A Multicenter Phase II Study Using a Dose Intensified Pegylated-Asparaginase Pediatric Regimen in Adults with Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A DFCI ALL Consortium Trial

Abstract Background: Current chemotherapy regimens in children with ALL produce disease-free survival (DFS) rates of greater than 80%. In contrast, adults with ALL have a much poorer prognosis, with DFS rates of 30-40%. Recent prospective studies suggest that young adults may have superior outcomes when treated with intensive pediatric regimens. We recently reported a 4-yr DFS and overall survival (OS) of 69% (n=78 who achieved CR) and 67% (n=92), respectively (DeAngelo et al. Leukemia 2015) using a native E. coliasparaginase based regimen. This phase II successor trial was performed to determine if a pediatric regimen using pegylated-asparaginase (peg-asp) could be feasibly administered to adults. Methods: Patients (pts) between 18-50 yrs with de novo ALL were eligible. The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of a single dose of peg-asp during induction and of delivering peg-asp every 2 wks during a 30 wk consolidation period. The therapeutic backbone of this protocol was based on the very high-risk arm of the DFCI Childhood ALL Consortium Protocol 05-01. Pts received induction chemotherapy, which included doxorubicin, prednisone, vincristine, pegylated-asparaginase (peg-asp), and triple intrathecal therapy. Consolidation I consisted of a course of high-dose methotrexate, followed by a BFM-like intensification and a course of high-dose cytarabine, etoposide and dexamethasone. CNS prophylaxis included triple intrathecal therapy and cranial radiation. Intensification therapy consisted of eight 3-wk courses of doxorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone, 6-mercaptopurine and 30 wks of IV peg-asp initially dosed at 2500 IU/m2every 2 wks. Continuation therapy consisted of 3 wk courses of vincristine, dexamethasone, methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine for a total of 2 yrs from complete remission (CR). Imatinib at 600 mg/d was administered to those pts who were Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positive. Results: Of 112 pts enrolled, 110 were eligible. The first 65 pts were treated with the initial study design of IV peg-asp during induction and peg-asp every two wks for 15 doses during consolidation. However, due to the high frequency of asparaginase toxicities mainly hyperbilirubinemia, peg-asp was replaced with native E. coli asp at a dose of 25,000 IU/m2 IM during induction and the dose and frequency peg-asp was decreased to 2000 IU/m2 every 3 wks during the consolidation phase in the subsequent 45 pts. The median age was 32 yrs, (range, 18-50), 61% were male, 82% had B-lineage phenotype, and 21 were Ph positive. The CR rate after 4 wks was 89%. 70 pts had the opportunity to receive peg-asp intensification therapy (42 at the 2500 IU/m2 every 2 wks schedule and 28 on the 2000 IU/m2 every 3 wk schedule). Of the 42, 18 pts (43%; 80% CI, 32-54%) on the 2 wk schedule completed at least 13 of 15 doses of peg-asp (26 wks) and 22 of 28 pts (79%; 80% CI, 65-88%) on the 3 wk schedule completed at least 8 of 10 doses of peg-asp, which met the feasibility endpoint (lower bound CI > 60%). The median asp levels post the induction dose of peg-asp were 0.025, 0.78, 0.28, 0.10, at baseline, 7, 11 and 25 days and >0.20 for each consolidation time point for both the 2 and 3 wk cohorts. Two deaths occurred during induction therapy (sepsis; CNS hemorrhage). Post-induction four pts developed pancreatitis, 14 pts had an allergic reaction to the asp, 12 pts developed osteonecrosis, 2 had a bone fracture, 13 pts had thrombosis/embolism and 32 pts had a grade 3-4 neutropenic infection. With a median follow-up time of 39 mos, the estimated 3-yr DFS is 73% for those who achieved a CR (n=90) and the estimated 3-yr OS is 75%. Conclusions: The administration of a dose intensified pediatric regimen with peg-asp to adults with ALL is feasible. However, the dose and schedule of peg-asp that is well-tolerated in adults is lower and less frequent as compared to that of pediatric pts. Although the DFS and OS are high for an adult cohort, longer follow up is needed. Pediatric-like therapies, including those using intensive peg-asp, are tolerable in young adults with ALL and represent a major therapeutic advance. Table 1. Outcome Summary n 3-yr % OS [95% CI] n 3-yr % DFS [95% CI] All Pts./CR Pts. 110 75 [66-82] 90 73 [62-81] Immunophenotype B cell 90 74 [64-82] 72 70 [58-80] T cell 20 78 [52-91] 18 83 [57-94] Ph- 89 80 [70-87] 78 75 [63-84] Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures DeAngelo: Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Storring:Celgene Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Steensma:Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Stone:Pfizer: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; AROG: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Other: DSMB for clinical trial; Abbvie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Multicenter Phase II Study Using a Dose Intensified Pediatric Regimen in Adults with Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.587.587 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 587-587 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽

Suzanne Dahlberg ◽

Lewis B. Silverman ◽

Stephen Couban ◽

Philip C. Amrein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Young Adults ◽

Phase Ii ◽

De Novo ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Intrathecal Therapy ◽

High Dose ◽

Childhood All

Abstract Background: Current chemotherapy regimens in children with ALL produce event-free survival (EFS) rates of greater than 80%. In contrast, adults with ALL have a much poorer prognosis, with EFS rates of 30–40%. Recent retrospective studies suggest that young adults may have superior outcomes when treated with intensive pediatric regimens. Unfortunately, prospective studies are lacking. This phase II trial was performed to determine if an intensive pediatric regimen could be administered to adults with ALL. Methods: The therapeutic backbone of this protocol is based on the high-risk arm of the DFCI Childhood ALL Consortium Protocol 00-01. Patients with newly diagnosed ALL received induction chemotherapy, which included doxorubicin, prednisone, vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, L-asparaginase (L-asp), and triple intrathecal therapy. CNS prophylaxis included triple intrathecal therapy and cranial radiation. Intensification therapy consisted of ten 3-week courses of doxorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone, 6-mercaptopurine and 30 weeks of L-asp that was dosed to maintain asparagine depletion, defined as an L-asp level between 0.1 and 0.14. Continuation therapy consisted of 3 week courses of vincristine, dexamethasone, methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine for a total of 2 years from an established complete remission (CR). Results: 89 patients have been enrolled and treated to date. The first 75 eligible patients were used for this analysis, 73 of whom had on-study data. Although there was no initial upper age restriction, the protocol was amended to include only patients between the ages of 18–50 with de novo ALL, which excluded 4 patients from the analysis. The median age was 28 years, (range, 18–50), 60% were male, 74% had B-lineage phenotype, and 20% were Philadelphia chromosome positive. The CR rate after 4 weeks was 84%. 39 patients had the opportunity to complete L-asp intensification therapy, and 27 (69%) completed all 30 weeks. The median L-asp dose was 16,582 U/m2 (starting dose was 12,500 U/m2). One death occurred during induction therapy (sepsis). Nine patients developed pancreatitis, one of whom died. This last case represented the only remission death on study. Two patients developed osteonecrosis, 14 thrombosis/embolism and 23 neutropenic infection during the post-remission period. With a median follow-up time of 15.3 months, the estimated 2-yr EFS is 72.5% (95%CI: 61–84%) and the estimated 2-yr overall survival (OS) is 77.1% (95%CI: 67–95%). Conclusions: The administration of a dose intensified pediatric regimen to adults with ALL is feasible. Although the high EFS and OS rates require longer follow up, such intensive treatment strategies for young adults with ALL could represent a major therapeutic advance.

Download Full-text

A Multicenter Phase II Study Using a Dose Intensified Pediatric Regimen in Adults with Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.1858.1858 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 1858-1858 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽

Lewis B. Silverman ◽

Stephen Couban ◽

Suzanne Dahlberg ◽

Philip C. Amrein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

De Novo ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Remission Induction ◽

Intrathecal Therapy ◽

High Dose ◽

Childhood All

Abstract Background: In children with ALL, current chemotherapy regimens produce an event-free survival (EFS) of greater than 80%. Adults with ALL have a much poorer prognosis, with EFS rates of 30–40%. Recent retrospective studies suggest that young adult patients may have superior outcomes when treated on more intensive pediatric regimens, but prospective studies are lacking. A phase II trial was performed in an effort to determine if an intensive pediatric regimen can be administered to adults with ALL. Methods: The therapeutic backbone of this protocol is based upon the high-risk arm of the DFCI Childhood ALL Consortium Protocol 00–01. Patients with newly diagnosed ALL were enrolled and received intensive multiagent remission induction chemotherapy, which included doxorubicin, prednisone, vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, high-dose asparaginase, and triple intrathecal therapy. CNS prophylaxis included triple intrathecal therapy and cranial radiation. Intensification therapy consisted of 3 week courses of doxorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone, 6-mercaptopurine and 30 weeks of high-dose asparaginase that was individually dosed in order to maintain asparagine depletion. Continuation therapy consisted of 3 week courses of vincristine, dexamethasone, methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine for a total of 2 years from an established complete remission (CR). Results: 71 patients have been enrolled to date. Although there was no initial upper age restriction, the protocol was amended to include only patients between the ages of 18–50 with de novo ALL; this amendment excluded 4 patients from the analysis. Two patients were enrolled but never received therapy. Demographic data are available for 61 evaluable patients. The median age was 28 years, (range, 18–50), 65% were male, 75% had B-lineage phenotype, and 13% were Philadelphia chromosome positive. In the 54 patients for whom response data was available, the 4 week CR rate was 82%. Among the patients who had the opportunity to complete Intensification therapy, asparaginase data was available for 23 patients, 18 (78%) of whom completed all 30 weeks. One death occurred during induction therapy from sepsis. Four patients developed grade 3 pancreatitis and one patient died of grade 5 pancreatitis. The latter case represented the only remission death on study. There were two cases of osteonecrosis, 10 cases of thrombosis/embolism and 12 cases of neutropenic infection that occurred during the post-remission period. At the median follow-up time of 18.4 months, the estimated EFS is 75% (95%CI: 61–89%) and the overall survival is 79% (95%CI: 65–93%). Conclusions: These results suggest that administration of a dose intensified pediatric-like strategy is feasible. Although the high EFS rate requires longer follow up and larger confirmatory studies, such intensive treatment of young adults with ALL could represent a major therapeutic advance.

Download Full-text

Cladribine Combined with Idarubicin and High-Dose AraC (CLIA2) As a Frontline and Salvage Treatment for Young Patients (≤65 yrs) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119271 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4039-4039 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Mansour Alfayez ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Farhad Ravandi ◽

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Marina Y. Konopleva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Young Patients ◽

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽

Intrathecal Therapy ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Genetics Research ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Nucleoside analogues such as cladribine can increase the efficacy of cytarabine (araC) by modulating deoxycytidine kinase. The addition of cladribine to standard 7+3 chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in pts with AML (Holowiecki JCO 2012). Results of our part-1 phase-2 clinical trial (cladribine combined with intermediate dose araC and idarubicin (CLIA1)) reported promising results that exceeded pretreatment expectations for response and tolerability (Jain, et. al. ASH 2016). Based on that, and the benefit of higher doses of cytarabine in younger patients (UK-MRC AML, Willemze JCO 2014), we investigated a higher dose of araC in combination with cladribine and idarubicin (CLIA2). Methods Non-APL, non-core binding factor AML pts 18-65 yrs of age with adequate organ function were enrolled in 1 of 3 cohorts: de novo AML, secondary AML (s-AML), or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R). Induction was cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5, followed by araC 2g/m2 IV on days 1-5, and idarubicin 10 mg/m2 IV days 1-3. Consolidation consisted of up to 5 more cycles of CLIA2 for 3 days instead of 5. Dose-adjustments were allowed for age and PS. Sorafenib or midostaurin was added for pts with FLT3 mutations which occurred in 35% of pts on this study. Prophylactic intrathecal therapy was offered to higher risk pts at count nadir during cycle 1. Mutation profiling was performed using next generation sequencing prior to starting therapy. Results 65 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 47 yrs (range, 24-65): 37 pts (57%) in the frontline, 12 (19%) pts in the s-AML, and 16 (25%) in the R/R cohorts. Pt characteristics and outcomes by cohort are outlined in Table 1. The most commonly detected mutations at baseline were TET2 (45%), DNMT3a (37%), FLT3 (35%), ASXL1 (28%), and NPM1 (28%). Of 35 evaluable pts in the frontline cohort, 31 responded (ORR=89%) with 27 CR (77%) and 4 CRi (11%). Among the responders, 61% were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD [-]) by multiparameter flow cytometry. In the s-AML cohort, 10 pts were evaluable with an ORR of 60% (6/10) with 5 CR (50%) and 1 CRp (10%); 4 (67%) were MRD [-]. In the R/R cohort, 14 pts, previously treated with a median of 1 (1-4) prior therapy were evaluable for response. There were 7 CR (50%), 1 CRi (7%), for ORR of 57%; and 63% were MRD [-]. The median OS was not reached in the frontline and s-AML cohorts with median follow up of 5.2 and 11.5, months, respectively. In the R/R cohort, the median follow up was 4.7 months and median OS was 6.7 months [Figure.1]. Relapse-free survival was not reached in frontline and salvage cohort, and was 9.1 months in s-AML with median follow up of 5.2, 3.9, and 3.5 months in frontline, s-AML, and salvage cohorts, respectively [Figure.2]. The regimen was well tolerated. The most common ≥ grade 3 possibly-related non-hematologic adverse events were fever/infection (38), bleeding (2), and abnormal liver function test (3). Conclusion The 3-drug combination with a higher dose of araC, CLIA2, is safe and effective in younger pts with AML. Compared to our prior experience in pts with s-AML, using higher dose of cytarabine in CLIA2 for this cohort seems to have the highest impact. This trend however was also seen in the salvage and frontline cohorts when compared to the results from CLIA1. Response rates for pts in the newly-diagnosed AML, s-AML, and in the salvage settings are promising and should be explored further in larger studies and compared to current standard regimens. Disclosures Ravandi: Jazz: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Daver:Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. DiNardo:Bayer: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy. Bose:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding. Andreeff:SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Reata: Equity Ownership; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer . Pemmaraju:abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jabbour:novartis: Research Funding. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding. Kadia:Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Pediatric-Inspired Chemotherapy Incorporating Pegaspargase Is Safe and Results in High Rates of MRD Negativity in Adults Ages 18-60 with Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115486 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4013-4013 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mark Blaine Geyer ◽

Ellen K. Ritchie ◽

Arati V. Rao ◽

M. Isabella Cazacu ◽

Shreya Vemuri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Lymphoblastic Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Among adolescents and young adults with (w/) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL), treatment using a pediatric (vs. adult) regimen appears to achieve superior event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS); this observation has driven increased interest in adapting pediatric regimens for middle-aged adults w/ ALL/LBL. However, greater risk of toxicities associated w/ asparaginase complicates administration of pediatric-inspired regimens in adults. We therefore designed a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen w/ doses of pegaspargase (PEG) rationally synchronized to limit overlapping toxicities w/ other chemotherapeutic agents. Methods: We conducted a phase II multi-center trial in adults ages 18-60 w/ newly-diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) ALL/LBL (NCT01920737). Pts w/ Ph+ ALL or Burkitt-type ALL were ineligible. The treatment regimen consisted of 2-phase induction (I-1, I-2), followed by consolidation w/ 2 courses of alternating high-dose methotrexate-based intensification and reinduction, followed by 3 years of maintenance (Figure 1). PEG 2000 IU/m2 was administered in each of the 6 intensive courses of induction/consolidation at intervals of ≥4 weeks. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in bone marrow (BM) by multiparameter flow cytometry (FACS) on day (d) 15 of I1 and following I-1 and I-2. Any detectable MRD (even <0.01% of BM WBCs) was considered positive. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results: 39 pts were enrolled (30M, 9F), w/ B-ALL (n=28), T-ALL (n=7), B-LBL (n=3), and T-LBL (n=5). Median age at start of treatment was 38.3 years (range 20.2-60.4), w/ 18 pts age 40-60. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated w/ PEG are summarized in Table 1. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was observed post-PEG in I-1 in 9 pts, but only recurred thereafter in 1/8 pts resuming PEG. Pts completing consolidation on protocol (n=16) received median of 6 doses of PEG (range, 2-6). Four pts developed hypersensitivity to PEG and subsequently received Erwinia asparaginase. PEG was discontinued in 4 additional pts due to hepatotoxicity (n=2), pancreatitis (n=1), and physician preference (n=1). Of pts w/ available response assessments, 35/36 (97%) achieved morphologic complete response (CR) or CR w/ incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) following I-1 (n=34) or I-2 (n=1). Both pts not achieving CR/CRi after I-I had early T-precursor ALL; one of these pts was withdrawn from study, and the other (w/ M2 marrow after I-1) achieved CR after I-2. Of the pts w/ ALL (excluding LBL) w/ available BM MRD assessments, 11/28 (39%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1; 18/22 (82%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-2. Of the pts w/ LBL w/ available BM MRD assessments, 7/7 (100%) achieved or maintained undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1 and I-2. Ten pts underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in CR1. Seven pts experienced relapse at median 15.2 months from start of treatment (range, 5.4-30.4), of whom 6 subsequently underwent 1st (n=5) or 2nd (n=1) alloHCT. Of the 11 pts w/ ALL w/ undetectable MRD following I-1, only one has relapsed. Five patients have died, including 2 pts in CR1 (from sepsis and multi-organ system failure), and 3 pts in relapse. At median follow-up of 22.3 months among surviving pts (range, 1.0-48.1), median EFS and OS (Figure 2A&B) have not been reached (EFS not censored at alloHCT). 3-year EFS was 62.1% (95% CI: 38.4-78.9%) and 3-year OS was 80.0% (95% CI: 57.5-91.4%). Conclusions: PEG can be incorporated into pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens w/ manageable toxicity for appropriately selected adults up to age 60 w/ Ph- ALL/LBL. While PEG-related AEs are common, few pts require permanent discontinuation of asparaginase. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was common, particularly post-I-1, but recurred infrequently when PEG was continued. Two induction courses resulted in a high rate of MRD negativity post-I-2 and translated to a low rate of relapse. Though further follow-up is required, 3-year EFS is encouraging. Data regarding asparaginase enzyme activity and silent inactivation w/ neutralizing anti-PEG antibody will be presented. Ongoing and future studies will additionally investigate whether incorporating novel therapies (e.g. blinatumomab, nelarabine) into frontline consolidation therapy may reduce risk of relapse among adults receiving PEG-containing regimens. Disclosures Geyer: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Ritchie:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rao:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Tallman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Douer:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Consultancy. Park:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Discontinuation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127499 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3819-3819 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Bachar Samra ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Koji Sasaki ◽

Marina Y Konopleva ◽

Rita Khouri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Tki Discontinuation

Background: Treatment of Ph+ ALL has significantly improved since the addition of TKIs to chemotherapy, with improvement in complete molecular remission (CMR) and overall survival (OS) rates. However, the optimal duration of TKI is not yet established and the common practice is to continue indefinitely unless allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is performed. In pediatric setting, when TKIs were discontinued after 2 years of maintenance, high rates of relapse were seen, fortunately salvaged with ASCT and other approaches (Slayton WB et al; JCO. 2018 and Schultz KR; Leukemia 2014). In chronic myeloid leukemia, patients (pts) who achieve deep and sustained molecular remissions on TKI may be able to stop therapy successfully. Herein, we reviewed outcome of pts with Ph+ ALL treated with chemotherapy + TKI without ASCT who later discontinued TKI mainly due to adverse events. Methods: We reviewed 240 pts treated at our institution on sequential protocols with Hyper-CVAD chemotherapy + TKI (dasatinib [n=100], ponatinib [n=84], or imatinib [n=56]) between 2001 and 2019. We identified 9 pts (4%) in whom TKI was discontinued, 4 (44.5%) post dasatinib therapy, 4 (44.5%) post imatinib therapy, and 1 (11%) post ponatinib. We analyzed their characteristics and outcomes including molecular relapse rates and treatment-free remission (TFR). Pts were closely monitored with monthly PCR for the first 3 months, then every other month for 3 months, then every 3 months thereafter. Molecular relapse was defined as the loss of MMR (PCR>0.1%) or positivity of PCR at two assessments within a 2-week period. TKI was resumed upon molecular relapse. TFR was defined from the date of TKI discontinuation to molecular relapse or last-follow-up. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics are summarized in table 1. The median follow up from the time of diagnosis was 138 months (range: 40-190). The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range: 20-80). Transcript type was p190 BCR-ABL1 in 7 pts (78%). Median time to CMR was 3 months (range: 0.4-120). Median duration of TKI therapy prior to discontinuation was 70 months (range: 23-143). Median duration of CMR before TKI stop was 52 months (range: 22-141). Reasons for stopping TKI were side effects in 8/9 pts, and physician's choice in 1 pt (after completing 2+ years of maintenance). At the time of TKI stop, 8 pts were in CMR, and 1 pt with low positive transcript level (0.01%). Median follow-up post TKI discontinuation was 37 months (range: 9-75). None of the pts had morphological relapse. Three pts (33%) had molecular relapse within a median of 6 months (range: 0.8-13.2 months). All 3 resumed TKI therapy: 2 of them regained MMR after a median of 4 months (range: 4.0-4.6 months); third pt continues to respond; the BCR-ABL1 transcripts down from 17.68% to 0.36% after 7 months (Table 2). Six pts remain alive and 3 pts died of disease-unrelated causes. The median TFR was not reached; 3-y TFR was 65% (Figure 1). Though the number of pts was only 9, the duration of CMR had a tendency of successful TFR (P=0.062; HR, 0.09; [95% CI, 0.009-1.119] with duration of CMR for 2 years, and P=0.137; HR, 0.15; [95% CI, 0.01-1.80] with duration of CMR for 3 years, as a binomial variable). The median duration of CMR in pts who relapsed and who did not relapse was 22 months (range, 0-39.9) and 58 months (range, 30.9-140.6), respectively (P= 0.096). Conclusions: Our anecdotal experience reflects the feasibility of stopping TKI in a subset of pts with Ph+ ALL and sustained molecular remissions. Longer follow up and validation of these findings on a larger cohort are highly needed before attempting to discontinue TKI. Disclosures Kantarjian: Astex: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding. Sasaki:Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Konopleva:Ascentage: Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Agios: Research Funding; Ablynx: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. O'Brien:Acerta: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Aptose Biosciences, Inc: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vaniam Group LLC: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kadia:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bioline RX: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jabbour:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase II Study of Dasatinib and Dexamethasone As Primary Therapy Followed By Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adults with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: CALGB Study 10701 (Alliance)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2782.2782 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2782-2782 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Matthew J. Wieduwilt ◽

Jun Yin ◽

Meir Wetzler ◽

Geoffrey L. Uy ◽

Bayard L Powell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Cns Prophylaxis ◽

Autologous Hct

Abstract Background: Potent inhibitors of BCR-ABL1have improved remission results and altered post-remission therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dasatinib plus dexamethasone followed by hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) promises high response rates, reduced toxicity, and durable remissions. Methods: We conducted a Phase II trial at 17 U.S. centers with the primary objective being to estimate the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with Ph+ ALL treated with dasatinib and dexamethasone for remission induction and intensification, central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, consolidation with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, or etoposide and cytarabine, and dasatinib-based maintenance. Eligible patients had untreated Ph+ ALL, were ≥18 years old, and had normal cardiac function. Induction (Course I) used dasatinib 140 mg oral daily and dexamethasone 10 mg/m2/day oral or intravenous (IV) days 1-7. For patients with ≤20% blasts in the Course I, Day 15 bone marrow biopsy, intensification (course II) continued daily dasatinib with another 7 days of dexamethasone. Those with >20% lymphoblasts also received vincristine (VCR) and daunorubicin (DNR). Patients (n=3) not in CR/CRi after Course II received a second induction (Course III) with dasatinib, cyclophosphamide, VCR, DNR, and dexamethasone. After Course II or III, CNS prophylaxis (Course IV) consisted of IV VCR and IV, oral, and intrathecal methotrexate (MTX). Dasatinib was restarted at serum [MTX] <0.05 microM. Course V consisted of HCT or chemotherapy. Patients aged 18-70 years with an HLA-matched donor underwent RIC allogeneic HCT; otherwise they underwent autologous HCT. Allogeneic HCT conditioning used fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day IV day -7 through -3, alemtuzumab 20 mg/day IV day -7 through -3, and melphalan 140 mg/m2 once on day -2. GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus began day -2. Patients undergoing autologous HCT received etoposide 10 mg/kg/day (age >65 years, 5 mg/kg/day) continuous IV for 4 days and cytarabine 2 g/m2 (age >65 years, 1 g/m2) IV every 12 hours for 8 doses (EA) then G-CSF for mobilization. Autologous HCT conditioning used melphalan 100 mg/m2/day on days -2 and -1. Patients >70 years or unable to undergo HCT received EA alone. Dasatinib maintenance (Course VI) began on day 30 of Course V and continued for 12 months and until 2 consecutively negative bone marrow BCR-ABL1RT-PCR assays 3 months apart or until relapse. Dasatinib levels were measured on day 15 of induction. Results: Sixty-six patients enrolled from 12/15/2010 to 11/14/2014; 65 received dasatinib and are evaluable. Median age was 60 years (22-87); 49% were male. Median presenting WBC count was 23.1 x 103/ul (0.3-453.6). No deaths occurred during induction or intensification. CR or CRi occurred 31 patients (48%) by Day 15 of induction and in 62 patients overall (95%; CR 86%). Median dasatinib levels in serum and CSF on Day 15 of induction were 30.3 ng/mL (<3-308) and 0.29 ng/mL (<0.2-1.37), respectively suggesting approximately 1% of plasma dasatinib penetrates into the CSF, less than the unbound fraction (6%). Fifty-four patients started Course IV, 38 Course V, and 37 Course VI. Fourteen patients continue on protocol therapy. Of 38 patients receiving Course V, 22 had allogeneic HCT, 6 had autologous HCT, and 10 had EA chemotherapy. Median age of allogeneic HCT recipients was 61 years (31-69). Robust autologous stem cell mobilization was observed [median CD34+ cell count, 90 x 106/kg (31-166, n=6)]. Dasatinib maintenance was feasible after allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and chemotherapy alone with no missed doses in 59%, 83%, and 63% of cycles, respectively. Ten patients have relapsed with one isolated CNS relapse. No relapses have occurred after allogeneic HCT with 3 relapses after autologous HCT and one after Course V EA alone. Median follow up for survivors is 22.8 months (longest, 51 months). There have been 23 deaths: 5 treatment-related (4 after allogeneic HCT, 1 after course V EA), 16 disease-related and 2 unrelated. Conclusions: Dasatinib with dexamethasone yields CR rates comparable to those reported with tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with conventional chemotherapy. Post-remission therapy with reduced-intensity allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, or chemotherapy followed by dasatinib maintenance is feasible. Survival follow up is maturing. Disclosures Stock: Sigma-Tau: Honoraria, Research Funding; Royalties for a chapter in Up to Date: Patents & Royalties; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria. Beumer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Stone:Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Xenetic Biosciences: Consultancy. Larson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Follow-up of Combined Hypercvad (hCVAD) Regimen with Dasatinib (Db) in the Front Line Therapy of Patients (pts) with Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1512.1512 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1512-1512 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hun Ju Lee ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Deborah A. Thomas ◽

Stefan Faderl ◽

Charles Koller ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Single Agent ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Platelet Recovery

Abstract Abstract 1512 Background: The introduction of tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) has significantly improved the outcome of patients (pts) with Ph+ ALL. Dasatinib (Db) is a second generation dual SRC/ABL TKI with greater potency compared to Imatinib in inhibiting BCR/ABL. Aim: To determine the outcome of pts with Ph+ ALL treated with hCVAD + Db. Method: Between 9/06 and 7/09, pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL received Db 50mg oral (PO) twice daily (BID) or 100mg PO daily for the first 14 days of each of 8 cycles of alternating hCVAD, and high dose cytarabine and methotrexate. Pts in complete remission (CR) continued to receive maintenance Db 50mg PO BID or 100mg PO daily, as well as monthly prednisone and vincristine for 2 years, followed by Db indefinitely. From 8/09 protocol was amended and pts received 100mg Db for the first 14 days of cycle #1 and then 70mg daily continuously for the next 7 cycles, as well as 2 doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2 during each of the first 4 cycles. Maintenance was with Db, vincristine and prednisone. Results: Sixty-one pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL have been treated to date. Median age was 56 years (yrs) (range (r), 22–80) and 41 (67%) pts were >50 yrs. The median follow up is 26.1 months (mo) (r, 4–58). Central nervous system (CNS) involvement was noted in 9 (14%) pts at diagnosis. Sixteen (26%) pts had Ph+ alone, 38 (62%) pts had Ph+ with additional abnormalities, and 7 (12%) pts were Ph negative, and BCR/ABL positive. Median white blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis was 13.4 × 109/L (r: 0.4–658), and 22 (36%) pts had WBC >30 × 109/L at diagnosis. BCR/ABL transcript was identified in 60 (98.3%) pts at diagnosis, including e1a2 in 46 (76%) pts, b2a2 in 10 (17%) pts, b2a2+b3a2 in 2 (3%) pts, b3a2 and e1a3 in 1 (1.6%) pt each. One pt had a variant transcript that was not detectable with the standard primers. The median number of induction and maintenance cycles received were 6 cycles (r: 1–8) and 13.5 cycles (r: 1–24), respectively. Fifty seven (94%) pts achieved CR1 and 1 (1.5%) pts achieved CR with incomplete platelet recovery with first induction cycle of chemotherapy. Three (4.5%) pts died before response assessment could be performed due to infections. Thirty-nine (64%) pts received maintenance, 3 (5%) pts are currently receiving induction and 19 (31%) pts had no maintenance [9 pts received allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) prior to maintenance, 10 pts had progression of disease]. To date, twelve (19%) pts have relapsed and Abl kinase domain mutations were analyzed in 7 pts; mutations were noted in 4 pts. These included T315I in 2 pts, and F359V and V299L in 1 pt each. CNS relapse occurred in 5 pts. Salvage (S1) regimens included [hCVAD + another TKI in 7 pts, single agent TKI in 2 pts, single agent monoclonal antibody in 1 pt, methotrexate, vincristine, asparginase, dexamethasone (MOAD) in 1pt, intrathecal cytarabine/methotrexate plus CNS radiation and Db in 1 pt]. Eight pts achieved CR2, 3 pts were refractory (2 pts with T315I and 1 pt with F359V) and one is still undergoing salvage treatment. Median DFS and OS after S1 were 5.3 mo (r: 0.7–17.3) and 6.7 mo (r: 0.6–24.4), respectively. ASCT was performed in 15 (24%) pts, including 10 pts in CR1 and 5 pts in CR2. Donors were related in 8 (53%) and unrelated in 7 (47%) transplants. Sixteen pts have died 11 (68%) pts from infectious complications, 2 (13%) pts from multi-organ failure, 1 (6%) pt with graft versus host disease, and 2 (13%) pts from unknown causes. Three-year disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (n=61) were 49% and 62%, respectively. Conclusion: Db plus hCVAD is an effective regimen with durable responses in pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. Disclosures: Kantarjian: BMS: Research Funding. Jabbour:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cortes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Chemgenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ravandi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Ramp-up Treatment Strategy in Philadelphia Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Associated with Deep Molecular Remissions and Favorable Outcomes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128770 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5120-5120

Author(s):

Nabiel A. Mir ◽

Charles Bodine ◽

Denise Peker ◽

Kimo Bachiashvili ◽

Pankit Vachhani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Fish Analysis ◽

Intensive Chemotherapy ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction: The advent of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) changed the treatment paradigm of Philadelphia chromosome Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). Different treatment strategies exist including combinations of TKI with steroids or with intensive multi-agent chemotherapy regimens. We present here our institutional experience of a "ramp-up" strategy using dasatinib with steroids as induction followed by the combination of dasatinib plus the intensive chemotherapy schema of HyperCVAD alternating with HD MTX/cytarabine. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical records of adult patients (pts) treated in our institution for Ph+ ALL. We collected and analyzed data for pts with Ph+ ALL treated with dasatinib and steroids followed by dasatinib plus HyperCVAD alternating with HD-MTX/cytarabine. Results: We identified 25 pts that were treated with the ramp-up treatment approach between 2014-2019. The median age at diagnosis was 45 years old (range 21-65 years old). Fifty-two percent were women and 60% white. Diagnosis of Ph+ ALL was based on FISH analysis with karyotype being positive for the Ph+ chromosomal abnormality in 64% pts; 8% of pts had cryptic translocation and rest not available ( N/A). Sixty percent of pts had p190 Bcr/Abl transcript, 16% had p210 and 8% N/A (including 2 pts that Bcr/Abl transcript was undetectable despite morphological disease). The CD20 by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) was positive in 16%, heterogenous in 20%, and low/negative in the rest (64%). Eighty-four percent of pts had a WBC less than 50K/cmm at diagnosis; median WBC was 17K/cmm (range 0.8 -131.4 K/cmm). All pts except one received induction with initial dose of 140 mg of dasatinib daily; 84% received prednisone and rest received dexamethasone followed by prednisone. For those pts on dasatinib 140 mg daily, only 2 required adjustment/brief interruption during induction. Eighty-four percent of pts achieved morphological CR, 8% CRp, and 8% had residual ALL post induction with dasatinib and steroids. Of the 23 pts achieving CR/CRp, 34% had minimal residual disease (MRD) by MFC, 26% by FISH analysis and 86% by PCR for Bcr/Abl transcript (21 evaluable pts). Median time from initiation of induction to response bone marrow assessment was 26 days (range 14 - 40 days;75% percentile 28 days). All 25 pts proceeded with HyperCVAD alternating with HD MTX/cytarabine, and the dose of dasatinib used was 70 mg daily (aside from 1 patient who received 100 mg daily). Median time from induction to initiation of HyperCVAD was 34 days (range 17-68 days). The median number of courses (HyperCVAD or HD MTX/cytarabine) for the 25 pts was 3. The 13 pts that ultimately went to transplant in CR1 had also a median of 3 courses. Sixty percent of pts ultimately underwent allo-HSCT. Median time to allo-HSCT from initiation of HyperCVAD was 106 days (range 66-294; 75% percentile 163 days). Overall, all pts achieved CR/CRp with 68% of pts (from the 22 evaluable for molecular remission) attaining also undetectable Bcr/Abl PCR (complete molecular response) as a best response. All pts with post-induction residual disease achieved CR with the dasatinib/intensive chemotherapy combination. Twenty percent of pts had morphological relapse; two pts were treated for non-morphological relapse. Median time to morphological relapse was 148 days from induction (range 106-796 days). The median follow-up was 20.4 months (range 1.5 -58.4; 75% percentile 36.8 months). At last follow up 72% of pts were alive; median OS (not censored for allo-HSCT) was not reached (figure 1). There were no deaths in the first 60 days. Conclusion: Induction therapy with dasatinib and steroids was overall well tolerated and was associated with a very favorable CR/CRp rate, with only a minority of pts requiring treatment adjustment. Subsequent consolidation with dasatinib and HyperCVAD alternating with HD-MTX/cytarabine (+/- allo-HSCT) led to deep remissions in 68% of the pts. Sixty percent of pts underwent allo-HSCT and the median OS was not reached and with no deaths in the first 60 days. Hence, induction therapy with dasatinib and steroids followed by dasatinib plus HyperCVAD alternating with HD-MTX/cytarabine can be considered for Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL pts to achieve deep remissions with low early mortality. Disclosures Vachhani: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Costa:Fujimoto Pharmaceutical Corporation Japan: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy. Erba:Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, ImmunoGen, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Millennium, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Sunesis: Consultancy; Celgene, Incyte, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, ImmunoGen, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Juno, Millennium, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Papadantonakis:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123637 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1589-1589

Author(s):

Fabian Frontzek ◽

Marita Ziepert ◽

Maike Nickelsen ◽

Bettina Altmann ◽

Bertram Glass ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Pegaspargase Can Safely be Administered in Adults Age 40 and Older with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124727 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3816-3816 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ryan J. Daley ◽

Sridevi Rajeeve ◽

Charlene C. Kabel ◽

Jeremy J. Pappacena ◽

Sarah E. Stump ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Frontline Treatment

Introduction: Asparaginase (ASP) has demonstrated a survival benefit in pediatric patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is now part of standard-of-care frontline treatment. As a result, asparaginase preparations have been incorporated into the treatment of adult ALL to improve outcomes. Pegaspargase (PEG-ASP), a modified version of asparaginase with prolonged asparagine depletion, appears to be safe in adults up to age 40 (Stock, et al., Blood, 2019), but is associated with a unique spectrum of toxicities, the risks of which appear to increase with age. Therefore, the safety of PEG-ASP remains a significant concern in older adults w/ ALL. Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective chart review of pts age ≥40 years who received PEG-ASP as part of frontline induction/consolidation or reinduction, between March 2008 and June 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The primary objective was to evaluate the tolerability and toxicity of PEG-ASP based on the incidence and severity of ASP-related toxicities (hypersensitivity reactions, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, pancreatitis, hypofibrinogenemia, etc) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Laboratory values recorded were either the peak or the nadir, the more appropriate for toxicity assessment, within a 4-week period following PEG-ASP administration. Secondary objectives were to determine the total number of doses of PEG-ASP administered in comparison to the number of doses intended, and to characterize the rationale for PEG-ASP discontinuation when applicable. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the incidence of PEG-ASP toxicities with respect to pt and treatment characteristics (regimen, age, BMI, gender, Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) vs. Ph-, presence of extramedullary disease, PEG-ASP dose). P values were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: We identified 60 pts with ALL (40 B-ALL and 20 T-ALL) who received at least one dose of PEG-ASP. Nine pts were Ph+. The median pt age at initiation of the treatment was 53, (range, 40 to 80), and 19 pts had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Forty-four pts received treatment for newly diagnosed ALL, and 16 pts for relapsed disease. Table 1 lists pt baseline characteristics. Among the 44 pts with newly diagnosed ALL, 27 pts received PEG-ASP as part of pediatric or pediatric-inspired regimens at doses of 2000 - 2500 units/m2, and 1 pt received a modified dose of 1000 units/m2 due to age. The remaining 16 pts received PEG-ASP at doses of 1000 - 2000 units/m2 for consolidation, per established adult regimens (ALL-2 and L-20; Lamanna, et al., Cancer, 2013). Grade 3/4 ASP-related toxicities with a >10% incidence included: hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Frontline treatment regimens in which PEG-ASP was used in consolidation cycles only (ALL-2, L-20) were associated w/ a lower incidence of hyperbilirubinemia (p=0.009) and hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001) compared to those regimens that included PEG-ASP during induction (pediatric/pediatric-inspired regimens) (Table 2). Younger age (40-59 vs. ≥60 years) was associated with a greater risk of hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001) and higher PEG-ASP dose (≥2000 vs. <2000 units/m2) was associated with a greater risk of hypertriglyceridemia and hypofibrinogenemia (p=0.002 and p=0.025, respectively). Thirty-eight pts (63%) received all intended doses of PEG-ASP. Six pts stopped PEG-ASP to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (5 in CR1, 1 in CR2), and 7 pts stopped for hypersensitivity reactions. Hepatotoxicity was the only ASP-related toxicity that led to PEG-ASP discontinuation occurring in 5 pts (hyperbilirubinemia, N=4; transaminitis, N=1). The total number of intended doses of PEG-ASP based on regimens used was 186, and 112 were administered. Conclusion: PEG-ASP was incorporated into the treatment of 60 adult ALL pts age ≥40, with manageable toxicity. Seven pts discontinued PEG-ASP due to hypersensitivity reactions and 5 discontinued due to hepatotoxicity, but other reported toxicities did not lead to PEG-ASP discontinuation and the majority of the pts completed all intended doses of PEG-ASP. This study suggests that with careful monitoring, PEG-ASP can safely be administered in adults ≥40 years of age. Disclosures Rajeeve: ASH-HONORS Grant: Research Funding. Tallman:UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Geyer:Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding. Park:Takeda: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Download Full-text