Abstract P1-07-13: The mutation detection and a high throughput screening of driver mutations in PI3K/AKT pathway based on next generation sequencing

Author(s):  
L Chen ◽  
L Yang ◽  
L Yao ◽  
X Hu ◽  
Z Shao
Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2273-2273
Author(s):  
Fanny Lassalle ◽  
Antoine Rauch ◽  
Benedicte Wibaut ◽  
Christine Vinciguerra ◽  
Mathilde Fretigny ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The identification of molecular defects in haemophilia is essential for the optimization of patient treatment and the formal characterization of female carriers. The Sanger method is the gold standard for sequencing F8 and F9 genes but is time-consuming and expensive. We aimed to develop a high-throughput method to genotype haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) patients using the Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology for an exhaustive and less expensive analysis of F8 and F9 genes. Material & Methods We developed a small panel containing F8 and F9 for exons and introns/exons junctions sequencing. We used two different methods for library preparation (AmpliSeq™, Life Technologies™ and HaloPlex™, Agilent™), performed in the same PCR emulsion system (Ion One Touch 2™, Life Technologies™) and sequenced with a Ion 316™ chip in a PGM™ Ion Torrent sequencer, or a Ion PI™ chip in a Proton™ sequencer (Life Technologies™) respectively. The promoter and 3' regions of F8 and F9 were always studied by Sanger. NGS analysis was first performed in 62 samples (HA: n= 42; HB: n=13; carriers: n=7) previously characterized for F8 or F9 mutations by Sanger method or Multiplex Ligation-Probe Amplification (MLPA). All types of mutations were studied (nonsense, missense, splice, small insertion/deletion and exons deletion/duplication) and were distributed in all exons of F8 and F9. NGS analysis was further performed in 42 haemophilia patients (HA: n=31, HB: n=11; of which 36 presented a mild phenotype), with unknown mutation status. All patients were included by the local Comprehensive Care Haemophilia Center of Lille University Hospital after written informed consent. Data were analyzed with SeqNext™ software (JCI Medical System™). A Normalized Reads Depth (NRD) ratio was used to detect exons deletion/duplication. Results All exons were well covered by AmpliSeq™ (average number of reads, ANR = 300) and overall by HaloPlex™ (ANR = 15000, except small parts of exons 14 and 19 in F8). The average quality value for mutation detection was 60 (risk of false result <0.0001%). In previously-genotyped patients, 92% (57/62) of F8 and F9 mutations were detected by AmpliSeq™ and 85% (53/62) by HaloPlex™. The detection rate of small insertion/deletion in homopolymers of exon 14 in F8 was only 20% (1/5) with both methods and 71% (5/7) in other exons of F8. Four deletions and one duplication of exons accounting for a severe haemophilia phenotype were identified (3 HA, 1 HB and 1 HA-carrier). In 5 uncharacterized patients by Sanger method, neither AmpliSeq™ nor HaloPlex™ were able to find a mutation suggesting that the molecular defect is located in introns of F8 or F9. In never-genotyped patients, a mutation was detected in 90% (38/42) of cases (including 34 missense, 2 nonsense and 2 splice mutations in both F8 and F9). A duplication of exons 10 to 14 was also detected in a severe HA patient and was confirmed by MLPA. In NGS negative patients, no mutation was found in promoter or 3' regions. Of the ten candidate mutations identified in our cohort, seven were predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis and/or co-segregation studies. No mutation was found in 10% (4/42) of never-genotyped patients with mild haemophilia A, in consistence with the available data for the mild phenotype. The technical development and laboratory protocol was easier and less expensive ($530 vs $602 including reagents and technical/medical staff) with AmpliSeq™ than HaloPlex™. Conclusion We confirmed that NGS is able to detect the main types of mutations in F8 and F9 genes, albeit with a lower mutation detection rate with HaloPlex™ compared to AmpliSeq™. These detections were associated with an important depth of reads and high Quality Values, except for exons 14 and 19 in F8 with HaloPlex™. AmpliSeq™ seems also an interesting screening method for the detection of exons deletion/duplication using the NRD ratio. However, both strategies fail to detect small insertion/deletion located in homopolymers of exon 14 in F8, whom identification will still rely on Sanger sequencing. AmpliSeq™ protocol performed in the PGM™ sequencer appears as a new interesting tool in genotyping of HA and HB patients of the Lille University Hospital. Disclosures Zawadzki: Pfizer Pharmaceutical Company: Research Funding.


The Analyst ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 139 (5) ◽  
pp. 882-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Klaper ◽  
Devrah Arndt ◽  
Jared Bozich ◽  
Gustavo Dominguez

The expression of molecular pathways in an organism provides a clue as to the potential impacts of exposure to nanomaterials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (31) ◽  
pp. 3350-3357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Tripathi ◽  
Jyotsna Singh ◽  
Jonathan A. Lal ◽  
Vijay Tripathi

Background: With the outbreak of high throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS), the biological research of drug discovery has been directed towards the oncology and infectious disease therapeutic areas, with extensive use in biopharmaceutical development and vaccine production. Method: In this review, an effort was made to address the basic background of NGS technologies, potential applications of NGS in drug designing. Our purpose is also to provide a brief introduction of various Nextgeneration sequencing techniques. Discussions: The high-throughput methods execute Large-scale Unbiased Sequencing (LUS) which comprises of Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) or NGS technologies. The Next geneinvolved necessarily executes Largescale Unbiased Sequencing (LUS) which comprises of MPS or NGS technologies. These are related terms that describe a DNA sequencing technology which has revolutionized genomic research. Using NGS, an entire human genome can be sequenced within a single day. Conclusion: Analysis of NGS data unravels important clues in the quest for the treatment of various lifethreatening diseases and other related scientific problems related to human welfare.


2021 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2021-207421
Author(s):  
Frido K Bruehl ◽  
Erika E Doxtader ◽  
Yu-Wei Cheng ◽  
Daniel H Farkas ◽  
Carol Farver ◽  
...  

AimVarious approaches have been reported for distinguishing separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases in patients with two lung nodules. The aim of this study was to determine whether histological assessment is reliable and accurate in distinguishing separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases using routine molecular findings as an adjunct.MethodsWe studied resected tumour pairs from 32 patients with lung adenocarcinomas in different lobes. In 15 of 32 tumour pairs, next-generation sequencing (NGS) for common driver mutations was performed on both nodules. The remainder of tumour pairs underwent limited NGS, or EGFR genotyping. Tumour pairs with different drivers (or one driver/one wild-type) were classified as molecularly unrelated, while those with identical low-frequency drivers were classified as related. Three pathologists independently and blinded to the molecular results categorised tumour pairs as related or unrelated based on histological assessment.ResultsOf 32 pairs, 15 were classified as related by histological assessment, and 17 as unrelated. Of 15 classified as related by histology, 6 were classified as related by molecular analysis, 4 were unrelated and 5 were indeterminate. Of 17 classified as unrelated by histology, 14 were classified as unrelated by molecular analysis, none was related and 3 were indeterminate. Histological assessment of relatedness was inaccurate in 4/32 (12.5%) tumour pairs.ConclusionsA small but significant subset of two-nodule adenocarcinoma pairs is inaccurately judged as related by histological assessment, and can be proven to be unrelated by molecular analysis (driver gene mutations), leading to significant downstaging.


2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 1155-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Rodrigo de Noronha ◽  
Miguel Mitne-Neto ◽  
Maria de Lourdes Chauffaille

Karyotype (KT) aberrations are important prognostic factors for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, around 50% of cases present normal results. Single nucleotide polymorphism array can detect chromosomal gains, losses or uniparental disomy that are invisible to KT, thus improving patients’ risk assessment. However, when both tests are normal, important driver mutations can be detected by the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). Fourteen adult patients with AML with normal cytogenetics were investigated by NGS for 19 AML-related genes. Every patient presented at least one mutation:DNMT3Ain nine patients;IDH2in six;IDH1in three;NRASandNPM1in two; andTET2,ASXL1,PTPN11, andRUNX1in one patient. No mutations were found inFLT3,KIT,JAK2,CEBPA,GATA2,TP53,BRAF,CBL,KRAS,andWT1genes. Twelve patients (86%) had at least one mutation in genes related with DNA methylation (DNMT3A,IDH1,IDH2,andTET2), which is involved in regulation of gene expression and genomic stability. All patients could be reclassified based on genomic status and nine had their prognosis modified. In summary, NGS offers insights into the molecular pathogenesis and biology of cytogenetically normal AML in Brazilian patients, indicating that the prognosis could be further stratified by different mutation combinations. This study shows a different frequency of mutations in Brazilian population that should be confirmed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 811-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev K Varshney ◽  
Himabindu Kudapa ◽  
Manish Roorkiwal ◽  
Mahendar Thudi ◽  
Manish K Pandey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document