A Phase 1b Study Investigating Carfilzomib Administered Once Weekly in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Background: The combination of carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) is approved in the United States and the European Union (EU) for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Under these approvals, carfilzomib is administered twice weekly as a 10-minute intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 20/27 mg/m2. The phase 1/2 CHAMPION-1 study showed that once-weekly carfilzomib (20/70 mg/m2; 30-minute IV infusion) with dexamethasone was well tolerated and active in patients with RRMM (Berenson et al. Blood. 2016;127:3360−3368). We present initial results from the dose evaluation component of a phase 1b study (NCT02335983) assessing the safety and efficacy of once-weekly carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with MM. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, dose-finding, phase 1b study.The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a once-weekly KRd regimen. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the efficacy of a once-weekly KRd regimen. This study consists of 2 parts: a dose-evaluation component in patients with RRMM and a dose-expansion component in both RRMM and newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Results from the ongoing dose-evaluation component in RRMM are presented. There were 2 planned dose cohorts in the dose-evaluation portion of the study: carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 KRd cohort (56 mg/m2) and carfilzomib 70 mg/m2 KRdcohort (70 mg/m2). All patients received carfilzomib (days 1, 8, and 15), lenalidomide 25 mg (days 1 - 21), and dexamethasone 40 mg (days 1, 8, 15 and 22) on a 28-day cycle (dexamethasone was not administered on day 22 for cycles 9+). Carfilzomib was administered as a 30-minute IV infusion: 20 mg/m2 on cycle 1 day 1 with escalation to the assigned dose level (56 or 70 mg/m2) thereafter. The protocol allowed 8 DLT-evaluable patients to be treated in the 56 mg/m2 and 70 mg/m2 cohorts. Response was assessed by investigators using International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. The data cutoff date for this analysis was June 23, 2016. Results: A total of 22 patients (56 mg/m2, n=10; 70 mg/m2, n=12) with a median age of 69 (range, 50-87) years were enrolled in the dose evaluation component of the study. The median number of prior regimens was 1 (range, 1 - 3) in both cohorts. There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed in any of the 15 dose-evaluable RRMM patients (56 mg/m2 cohort, n=8; 70 mg/m2 cohort, n=7). The median number of cycles started as of data cutoff was 9.5 (range, 3-15) in the 56 mg/m2 cohort and 6.0 (range, 2-9) in the 70 mg/m2 cohort. All patients experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (AE). Grade ≥3 AEs occurring in ≥9% of patients, and any AE of interest are shown in Table 1. The only grade ≥3 AEs to occur in ≥2 patients (≥9%) were thrombocytopenia (56 mg/m2, n=2; 70 mg/m2, n=1), decreased neutrophil count (56 mg/m2, n=2; 70 mg/m2, n=1), anemia (56 mg/m2, n=2), and hypertension (56 mg/m2, n=1; 70 mg/m2, n=1). Although the numbers were small, there was no apparent difference in the incidence of dyspnea or hypertension between the 56 and 70 mg/m2 cohorts. Cardiac or renal failure of any grade was not reported at the time of the database snapshot in these patients with RRMM. Response rates after 4 cycles, as assessed by investigators, are shown in Table 2. Two patients in the 56 mg/m2 cohort did not complete 4 cycles: an 87-year old patient developed asymptomatic pulmonary hypertension (detected on a required echocardiogram study) and was taken off therapy; another patient withdrew consent. One patient in the 70 mg/m2 cohort had a partial response after cycle 1 but was found to have progressive disease in cycle 3 (listed as did not complete 4 cycles in Table 2). After 4 cycles, the response rates (investigator assessed), were 70% and 75% in the 56 and 70 mg/m2 cohorts (response assessment for 2 patients in the 70 mg/m2 cohort was missing at the time of the data cutoff). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that carfilzomib administered in a convenient once-weekly schedule in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM is safe with promising efficacy. The 70 mg/m2 dosing was selected for dose-expansion cohorts in RRMM and NDMM. An update on the expansion cohorts will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Biran: Onyx: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Siegel:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen, Bluebird, BMS, Calithera, Celgene, Constellation, Curis, Epizyme, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kesios, Novartis, Onyx, Takeda, Tragara: Research Funding. Faber:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Cardinal Health: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Seneviratne:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Alsina:Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Bensinger:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kimball:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhou:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Landgren:BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1b Study of Oprozomib with Dexamethasone or Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112610 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 803-803 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Parameswaran Hari ◽

Mark A. Schroeder ◽

James R Berenson ◽

Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽

Jonathan L Kaufman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Objective Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Oprozomib is a selective oral tripeptide epoxyketone inhibitor of the chymotrypsin-like subunit of the constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome. This phase 1b study evaluated the safety and tolerability of two new formulations of oprozomib in combination with dexamethasone (Odex) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (OPomD) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Methods: Adult patients with RRMM who had received at least 2 prior lines of therapy and whose prior treatment included both lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor were eligible for inclusion. Patients received either immediate-release (IR) or extended-release gastroretentive (GR) oprozomib, orally, in combination with dexamethasone (20 mg) alone or pomalidomide (4 mg) and dexamethasone (20 mg) in 4-week cycles. Oprozomib was given according to a 2/7 schedule on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 of each 4-week cycle. In part 1 of the study, patients received Odex with either IR oprozomib at 150 mg/day or GR oprozomib at 150 mg/day. In part 2 of the study, patients received OPomD at increasing dose levels. Dosing for the IR formulation began at 150 mg/day and could be increased to 300 mg/day in increments of 25 mg as needed; at least one cohort could be enrolled at each dose level of oprozomib. Dosing for the GR formulation was determined based on the efficacy and safety data observed in the initial IR dose escalation and was at least one dose level lower than the highest dose tested of the IR formulation. The primary objectives of the study were to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the OPomD formulations. Results: Overall, 34 patients were assessed at the time of this analysis. Baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics are shown in Table 1. Fourteen patients (41%) received prior carfilzomib, and 10 of these were carfilzomib-refractory; 27 patients (79%) received prior bortezomib and 14 were bortezomib-refractory. Patients were enrolled into 6 cohorts and received either IR 150 mg/day (n=5) or GR 150 mg/day (n=8) Odex, or IR 150 mg/day (n=4), IR 200 mg/day (n=8), IR 225 mg/day (n=5), or GR 150 mg/day (n=4) OPomD. Median (interquartile range) number of cycles of oprozomib received for each cohort was 2.0 (1.0-11.0), 3.5 (1.5-4.0), 6.5 (2.5-9.5), 4.5 (3.0-5.5), 1.0 (1.0-1.0), and 2.0 (1.5-2.0), respectively. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (IR 150 mg/day OPomD, increased lipase; IR 200 mg/day OPomD, acute kidney injury; GR 150 mg/day OPomD, febrile neutropenia). At the time of this analysis the MTD was not yet reached for either the IR or GR formulation. Most patients (97%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) and 23 (68%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent grade ≥3 AE. AEs that occurred in ≥50% of patients in any cohort are listed in Table 2; the most common overall were nausea (62% any grade; 3% grade ≥3), diarrhea (50% any grade; 6% grade ≥3), and vomiting (47% any grade; 6% grade ≥3). Four patients (12%) experienced treatment-emergent AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug; no fatal AEs occurred. Seven patients who received OPomD had an objective response at the time of this analysis (IR 150 mg/day, n=1 [33%], median duration of response [DOR]=169 days; IR 200 mg/day, n=6 [67%], median DOR=86.5 days; DOR assessments ongoing). Of the seven patients with an objective response, six had a partial response (IR 150 mg/day and IR 200 mg/day) and one had a very good partial response (IR 200 mg/day). Progression-free survival data were not yet mature. In total, 16 of 34 patients continue to receive oprozomib therapy. The results reported are based on preliminary data available at the time of analysis. The study is ongoing and updated results will be provided at the meeting. Conclusion: Results from this study showed that treatment with OPomD had manageable toxicity in patients with RRMM. The most common AEs observed were gastrointestinal disorders, and most of these were grade 1-2 with no gastrointestinal bleeding reported. Furthermore, OPomD therapy showed promising efficacy, with an objective response rate of 67% for patients in the IR 200-mg/day cohort. Disclosures Hari: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schroeder:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berenson:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; SkylineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kaufman:BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; Janssen: Consultancy. Voorhees:Amgen Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: served on an IRC; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TeneoBio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: served on an IRC; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: served on an IRC. Fujii:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Galimi:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VTD) Versus VTD Plus Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients Eligible for HDT-ASCT: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2312.2312 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2312-2312 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Heinz Ludwig ◽

Luisa Viterbo ◽

Richard Greil ◽

Tamas Masszi ◽

Ivan Spicka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2312 Poster Board II-289 Bortezomib (Velcade®) has shown substantial activity and manageable toxicity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with thalidomide (Thalomid®) and dexamethasone (VTD) in a phase 3 study (Cavo et al, ASH 2008), and with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) in a phase 2 study (Knop et al, ASCO 2009). Four-drug combinations may be more effective than 3-drug regimens, but may also be associated with increased toxicity. This randomized, non-comparative, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VTD and VTD plus cyclophosphamide (VTDC) as induction therapy prior to high-dose therapy plus autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT). A total of 98 previously untreated MM patients with measurable disease who were candidates for HDT-ASCT were enrolled. Additional eligibility criteria included: age 18–70 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥60%, adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function, and no grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN)/neuropathic pain. Patients were randomized (1:1), stratified by International Staging System (ISS) disease stage (I / II / III), to receive four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, thalidomide 100 mg daily, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 9–12 (VTD), or VTD plus cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, as induction therapy prior to HDT-ASCT. All patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis. Patients who became ineligible for HDT-ASCT or had a complete response (CR) after induction therapy could receive an additional 4 cycles of treatment. Responses were categorized using modified IMWG Uniform Response Criteria (stringent CR [sCR] were unconfirmed by immunohistochemistry) through blinded review by the principal investigator and medical monitor, using central laboratory M-protein data and local bone marrow data. The primary efficacy endpoint was combined CR rate (sCR + CR + near-CR) following induction therapy. Secondary objectives included combined CR rate post-HDT-ASCT, overall response rate (ORR: ≥partial response) post-induction and post-HDT-ASCT, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Forty nine patients were randomized to each arm; median age was 57 and 58 years in the VTD and VTDC arms, respectively, 53% and 51% of patients were male, 49% and 43% had KPS ≤80%, and 24 / 45 / 31% and 18 / 47 / 35% had ISS stage I / II / III MM. All but 7 patients completed induction; these patients discontinued due to AEs (3 [6%] each arm) and disease progression (1 [2%] VTDC). Four VTDC patients received additional cycles of treatment. One patient (VTDC arm) was not evaluable for response. Response rates following induction are shown in the table. Median CD34+ stem cell yields were 8.16 (VTD; n=48) and 8.13 (VTDC; n=40) x 106/kg. At data cut-off (April 10, 2009), 47 VTD and 35 VTDC patients had undergone HDT-ASCT; response rates post-HDT-ASCT in 38 and 27 evaluable patients are shown in the table. Time-to-event data are not mature (median follow-up: 9.8 months). The 1-year survival rate was estimated to be 94% in each arm. At least one AE was reported in 98% and 96% of patients on the VTD and VTDC arms, with at least one grade ≥3 AE reported in 47% and 59%, respectively. The most common non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (2% and 8%) and constipation (6% and 2%); analyses of hematology laboratory values indicated grade 3/4 AEs of lymphopenia (39% and 77%), anemia (8% and 18%), neutropenia (14% and 18%), and thrombocytopenia (6% each). PN was reported in 35% (VTD) and 29% (VTDC) of patients, including 8% grade 3 in each arm and 2% grade 4 in the VTD arm. Two patients (1 [2%] each arm) had deep vein thrombosis; one (VTDC arm) was a grade 3 SAE. At least one serious AE (SAE) was reported in 22% (VTD) and 41% (VTDC) of patients, including 6% and 14% with SAEs of infections (MedDRA SOC), and 2% and 14% with musculoskeletal-related pain. In conclusion, both VTD and VTDC are highly active induction regimens, with CR rates and ORRs among the highest reported; the efficacy profiles were similar between the arms, but there were higher rates of toxicity in the VTDC arm compared with the VTD arm. Table. Response rates following induction and post-HDT-ASCT. Post-induction n=49 n=48 Combined CR*, % 51 44 sCR†, % 27 27 ORR, % 100 96 Post-HDT-ASCT n=38 n=27 Combined CR*, % 76 78 sCR, % 39 33 ORR, % 100 100 * sCR + CR + near-CR † unconfirmed Disclosures: Ludwig: Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; AMGEN: Honoraria; Ortho-Biotech : Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Masszi:Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hajek:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Dmoszynska:Milllennium: Research Funding. Cakana:Janssen Cilag: Employment, Equity Ownership. Enny:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Feng:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1b Clinical Trial of Dacetuzumab in Combination with Rituximab and Gemcitabine: Multiple Responses Observed in Patients with Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.586.586 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 586-586 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Andres Forero-Torres ◽

Nancy L Bartlett ◽

Sunita D Nasta ◽

Donald Northfelt ◽

Anne Beaven ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antitumor Activity ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Gene Signature ◽

Median Number ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Expansion Cohort

Abstract Abstract 586 Background: Dacetuzumab (SGN-40), a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD40, mediates antitumor activity through multiple mechanisms of action, including effector cell functions (ADCC/ADCP) and direct apoptotic signal transduction. Ongoing evaluation of the molecule has led to 2 additional key findings: a gene signature that predicts sensitivity to single-agent dacetuzumab, and upregulation of the pro-apoptotic and chemosensitizing transcription factor TAp63αa when dacetuzumab is combined with rituximab (R) and gemcitabine (GEM). In prior single-agent dacetuzumab trials, several patients who were immediately treated with GEM after progressing achieved unexpected responses. These observations provided rationale for further analysis of the combination of dacetuzumab, R and GEM. Methods: A phase 1b dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and adverse event profile of dacetuzumab, R and GEM was conducted in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients received dacetuzumab at cohort-specific doses of 8 or 12 mg/kg IV weekly in combination with R (375 mg/m2 IV for 1 cycle, then once/28-day cycle) and GEM (1000 mg/m2 IV weekly or biweekly) in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme. A maximum number of 8 cycles was permitted. Eligible patients included those with de novo DLBCL, including transformed lymphoma and follicular grade 3, who failed potentially curative therapy. Results: Thirty-one patients with a median age of 68 years (range 29–80) were enrolled and treated in the study (3 patients in each of 3 cohorts + 22 in an expansion cohort). The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 1–18); 10 patients (32%) had transformed histology and 4 (13%) had prior ASCT. The median number of cycles received was 3 (range 1–8), although 11 patients are still on treatment. Three patients in the first cohort required dose reduction of GEM due to transient, non-dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. The protocol was thus amended to administer GEM on a biweekly schedule. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and MTD was not defined. Based on pharmacokinetic modeling suggesting no significant difference in exposure between dose levels, 8 mg/kg of dacetuzumab was chosen as the dose for the expansion cohort. The combination of dacetuzumab, R and GEM was generally well tolerated. Across all cohorts, the most common adverse events (> 15%) were nausea (42%), thrombocytopenia (35%), fatigue (32%), headache (29%), anorexia (19%), dyspnea (19%), pyrexia (19%), diarrhea (16%), and neutropenia (16%), the majority of which were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 3/4 adverse events related to dacetuzumab occurred infrequently. One patient experienced Grade 3 stress cardiomyopathy that resolved; this patient had a history of congestive heart failure. One patient developed pneumonitis in the left lung and acute respiratory distress syndrome, and subsequently died due to pulmonary toxicity; this patient had received prior radiation therapy to the left chest. There was preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. Of the 28 patients with response assessments, 7 patients achieved CR, 8 PR, 7 SD, and 6 PD per investigator assessment of response, yielding an objective response rate of 54%. Of interest, 1 patient who previously failed ASCT achieved a CR and was able to undergo allogeneic transplant. To date, this patient remains in CR. Conclusion: The combination of dacetuzumab, R and biweekly GEM was generally well tolerated. Evidence of antitumor activity with this combination is encouraging as multiple responses were observed in a population with heavily pre-treated patients. Further investigation with a randomized trial is warranted to more fully characterize safety and efficacy and to determine if sensitivity to this combination correlates with the previously identified single-agent predictive gene signature. Disclosures: Forero-Torres: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Gemcitabine has not been FDA approved for treatment of lymphoma. Dacetuzumab is an investigational agent.. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Nasta:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Northfelt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Beaven:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Myint:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Whiting:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Drachman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moskowitz:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

JCARH125, Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Initial Proof of Concept Results from a Phase 1/2 Multicenter Study (EVOLVE)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113548 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 957-957 ◽

Cited By ~ 48

Author(s):

Sham Mailankody ◽

Myo Htut ◽

Kelvin P. Lee ◽

William Bensinger ◽

Todd Devries ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

T Cells ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is expressed on malignant plasma cells and is an attractive therapeutic target for multiple myeloma. BCMA CAR T-cells, antibody drug conjugates and bispecific T-cell engagers have demonstrated substantial preclinical and clinical activity to date. JCARH125 is a BCMA-targeting CAR T product containing a lentiviral CAR construct with a fully human scFv, optimized spacer, 4-1BB co-stimulatory and CD3z activation domains. The construct has shown minimal tonic signaling and lack of inhibition by soluble BCMA. JCARH125 is generated using a manufacturing process developed to optimize various aspects, including increased consistency of cell health, in the drug product. Methods: EVOLVE (NCT03430011) is a multi-center, phase 1/2 trial of JCARH125 in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, who have received 3 or more prior regimens, which must include autologous stem cell transplant, a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, unless not a candidate (i.e. contraindicated) to receive one or more of the above treatments. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) consisting of 3 days of fludarabine (30 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) is given 2 to 7 days prior to JCARH125 infusion. A single dose of JCARH125 is given on day 1. Dose escalation is determined using the modified toxicity probability interval 2 (mTPI-2). A minimum of 3 patients are evaluated at each dose level (DL). The first 2 DLs evaluated were 50 and 150x 106 CAR+ T cells. Additional DLs are planned, followed by an expansion at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The primary objectives of the phase 1 portion are safety and identifying a RP2D. Results: At the time of the July 12, 2018 data analysis, 19 patients have been enrolled (i.e. apheresed) and 13 patients dosed with JCARH125. Only one patient was unable to receive JCARH125, due to sepsis after LDC, leading to death before JCARH125 administration. Eight patients were evaluable for safety (≥ 1 mo follow-up). (n = 5 DL1; n = 3 DL2). Three patients (all from DL1) were evaluable for confirmed response (≥ 2 mo follow-up) per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Data reported here are from these initial 8 patients. Median follow-up is 5 weeks (range 4 - 13 weeks). Median age is 53 years (range 36 - 66) with a median time from diagnosis of 4 years (range 2 - 12). Patients had received a median of 10 prior regimens (range 4 - 15). Of these 8 patients, 4 (50%) were refractory (no response or progression within 60 days of last therapy) to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, pomalidomide and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Seven of 8 (88%) had prior autologous stem cell transplant and 4 of 8 (50%) have IMWG high risk cytogenetics. As of the data cut, no DLTs have been observed at the first 2 DLs. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), all grade 1 or 2, was observed in 6 of 8 (75%) patients. Median onset of CRS was 9 days (range 4 - 10) with a median duration of 4.5 days (range 2 - 19 days). None of the patients with grade 2 CRS required vasopressor support and only 1 patient received tocilizumab. No patients had grade ≥ 3 CRS. Three of 8 (38%) patients experienced neurologic adverse events (AE). Two patients had grade 1 events, and 1 had a grade 3 event (lethargy), which resolved within 24 hours after receiving steroids. Onset of neurologic AEs was 9,11 and 12 days with a duration of 2, 3 and 1 days respectively. Notably, the patient who experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity (NT), developed secondary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) just prior to receiving LDC. All 8 patients have evidence of objective response (≥ MR), including the patient with secondary PCL. 3 patients, all treated at DL1 (50 x 106 CAR+ T-cells), have confirmed responses (1 PR, 2 sCR) with the remainder unconfirmed (1 CR, 2 VGPR, 1 PR, 1 MR). As of the data cut, no patients have progressed. Additional clinical and translational data on at least 30 patients and additional follow up of at least 4 months will be available at time of presentation. Conclusion: At initial lower dose levels, JCARH125 showed an acceptable safety profile with no DLTs reported thus far. Incidence of grade ≥ 3 NT was low and no grade ≥ 3 CRS has occurred with clear clinical activity. Although durability of response and response rate in a greater number of patients remain to be determined, early experience with JCARH125 support a favorable risk-benefit profile and rapid clinical development. Disclosures Mailankody: Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Juno: Research Funding. Bensinger:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Devries:Junot Therapeutics: Employment. Piasecki:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership; Cascadian Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties; Amgen: Patents & Royalties. Ziyad:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blake:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Byon:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jakubowiak:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; SkylineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

ACY-1215, a Selective Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) 6 Inhibitor, In Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (dex), Is Well Tolerated Without Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) In Patients (Pts) With Multiple Myeloma (MM) At Doses Demonstrating Biologic Activity: Interim Results Of a Phase 1b Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3190.3190 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3190-3190 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Andrew Yee ◽

Peter Vorhees ◽

William I. Bensinger ◽

Jesus Berdeja ◽

Jeffrey G Supko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acetylated Tubulin ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Background ACY-1215 is the first selective HDAC6 inhibitor in clinical trials and is well-tolerated as monotherapy up to 360 mg/day, the maximum dose examined. Cmax ≥ 1µM was achieved at dose levels >80 mg. Unlike nonselective HDAC inhibitors, which are associated with severe fatigue, vomiting, diarrhea and myelosuppression, DLTs have not been observed with ACY-1215. ACY-1215 synergizes in in vitro with both lenalidomide and dex in MM cell lines providing the rationale to conduct a phase 1b trial of ACY-1215 in combination with these agents. Methods Relapsed and relapsed and refractory pts who have progressed on at least one prior treatment regimen, who have creatinine clearance >50 mg/mL/min, adequate bone marrow and hepatic function, and who gave informed consent were enrolled. In Part A, patients were treated with escalating doses of oral ACY-1215 on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 28 day cycle with lenalidomide 25 mg d 1-21 and dex 40 mg weekly. In Part B, the schedule includes ACY-1215 on days 15-19. Subsequent cohorts will explore twice daily dosing based on emerging clinical, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Peripheral blood samples were obtained for PK and PD analysis. PD assessment measured the fold increase of acetylated tubulin (a marker of HDAC6 inhibition) and acetylated histones (a marker of class 1 HDAC inhibition) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results As of July 3, 2013, 15 pts who progressed after 1 to >3 prior therapies have been enrolled; 8 were relapsed and 7 were refractory to the most recent therapy. Patients were treated daily at up to 240 mg ACY-1215. Fourteen pts had received prior lenalidomide of which 6 were previously refractory as defined by having less than a minimal response (MR) to therapy (1) or progressive disease on either full dose or maintenance therapy (5). Pts have completed 0 to 11+ cycles of therapy with 10 pts continuing on therapy. Five pts have discontinued therapy due to progressive disease (PD) (3), travel difficulties (1), or missed doses of lenalidomide (1). The latter pt was replaced. The most common treatment emergent events were fatigue (43%), upper respiratory infection (36%), anemia and peripheral edema (21% each), neutropenia (29%) and muscle spasms (21%). Most were grade 1 and 2 and there was no dose relationship to ACY-1215. There were 9 grade 3-4 events in 6 pts, primarily hematologic, as well as fatigue and asymptomatic laboratory investigations. Only 1 event, grade 3 neutropenia, was considered possibly related to ACY-1215 by the investigator. PK and PD data is available from 12 pts up to 160 mg dose level. PK for ACY-1215 is similar to the analogous dose levels in phase 1a monotherapy suggesting coadministration of lenalidomide does not significantly impact the PK of ACY-1215. Maximal levels were ≥ 1µM at ≥ 80 mg correlating with measurable increases >2x in acetylated tubulin with a minimal increase in acetylated histones. Twelve pts, at doses up to 160 mg ACY-1215, are evaluable for response (after at least two cycles). In addition, 1 pt who discontinued therapy after one cycle had response data available. Nine patients (69%) have ≥ PR, including 1 CR, 4 VGPR, 3 PR, and 1 PRu. Two pts had MR and 2 had SD as the best response. Reponses are durable up to 11+ cycles of therapy. Of the 6 patients who were refractory to lenalidomide, best responses included 1 PR, 1 VGPR, 2 MR and 2 SD. Conclusions ACY-1215 at doses which have biological activity (as determined by PD data in PBMC) can be safely combined with lenalidomide and dex with favorable toxicity to date. Significant responses were observed in pts, and responses have been seen in pts previously refractory to lenalidomide. Future cohorts will explore longer duration of exposure as well as a twice daily dosing schedule for ACY-1215. Disclosures: Vorhees: Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; GlaxcoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Prolexys: Research Funding; Abbott: Consultancy. Bensinger:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Supko:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jones:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Patrick:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wheeler:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Raje:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase 1b Study of PD-1 Blockade with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma (PMBCL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3986.3986 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3986-3986 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽

Vincent Ribrag ◽

Craig H. Moskowitz ◽

Jean-Marie Michot ◽

John Kuruvilla ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Humanized Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Like classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), PMBCL frequently harbors genetic alterations of the 9p24.1 locus, leading to overexpression of the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. This provides a possible mechanism of immune evasion and suggests that PMBCL could have a genetically determined vulnerability to PD-1 blockade. Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands. Pembrolizumab has already demonstrated robust antitumor activity in advanced solid tumors and in cHL. KEYNOTE-013 (NCT01953692) is a multicenter, multicohort phase 1b trial testing the safety and preliminary efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with hematologic malignancies. Based on its genetics, PMBCL was included as an independent cohort in this trial. Here we report the preliminary results in this patient population. Methods: The PMBCL cohort of KEYNOTE-013 is enrolling patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease who have relapsed after or are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Pembrolizumab is administered intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end points are safety and antitumor activity. Response is being evaluated using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) at week 12 and every 8 weeks thereafter, using IHP 2007 criteria. Other end points include complete remission (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results: As of July 23, 2015, 10 patients with R/R PMBCL with a median age of 28 (23-62) years have been enrolled in this cohort. Patients were heavily pretreated: 40% had ≥4 prior lines of therapy, and 60% had prior radiation. Six patients (60%) experienced at least 1 adverse event (AE) of any grade related to study treatment. These treatment-related AEs, all grade 1/2, were: hypothyroidism and decreased appetite (2 patients each), and diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, edema, weight loss, and arthralgia (1 patient each). There were no grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs. Two patients experienced a serious AE (grade 3 infectious pneumonia) unrelated to study drug. No patient discontinued for toxicity. Nine patients were evaluable for response (1 discontinued treatment based on clinical progression before week 12). The objective response rate (ORR) was 44% (4/9), with 1 patient achieving a CR and 3 patients achieving a partial response. The intent-to-treat ORR was 40%. With a median follow-up of 144 days, the median DOR has not been reached (1+ to 291+) days, with all 4 responses ongoing at the time of data cutoff. Six of 10 patients have discontinued study treatment because of disease progression, and 4 patients remain on study. Conclusion: The preliminary results of KEYNOTE-013 indicate that PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab is associated with a tolerable safety profile and a promising response rate in heavily pretreated patients with R/R PMBCL. Those patients often have a very poor outcome with conventional therapy, justifying further studies of pembrolizumab in this population. Disclosures Zinzani: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; J&J: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: The PD-1 pathway is an important mechanism of immune evasion for many tumors. Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 on the tumor cell surface and, based upon pembrolizumab's antitumor immune activity in several solid tumors, it may be an effective option for treating hematological malignancies.. Ribrag:Pharmamar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Esai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moskowitz:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuruvilla:Merck: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Hoffmann LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Honoraria. Balakumaran:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership; Amgen: Equity Ownership. Snyder:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marinello:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shipp:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Armand:Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sequenta, Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Dacetuzumab (SGN-40), Lenalidomide, and Weekly Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Multiple Responses Observed in a Phase 1b Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2870.2870 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2870-2870 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Edward Agura ◽

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Jeffrey Matous ◽

Nikhil Munshi ◽

Mohamad Hussein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Antitumor Activity ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Expansion Cohort ◽

Number Of Cycles

Abstract Abstract 2870 Poster Board II-846 Background: Dacetuzumab (SGN-40) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD40. In prior phase 1 studies, antitumor activity was demonstrated with dacetuzumab monotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and stabilization of disease was noted in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Preclinical data demonstrate that the addition of lenalidomide to dacetuzumab markedly enhances dacetuzumab-mediated ADCC and apoptosis in both MM cell lines and patient isolates through modulation of NK cell activity. Methods: A phase 1b, dose-escalation study of dacetuzumab, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone has been initiated in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Patients were enrolled in a 3+3 dose-escalation scheme and were given cohort-specific doses of weekly IV dacetuzumab (4, 8, or 12 mg/kg) in addition to oral lenalidomide (25 mg, Days 1-21 every 28 days), and weekly oral dexamethasone (40 mg). At the conclusion of dose escalation, the highest tolerated dose combination was used to treat an expansion cohort, approximately half of whom were lenalidomide-naïve. The maximum number of cycles permitted was 8, or 2 cycles beyond a complete response (CR). Results: Thirty-six patients from 8 centers were enrolled and treated, 15 patients in 3 dose-escalation cohorts and 21 patients in the expansion cohort at the 12 mg/kg dacetuzumab dose level. The median age of patients was 65 years (range 48-83) with a median of 3.4 years since diagnosis (range 1-11); patients were heavily pretreated (median of 4 prior systemic regimens [range 2-14]). The median number of cycles received was 4 (range 1-8), although 14 patients remain on treatment. The most common adverse events (AEs) in the study were fatigue (47%), neutropenia (28%), thrombocytopenia (25%), diarrhea (22%), constipation (19%), and headache (19%), the majority of which were Grade 1 or 2 in severity. Two patients discontinued treatment due to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1: one patient developed Grade 3 herpes zoster (4 mg/kg); a second patient developed Grade 4 renal failure requiring dialysis (12 mg/kg). This patient had IgA myeloma with a rising M-protein and deteriorating kidney function at study entry; the patient's renal function eventually improved and dialysis was no longer required. Another patient discontinued treatment due to a serious AE that was not considered a DLT (tumor lysis syndrome). Of 33 patients who have had Investigator-assessed response evaluations according to the European Group for Bone Marrow and Transplantation criteria, 13 patients (39%) achieved an objective response (1 CR, 12 partial responses [PR]); other responses were 4 (12%) minimal responses (MR), 10 patients (30%) had stable disease (SD), 2 patients (6%) had progressive disease (PD), and 4 patients (12%) were not evaluable. Responses that occurred among lenalidomide-naïve patients (n=18) were 1 CR, 9 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD, 2 PD, and 2 not evaluable. Among patients who have previously received lenalidomide (n=18), the responses were 3 PR, 3 MR, 7 SD, and 2 not evaluable; additionally, 3 patients who are receiving treatment have not yet been assessed for response. Conclusion: The combination regimen of dacetuzumab, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone was generally well tolerated at all doses studied. Evidence of anti-myeloma activity with this combination is encouraging as antitumor activity was observed in patients with MM who have previously received lenalidomide as well as lenalidomide-naïve patients. Disclosures: Agura: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Dacetuzumab is an investigational agent. Niesvizky:Proteolix: Research Funding, data monitoring committee; Seattle Genetics, Inc: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Matous:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Munshi:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Hussein:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Parameswaran:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Tarantolo:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Whiting:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Drachman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zonder:Pfizer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1, Multicenter Study of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Proteasome Inhibitor Exposed and Lenalidomide-Refractory Myeloma (Trial MM-005)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3036.3036 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3036-3036 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Craig Hofmeister ◽

Noopur S. Raje ◽

David Siegel ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Median Number ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Immunomodulatory Drug ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: The combination of an immunomodulatory drug with the proteasome inhibitor (PI), bortezomib (BORT), and low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) has demonstrated preclinical synergy and considerable clinical activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; Mitsiades et al Blood, 2002; Richardson et al Blood, 2014). Treatment (Tx) with the immunomodulatory drug pomalidomide (POM) + LoDEX has been shown to delay disease progression and extend survival in patients (pts) with myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (LEN) and BORT (Richardson et al Blood, 2014; San Miguel et al Lancet Oncol, 2013). This approach was tested using POM + BORT + LoDEX (PVd) in MM-005; preliminary results showed that PVd was effective and well tolerated in LEN-refractory and BORT-exposed pts. Subcutaneous (SC) BORT was shown to be non-inferior to intravenous (IV) BORT and had an improved safety profile in RRMM (Moreau et al Lancet Oncol, 2011). In addition to a cohort of PVd with IV BORT, MM-005 included a cohort of PVd with SC BORT. Methods: In this phase 1 dose-escalation trial, pts must have received 1-4 lines of prior Tx, with ≥ 2 consecutive cycles of LEN plus a PI. Pts had to be PI exposed and refractory to LEN but not to BORT. A 3 + 3 design with 21-day cycles was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Cycles 1-8 of dose-escalation cohorts received POM (1-4 mg/day on days 1-14), IV or SC BORT (1-1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and LoDEX (20 mg/day, or 10 mg/day for pts aged > 75 years, on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12) until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable adverse event (AE). After cycle 8, BORT was administered on days 1 and 8, and LoDEX was administered on days 1, 2, 8, and 9. The primary endpoint was MTD, and secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response [PR]), duration of response (DOR), and time to response. Results: Of the 34 pts enrolled from March 2012 to August 2014, the median age was 58.5 years (range, 36-76 years) and 59% were male. The median number of prior antimyeloma Tx lines (PAMTL) was 2 (range, 1-4), the proportion of pts with ≥ 2 PAMTL was 56%, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was ≤ 1 for all pts. All pts were refractory to LEN, and all were exposed to prior PI (33 pts [97%] received prior BORT and 2 pts [6%] received prior ixazomib). All pts discontinued Tx, most commonly due to PD (n = 23), but none due to Tx-related AEs. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the dose-escalation cohorts or at the maximum planned dose (MPD) of POM 4 mg, BORT 1.3 mg/m2, and LoDEX 20 mg (10 mg for pts aged > 75 years). The median number of Tx cycles received was 9 (range, 2-36) for all pts and was 11 (range, 2-19) vs 8 (range, 3-15) in the MPD with IV BORT (n = 10) vs SC BORT (n = 12) cohorts. The ORR for all pts was 65% (n = 22), with 2 complete responses (CRs), 1 stringent CR, 10 very good PRs (VGPRs), and 9 PRs; all pts achieved at least stable disease. The median DOR for the 22 responders was 7.4 months. Commonly reported grade 3/4 AEs were more frequent at the MPD level with IV BORT vs SC BORT (90% vs 75%), including neutropenia (60% vs 17%), thrombocytopenia (40% vs 8%), and pneumonia (30% vs 8%). There were no reports of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy (PN) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in any of the cohorts. Conclusions: PVd was effective, with an ORR of 65% in pts with LEN-refractory and PI-exposed myeloma. PVd was well tolerated, with no grade 3/4 PN or DVT and no Tx discontinuation due to Tx-related AE; toxicities were well managed. Moreover, AEs were generally less frequent with SC vs IV BORT. Thus, the favorable tolerability and efficacy of PVd, which could be a highly attractive therapeutic option in pts with RRMM, is under further evaluation in the large ongoing phase 3 trial MM-007. Disclosures Richardson: Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide in combination with bortezomib. Raje:BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding. Siegel:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Laubach:Novartis: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Vesole:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nooka:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Zaki:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Herring:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Li:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Oncocorp: Equity Ownership; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; acetylon pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Results of a Phase 1b Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of GS-4059 in Combination with Idelalisib in Subjects with B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2961.2961 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2961-2961 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Gilles A. Salles ◽

Franck Morschhauser ◽

Bruce Cheson ◽

Simon A. Rule ◽

Christopher Fegan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Single Agent ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Inhibitors of signaling downstream of the B-cell receptor have a demonstrated clinical benefit in a number of lymphoid malignancies but generally require chronic therapy with the potential for single mutations to lead to resistance. GS-4059 (ONO-4059) is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. GS-4059 is safe and tolerable as a single agent at doses up to 480 mg in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and up to 600 mg in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Idelalisib, a phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase delta (PI3Kd) inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of CLL. Single-agent therapy leads to durable responses, but with limited depth of response; treatment with a combination of GS-4059 and idelalisib has the potential to lead to deeper and more durable responses at lower doses of individual agents than needed as monotherapy. Methods:This ongoing, phase 1b study (NCT02457598) is evaluating the safety and tolerability of GS-4059 in combination with idelalisib. Patients with previously treated CLL, FL, small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), or non-germinal-center B-cell type (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and no prior exposure to BTK or PI3Kd inhibitors eligible for enrollment. Patients are enrolled using a 3+3 dose escalation design with a fixed dose of idelalisib (50 mg BID) and increasing doses of GS-4059. Optional dose expansion cohorts of up to 30 patients can be enrolled to generate disease-specific data. Patients were observed for a 28-day period to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Efficacy evaluation was performed at 6-week intervals for DLBCL, 24-week intervals for CLL, and 12-week intervals for all other indications. Results: As of June 1, 2016, 20 patients have enrolled; the median age was 64 (37-79) years and 65% were men. The disease subtypes enrolled were CLL (n = 8), FL (5), MZL (2), SLL (2), and 1 each with DLBCL, MCL, and WM. The median number of prior therapies is 2.5 (range 1-4). The median duration of treatment is 113 days (range 29-310) with 17 patients still on-treatment. Three patients discontinued all study treatment due to disease progression (FL, MZL, DLBCL). There has been 1 death on study following progressive disease. Two DLTs of neutropenia were observed at dose level 2B (GS-4059 20 mg BID/idelalisib 50 mg BID), prompting the decision to discontinue the evaluation of twice-daily administration of GS-4059 when combined with idelalisib. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached in Arm A of the study (Table 1). Of the 20 patients enrolled, 95% reported a treatment-emergent AE (TEAE), of which 55.0% were ≥grade 3. The only ≥grade 3 TEAE that was present in more than 1 patient was neutropenia. The most common TEAEs are listed in Table 2. Grade 3 liver laboratory test abnormalities were observed in 1 patient after approximately 5 months of treatment; a liver biopsy revealed a lymphocytic infiltrate consistent with CLL. Dose interruption due to an AE was reported in 45% of patients. Aside from 2 patients who discontinued idelalisib due to neutropenia and restarted therapy on GS-4059 alone, all patients successfully re-initiated therapy with both agents after treatment interruption. Nine patients have been on study for ≥24 weeks with 7 patients evaluable for radiographic response; 3 patients have had a >50% decrease in lymphadenopathy (CLL, SLL, FL). Preliminary pharmacokinetic (PK) results indicate that idelalisib at the evaluated dose levels does not significantly alter the PK of GS-4059. Conclusion: Once-daily dosing of GS-4059 up to 80 mg in combination with idelalisib 50 mg BID was generally safe and well tolerated. Early results show efficacy at combination doses significantly below the MTD for either single agent. This data supports continued clinical evaluation of the combination of GS-4059 and idelalisib for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Disclosures Salles: Mundipharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morschhauser:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cheson:Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Fegan:AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria. Nelson:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mitra:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Starodub:Bayer: Consultancy; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy. Dyer:Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ONO Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Other: Travel funding, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Weekly Carfilzomib with Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Results from the Phase 1/2 Study Champion-1 (NCT01677858)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.373.373 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 373-373 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

James Berenson ◽

Alan Cartmell ◽

Roger Lyons ◽

Wael Harb ◽

Dimitrios Tzachanis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

The United States ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Carfilzomib is an irreversible proteasome inhibitor that is approved as a single agent in the United States and other countries for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone is also approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsed MM. The approved dose and schedule of carfilzomib is a twice-weekly, 10-min intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day cycles (starting dose: 20 mg/m2 [days 1 and 2 of cycle 1]; escalated to a target dose of 27 mg/m2 thereafter). Here we present updated results from the multicenter, phase 1/2 study CHAMPION-1 (NCT01677858), which evaluated the safety and efficacy of once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone (Kd) in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory MM (1-3 prior lines of therapy) were eligible. Patients received carfilzomib as a 30-min IV infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. The phase 1 portion of the study utilized a standard 3+3 dose-escalation scheme. All patients received carfilzomib at 20 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 1; patients received 45, 56, 70, or 88 mg/m2 beginning on day 8 of cycle 1 in successive dose-level cohorts until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached. All patients received dexamethasone 40 mg (IV or oral administration) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1-8; dexamethasone was omitted on day 22 in cycles ≥ 9. In the phase 2 portion, patients received carfilzomib at the MTD (carfilzomib dose of 20 mg/m2 on cycle 1, day 1; escalating to the MTD for subsequent doses) and dexamethasone at the same dose and schedule. Kd was administered until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary objective of the phase 1 portion was to determine the MTD of carfilzomib in the Kd regimen; the primary objective of the phase 2 portion was to determine the overall response rate (ORR [≥partial response]). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled in phase 1; the MTD of carfilzomib was determined to be 70 mg/m2. Results are presented for all patients treated with Kd at the carfilzomib MTD in both the phase 1b (n=15) and phase 2 (n=89) portions of the study. Among these 104 patients, median patient age was 68.5 years (range, 41-88). Patients received a median of 1 prior line of therapy (range, 1-3); 83% of patients had received prior bortezomib (BTZ), 49% of patients were BTZ-refractory, 27% were LEN-refractory, and 16% were refractory to both BTZ and LEN. Median carfilzomib treatment duration was 7.7 months (range, 0.03-24.2). The ORR was 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68%-85%); the clinical benefit rate (≥minimal response) was 84% (95% CI: 75%-90%). Kaplan-Meier median progression-free survival was 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.0-not estimable). Twelve patients (12%) discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. The most common adverse events of any grade and of grade ≥3 are shown in the Table. Five patients died on study: 1 patient each had cause of death reported as disease progression, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, and cardiopulmonary arrest. The mean area under the curve and maximum concentration following a 70-mg/m2 carfilzomib dose was 1050 ng×h/mL and 2510 ng/mL, respectively. At 1 hour post dosing of carfilzomib 70 mg/m2, the activity of the predominant chymotrypsin-like proteasome catalytic subunit in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (ie, low molecular mass polypeptide 7) was strongly inhibited (97% inhibition as determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ProCISE]; 93% inhibition as determined by a fluorogenic substrate assay). Conclusions: CHAMPION-1 is the first clinical study to evaluate carfilzomib on a weekly dosing schedule. Once-weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m2) with dexamethasone demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability with promising efficacy for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The dose and schedule of carfilzomib used in the CHAMPION-1 study (20/70 mg/m2) is currently being compared with the regulatory-approved carfilzomib dose and schedule (20/27 mg/m2 administered twice-weekly) in the ongoing, phase 3, superiority study ARROW (NCT02412878). Disclosures Lyons: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Insyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Harb:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Boccia:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Moss:Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rifkin:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schupp:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dixon:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ou:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderl:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berdeja:Abbvie: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text