular diagnostics laboratory. Design.— We used 109 unique clinical specimens to validate a custom panel targeting 104 exon boundaries from 17 genes involved in fusions in solid tumors. The panel can accept as little as 100 ng of total nucleic acid from PreservCyt-fixed tissue, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens with as little as 10% tumor nuclei. Results.— Using FISH as the gold standard, this assay has a sensitivity of 88.46% and a specificity of 95.83% for the detection of fusion transcripts involving ALK, RET, and ROS1 in lung adenocarcinomas. Using a validated next-generation sequencing assay as the orthogonal gold standard for the detection of EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII) in glioblastomas, the assay is 92.31% sensitive and 100% specific. Conclusions.— This multiplexed assay is tumor and fusion partner agnostic and will provide clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 811-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev K Varshney ◽  
Himabindu Kudapa ◽  
Manish Roorkiwal ◽  
Mahendar Thudi ◽  
Manish K Pandey ◽  
...  

BMC Genomics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wells W. Wu ◽  
Je-Nie Phue ◽  
Chun-Ting Lee ◽  
Changyi Lin ◽  
Lai Xu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (10) ◽  
pp. 1609-1619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Wagner ◽  
David Roberson ◽  
Joseph Boland ◽  
Aimée R Kreimer ◽  
Meredith Yeager ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundHuman papillomaviruses (HPV) cause over 500 000 cervical cancers each year, most of which occur in low-resource settings. Human papillomavirus genotyping is important to study natural history and vaccine efficacy. We evaluated TypeSeq, a novel, next-generation, sequencing-based assay that detects 51 HPV genotypes, in 2 large international epidemiologic studies.MethodsTypeSeq was evaluated in 2804 cervical specimens from the Study to Understand Cervical Cancer Endpoints and Early Determinants (SUCCEED) and in 2357 specimens from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (CVT). Positive agreement and risks of precancer for individual genotypes were calculated for TypeSeq in comparison to Linear Array (SUCCEED). In CVT, positive agreement and vaccine efficacy were calculated for TypeSeq and SPF10-LiPA.ResultsWe observed high overall and positive agreement for most genotypes between TypeSeq and Linear Array in SUCCEED and SPF10-LiPA in CVT. There was no significant difference in risk of precancer between TypeSeq and Linear Array in SUCCEED or in estimates of vaccine efficacy between TypeSeq and SPF10-LiPA in CVT.ConclusionsThe agreement of TypeSeq with Linear Array and SPF10-LiPA, 2 well established standards for HPV genotyping, demonstrates its high accuracy. TypeSeq provides high-throughput, affordable HPV genotyping for world-wide studies of cervical precancer risk and of HPV vaccine efficacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document