Targeting Replicative Stress to Treat Hematological Disorders

Abstract Background: Combinations of chromosomal translocations, copy-number variations, somatic mutations, and clonal heterogeneity that characterize hematological cancers make every patient unique from a genetic point of view. This variety creates a true challenge for tailored therapy. We have previously described that myeloma (MM) cells present signs of ongoing DNA damage, and activate an ATM/ABL1-dependent DNA damage response (DDR) without overt apoptosis. Here we further characterize the mechanisms of DNA damage and replicative stress in MM, and we extend this knowledge to other hematological malignancies to evaluate a novel and possibly shared approach to synthetic lethality (1). Results: We studied a panel of MM cell lines together with acute myeloid, lymphoid leukemia and lymphoma cell lines. Several cell lines have demonstrable ongoing DNA damage, activate ATR and CHK1 and also present with signs of replicative stress, such as 53BP1, RPA and RAD51 foci. We next evaluated a gene expression signature specific for increased chromosomal instability and DNA damage in a cohort of MM patients, comparing them with normal plasma cells. Specifically, we identified a subset of patients, representing around 20 percent of individuals with MM that show this signature and also present with an unfavorable prognosis due to a more aggressive disease. Interestingly, in a multivariate analysis, this signature was independent from other poor prognostic criteria, including proliferation and the presence of MMSET/FGFR3 or MAF translocations (2), hence representing a potential novel prognostic signature (3). Gene-set enrichment studies are ongoing in other hematological disorders. However, preliminary data show that subsets of patients with other hematological malignancies also present with intense over expression of genes belonging to the instability signature when compared to normal B cells, in a very similar fashion to that seen with MM. An intact ATR/CHK1 pathway is crucial for the survival of tumor cells in vivo, especially in the presence of activated oncogenes. For instance, Em-myc transgenic mice develop B-cell lymphomas with intense replicative stress that can be blocked by crossing the Em-myc transgenic mice with a hypomorphic Atr mouse strain (Atr-Seckel; Atr S/S). We therefore decided to exploit the concept of replicative stress overload, impeding the capacity of the cells for repairing the excess of damaged DNA. We then silenced ATR using shRNAs, the upstream protein involved in the control of stalled replication origins, in two MM cell lines (H929 and OPM-2) and in the Jurkat cell line. Critically, inhibition of ATR caused a reduction in cellular growth and induction of apoptosis. A similar phenotype was observed using VE-821, a specific ATR inhibitor. Finally, a broad panel of MM cells and leukemia cell lines was used to confirm these growth inhibitory effects. Conclusion: Replicative stress is present in multiple groups of patients with aggressive types of MM or leukemia. Strategies which couple pre-existing high rates of DNA damage with reduced DNA repair can specifically cause apoptosis of malignant cells and encouragingly spare normal ones, thus providing a strong rationale for potential clinical benefit to those cohorts of patients with otherwise very unfavorable outcomes. (1) Cottini F, Hideshima T, Xu C, Sattler M, Dori M, Agnelli L, et al. Rescue of Hippo coactivator YAP1 triggers DNA damage-induced apoptosis in hematological cancers. Nature medicine. 2014;20(6):599-606. (2) Zhan F, Huang Y, Colla S, Stewart JP, Hanamura I, Gupta S, et al. The molecular classification of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108(6):2020-8. (3) Cottini F, Teru Hideshima, Rikio Suzuki, Yu-Tzu Tai, et al. Synthetic lethal approaches exploiting DNA damage in aggressive myeloma. Cancer Discovery ahead of print. Disclosures Richardson: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Oncocorp: Equity Ownership; acetylon pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Absence Of Mutation In Cereblon (CRBN) and DNA Damage Binding Protein 1 (DDB1) Genes In Myeloma Cells and Patients and Its Clinical Significance

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3139.3139 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3139-3139

Author(s):

Anjan Thakurta ◽

Anita K Gandhi ◽

Michelle Waldman ◽

Chad C. Bjorklund ◽

Suzanne Lentzsch ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Heterozygous Mutation ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Single Nucleotide ◽

Truncating Mutation ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background CRBN, a target of thalidomide and IMiDs® immunomodulatory agents lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM), is a component of the E3 ubiquitin cullin 4 ring ligase (CRL4) complex that also includes DDB1, Roc1, and Cul4. Two CRBN mutations have been reported in multiple myeloma (MM) patients: truncating mutation (Q99) and point mutation (R283K). One copy of the CRBN gene was shown to be deleted in the MM1S and MM1S.R cell lines. No DDB1 mutation has been described previously. Results We investigated the incidence of CRBN and DDB1 mutations by next-generation sequencing in 20 MM cell lines and MM subjects. Of 90 MM patients, 24 were newly diagnosed and 66 were relapsed and refractory of which 36 patients were LEN resistant. Out of the cell lines tested, 1 heterozygous CRBN mutation (D249Y) was found in the LEN-resistant ANBL6R cells, which is located in the putative DDB1 binding domain, and 2 single silent mutations were identified in the KMS-12-BM (rs17027638) and OPM-2 cells. One DDB1 heterozygous mutation (E303D) was identified in ANBL6 cells. In the cohort of patients assessed, no CRBN mutation was detected; however, 5 single nucleotide variations (SNV) were identified. Three of the 5 SNVs were at position 735 (Y245Y) and 1 each at position 219 (H73H) and 939 (C313C), respectively. The first 2 SNVs (rs17027638 and rs1045309) are described but not the last. We found a single SNV (P51P; rs2230356) in DDB1 gene the patient samples. Conclusion Mutations within the coding sequences of CRBN and DDB1 are rare in MM patients and cell lines. Most intrinsically LEN-resistant cells and cell lines made resistant to LEN or POM do not have CRBN or DDB1 mutations, suggesting the potential role of other sources, such as genetic or epigenetic pathways in developing resistance to IMiD drug–based therapy. Disclosures: Thakurta: Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gandhi:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Waldman:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bjorklund:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lentzsch:Celgene: Research Funding. Schey:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NAPP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Orlowski:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Array: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Madan:Covance Genomics Lab: Employment. Ning:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mendy:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lopez-Girona:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schafer:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Avet-Loiseau:Celgene: Research Funding. Chopra:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

The 3-Drug Combination Treatment ART838, ABT199 Plus Sorafenib Is Effective Against AML Xenografts, Possibly Via Cooperative Targeting of MCL1

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113040 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4044-4044

Author(s):

Blake S Moses ◽

Jennifer Fox ◽

Xiaochun Chen ◽

Samantha McCullough ◽

Sang Ngoc Tran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Drug Combination ◽

Research Funding ◽

Leukemia Cell ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Leukemia Cell Lines ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Antimalarial artemisinins have broad antineoplastic activity in vitro, are well tolerated and inexpensive, and can be parenterally or orally administered in humans. Artemisinin-derived trioxane diphenylphosphate dimer 838 (ART838; a potent artemisinin-derivative) inhibited acute leukemia growth in vivo and in vitro, at doses where normal human CD34+ hematopoietic stem-progenitor cell clonogenicity was essentially unaffected (Fox et al, Oncotarget 2016, PMID: 26771236). In our focused drug combination screen for drugs that synergize with ART838, the only BCL2 inhibitors in the screen library of 111 emerging antineoplastic compounds, navitoclax (ABT737) and venetoclax (ABT199; FDA-approved), were identified as 2 of the top 3 candidates. Synergies between ART838 and BCL2 inhibitors were validated in multiple acute leukemia cell lines and primary cases. This ART838-BCL2 inhibitor synergy may be due to reduced levels of MCL1 protein that we and others have observed in multiple acute leukemia cell lines and primary cases treated with artemisinins (Budhraja et al, Clin Cancer Res 2017, PMID: 28974549). Treatment of acute leukemia xenografts with the ART838 plus ABT199 combination reduced leukemia growth rates and prolonged survivals, compared to vehicle or either ART838 or ABT199 alone. To add to the efficacy of this ART838 plus ABT199 treatment regimen, we sought to rationally add a third low-toxicity active antileukemic agent. Sorafenib (SOR; FDA-approved) inhibits multiple kinases which may mediate its antileukemic activity, with the importance of the targets varying from case to case; e.g. FLT3 is an important target in many AMLs. In addition, several reports have found that SOR reduces MCL1 protein stability and translation through inhibition of the ERK and PI3K pathways (Wang et al, Clin Cancer Res 2016, PMID: 26459180; Huber et al, Leukemia 2011, PMID: 21293487). In all acute leukemia cell lines tested, we observed large reductions in MCL1 protein levels with SOR treatment, which may further rationalize the addition of SOR to our ART838 plus ABT199 antileukemic regimen. We had previously observed strong in vitro synergy between ART838 and SOR (PMID: 26771236). Treatment of acute leukemia xenografts with the ART838 plus SOR combination reduced leukemia xenograft growth rates and prolonged survivals, compared to single drugs. Mice bearing luciferase-labelled acute leukemia xenografts were treated (PO daily x5) with single drug or 2-drug or 3-drug combinations of ART838, ABT199, and SOR, each at their individual maximally tolerated doses. Treatment with this 3-drug combination caused rapid regression of luciferase-labelled MV4;11 AML xenografts (Fig 1A). The 5-day treatment cycles were repeated every other week, and mice receiving this 3-drug combination survived >4 times longer than vehicle-treated mice (Fig 1B). Mouse body weights were stable during treatment. Although myelosuppression is the human clinical dose-limiting toxicity of each of these 3 drugs, mouse blood cell counts during 3-drug combination treatment were in the normal range. Treatment of a luciferase-labelled primary AML leukemia xenograft with this 3-drug combination reduced leukemia growth more than the single drugs or 2-drug combinations (Fig 1C). Assessment of efficacy and pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics against diverse acute leukemia xenografts will test this combination of ART838, ABT199 plus SOR as a rational low-toxicity drug triad for treatment of acute leukemias and potentially other cancers. Disclosures Fox: Intrexon Corporation: Employment. Tyner:Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose: Research Funding. Civin:ConverGene LLC: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GPB Scientific LLC: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 3DBioWorks Inc: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BD (Becton Dickinson): Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Targeting Wnt/β-Catenin and BCL-2, Two Critical Survival Factors, Synergistically Induces Apoptosis in AML Via Rac1-Mediated MCL-1 Inhibition

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118367 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1442-1442

Author(s):

Xiangmeng Wang ◽

Po Yee Mak ◽

Wencai Ma ◽

Xiaoping Su ◽

Hong Mu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Progenitor Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Critical Survival

Abstract Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates self-renewal and proliferation of AML cells and is critical in AML initiation and progression. Overexpression of β-catenin is associated with poor prognosis. We previously reported that inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by C-82, a selective inhibitor of β-catenin/CBP, exerts anti-leukemia activity and synergistically potentiates FLT3 inhibitors in FLT3-mutated AML cells and stem/progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo (Jiang X et al., Clin Cancer Res, 2018, 24:2417). BCL-2 is a critical survival factor for AML cells and stem/progenitor cells and ABT-199 (Venetoclax), a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, has shown clinical activity in various hematological malignancies. However, when used alone, its efficacy in AML is limited. We and others have reported that ABT-199 can induce drug resistance by upregulating MCL-1, another key survival protein for AML stem/progenitor cells (Pan R et al., Cancer Cell 2017, 32:748; Lin KH et al, Sci Rep. 2016, 6:27696). We performed RNA Microarrays in OCI-AML3 cells treated with C-82, ABT-199, or the combination and found that both C-82 and the combination downregulated multiple genes, including Rac1. It was recently reported that inhibition of Rac1 by the pharmacological Rac1 inhibitor ZINC69391 decreased MCL-1 expression in AML cell line HL-60 cells (Cabrera M et al, Oncotarget. 2017, 8:98509). We therefore hypothesized that inhibiting β-catenin by C-82 may potentiate BCL-2 inhibitor ABT-199 via downregulating Rac1/MCL-1. To investigate the effects of simultaneously targeting β-catenin and BCL-2, we treated AML cell lines and primary patient samples with C-82 and ABT-199 and found that inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling significantly enhanced the potency of ABT-199 in AML cell lines, even when AML cells were co-cultured with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). The combination of C-82 and ABT-199 also synergistically killed primary AML cells (P<0.001 vs control, C-82, and ABT-199) in 10 out of 11 samples (CI=0.394±0.063, n=10). This synergy was also shown when AML cells were co-cultured with MSCs (P<0.001 vs control, C-82, and ABT-199) in all 11 samples (CI=0.390±0.065, n=11). Importantly, the combination also synergistically killed CD34+ AML stem/progenitor cells cultured alone or co-cultured with MSCs. To examine the effect of C-82 and ABT-199 combination in vivo, we generated a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model from an AML patient who had mutations in NPM1, FLT3 (FLT3-ITD), TET2, DNMT3A, and WT1 genes and a complex karyotype. The combination synergistically killed the PDX cells in vitro even under MSC co-culture conditions. After PDX cells had engrafted in NSG (NOD-SCID IL2Rgnull) mice, the mice were randomized into 4 groups (n=10/group) and treated with vehicle, C-82 (80 mg/kg, daily i.p injection), ABT-199 (100 mg/kg, daily oral gavage), or the combination for 30 days. Results showed that all treatments decreased circulating blasts (P=0.009 for C-82, P<0.0001 for ABT-199 and the combination) and that the combination was more effective than each single agent (P<0.001 vs C-82 or ABT-199) at 2 weeks of therapy. The combination also significantly decreased the leukemia burden in mouse spleens compared with controls (P=0.0046) and single agent treated groups (P=0.032 or P=0.020 vs C-82 or ABT-199, respectively) at the end of the treatment. However, the combination did not prolong survival time, likely in part due to toxicity. Dose modifications are ongoing. These results suggest that targeting Wnt/β-catenin and BCL-2, both essential for AML cell and stem cell survival, has synergistic activity via Rac1-mediated MCL-1 inhibition and could be developed into a novel combinatorial therapy for AML. Disclosures Andreeff: SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Reata: Equity Ownership; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer . Carter:novartis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Single-Cell Mapping of Stress Response and Cell Death Pathways in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Reveals Stressor-Specific Alterations and Distinct Response Patterns

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131784 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 882-882

Author(s):

Muharrem Muftuoglu ◽

Vivian Ruvolo ◽

Yuki Nishida ◽

Po Yee Mak ◽

Peter P. Ruvolo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Cell Death ◽

Stress Response ◽

Er Stress ◽

Single Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Mapping ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Cells respond to stress in various ways ranging from adaptation to environmental challenges and activation of survival pathways to induction of cell death. The initial response to stress encompasses adaptive measures to ensure survival and in the presence of irreparable damage associated with unresolved stress cell death ensues. Understanding the principles and mechanisms governing cell survival over cell death is of particular importance in the field of cancer therapy. It is intriguing that exposure of a seemingly homogenous population to death inducing stimuli, such as chemotherapeutic agents, induces fractional tumor killing in a stochastic manner while a subgroup of cells acquire a persistent state, most probably through activation of compensatory survival pathways. Fractional cell killing and, therefore, inability to completely eradicate transformed cells result in resistance to therapy. Methods/Results: To gain further insight into compensatory mechanisms and divergent responses elicited in response to death inducing stimuli we designed a multiparametric flow cytometry panel for simultaneous assessment of different forms of cell death at the single cell level, and aimed to dissect stimulus-specific death patterns and pinpoint potential compensatory mechanisms in persistent cells. We modified ( Bergamaschi et al. 2019) and utilized panels including antibodies against RIP3, LC3B, cleaved caspase 3, cleaved PARP-1, PERK, H2AX, p21, Ki-67 and dead cell discriminating dye. This enabled simultaneous interrogation of a multitude of cell death modes including necrosis, necroptosis, apoptosis and parthanatos in response to DNA damage and as well as proliferation, autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. To test this concept, we initially utilized agents inducing DNA damage and generated two-dimensional t-SNE plots and diffusion maps to illustrate the multifaceted stress response and developmental trajectories upon challenging with DNA damaging agents. Exposure of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines to etoposide (E) and daunorubicin (DNR) dramatically altered cellular landscape and resulted in emergence of distinct stress responses characterized by differential induction of autophagy, ER stress and DNA damage response and an increase in multiple cell death subpopulations differentially expressing cleaved caspase 3, PARP-1, necrotic cell identifier (live dead aqua dye) and H2AX. We then generated diffusion maps to infer developmental trajectories of dead cells and identified H2AX+PARP+Caspase-3 co-expression as the earliest event occurring in dying cells while cells stained positive for dead cell dye only marked the latest stage. Of note, a fraction of cells exhibited increased autophagy, accompanied with high ER stress and low DNA damage. Presumably, this pattern identifies persistent cells attaining a transient state in response to E and DNR associated with higher likelihood of survival. Evidently, external stress induced a divergent multifaceted response: DNA damage followed by cell death vs. induction of adaptive mechanisms including autophagy and high ER stress. Although both E and DNR preferentially targeted proliferating cells and induced cell cycle arrest, overall stress response to E was distinct from stress to DNR in high-dimensional plane. To attain a comprehensive overview of stress response to E vs. DNR we compared t-SNE maps depicting overall stress response and observed significant segregation. Autophagy and ER stress was more pronounced in E group while DNR completely abrogated proliferation in surviving cells. To further corroborate the utility of this approach, we assessed the activity of exportin-1 (XPO1, KPT-330) and MDM2 (DS-3032b) inhibitors. KPT-330 and DS-3032b individually induced limited cell death. Combination of XPO-1 and MDM2 inhibitors resulted in enhanced apoptotic cell death with unrepaired DNA damage while surviving cells displayed an autophagy pattern. Conclusion: These findings provide proof of concept for the utility of single cell mapping of cellular stress in delineating stressor-specific response patterns and identifying potential resistance mechanisms. Single cell mapping of cell stress and cell death can inform the development of more effective combinatorial drug regimens. Studies to identify stress signatures of targeted agents currently developed for the treatment of AML are ongoing Figure 1 Disclosures Carter: Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding. Andreeff:NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Cliln Network): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CLL Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; AstaZeneca: Consultancy; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; German Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Patents licensed, royalty bearing, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-CTEP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Center for Drug Research & Development: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NIH/NCI: Research Funding; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; CPRIT: Research Funding; Eutropics: Equity Ownership; Senti Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Reata: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Combination of Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compounds, Selinexor and KPT-8602, with Venetoclax (ABT-199) Displays Enhanced Activity in Leukemia and Large Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3949.3949 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3949-3949 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Melissa A. Fischer ◽

Sharon Friedlander ◽

Leah Hogdal ◽

Pia Arrate ◽

Hua Chang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Combination Treatment ◽

Nuclear Export ◽

Research Funding ◽

Selective Inhibitor ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytoplasmic Transport ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Exportin 1 (XPO1) is a well characterized and essential nucleo-cytoplasmic transport protein in the karyopherin family, and is responsible for the nuclear export of over 200 cargo proteins, including the major tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs) p53, p21, FOXO and the translation regulator elF4E. XPO1 is overexpressed in numerous cancer types including solid and hematological malignancies, often correlating with poor prognosis. Recently, a novel class of Selective Inhibitors of Nuclear Export (SINE) compounds, selinexor (KPT-330) and the second generation KPT-8602, have been developed for the treatment of advanced cancers. We have previously shown that selinexor has marked activity in AML and DLBCL pre-clinical models. The BCL-2 family of anti-apoptotic proteins are deregulated and linked to maintenance and survival in AML and DLBCL. For its translation, the mRNA for BCL-2 is transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by forming a complex with XPO1 cargo, elF4E. Other important mRNAs exported from the nucleus via this mechanism include BCL6 and MYC. We hypothesize that SINE compounds inhibit XPO1/elF4E-mediated nuclear-cytoplasmic transport by covalently binding to the XPO1 cargo binding site and that in the absence of protein translation, BCL-2, BCL6 and MYC levels rapidly decline. Venetoclax (VEN; ABT-199) is a potent, selective inhibitor of BCL-2. In vitro, AML cells acquire resistance to VEN over time, often due to up-regulation of another BCL-2 family anti-apoptotic protein, MCL-1. MCL-1 is regulated by the anti-apoptotic transcription factor and XPO1 cargo NF-kB. We have previously shown that SINE compounds significantly decreased MCL-1 levels, presumably via inactivation of NF-kB. The goal of this study was to test whether SINE compounds will synergize with VEN via BCL-2 modulation and whether the combination would diminish MCL-1 mediated resistance to BCL-2 inhibition in DLBCL and AML models, respectively. Methods: BH3 profiling was performed in a sample of cell lines using a cytochrome c release assay to identify anti-apoptotic dependencies. The effects of SINE compounds and VEN as single agents or in combination on cell viability were performed in AML (K-562, MOLM-13, MV-4-11, and U-937) and DLBCL cell lines (SU-DHL-6, DoHH-2 and Toledo). Whole cell protein lysates were extracted 24 hours after treatment for immunoblot analysis. The activity of SINE compounds (5 mg/kg) and VEN (25 mg/kg) as single agents, or in combination were measured in AML (MV-4-11) and DLBCL (DoHH-2 and Toledo) xenografts in NSGS and nude mice, respectively. Tumor growth and survival were measured throughout these animal studies. Tumor tissue was collected at the end of treatment for flow cytometric analysis, western blotting and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: By employing BH3 profiling, we identified AML cell lines that were dependent (MV-4-11 and MOLM-13) and not dependent (U-937 and K-562) on MCL-1. Dose response analysis demonstrated that each of the AML cell lines was sensitive to the SINE compounds, while VEN only reduced viability in the MV-4-11 and MOLM-13 cells. Additionally, there was enhanced growth inhibition when the SINE compounds were combined with VEN in the MCL-1 dependent cells. SINE compound treatment synergistically decreased c-MYC protein levels in all 4 AML cell lines with the combination treatment (Figure 1), whereas PARP cleavage was only enhanced with the combination in the MV-4-11 and MOLM-13 cells. Likewise, MCL-1 is reduced in the presence of SINE compound or SINE compound-VEN combinations. In DLBCL xenograft studies (DoHH-2 and Toledo), combination of selinexor with VEN was synergistic for tumor reduction and increased animal survival when compared to either single agent alone. By IHC we observed a concomitant reduction in BCL-2 and BCL-6 and an increase in cleaved caspase 3 in DLBCL tumors after combination treatment. Conclusions: SINE compound-VEN combinations show enhanced antitumor effect, with reduction of oncogenic activity. SINE compounds reduce MCL-1 in VEN-resistant cells. As MCL-1 driven anti-apoptotic machinery is responsible for resistance to inhibition of BCL-2 in DLBCL and AML, SINE compound regulation of MCL-1 may lead to rescue of VEN resistance. SINE compounds and VEN are excellent candidate partners for combination therapies in AML and DLBCL. Disclosures Friedlander: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Chang:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kashyap:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Argueta:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Klebanov:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baloglu:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lee:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Savona:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Synergistic Anti-Leukemic Activity of PARP Inhibition Combined with IMGN632, an Anti-CD123 Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Models

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117214 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2647-2647 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Claire Fritz ◽

Scott M. Portwood ◽

Julie Adams ◽

Tara Cronin ◽

Linda Lutgen-Dunckley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Parp Inhibitors ◽

Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Drug Conjugate ◽

Antibody Drug

Abstract Background CD123 (IL-3 receptor alpha-chain) is a therapeutic target for hematological malignancies based on high expression levels in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN), and other cancers. The anti-CD123 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), IMGN632, comprises a humanized monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a DNA - alkylating cytotoxic payload which is currently in phase 1 evaluation for relapsed/refractory CD123-positive hematological malignancies (NCT03386513). Novel approaches to enhance the efficacy of ADCs are of significant therapeutic interest. Our laboratory has previously demonstrated that the Poly ADP Ribose (PARP) inhibitor, olaparib, synergistically enhances the activity of the CD33-targeted ADC, IMGN779, in preclinical AML models (Portwood S et al, ASH 2016). Based on the hypothesis that PARP inhibition will synergize with DNA damaging mechanism of IMGN632, we investigated the ability of olaparib and other PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in clinical development (talazoparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and veliparib) to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of IMGN632 across diverse human AML cell lines and primary relapsed/refractory AML samples. Materials and Methods CD123 expression on human AML cell lines (HEL, HL60, MV411, Molm13, EOL-1, THP-1, and Kasumi-1) was quantified by flow cytometry using QuantriBrite beads. AML cells were continuously cultured for 72-96 hours with varying doses of IMGN632 (range 100pM - 100nM) and specific PARP inhibitors (range 100pM -15μM) alone and in combination. Cell viability was measured using a WST-8 colorimetric assay. Primary clinically annotated CD123+ AML cells from patients with relapsed/refractory disease were obtained under IRB-approved protocols from the Roswell Park Hematologic Procurement Shared Resource and cultured short-term in the presence of multiple cytokines plus IMGN632 +/- PARP inhibitors. Apoptosis (Annexin V/PI), cell cycle, and DNA damage (H2AX) were evaluated by flow cytometry. Additive vs. synergistic effects were determined by combination indices using Compusyn software. PARP trapping was evaluated by Western blot analysis in nuclear lysates obtained from IMGN632 +/- PARP inhibitors treated AML cells. Results High expression levels of CD123 (range 937 - 2231 CD123 molecules/cell) were detected on multiple human AML cell lines (HEL-luc, MV411, Molm13, EOL-1, and THP-1) relative to unstained negative controls. Western blot analysis of nuclear lysates from AML cells demonstrated that all PARP inhibitors had varying degrees of PARP trapping on DNA. Continuous single agent 5-day treatment with all tested PARP inhibitors resulted in dose dependent in vitro inhibition of AML cell line growth with IC50 values ranging from 360 nM (talazoparib, most potent) to 78uM (veliparib, least potent). Combination therapy using PARP inhibitors (doses ranging from 300nM - 15uM) and IMGN632 (10nM) consistently resulted in enhanced anti-leukemic effects over monotherapy (Figure 1 for example). Synergistic anti-proliferative effects were obtained across all tested AML cell lines (n=5) with combination indexes ranging from 0.3-0.7 by Compusyn analysis. Combination therapy correlated with enhanced DNA damage, tumor cell apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest of AML cells. Moreover, IMGN632 and PARPi (olaparib or talazoparib) resulted in single agent activity against clinically annotated primary relapsed/refractory AML patient samples with evidence of synergistic effects when combined in vitro. Conclusions Addition of PARP inhibitors to IMGN632, a novel anti-CD123 antibody-drug conjugate, further enhances DNA damage effects and consistently results in synergistic in vitro anti-leukemic effects across multiple CD123+ AML cell lines and primary AML patient samples. Further studies investigating this novel combinatorial approach in specific molecular subtypes of AML with variable baseline sensitivities to PARPi are currently ongoing. Our results strongly support future investigation of PARPi as a novel class of agents with the potential to significantly enhance the efficacy of DNA-alkylating ADCs and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy for hematological malignancies. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Sloss: ImmunoGen: Employment. Watkins:ImmunoGen Inc.: Employment. Kovtun:ImmunoGen Inc.: Employment. Adams:ImmunoGen Inc.: Employment. Wang:Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Simultaneous Kinase Inhibition with Ibrutinib and BCL2 Inhibition with Venetoclax As a Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131288 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3950-3950

Author(s):

Christopher A. Eide ◽

Stephen E Kurtz ◽

Andy Kaempf ◽

Nicola Long ◽

Jessica Leonard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Mononuclear Cells ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Single Agent ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: In patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), patient outcomes vary considerably by patient age group, specific genetic subtypes, and treatment regimen. Large-scale sequencing efforts have uncovered a spectrum of mutations and gene fusions in ALL, suggesting that combinations of agents will be required to treat these diseases effectively. Previous preclinical studies have shown efficacy of the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax alone or in combination in ALL cells (Chonghaile et al., Can Disc 2014; Leonard et al, STM 2018), and the multi-kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (approved for patients with chonic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL)) has also shown potent activity in subsets of ALL (Kim et al., Blood 2017). However, the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax has not been evaluated to date in patients with ALL. Methods: We used a functional ex vivo screening assay to evaluate the potential efficacy of the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax (IBR+VEN) across a large cohort (n=808) of patient specimens representing a broad range of hematologic malignancies. Primary mononuclear cells isolated from leukemia patients were plated in the presence of graded concentrations of venetoclax, ibrutinib, or the combination of both FDA-approved drugs. IC50 and AUC values were derived from probit-based regression for each response curve. A panel of clinical labs, treatment information, and genetic features for tested ALL patient specimens was collated from chart review. Single and combination drug treatment sensitivity were compared within groups by Friedman test, across groups by Mann-Whitney test, and with continuous variables by Spearman rank correlation. Results: Consistent with clinical data and previous literature, IBR+VEN was highly effective in CLL specimens ex vivo (median IC50=0.015 µM). Intriguingly, among specimens from 100 unique ALL patients, we also observed that IBR+VEN demonstrated significantly enhanced efficacy by AUC and IC50 compared to either single agent (p<0.001; median IC50=0.018 µM). In contrast, evaluation of this combination on primary mononuclear cells from two healthy donors showed little to no sensitivity. Breakdown of combination sensitivity (as measured by AUC) by a variety of clinical and genetic features revealed no associations with gender or specimen type. Among continuous variables tested, age was modestly correlated with combination AUC (Spearman r = 0.26) and increased blasts in the bone marrow were associated with increased sensitivity to the combination (Spearman r = -0.41; p = 0.0068). More broadly, specimens from patients with B-cell precursor disease (B-ALL) were more sensitive to IBR+VEN than those with T-cell precursor leukemia (T-ALL) (p = 0.0063). Within the B-ALL patient samples, those harboring the BCR-ABL1 fusion were significantly less sensitive to IBR+VEN than other subtypes of B-ALL (p = 0.0031). Within the T-ALL subset, there was a trend toward reduced sensitivity in patients with evidence of mutations in NOTCH1, though statistical significance was not reached. Evaluation of the combination using an expanded 7x7 concentration matrix in human ALL cell lines revealed varying degrees of sensitivity. For example, IBR+VEN showed enhanced efficacy in RCH-ACV B-ALL cells and showed synergy for the majority of drug-pair concentrations by the highest single agent (HSA) method (ibrutinib, venetoclax, and combination IC50: 0.60, 3.4, and 0.28 uM, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the IBR+VEN combination, currently approved for patients with CLL, also demonstrates impressive efficacy against primary leukemia cells from ALL patients, warranting further investigation as a treatment strategy in the clinic to continue to improve outcomes for patients. Disclosures Leonard: Amgen: Research Funding. Druker:Cepheid: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Research Funding; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute license #2063, Monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibody 4G10, exclusive commercial license to Merck & Co; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (antibody royalty): Patents & Royalties: #2524, antibody royalty; OHSU (licensing fees): Patents & Royalties: #2573, Constructs and cell lines harboring various mutations in TNK2 and PTPN11, licensing fees ; Gilead Sciences: Other: former member of Scientific Advisory Board; Beta Cat: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Stock options; Aptose Biosciences: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ALLCRON: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: #2573, Constructs and cell lines harboring various mutations in TNK2 and PTPN11, licensing fees , Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Research Funding; Novartis: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Patents & Royalties: Patent 6958335, Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, exclusively licensed to Novartis, Research Funding; GRAIL: Equity Ownership, Other: former member of Scientific Advisory Board; Patient True Talk: Consultancy; The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Stock options; Beat AML LLC: Other: Service on joint steering committee; CureOne: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; ICON: Other: Scientific Founder of Molecular MD, which was acquired by ICON in Feb. 2019; Monojul: Other: former consultant; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tyner:Petra: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Syros: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Syros: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Petra: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

BRCA1/2 Containing Complex 3 (BRCC36) Is Recurrently Mutated in AML with t(8;21) and Associated with Increased Sensitivity to Chemotherapy through Impairment of the DNA Damage Repair Pathway

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114143 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1487-1487

Author(s):

Tatjana Meyer ◽

Nikolaus Jahn ◽

Anna Dolnik ◽

Peter Paschka ◽

Verena I. Gaidzik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

De Novo ◽

Dna Damage Repair ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Data Set ◽

Damage Repair ◽

De Novo Aml

Abstract Introduction BRCA1/BRCA2-containing complex 3 (BRCC36) is a Lys63-specific deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB) involved in DNA damage repair. Mutations in BRCC36 have been identified in 2-3% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and secondary AML (sAML). The role of BRCC36 mutations in de novo AML and their impact on DNA damage-inducing cytotoxic chemotherapy sensitivity is not clear. Aim We aimed to determine the incidence of BRCC36 mutations in AML and their impact on outcome and drug sensitivity in vitro. Methods We analyzed the entire coding region of BRCC36 for mutations in 191 AML cases with t(8;21) (q22;q22.1) and 95 cases with inv(16) (p13.1q22) using a customized targeted sequencing panel. Data for de novo AML was derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (TCGA) data set (NEJM 2013). Lentiviral CRISPR/Cas9 was used to inactivate BRCC36 in t(8;21)-positive AML cell lines - Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1 - and murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (LSKs). Knockout was confirmed by a cleavage assay as well as Western blot. AML1-ETO-9a was expressed by a retroviral vector. Cell lines and LSK cells were treated with different concentrations of doxorubicin or cytarabine and their viability was assessed seven days post treatment. DNA damage was assessed through phospho-γH2AX staining using flow-cytometry. Results BRCC36 mutations were identified in 7 out of 191 patients (3.7%) with t(8;21) AML and none of 95 patients with inv(16). In the TCGA data set one out of 200 patients (0.5%) with de novo AML had a BRCC36 mutation. This patient had a complex karyotype and would be considered as secondary AML with myelodysplastic-associated changes according to the 2016 WHO classification. Six of the 7 mutations were missense or nonsense mutations that were predicted to be deleterious to BRCC36 function. One mutation affected a splice site at exon 6, resulting in an impaired splicing capability. With intensive standard chemotherapy all patients with BRCC36 mutations achieved a complete remission and had an estimated relapse-free and overall survival of 100% after a median follow up of 4.2 years. Given its role in DNA damage repair, we hypothesized that BRCC36 inactivation sensitizes AML cells to DNA-damage inducing drugs. In order to test this, we generated BRCC36 knockout Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1 cell lines using CRISPR-Cas9. BRCC36 inactivation had no impact on cell growth on either of the cell lines. However, we found that BRCC36 knockout cells were significantly more sensitive to doxorubicin as compared to the parental cells with normal BRCC36. This was accompanied by a significant increase in DNA damage as assessed by phospho-γH2AX in BRCC36 knockout vs control cells after doxorubicin treatment. In contrast, BRCC36 inactivation had no impact on cytarabine sensitivity. We next assessed drug sensitivity in primary murine leukemic cells expressing AML1-ETO-9a. Again, inactivation of BRCC36 resulted in a significant higher sensitivity to doxorubicin but not cytarabine. Conclusion We found BRCC36 to be recurrently mutated in t(8;21)-positive AML Inactivation of BRCC36 was associated with impairment of the DNA damage repair pathway and thus higher sensitivity to DNA damage-inducing chemotherapy. This might be also reflected by the favorable clinical outcome of patients with BRCC36 mutated t(8;21)-positive AML, a finding which has to be confirmed in a large patient cohort. Disclosures Paschka: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Other: Travel support; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel support; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bullinger:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Bayer Oncology: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Döhner:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

STAG2 Mutations Alter Cohesin Ring Function and Provide Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117480 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 940-940

Author(s):

Zuzana Tothova ◽

John M. Krill-Burger ◽

Daniel S. Day ◽

J. Erika Haydu ◽

Brian J. Abraham ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dna Damage Repair ◽

Cohesin Complex ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Damage Repair ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Mutant Cells ◽

Splicing Machinery

Abstract Recurrent somatic mutations in core components and modulators of the cohesin ring - a multimeric protein complex that forms a ring structure around DNA and provides spatial genome organization - have been identified across multiple cancer types, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), where they are associated with poor overall survival. Cohesin proteins are involved in sister chromatid cohesion, chromatin organization into loops, transcriptional activation, and DNA damage repair. The mechanisms underlying clonal expansion of these driver mutations are unknown and no therapies have selective efficacy in cohesin-mutant cancers. We sought to determine the effects of mutations in the most frequently mutated cohesin subunit, STAG2, on cohesin complex composition using immunoprecipitation followed by quantitative mass spectrometry (IP-MS), genetic dependencies of STAG2-mutant cells by genome-wide CRISPR screening, and mutant cohesin association with chromatin using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-Seq). Our goal was to understand how these mutations contribute to cellular transformation and to identify possible therapeutic targets. Applying IP-MS in AML cell lines engineered with different STAG2 mutations, we identified and validated a switch from STAG2- to its paralog STAG1-containing cohesin complexes. In addition, we observed changes in the interaction of the mutant cohesin complex with proteins involved in DNA repair and replication, including PARP1, and RNA-mediated interaction with RNA splicing machinery, including SF3B family members. We next hypothesized that these cohesin-dependent alterations could lead to shifts in genetic dependencies. Using genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 screens, we identified preferential dependency of STAG2-mutant cells on STAG1, consistent with our proteomics studies. We also found a striking concordance between additional cellular processes highlighted by IP-MS experiments and observed increased dependency of STAG2-mutant cells on DNA damage repair and mRNA processing. Therefore, STAG2 mutations lead to changes in cohesin complex structure and alter interactions with proteins involved in DNA damage, replication, and RNA modification, which become genetic dependencies in this context. Prompted by this concordance, we evaluated DNA replication, DNA damage and splicing in cohesin-mutant cells. We observed a 4-fold increase in replication fork stalling in STAG2-mutant cells, which was associated with accumulation of double strand DNA breaks and activation of the ATR and ATM DNA damage checkpoints. STAG2-mutant cells demonstrated ~100-fold increased sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor talazoparib, which was consistent across models of other cohesin-mutant subunits. In addition, cohesin-mutant cells showed aberrant splicing and increased sensitivity to treatment with SF3B1 inhibitors E7107 and H3B-8800. In aggregate, genetic or pharmacologic perturbation of DNA damage repair or splicing created a synthetic vulnerability for cohesin-mutant cells in vitro and in vivo. Finally, we explored how STAG1-containing complexes alter cohesin-mediated genome compartmentalization in cohesin-mutant cells. Using ChIP-Seq, we observed that STAG2 loss leads to a global decrease in cohesin binding to chromatin, including at sites of insulated neighborhood boundaries, with subsequent gene expression changes. Loss of cohesin binding was associated with increased enhancer activity and super-enhancer expansion in STAG2-mutant cells. In addition, we identified changes in the co-localization of the mutant cohesin complex with super-enhancer enriched factors, DNA damage repair and splicing machinery. These findings are consistent with a model in which wild type and mutant cohesin complexes, defined by their unique composition and patterns of chromatin binding and architecture, have differential abilities to maintain chromatin organization as it relates to spatial organization of super-enhancers, coactivators and transcription factors, as well as DNA damage repair and splicing machinery. Perturbation of any of these components, which have been recently proposed to form phase-separated nuclear bodies, creates vulnerabilities that may be exploited therapeutically with existing drugs in patients with cohesin-mutated malignancies. Disclosures Abraham: Syros Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership. Seiler:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Buonamici:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. D'Andrea:Intellia Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cedilla Therpeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; EMD-Serono: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ideaya: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Lilly: Consultancy, Research Funding; Formation Biologics: Consultancy. Young:Omega Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Camp4 Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Hexabody-CD38, a Novel CD38 Antibody with a Hexamerization Enhancing Mutation, Demonstrates Enhanced Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity and Shows Potent Anti-Tumor Activity in Preclinical Models of Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125788 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3106-3106 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Bart ECG De Goeij ◽

Maarten L Janmaat ◽

Grietje Andringa ◽

Laurens Kil ◽

Berris Van Kessel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tumor Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity ◽

Anti Tumor Activity

HexaBody-CD38 (GEN3014) is a novel, hexamerization-enhanced human IgG1 targeting CD38 with superior complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) activity, in addition to other effector mechanisms. HexaBody-CD38 carries the E430G mutation and binds a different epitope than the clinically validated CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab, which is currently being established as backbone therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Introduction of the E430G mutationfacilitates the natural process of antibody hexamer formation through increased intermolecular Fc-Fc interactions after antigen binding at the cell surface (Diebolder et al., Science 2014; de Jong et al., PLoS Biol 2016). Improved IgG hexamer formation can increase binding of the hexavalent complement component C1q, thereby potentiating or unlocking antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Preclinical data demonstrate highly potent CDC-mediated tumor cell kill in vitro in a panel of cell lines derived from hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma (MM), B cell lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In these cell lines, at the highest dose tested (10 µg/mL), HexaBody-CD38 induced approximately 2-fold more CDC-mediated lysis compared to daratumumab. Of note, in those cell lines that were responsive to daratumumab in CDC assays (>50% tumor cell lysis), CDC activity of HexaBody-CD38 was superior to daratumumab, with IC50 values for HexaBody-CD38 2.4- to 13-fold lower than for daratumumab. Moreover, HexaBody-CD38 unlocked CDC activity in 17 out of 28 tumor cell lines that were not sensitive to daratumumab in CDC assays (<50% tumor cell lysis), including cell lines with lower expression of CD38 or higher expression of the complement inhibitory protein CD59. Importantly, in pilot experiments that are part of an ongoing larger study, HexaBody-CD38 was able to effectively kill MM cells from patients in CDC assays ex vivo, including in one patient that had relapsed from daratumumab (Figure 1). In addition to superior CDC, HexaBody-CD38 was shown to induce comparable antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cell mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) as daratumumab. HexaBody-CD38 demonstrated more efficient inhibition of CD38 cyclase activity, which has been postulated to contribute to immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, in the presence of monocytes, HexaBody-CD38 treatment resulted in the removal of CD38 from the cell membrane of CD38 expressing cells, including T regulatory cells. This suggests downmodulation of CD38 as another potential mechanism to reduce CD38-generated metabolites and associated immune suppression. Finally, HexaBody-CD38 induced promising anti-tumor activity in vivo in PDX models of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in nude mice. Anti-tumor activity was associated with CD38 expression levels. In conclusion, HexaBody-CD38 is a novel CD38 antibody that shows superior capacity to induce CDC-mediated tumor cell kill compared to daratumumab, including in tumor samples from MM patients. Furthermore, HexaBody-CD38 induces FcγR-mediated effector functions and effectively inhibits CD38 enzymatic activity, either directly or indirectly by removal of CD38 from the cell membrane, thereby potentially contributing to immune activation. Targeting CD38 with HexaBody-CD38 could have therapeutic potential in daratumumab-naïve and -refractory MM patients, as well as in CD38-positive tumors in which daratumumab does not have single agent efficacy, such as DLBCL and AML. The promise of HexaBody-CD38 warrants further clinical investigation in CD38-positive hematological malignancies, including MM, B cell lymphoma and AML. Disclosures De Goeij: Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Janmaat:Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Andringa:Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Kil:Genmab: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Van Kessel:Genmab: Other: stock and/or warrants. Lingnau:Genmab: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Freidig:Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Mutis:Onkimmune: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Aduro: Research Funding. Sasser:Genmab: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Breij:Genmab: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Van De Donk:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ahmadi:Genmab Inc: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Satijn:Genmab BV: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants.

Download Full-text