Comparative Effectiveness of Generic Imatinib and Brand-Name Imatinib for the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2778-2778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi J Klil-Drori ◽  
Laurent Azoulay ◽  
Hui Yin ◽  
Michel-Olivier Gratton ◽  
Michaël Harnois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Case Series ◽  
The Self ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Brand Name ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
First Line

Abstract Background: Generic versions of imatinib (GEN) have been approved for use in Canada for chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic phase (CML-CP) on the basis of bioequivalence studies and were reimbursed in Québec starting from October 2013. Molecular responses with GEN have not yet been examined in detail. This study assesses the risk of diminished molecular response in switchers from brand-name imatinib (BN) to GEN and compares the effectiveness of initiating first-line GEN and first-line BN. Methods: Prospective individual patient data were available from nine hospitals participating in the Québec CML registry. To allow equipoise between GEN and BN, we focused on stable BN users at the time of GEN market entry, of which some were subsequently switched to GEN. We further selected only those who had a 1-log rise in international reporting scale (IS) BCR-ABL1 transcript level and conducted a self-controlled case series study (SCSS).1 Using SCSS, each patient contributed follow-up for BN use, and for GEN use (if a switch occurred). The analysis used pooled BN and GEN person-time and compared the odds ratio (OR) of 1-log rise during GEN and BN treatment using conditional Poisson regression. A second analysis used a cohort of initiators of BN and GEN from 2013 and onwards. Kaplan Meier (KM) analyses were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of early molecular response (EMR) corresponding to < 10% IS. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for EMR with GEN use, when compared with BN use. Results: We identified 184 patients treated with BN, 38 who were switched from BN to GEN, and 5 who used GEN only. For the SCSS analysis we included 23 patients, of which 17 had 1-log rise during BN use and 6 during GEN use. All patients had achieved major molecular response (MMR) prior to cohort entry (Table). Mean follow-up was 1.45±0.43 years. Overall, the use of GEN was associated with an increased incidence of 1- log rise (OR: 3.34, 95% CI: 0.33-33.68), although not reaching statistical significance. Ten of 23 rises in BCR-ABL1 levels were subsequently confirmed (7 in BN and 3 in GEN). Eleven patients lost MMR (IS>0.1%), 9 during BN use and 2 during GEN use. The cohort of first-line imatinib included 11 patients, 4 GEN and 7 BN. GEN users were slightly older (61 vs 53, GEN vs BN), and Sokal scores were comparable (low, 2 vs 4; intermediate, 2 vs 3). There was no clear separation of the EMR curves (Figure). However, the adjusted HR of EMR with GEN was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.07-2.15), compared with BN. Conclusions: While these analyses are preliminary, our results call for an initiative on a larger scale to examine the clinical effectiveness of generic imatinib for CML-CP. 1. Whitaker HJ, Farrington CP, Spiessens B, Musonda P. Tutorial in biostatistics: the self-controlled case series method. Stat Med. 2006;25(10):1768-1797. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the self-controlled case series cohort (n=23) Characteristic Value Mean age, years (SD) 62.87 (15.4) Female sex (n, %) 9 (39.1) Mean number of concomitant medications (SD) 1.07 (2.2) Mean years of brand-name imatinib use (SD) 6.85 (2.8) Number major molecular response (%) 23 (100.0) Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of EMR (<10% IS) following the initiation of generic or brand-name imatinib. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of EMR (<10% IS) following the initiation of generic or brand-name imatinib. Disclosures Chamakhi: Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Delage:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Laneuville:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Mollica:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Olney:Cellgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Busque:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Assouline:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Specific Drug Transporter Genotypes Are Significantly Associated with Increased Rates of Major and Complete Molecular Responses In Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Imatinib – A TOPS Correlative Substudy

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 670-670
Author(s):  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Sabrina Angelini ◽  
Eleonora Turrini ◽  
Matt Burnett ◽  
Gloria Ravegnini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Favorable Alleles ◽  
Summary Measures

Abstract Abstract 670 The availability of multiple options for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment is not paralleled by the availability of biological predictors of outcome allowing to identify patients (pts) who are more likely to benefit from dasatinib or nilotinib rather than imatinib (IM). Pharmacogenetics has proven a potential source of biomarkers given the known influence of polymorphisms in key genes encoding drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes on drug delivery – hence effectiveness. In CML, only two studies had so far explored this field, but both were conducted in heterogeneous populations including pts at different stages of disease, not all receiving IM first-line. We thus aimed to investigate a panel of 20 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ABCB1, ABCG2, SLC22A1, OATP1A2, OCTN1, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes that can be hypothesized to influence IM transport and metabolism in 189 newly diagnosed CML pts enrolled in the TOPS phase III trial (Cortes et al, J Clin Oncol 2010). Pts selection was exclusively based on availability of written informed consent and sufficient amount of archived material. Median age was 46 years; male to female ratio was 103 to 86; 156 (83%) pts were Caucasian and 23 (12%) were Asian; low, intermediate and high Sokal risk pts were 84 (44.4%), 65 (34.4%) and 40 (21.2%), respectively. Baseline demographic/clinical features did not differ significantly from those of the overall population. Treatment outcomes (complete cytogenetic response [CCyR]; major molecular response [MMR] and complete molecular response [CMR]) were compared according to i) each candidate genotype ii) summary measures based on combinations of SNPs in the same gene and iii) summary measures based on combinations of SNPs in functionally related genes (uptake; efflux). CC genotype in OCTN1 had a favorable impact on the achievement of MMR at 12 months (MMR@12m; P = 0.03). With respect to the summary measures, combination of SNPs in the SLC22A1 gene was significantly correlated with MMR@12m (P = 0.03). When considering summary measures of uptake and efflux, the former was found to be associated with both MMR@12m and CMR@12m (P = 0.003 and P = 0.01, respectively). A separate analysis limited to Caucasian pts (n=156) yielded similar results (Table 1). In addition, the analysis in the Caucasian subgroup evidenced a significant association between the CC genotype in ABCB1 rs60023214 and MMR@12m (P = 0.005) (Table 1). Cumulative incidence plots based on the Kaplan-Meier method were also analyzed in the overall population and in Caucasians, with comparable results. Representative plots are shown in Figure 1. There was evidence for difference among MMR cumulative incidence curves for 2 single SNPs and 2 score measures. Presence of the major allele in OCTN1 (CC) and of the minor allele in CYP3A4 rs2740574 (GG) were associated with increased MMR rate (P = 0.028 and P = 0.042, respectively, in the overall population and P = 0.027 and P = 0.038, respectively, in Caucasians). Similarly, an increase in the number of favorable alleles in the SLC22A1 gene was associated with increased MMR rate (P = 0.030 and P = 0.043 in the overall population and in Caucasians, respectively). In addition, the combination of favorable alleles in the genes involved in IM uptake was associated with increased rates of both MMR and CMR (P = 0.004 and P = 0.015, respectively, in the overall population and P = 0.005 and P = 0.009, respectively, in Caucasians). Our results suggest that SNP genotyping might be helpful in selecting pts who are more likely to benefit from first-line use of more potent inhibitors. Further assessment of the SNPs here identified in larger series of pts is warranted. Supported by Novartis Oncology, Clinical Development, TOPS Correlative Studies Network Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. White:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hatfield:Novartis: Employment. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1493-1493
Author(s):  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Predictive Value Of Early Molecular Responses In Outcomes Of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Imatinib In First-Line Therapy

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4941-4941
Author(s):  
Katia B. Pagnano ◽  
Bruna Vergilio ◽  
Eliana C M Miranda ◽  
Marcia Torresan Delamain ◽  
Maria Helena De Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Advanced Phase ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Several studies demonstrated the prognostic significance of an early molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) treated with imatinib in first line or other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of early molecular responses, at 3 and 6 months after treatment with imatinib in CML pts and correlate these responses with CCR, MMR, overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS). Patients and Methods Between February 2006 and June 2012, 95  adult pts with newly diagnosed CML in chronic phase (CP) received imatinib 400mg/daily. CP was defined using WHO 2008 criteria. All pts received a short course of hydroxiurea until imatinib was available. Cytogenetic analysis was performed at diagnosis, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after starting therapy and then every 12-24 months thereafter. BCR-ABL transcripts were measured in peripheral blood at 3-month intervals using quantitative RT-PCR (RQ-PCR). Results were expressed as BCR-ABL/ABL ratio, with conversion to the international scale (IS). Major molecular response (MMR) was defined as a transcript level ≤ 0.1% (IS). Statistical analysis: OS was measured from imatinib start until date of death or last visit. An event was defined as death from any cause. EFS was measured from imatinib start until the first event (loss of complete hematological response (CHR); complete cytogenetic response (CCR), progression to advanced phase, death or imatinib discontinuation) or last visit. OS and EFS rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare its curves. The MMR probabilities according to molecular responses at 3 and 6 months were calculated by c2 method and cumulative incidence, considering as competitive event death or progression, before the event. Results 95 pts were analyzed, 57 (60%) male, with a median age of 47 years (17-79); Sokal score: high, intermediate and low was 30, 38.6 and 31.4% respectively; EUTOS scores was 81.5% low and 18.5% high. The median time from diagnosis until imatinib therapy was 1 month (0-5) and the follow-up was 39 month (3-89). Responses: 88% achieved CHR; 50% CCR and 53% MMR. One patient progressed to advanced phase during follow-up, while on imatinib treatment. 21 (22%) pts discontinued imatinib due to intolerance (47.6%); resistance (42.9%), death (4.8%) and Allo-HSCT (4.8%). At 3 months from the start of therapy, 30/64 (46.8%) achieved CCR, 15/64 (23.4%) partial cytogenetic response and 20/64 (31.2%) less than partial; by RQ-PCR, 72.3% (68/94) achieved at 3 months BCR-ABL transcripts ≤10% and 27.7% (26/94) > 10%. At 6 months 55.2% (48/87) had BCR-ABL transcripts ≤ 1% and 44.8% (39/87) >1%. The OS was 97% (95%CI: 95-99%) and EFS 63% (95%CI: 52-75%).There was no significant difference in OS and EFS in pts with RQ-PCR > 10% vs ≤ 10% at 3 months (figure 1), but pts with BCR-ABL transcripts > 10 and >1-10% at 6 months had an inferior EFS in comparison with pts with  BCR-ABL transcripts ≤ 1%  (41%,50%,89% respectively - p= 0.005), (figure 2). The CI showed that CCR pts at 3 months reached MMR earlier at 24 month (54% vs 18%, p=0.03), as well as CCR pts at 6 months, albeit no significance statistically (52% vs 37%, p= 0.16). For RQ-PCR at 3 months, pts with BCR-ABL transcripts 0-1% had a probability of 88% to achieve MMR, 1-10% had 52% and >10% 42%, p< 0.0001 (figure 3). In conclusion, our results show that early molecular responses are predictive of achieving MMR and BCR-ABL transcripts <1% at 6 months is predictive of EFS in CP-CML treated with imatinib. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Concomitant essential thrombocythemia with JAK2 V617F mutation in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia with major molecular response with imatinib and long-term follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 485-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATIA BORGIA BARBOSA PAGNANO ◽  
MÁRCIA TORRESAN DELAMAIN ◽  
MARIANA MUNARI MAGNUS ◽  
JOSÉ VASSALLO ◽  
CARMINO ANTONIO DE SOUZA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Essential Thrombocythemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Jak2 V617f ◽  
Jak2 V617f Mutation ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Low-level Bcr–Abl mutations are very rare in chronic myeloid leukemia patients who are in major molecular response on first-line nilotinib

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1527-1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Alessandra Gnani ◽  
Caterina De Benedittis ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Low Level

Identification of a Rare e8a2 BCR-ABL Fusion Gene in Three Novel Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Imatinib.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4830-4830
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Franck Nicolini ◽  
Daniel Espinouse ◽  
Christophe Ollagnier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Fusion Transcript ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Abstract Most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) express the BCR-ABL transcript with the b2a2 (e13a2) or b3a2 (e14a2) junctions corresponding to the major BCR gene breakpoint cluster region (M-BCR). We and others have reported that a small proportion of CML patients (1–2%), which have breakpoints that fall outside of the M-BCR, giving rise to shortened BCR-ABL transcripts (m-BCR, e6a2, b2a3, b3a3) or longer BCR-ABL transcripts (μ-BCR). The clinical and hematologic features of 8 additional patients with e8a2 BCR-ABL fusions transcripts have been recently reviewed (Demehri et al, Leukemia 2005) and, according to the authors, could be associated with thrombocytosis and a worse prognosis than common M-BCR transcripts. Here, we report three additional CML patients with an e8a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript treated with imatinib and who achieved hematologic, cytogenetic remission. Molecular studies allowed us to quantify this rare BCR-ABL fusion mRNA. All the patients showed a major molecular response with a reduction of at least 3 logs compared to initial samples at a median follow-up of 34 months (range 30–39). None of the cases (patients #1, 2 and 3) described here showed thrombocytosis at diagnosis. The diagnosis of chronic phase CML was based on typical peripheral blood findings and cytogenetics. In all cases, standard karyotyping demonstrated a t(9;22)(q34;q11), but further molecular analysis revealed an atypical e8a2 BCR-ABL fusion gene. In case #1, FISH using the LSI-bcr/abl ES probe (Vysis) showed a typical M-BCR picture which was different with the case previously described. Multiplex RT-PCR for BCR-ABL and sequencing showed a fusion between BCR exon e8 and ABL exon a2, with a 55 base pair (bp) insert, which perfectly matched an inverted sequence from ABL intron Ib. Most of the patients with an e8a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript previously described seem to be associated with a worse prognosis because none of them treated with interferon achieved even a minor response. Here, all the patients are alive, achieved complete cytogenetic and major molecular responses with a prolonged follow up, confirming thus the efficacy of imatinib mesylate in patients with rare BCR-ABL transcripts. Of note, in cases #2 and #3, the major molecular response was obtained after increasing the dosage of imatinib (400 to 600 mg/day), suggesting that those patients may require higher doses of imatinib to achieve proper molecular response. The aggressive clinical course of these leukemias could be shrouded by appropriate targeted therapy. A longer follow-up and the analysis of a large cohort of patients with e8a2 BCR-ABL fusions are necessary to analyse the clinical outcome of these patients. The study of these unusual transcripts is essential to gain more insights of their molecular pathological function and a more comprehensive survey of the different functions of the BCR-ABL chimeric protein.

Frequency of Complete Molecular Response In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients In Real Life Practice.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1227-1227
Author(s):  
Matthieu Decamp ◽  
Dina Istasi ◽  
Atchroue Johnsonansah ◽  
Oumedaly Reman ◽  
Xavier Levaltier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Ifn Treatment ◽  
Complete Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 1227 Introduction: Scarce data are available on the frequency of complete molecular response (CMR) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. The European Leukemia Net defined CMR lately as an undetectable transcript quantified by Real Time PCR and/or nested PCR in two consecutive blood samples of adequate quality, using strict sensitivity criteria (sensitivity > 10 4). CMR is the best response that we can achieve in CML patients. Generally it is obtained after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) but since the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), the number of patients seen with CMR is continuously increasing. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency of CMR in CML patients, and study their characteristics. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to collect epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and laboratory data of CML patients followed in hospitals of the region of Basse Normandie in France. All CML patients who had been followed up, between 1999 and 2010, by molecular monitoring for their Bcr-Abl transcript level were included. Clinical and biological responses were defined according to the ELN 2009 recommendations. Results: 199 patients were included in this study, 154 were diagnosed during the study period. Median age at diagnosis was 54 years and 46% were females. 61.3% were diagnosed in the chronic phase while the accelerated and the blast crisis phase accounted for 10.5% and 0.02%. Among these patients, 2 had the p190 BCR-ABL transcript and 2 the p230 transcript type. 169 were still followed at the end of this study and the median follow up duration was 6,4 years. Out of these 199 patients 12 died and 18 were lost out of sight. Imatinb (IM) alone or Imatinib-based combined therapies in clinical trials, was administrated as a first line treatment in 51,2% of patients. Interferon (INF) alone or in association with other chemotherapy was the frontline therapy in 37,7%; 52% of them started IFN treatment before 2000 and 73% switched to IM. At the time of analysis 26.6% of patients achieved a complete molecular response and 39.7% obtained a major molecular response (MMR) as defined by the international scale; this figure is to be tempered by the fact that the follow up duration was less than 18 months for 9,5% of patients. CMR was obtained in 11 patients following HSCT. With IM as a first line therapy, 11 patients achieved CMR or had an undetectable transcript after a median duration of 43.3 months and lasted for 13.3 months. When IM was given as a second line therapy, 17 obtained a CMR or had an undetectable transcript, in this case the median time calculated starting from the second line treatment administration was 37,3 months and in half of them, it persisted for 28 months. Among these patients, two discontinued therapy and currently they are still on CMR, 24 and 18 months after IM arrest. There was no significant difference in the median CMR achievement duration between the first and second line IM therapy groups. CMR following IFN treatment had been observed in 8 patients, 7 of them stopped IFN and have been in CMR for more than 5 years since its discontinuation. Finally five patients achieved a CMR after administration of second generation TKI. Altogether, a total of 63 patients were followed up for undetectable BCR-ABL transcript. In 53, the transcript remained undetectable; whereas 10 had lost that level of molecular response; 7 of them had regressed to a MMR though they were under IM therapy; 2 lost the MMR, one of them after IM arrest and one progressed to acute leukemia. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients is in CMR or at least had no detectable transcript. In case of TKI therapy, the response is obtained after continuous administration (median duration was 36 months) and is durable in most cases. In this study, few patients in CMR have discontinued treatment but maintained their CMR response. Unfortunately one stopped the treatment and relapsed rapidly. The maintenance of this level of response appears to be dependent on continued suppression of the Bcr-Abl clone by TKI. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Impact of Cytogenetic Response At 6 Months of Therapy in Global Survival of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib in the South of Brazil

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4453-4453
Author(s):  
Laura Fogliatto ◽  
Marcelo Capra ◽  
Mariza Schaan ◽  
Mario Sérgio Fernandes ◽  
Tito Vanelli Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Global Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4453 Background Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib leads to disease remission in a majority of patient, but in some patients (pts) controlling the disease remains a challenge. One of the proposed prognostic factors for identifying this subset of pts is the treatment response in the first months of therapy. Objectives We conducted a study to evaluate the importance of the early complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and the factors associated with its achievement. Methods This is a retrospective study in a cohort of pts with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) enrolled in 3 Hematology centers in South Brazil. All pts received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Early-imatinib treatment was considered when imatinib started before 12 months (mo) from diagnosis. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the ELN recommendations. The ACE-27 (Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27) is a 27 item comorbidity index for patients with cancer and assign weights from 1 to 3 based on the dysfunction grade of each condition (mild, moderate and severe, respectively). An ACE-27 score was applied to each patient. Imatinib suspensions were considered if superior to 20 days at any point during therapy. Global survival (GS) was measured from the start of imatinib to the date of death from any cause. Results We analyzed data from 181 pts with CP-CML diagnosed since 1990. The median age at diagnosis was 48 yr (4 – 85) and 55% were male. The median time from diagnosis to imatinib was 7 mo (0 – 178) and 71% pts were early-imatinib treated. Prior therapy with interferon was used in 60% pts. The median of follow-up was 47 mo. With 6 months of imatinib therapy, 123 pts (68%) achieved CCyR, in this group the four year global survival was 97%. 58 (32%) were not in CCyR at 6 months of therapy, in this group the four year GS was 87%. This difference was significant (P=.024; Figure 1). The chance of achieving major molecular response (MMR) during follow up was 79% for the pts with CCyR at 6 months compared to 53% for the group with no CCyR at 6 months (P<0,001). Some factors were associated with reduced chance of CCyR at 6 months. In a multivariate analysis, the pts with late-onset imatinib treatment (more than 12 mo from diagnosis) had a CCyR rate of 31%, in contrast, the pts who started imatinib before 12 mo had a rate of 50% (P=0,02). The pts with good adherence to treatment had greater CCyR rate than those with poor adherence (interruption greater than 20 days), 51,4% and 35%, respectively (P=0,04). Comorbidity measured by ACE-27 score also influenced the CCyR rates at 6 months: 54% of score 0 (no comorbidity) patients achieved CCyR, compared to 30% of pts with score 1 (mild comorbidity), 33% of pts with score 2 (moderate) and 47% of pts with score 3 (severe) (P=0,009). The greater CCyR rate in the severe comorbidity group probably lacks significance due to the reduced number of pts in this group (22). Conclusions A great proportion of pts achieve CCyR after 6 months of imatinib therapy, nevertheless, the pts who achieve CCyR by 6 months of therapy have greater proportion of major molecular response and global survival. Imatinib therapy should be started as soon as possible and additional efforts must be taken to avoid nonadherence. Finally, special attention should be given to pts with comorbidities as their results tend to be worse. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Imatinib and pegylated IFN-α2b discontinuation in first-line chronic myeloid leukemia patients following a major molecular response

2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perttu Koskenvesa ◽  
Anna Kreutzman ◽  
Peter Rohon ◽  
Markus Pihlman ◽  
Emmi Vakkila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
First Line

scholarly journals Timely Molecular Monitoring and Achievement of Major Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3072-3072
Author(s):  
Adi J. Klil-Drori ◽  
Laurent Azoulay ◽  
Hui Yin ◽  
Alexa Del Corpo ◽  
Michaël Harnois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Patient Adherence ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Monitoring

Abstract Background: Timely molecular monitoring is the cornerstone of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment guidelines. These guidelines are based on the design of clinical trials, but none have been validated prospectively. We hypothesized that timely molecular monitoring in routine patient care increases the likelihood of achieving major molecular response (MMR) in CML. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study using the Québec CML Registry, which comprises 713 patients from 16 hospitals. Patients with newly-diagnosed CML (2009-2014) and measurable disease by quantitative PCR were followed from tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) initiation. Timely PCR (tPCR) was defined as a PCR performed at 2-4, 11-13, and 17-19 months. (Figure). Study outcome was the achievement of MMR at 25 months, defined as international scale ratio (IS) <0.1% or a 3-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 copy number. Achievement of MMR was determined using any PCR during follow-up. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) using an exchangeable correlation structure, to account for patient clustering by center, were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of achieving MMR comparing adherence and nonadherence to tPCR. The models were adjusted for age, sex, first-line TKI, year of study entry, and Charlson comorbidity index. Results: A total of 246 patients with 25 months of follow-up were included in the analysis (Table 1). Patients were excluded due to diagnoses before 2009 (350), insufficient follow-up (76), and other (41). The mean (standard deviation) age was 56.1 (15.5), 43.9% were female; 67.5% were started on imatinib, and 47.6% were treated in higher-volume (>50 CML patients) centers. Timely PCRs were performed in 76.3%, 69.5%, and 61.0% of patients at 2-4, 11-13, and 17-19 months, respectively. When compared with not performing tPCRs, performing one and two tPCRs were associated with achieving an MMR by 25 months (OR: 17.05, 95% CI: 5.18-56.09 and OR: 14.96, 95% CI 3.63-61.73, respectively, Table 2). The highest OR of achieving MMR was observed among those who underwent three tPCRs (OR: 24.02, 95% CI: 7.07-81.55). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess clinical outcomes associated with timely molecular monitoring in early CML. While performing one and two tPCRs was associated with achieving MMR at 25 months, the point estimate for performing three tPCRs was the highest. These findings indicate that timely monitoring may allow for faster switching of TKI, which ultimately permits patients with early failure to "catch up." Alternatively, more regular testing may increase patient adherence to therapy. If replicated, these findings support routine and punctual monitoring of patients on TKI therapy. Disclosures Assouline: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document