Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) with Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) Effectively Reduces the Severe (Grade III-IV) Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) When Compared to ATG Alone in Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3430-3430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uday Deotare ◽  
David Loach ◽  
Fotios V. Michelis ◽  
Dennis D. Kim ◽  
Santhosh Thyagu ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD) is a frequent complication of Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplants (allo-HCT). It can be lethal with increased morbidity and mortality and can occur in upto 40-50% of allo-HCT. Various agents such as calcineurin inhibitors, anti-metabolites and anti T cell antibodies, have been variably used for GVHD prophylaxis. Use of Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has recently been used extensively in haplo-identical transplant setting with promising results, but has mainly been used in patients with BM as a stem cell source. In those patients receiving PBSC as a stem cell source, PTCy alone could reduce the risk of acute and chronic GVHD significantly. Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) has been associated with decrease in chronic but not acute GVHD. As most of our patients use PBSC as a graft source, we hypothesized that combination of ATG and PTCy can reduce the incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD. Since we had also used ATG for GVHD prophylaxis in a historical cohort, we compared the results of this approach with the current GVHD prophylaxis regimen. Methods: A total of 28 patients with hematological malignancies, who had an unrelated donor underwent allo-HCT at our center from 1 Oct 2015 to 31 Mar 2016. After interim analysis, when increased non-hematological toxicity was observed with myeloablative conditioning, all patients subsequently received reduced intensity conditioning. Peripheral blood was used as a stem cell source in all patients. The GVHD prophylaxis consisted of a combination of ATG-PTCy-CsA, with rabbit ATG administered on Days -3 (0.5 mg/Kg), -2 (2 mg/Kg) and -1 (2 mg/Kg), PTCy at dose of 50 mg/kg on Days +3 and +4 and CsA from Day+5 onwards. Filgrastim was used from day +7 onwards for 13 patients. Emphasis was given to incidence of acute GVHD, especially Steroid Refractory (SR-GVHD). Results: Out of total of 28 patients, aGVHD was seen in 6 (21.4%) patients, five of which had skin involvement (Grade I- II) and one suspected liver involvement (Grade III), all of which responded rapidly to steroids with no cases of SR-GVHD. Secondary graft failure and EBV reactivations; each were seen in 10% of cases. Primary disease relapse was seen in 3 patients, two of which had minimal residual disease prior to transplantation. These results were then compared to the historical cohort of 27 patients who received a combination of ATG-CsA plus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMf) (Table 1). The incidence of acute GVHD was 26% vs 22% (p=0.99), with severe Grade III-IV aGVHD of 4% vs 20% (p=0.085) in the ATG-PTCy-CsA and ATG-CsA-MMf cohorts, respectively; both were statistically not signifcant. There were five patients with SR-GVHD in the ATG-CsA-MMf cohort and none in the current GVHD prophylaxis arm. In the historical cohort, the main cause of death in 7 out of 11 patients was severe GVHD as compared to 1 out of 9 in the ATG-PTCy-CsA cohort. Conclusions: Combination of ATG-PTCy-CsA is an effective strategy to reduce aGVHD; especially severe Grade III-IV and doesnot increase the risk of SR-GVHD, in unrelated donor transplants as compared to ATG-CsA-MMf. However, a long term follow up is needed to assess relapse and cGVHD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4655-4655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita Raj ◽  
Eduardo Olavarria ◽  
Diderik-Jan Eikema ◽  
Liesbeth C de Wreede ◽  
Linda Koster ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a treatment option for patients with advanced myelofibrosis. Problems encountered include an increased risk of delayed or poor engraftment and in the mismatched unrelated donor setting a higher rate of GVHD and particularly poor outcomes. As for other indications for allogeneic stem cell transplants, patients for whom either a matched sibling or matched unrelated donor is not available are considered for either a double umbilical cord blood, a mismatched unrelated donor or haploidentical stem cell transplant. Data on the latter option are limited and we reviewed registry data on all family mismatched donor transplants performed between 2001 and 2015 and reported to the EBMT registry. Results: Records retrieved 69 patients with myelofibrosis transplanted between November 2001 and November 2015. 44 (64%) were male. 50 (74%) had primary myelofibrosis,18 (27%) had secondary myelofibrosis (6 from ET, 5 from PRV and 7 others) and unknown 1(2%). Of 25 patients for whom the JAK2 V617F mutation status was known, 15 (22%) harboured the mutation. Patient Karnofsky performance status was > 70% in 98%. Of the mismatched family donors, 47 (68%) were male and 22 (31%) female. Donors were HLA mismatched at 1 locus in 12 (17%) and 2 or more loci in 48 (69%). Donor-recipient serology combinations were CMV -/- in 8 (12%), +/- in 4 (6%), -/+ in 15 (22%) and +/+ in 34 (49%) missing 8 (12%). Bone marrow was the stem cell source in 34 (49%) and peripheral blood in 35 (51%). The median total nucleated cell count (TNC) infused was 7.5x108/kg (range 2.3-21x108/kg) from data available in 17 patients. The median CD34+ cell dose was 6.9x106/kg (range 1.9-18.18x106/kg) from data available in 19 patients. Conditioning was myeloablative in 48 (70%) and RIC in 21 (30%) The conditioning regimes were varied but the predominant ones were Fludarabine, Busulphan, ATG (FBATG) and Thiotepa, Busulphan, Fludarabine (TBF). TBI was administered in 8 (12%) and in vivo T cell depletion in 22 (32%), ex-vivo T cell depletion in 5 (7%) patients. GVHD prophylaxis varied with post transplant Cyclophosphamide administered in 34/67 (49%) and ATG in 19/67 patients (28%). Neutrophil engraftment was established in 53 (82%) at a median of 20 days (range 11-83). Primary graft failure occurred in 8 (12%) and secondary graft failure in 4 (6%). This occurred at a median of 12 months (range 4.5-35 months). Eleven of these patients had a second allograft at a mean interval of 6.4 months. Responses to the first allograft (censoring for patients who had a second allograft) with data available in 45 patients, showed that complete remission was achieved in 35 patients (78%), 6 (13%) were never in CR and 4 (9%) were not evaluable. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD at 100 days was 12% (95% CI 4-21%) and for grade III-IV acute GvHD at 100 days it was 5% (95% CI 3-11%). Data for chronic GVHD was valid in 49 patients. The cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at 2 years was 62% (95% CI 47-76%). The cumulative incidence of limited cGvHD was 45% (95% CI 31-59%) whereas the cumulative incidence of extensive cGvHD was 10% (95% CI 2-19%). The median follow up was 24 months (95% CI 13-35 months). The 2-year OS was 51% (95% CI 37-76%) and the 5-year OS was 38% (95% CI 21-55%). The 2-year RFS was 44% (95% CI 30-59%) and the 5-year RFS was 31% (95% CI 15-48%). The 2 year cumulative incidence of relapse was 14% (95% CI 5-24%). The 2 year NRM was 41% (95% CI 28-55%), which increased to 54% (95% CI 37-72%) at 5 years. The main causes of death were infection (16, 24%), GVHD (7, 10%) organ damage or failure (3, 5%), relapse/disease progression (1, 2%) and secondary malignancy or PTLD (1, 2%). On univariate analysis there was no significant effect of recipient gender, donor gender, degree of HLA mismatch 1 vs >1 Ag MM, CMV matching between donor and recipient, primary or secondary MF, disease stage at transplant (chronic versus advanced phase), conditioning intensity, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis with ATG or post transplant cyclophosphamide or stem cell source on overall survival. Conclusion: Concerns regarding engraftment and secondary graft failure have excluded patients with myelofibrosis from clinical trials of mismatched related donor transplant. The data suggest that engraftment is feasible, and PFS and OS can be attained with limited severe chronic GVHD with family mismatched donors in this setting. Disclosures Ciceri: MolMed SpA: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 46-46
Author(s):  
B.E. Shaw ◽  
Nigel H. Russell ◽  
A. Pagliuca ◽  
J. Apperley ◽  
G. Cook ◽  
...  

Abstract The use of GSCF-mobilised Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) for unrelated donor (UD) transplantation has increased dramatically since 2000. The association of PBSC with more rapid engraftment and with an increase in chronic Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD), compared to bone marrow (BM) has been reported in a number of studies. More recently the use of PBSC has been associated with an increase in transplant related mortality (TRM) and decrease in survival (OS) in T-cell replete transplants. We sought to analyse the impact of PBSC compared to BM in a cohort of UD transplant recipients, where T-cell depleting agents (in-vivo campath in >90%) were included in the transplant conditioning. The study included 145 patients transplanted between January 2000 and March 2006: CML- 35 in 1CP; acute leukaemia (AML in 61, ALL in 49)-110 in CR1 or 2. All had myeloablative conditioning regimens and received grafts with 9–10/10 matched HLA alleles. 86 patients received BM and 59 PBSC. There were no associations between the stem cell source and any transplant variable (including disease and stage). There was a trend to an increased use of PBSC in patients with a single antigen mismatch (p=0.052). All evaluable patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, with a significantly faster time to engraft in recipients of PBSC compared to BM (16 vs 20 days; p=0.0003). The incidence of acute GvHD was 46% (grade I in 50%, II in 41%, III in 8%, IV in 2%). This was significantly higher in recipients of PBSC (60%) compared to BM (36%; p=0.006), however there was no increase in either II/IV (p=0.69) or III/IV (p=0.18) disease in PBSC recipients. In univariate analysis, the presence of a single HLA mismatch (p=0.026) was the only other variable to be associated with an increase in acute GvHD. In a logistic regression model including both these variables, the use of PBSC remained significantly associated with an increase in aGvHD (OR=2.3; 95% CI 1.1,4.7;p=0.020). The TRM was 14%, 27% and 39% at 100 days, 1 and 5 years respectively. At none of these time points was the stem cell source associated with a significant difference in TRM. The 5-year incidence of chronic GvHD was 58% (BM 55%, PBSC 60%; NS), extensive disease in one third, and of relapse was 61% (BM 60%, PBSC 62%; NS). The 5-years OS was 41% with a median follow-up of 3.4 years (0.5–7.1). This was 44% using PBSC and 40% using BM (NS). In conclusion, although we observed an increase in acute GVHD with PBSC this was only of grade 1 disease. We found no association between the use of PBSC and an increased risk of chronic GVHD or of a worse transplant outcome, when compared to BM, in recipients of T-cell depleted myeloablative transplants for leukaemia.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 956-956
Author(s):  
Florent Malard ◽  
Sabine Furst ◽  
Marion Loirat ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Jean El-Cheikh ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 956 Background. Unrelated umbilical cord blood cells (UCB) have emerged as an alternative stem cell source for allo-SCT in patients who lack a matched-related or unrelated donor (MUD). Several studies found a similar outcome between HLA 4–6/6 matched UCB and HLA 8/8 matched and 7/8 mismatched unrelated donors, mainly in the setting of standard myeloablative conditioning. However, currently it is more common practice in many centres to search for 10/10 or 9/10 MUD or for double UCB. Thus far, no study focussed on the comparison of outcome of patients who received double UCB allo-SCT versus allo-SCT using 9/10 mismatched donors. With this background, this retrospective analysis assessed outcome after allo-SCT using double UCB cells or 9/10 mismatched donors in the setting of a RIC regimen. Patients and Methods. This analysis was performed in a series of 152 consecutive adult patients treated for hematological malignancies in 2 centers adopting similar transplant procedures. 85 patients were males (56%) and the median age at time of allo-SCT was 53 years (range, 16–69). Diagnoses included 59 AML (39%), 21 MDS/MPN (14%), 42 NHL (28%), 5 Hodgkin diseases (3%), 18 ALL (12%) and 7 Myelomas (5%). 35 patients (23%) had standard risk disease and 117 patients (77%) presented with high risk disease. Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and low dose TBI for 108 patients (71%), fludarabine and busulfan for 35 patients (23%); and other regimens in the remaining 9 patients (6%). 50 patients (33%) received antithymocyte globulin. The donor was double UCB in 110 cases (“dUCB” group) and 9/10 mismatched unrelated in 42 cases (“9/10” group). During the study period, both participating centers adopted the same strategy for donor search and choice: in the absence of matched-related siblings or 10/10 MUD, 9/10 donors were searched. UCB cells were used if no 9/10 donor could be identified within a reasonable time frame (usually 2–3 months after search initiation). Results. With a median follow-up of 30.3 months (range, 6–72.4), the Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival (OS) at 2 years was comparable between both groups [52% (95%CI, 42–61%) in the dUCB group versus 48% (95%CI, 32–62%) in the 9/10 group, P=0.55]. The cumulative incidence of NRM was 26% in the dUCB group versus 24% in the 9/10 group (P=0.95). Grade 3–4 acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD incidences were 20% versus 21.4% (P=0.83), and 6% versus 21% (P=0.02), in the dUCB group versus the 9/10 group, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 34% in the dUCB group versus 38% in the 9/10 group (P=0.63). Finally, the estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was 43% (95%CI, 34–52%) in the dUCB group versus 38% (95%CI, 23–53%) in the 9/10 group (P=0.55). In multivariable analysis including the most important parameters associated with outcome (patient's age at transplantation, patient's sex, diagnosis, disease status at transplantation, use of ATG, GVHD prophylaxis), the stem cell source (dUCB versus 9/10) did not have any significant impact on OS (HR=0.92 (95% CI, 0.41–2.08); P=0.86) Conclusion. These data suggest that dUCB is likely a valid alternative graft source compared to 9/10 mismatched unrelated donors in the setting of RIC allo-SCT since both donor types showed similar results in terms of OS, PFS, disease relapse, and acute GVHD incidence. However, the significantly lower incidence of extensive chronic GVHD in the dUCB group is an important and major finding, highlighting the need for a prospective randomized study in this field. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5781-5781
Author(s):  
Uday Deotare ◽  
David Loach ◽  
Fotios V. Michelis ◽  
Dennis D. Kim ◽  
Santhosh Thyagu ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction:Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD) is a frequent complication of Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplants (allo-HCT); aGVHD, especially Grade III-IV, can be lethal with increased morbidity and mortality and can occur in upto 40-50% of allo-HCT. GVHD prophylaxis has been used for control of GVHD, with use of calcineurin inhibitors, anti-metabolites and anti T cell antibodies. Use of Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has recently been used extensively in haplo-identical transplant setting with promising results. However, PtCy has mainly been used in patients with BM as the stem cell source. In those patients with PBSC as the stem cell source, alone PTCy has been associated with clinically significant acute and chronic GVHD. As most of our patients use PBSC as the graft source, we hypothesized to combine both ATG and PTCy to reduce incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD in our patient cohort. Here we present a small cohort data using a combination of all these agents to effectively reduce aGVHD in hematological malignancies.. Methods:A total of 28 patients with hematological malignancies, who had an unrelated donor underwent allo-HCT at our center from 1 Oct 2015 to 31 Mar 2016. The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. The conditioning regimen was either myeloablative (MAC, namely FBT400) or Reduced Intensity (RIC, namely FBT200) in patients with age ≤ 60 and >60 years, respectively. After interim analysis when increased non-hematological toxicity was observed in the MAC arm, all patients subsequently received FBT 200 conditioning. Peripheral blood was used as the stem cell source in all patients. Filgrastim was used from day +7 onwards for 13 patients. Special emphasis was given to incidence of acute GVHD, infections, regimen related toxicities and engraftment. Results:Out of total of 28 patients, aGVHD was seen in only 6 (21.4%) patients, five of which had skin involvement (Grade I-II) and one suspected liver involvement (Grade III), all of which responded rapidly to steroids. However, we did observe increased toxicities such as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (32%), bacterial infections (68%) and viral infections (46%; CMV reactivations in 64%). Primary disease relapse, secondary graft failure and EBV reactivations were seen in 10% of cases, with documented Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) in only 2 patients. The overall survival of the entire cohort was 67.8% with a median duration of 6 months (range; 3-8 months). In comparison to MAC, RIC regimen was found to be superior with no Gr III-IV aGVHD, less toxicity and improved survival (RIC-82% vs MAC-45%). Conclusions: Combination of ATG-PTCy-CsA is an effective strategy to reduce aGVHD in unrelated donor transplants, albeit with moderate increase in toxicities. RIC with this combination was associated with less organ damage and superior survival. However, a long term follow up is needed to assess relapse and cGVHD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1205-1205
Author(s):  
Bronwen E Shaw ◽  
Jane Apperley ◽  
Nigel H. Russell ◽  
Charles F. Craddock ◽  
Effie Liakopoulou ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1205 Poster Board I-227 The use of GSCF-mobilised Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) for unrelated donor (UD) transplantation has increased dramatically since 2000. The association of PBSC with more rapid engraftment and with an increase in chronic Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD), compared to bone marrow (BM) has been reported in a number of studies. More recently the use of PBSC has been associated with an increase in non relapse mortality (NRM) and decrease in survival (OS) in T-cell replete transplants. We have previously reported outcome data in 145 patients who received an unrelated donor transplant for leukaemia. In that study we reported an increase in mild acute GvHD using PBSC, but no other significant differences in outcome. We have now doubled the cohort and report our findings on 320 patients here. In this group all of the patients received pre-transplant serotherapy (Alemtuzumab = 306, ATG = 14) as part of myeloablative conditioning prior to an HLA-matched UD allograft. Patients were transplanted between January 2000 and August 2007: CML in 1CP (n=102) and acute leukaemia in CR1/2 (AML in 105, ALL in 144). 190 patients received BM and 130 PBSC. The median age of the recipients was 28.9 years (10months - 58years). There was no significant difference in age between those receiving BM or PBSC.98% and 96% of patients receiving PBSC and BM achieved neutrophil engraftment (NS), with a significantly faster time to engraftment in recipients of PBSC compared to BM (14 vs 20 days; p<0.001). The incidence of acute GvHD was significantly higher in recipients of PBSC (64%) compared to BM (51%; p=0.022), however there was no increase in grade III/IV (p=0.420) disease in PBSC recipients. The incidence of chronic GvHD at 6 years was 61% in the BM recipients and 55% in the PBSC recipients (NS), with no difference in the incidence of extensive disease. The 5-years OS was 55% in BM recipients, with a median follow-up of 59 months, compared to 54% in PBSC recipients at a median follow-up of 38 months (NS). The incidence of neither disease relapse nor NRM was significantly different between groups (relapse at 5 years: BM 44%, PBSC 36%; p=0.112, and NRM at 5 years: BM 22%, PBSC 24%; p=0.751). In view of the fact that there were more CML patients in the BM group and more AML patients who received PBSC (the distribution of ALL patients was similar) (p=0.051), we performed a subgroup analysis. The pattern of results for each outcome, dependant on the use of BM or PBSC, in patients with CML and those with acute leukaemia were similar to those reported in the group overall. In conclusion, we have confirmed the results of our previous smaller study, showing the only significant difference in clinical outcome between PBSC and BM to be a higher incidence in the occurrence (but not grade) of acute GvHD. We found no association between the use of PBSC and an increased risk of chronic GVHD or of a worse transplant outcome, when compared to BM. We suggest that either stem cell source can be used with a similar outcome in adult and paediatric recipients of T-cell depleted allografts for standard risk leukaemia. Disclosures: Apperley: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4540-4540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Y. Detrait ◽  
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽  
Valerie Dubois ◽  
Françoise Dufossé ◽  
Myriam Labalette ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4540 Introduction The impact of HLA DRB3 and DRB4 allele mismatch after allogeneic HSCT using unrelated donors is unclear. We therefore examined retrospectively the outcome of 35 patients who received HLA-10/10 unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch between 2005 and 2011. This cohort of 35 patients was a part of a cohort of 132 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT between 2005–2011 with a 10/10-HLA matched donor. There were 18 males (51.4%) and 17 females (48.6%) with a median age of 48 years (range, 6–64), there were 13 (37%) AML, 9 (26%) ALL, 4 (11.5%) MDS, 3 (8.5%) multiple myeloma and 6 (5.7%) other (CML, CLL, NHL). Twenty patients (57%) received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 15 (43%) received a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). At transplantation, 21 patients (60%) were in complete remission (CR), 4 patients (11.5%) in partial remission (PR) and 10 (28.5%) in relapse; 13 (37%) patients received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and 22 (63%) received bone marrow (BM). Twelve (34%) patients had a mismatched DRB4 donor and 23 (66%) patients had a mismatched DRB3 donor. In the remains of 97 patients, there were 55 male (57%) and 42 female (43%), 28 (29%) patients received a MAC and 69 (71%) a RIC as regimen before allogeneic HSCT. The stem cell source was BM for 32 (34%) patients and PBSC for 65 (66%). At transplantation, 34 (35%) patients are in CR and 63 (65%) were in PR. The distribution of diagnosis was acute leukaemia and MDS for 44 (45%), CLL for 2 (2.5%) and other diagnosis (aplastic anemia, NHL, CML, MPS) for 51 patients (52.5%). Results After HSCT, 124 (94%) patients engrafted. After a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range, 0–76), the cumulative incidence of acute GvHD≥2 at 3 months was 20% (95%CI,16.5–24) and the cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at one year was 19 % (95%CI, 15–22). In univariate analysis, the mismatch DRB3 or DRB4 had no effect on engraftment and no effect on acute GvHD (p=0.08) or chronic GvHD (p=0.63). There was no impact of DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch on relapse (p=0.33 and p=0.53, respectively) and on PFS (p=0.63 and p=0.07, respectively). We found an impact of the DRB4 mismatching (p=0.016) on overall survival. The median survival for patient without DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch was 23 months (14-NR), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 32 months (12-NR), and for DRB4 mismatched patients 5 months (3-NR). The probability of survival at 24 months, for patients without mismatch DRB3 or DRB4 is 47% (36–61), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 51% (32–82) and for DRB4 mismatched patients 19% (6–66%). (figure1). The multivariate analysis that studied age, type of disease, DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch, sexmatching, TBI, ATG, disease status at transplantation and type of conditioning and stem cell source showed a significant impact of mismatch DRB4 on survival (HR= 2.5 [95%CI, 1.2–5.5] p=0.019); there was no impact for DRB3 mismatch (HR= 1.3 (95%CI,0.5–3.9 p=0.58). We found also an impact of the DRB4 mismatch on TRM (HR= 3.5; [95%CI, 1.6 –8] p= 0.026). The incidence of TRM at 24 months for patients without DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch is 29% (24–34), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 17% (9–26%) and for DRB4 mismatched patients 50% (34–66%). (figure 2). Conclusion The HLA DRB4 matching donor is relevant for survival of patients who undergo allo-HSCT from unrelated donor in the HLA-10/10 matching settings. In view of the important impact of these loci mismatches on clinical outcome, it seems to be important to consider this matching loci in the unrelated donor selection. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 148-148
Author(s):  
Giorgia Battipaglia ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Rose-Marie Hamladji ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
...  

Introduction. In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from an HLA-identical matched sibling donor (MSD), use of cyclosporine A in association with methotrexate has been the main graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategy. Addition of antithymocyte globulin (ATG), especially when using peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as source, has also been shown to favor lower rates of chronic GVHD. More recently, use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) in the haploidentical setting resulted in low incidences of both acute and chronic GVHD. Its use has therefore been subsequently reported in other donor settings, including MSD. The aim of our study was to compare GVHD prophylaxis containing either PTCY or ATG in patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia and undergoing allo-HSCT from a MSD. Methods. This was a retrospective study from the EBMT registry. Included were adult patients undergoing their first allo-HSCT during the period 2008-2018 and who were in complete remission at time of allo-HSCT. Results. Globally, 197 and 1,913 patients receiving either PTCY or ATG, respectively, were identified who fulfilled inclusion criteria. Patients in the PTCY group were younger (median age 47 versus 54 years, p&lt;0.01) and had undergone allo-HSCT more recently (median year of allo-HSCT: 2015 versus 2014, p&lt;0.01). Peripheral blood was the more frequently used stem cell source, this being significantly more frequent in the ATG group (95% versus 70%) than in the PTCY group (p&lt;0.01). The conditioning regimen was more frequently myeloablative in the PTCY group (59% versus 48% in the ATG group, p&lt;0.01). Cyclosporine-A alone was the most used systemic immunosuppressive agent associated with either PTCY (22%) or ATG (28%), while 34% and 29% of patients in the ATG group and 7% and 12% in the PTCY group also received either methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil along with cyclosporine A. No statistical differences were observed for incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at 100 days after allo-HSCT, this being 19% versus 17% in the PTCY and ATG groups, respectively (p=0.81). On the other hand, a significantly higher incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years was observed with the use of PTCY (37% versus 30%, p&lt;0.02) and for extensive chronic GVHD (16% versus 12%, p&lt;0.01) as compared to ATG. There was no impact of conditioning intensity on GVHD incidence. No statistical differences were observed on univariate analysis for all other transplant outcomes, with a leukemia-free survival (LFS) of 55% versus 58%(p=0.75), overall survival (OS) of 64% versus 65% (p=0.61), GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) of 44% versus 49% (p=0.19), relapse incidence (RI) of 36% versus 32% (p=0.56) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 8% versus 10% (p=0.78). Of note, the cumulative incidences of death due to GVHD were 4.4% and 4% in the PTCY and ATG groups, respectively (p=0.53). Also, there were no differences between the 2 groups for death due to infections: 6% in the PTCY group and 6.3% in the ATG group, respectively (p=0.49). On multivariate analysis, these results were confirmed, with a higher risk of chronic GVHD of any grade (HR=1.41, 95%CI 1.03-1.92; p&lt;0.01) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR=1.68, 95%CI, 1.07-2.62; p&lt;0.01) with PTCY, and no differences with respect to the other outcomes. We also observed that, regardless of the use of PTCY or ATG, use of PBSC was associated with lower RI (HR=0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89; p&lt;0.01), higher LFS (HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95; p&lt;0.03), and OS (HR=0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99; p&lt;0.05). On the other hand, we found no statistical differences in terms of both acute GVHD (HR=0.73, 95%CI, 0.48-1.12; p=0.15) and chronic GVHD (HR=0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.21; p=0.33) according to stem cell source. These results were also confirmed in a matched-pair analysis. Conclusion. In conclusion, our results highlight that in the HLA-identical sibling setting, the use of ATG provides similar outcomes to those seen with PTCY except for chronic GVHD for which a protective effect of ATG is confirmed as previously reported by different other studies. Disclosures Blaise: Sanofi: Honoraria; Molmed: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pierre Fabre medicaments: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Chevallier:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Socie:Alexion: Consultancy. Mohty:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2202-2202
Author(s):  
Herbert G. Sayer ◽  
Lars-Olof Mügge ◽  
Sebastian Scholl ◽  
Anne Klink ◽  
Kristina Schilling ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Acute GvHD has, despite established immunosuppressive prophylaxis regimens, significant impact on acute morbidity and mortality following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In the unrelated or even non-matched unrelated situation new GvHD-prophylaxis regimens balancing GvHD and graft-versus-leukaemia effect are needed. EC-MPS and mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] are effective immunosuppressants by inhibition of T- and B-cell proliferation. Primary study aims in this ethical board approved, prospective, single-centre, open phase II trial were (1) feasibility of prolongatedly started oral EC-MPS and (2) reduction in the rate of GvHD in unrelated allogeneic SCT. Patients and Methods: EC-MPS [Myfortic ®] 720 mg twice a day orally starting at day +10 after SCT in addition to standard GvHD prophylaxis, consisting of cyclosporine (CSA) 3 mg/kg continuous intravenous infusion with or without methotrexate (MTX) 15 mg/m2 day +1 and 10 mg/m2 day +3,+6,+11 intravenous push, was evaluated. According to the protocol, EC-MPS was tapered from day +40, if no acute GvHD-signs were present. 54 patients, including 8 patients from a previous pilot trial, with advanced haematological malignancies (n=28) or in first remission of acute leukaemia (n=26) between 8/03 and 12/07 were evaluated. The patients had either a 10/10 HLA-matched (n=32) or a 8-9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated donor (n=22). 32 (59%) patients received 40 mg/kg antithymocyte globulin (ATG), with 8 Gray total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide (CY), or with fludarabine 120mg/m2, busulfan 8mg/kg or treosulfan 8–12 mg/kg. 12 or 8 Gray TBI and 120 mg/kg CY followed by MTX i.v. were administered to 22 (41%) patients. Results: A median of 5.7 (range: 0.9–9.9) unmanipulated G-CSF-mobilized CD-34 positive stem cells per kg were given on day 0. All of the 23 women and 31 men (median age 48 years (range: 20–65)), except one patient, showed a leukocyte engraftment on median day +14 (range: 9–35). Platelet engraftment was observed on median day +17 (range: 9–132). In 12 patients (22%) initially i.v. MMF (1g twice a day) instead of oral study medication was given temporarily, mostly due to severe mucositis. In six patients (11%) EC-MPS (on day +14, 17, 22, 32, 37, 76) had to be discontinued, due to severe nausea (n=2), neurological toxicity (n=2), graft failure (n=1) and protocol violation (n=1). Acute GvHD grade II-IV was observed in 27 (52%) patients, including 8 (15%) with grade III and 4 (7.5%) with grade IV. The incidence of chronic GvHD was 63 % (n=29) [limited chronic GvHD: 54 % (n=15), extended chronic GvHD: 14% (n=4)] of the 46 patients surviving &gt;100 days after SCT. With 10/10 HLA-matched donors GvHD grade II-IV was seen in 44% (n= 14) [grade III and IV n=5 (16%)], whereas with non fully-matched donors the incidence was 59 % (n=13) [grade III and IV n=7 (32%)]. Chronic GvHD incidence was 50% (14/28) in the fully matched donor situation in contrast to 83% (15/18) in the non-fully matched situation. The conditioning regimen with ATG resulted in a GvHD grade II-IV incidence of 39% (n=12) [GvHD grade III/IV: 19% (n=6)], compared to 68% (n=15) [GvHD grade III/IV: 27% (n=6)] without ATG. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range: 1–56) 28 patients (52%) are alive, 18 fully HLA-matched stem cell recipients (56%) and 10 mismatched HLA recipients (45%). Survival with or without ATG was 50% (n=16) and 55% (n=12), respectively. Twenty-six (48%) patients have died; 12 (22%) due to relapse, 10 (19%) due to acute/chronic GvHD, and 4 (7%) due to infection/secondary cancer without GvHD. Conclusions: EC-MPS with a 10 day prolongated start after transplantation combined with initial standard GvHD prophylaxis in the unrelated stem cell transplantation setting seems to be feasible. Mucositis was the main course for oral intake problems. The toxicity drop-out rate of 7 % should be considered. The analysis of all evaluable patients in the pilot and the prospective trial yielded effectiveness in reducing severe GvHD Grade III/IV, especially in combination with ATG. The MPS application regimen failed to show less incidence of chronic GvHD in the non-fully matched unrelated donor setting. GvHD prevention trials in the future should incorporate new drugs with a different pathway of T-cell inhibition or tolerance induction, respectively.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3335-3335
Author(s):  
John Koreth ◽  
Haesook T. Kim ◽  
Paulina B. Lange ◽  
Bhavjot Bindra ◽  
Philippe Armand ◽  
...  

Abstract In a phase I/II trial of a novel bortezomib-based regimen for reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients of HLA-mismatched peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts, we documented low rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM), with promising survival. In registry analyses, myeloablative conditioning (MAC) HSCT recipients of both HLA-matched (MUD) and 1-locus mismatched donor (MMUD) grafts also have impaired outcomes, with day +100 grade III-IV acute GVHD rates of 28% and 37% respectively, 1-year NRM of 36% and 45% respectively, 1-year progression-free (PFS) of 47% and 38% respectively, and 1-year overall survival (OS) of 52% and 43% respectively. We therefore evaluated a similar bortezomib-based regimen in MAC HSCT recipients lacking 8/8 HLA-matched (-A, -B, -C, -DRB1) related donors. In a prospective single-arm phase II trial, we enrolled patients with hematologic malignancies, aged 18-60 years, receiving MUD, MMUD, or mismatched related donor (MMRD) grafts. Myeloablative conditioning was IV busulfan (130 mg/m2, without PK dose adjustment) and fludarabine (40 mg/m2) once daily for 4 doses (days -7 to -4). T-replete PBSC grafts with ≥ 2x106 CD34+ cells/kg were infused on day 0. GVHD prophylaxis comprised bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 IV on days +1, +4, +7), methotrexate (15 mg/m2 IV on day +1, 10 mg/m2 on days +3, +6, +11) and tacrolimus from day -3, with a planned taper starting day +100 and complete by day +180. The primary endpoint was day +100 acute GVHD incidence. Secondary endpoints included NRM, relapse, PFS, OS and chronic GVHD at 1 year. The 34 patients (19 male, 15 female), accrued between March 2011 and November 2012, had a median age of 49 years (range, 21-60) and variable diagnoses (17 AML, 6 MDS, 4 NHL, 3 MPD, 2 ALL, 1 CML, 1 MM) and disease risk indices (Low 1, Intermediate 24, High 9). They received 8/8 MUD (n=14), 7/8 MMUD (n=18) or 7/8 MMRD (n=2) PBSC grafts. Mismatches (16 antigen-, 4 allele-level) involved HLA-A (9), -B (1), -C (6) and -DRB1 (4). The median follow up in survivors is 20 months (range, 7.2-25.5). The regimen was feasible and well tolerated. Mucositis was noted in the MAC recipients, but no doses were missed due to toxicity. Excluding 1 patient who died of sepsis prior to engraftment, neutrophil and platelet engraftment was prompt, at a median of 14 (range, 3-33) and 17 (range, 7-54) days respectively. Median day +30 donor chimerism was 99% (range, 90-100). Grade II-IV acute GVHD incidence by day +100 and +180 was 32% and 36% respectively, but only 18% and 21% respectively if upper GI GVHD (which had excellent long term outcomes) was excluded. Grade III-IV acute GVHD incidence by day +100 and +180 was 12%. 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM and relapse was 8.8% and 5.9% respectively. 2-year PFS and OS was 85% and 84% respectively (Figure). 2-year cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was 57%. For 8/8 MUD vs. 7/8 MMRD/MMUD, grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +180 was 30% vs. 40% (p=0.47) (excluding upper GI GVHD, 16% vs. 25%, p=0.42), and grade III-IV acute GVHD was 7% vs. 15% (p=0.48) respectively.FigureStudy SurvivalFigure. Study Survival In conclusion, bortezomib-based prophylaxis for MAC HSCT recipients of HLA-mismatched and unrelated donor grafts was safe and well-tolerated, with low rates of severe acute GVHD, NRM and relapse, and excellent long-term survival. On preliminary landmark analysis, upper GI GVHD did not appear to impair transplantation outcomes. Bortezomib-based prophylaxis is suitable for prospective randomized evaluation in myeloablative transplantation recipients lacking HLA-matched related donors. Disclosures: Koreth: Millennium pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Bortezomib for GVHD prophylaxis.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1150-1150
Author(s):  
Florent Mallard ◽  
Eolia Brissot ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Thierry Guillaume ◽  
Jacques Delaunay ◽  
...  

Abstract CsA is widely used as the backbone immunosuppressive agent for GVHD prevention after allo-SCT. Previous studies have demonstrated that the immunosuppressive effects of CsA (eg. inhibition of calcineurine in lymphocytes) may be correlated with CsA blood concentration, especially in the context of solid organ transplantation. This report aimed to investigate the impact of CsA concentrations in the early post allo- SCT period, on the incidence of severe acute GVHD, in 85 consecutive patients treated in a single centre between Jan. 2006 and Jan. 2008, and for whom CsA concentrations in the blood were monitored weekly after the start of infusion. 85 patients (45 males) received CsA (usually at 3 mg/Kg/d, 2 or 3 days prior to graft infusion) as a 24-h continuous infusion until hematopoietic recovery and switch to oral formulation. Dose modifications of CsA were performed to maintain adequate trough blood levels and to prevent nephrotoxicity. Patients’ and donors characteristics were as follow: median age: 51 (range, 18–67), 46 (54%) female donors, 33 (39%) myeloid malignancies, 49 (58%) lymphoid malignancies, and 3 cases of SAA. The stem cell source was PBSC in 66 (78%) patients, while bone marrow was used in 19 (22%) patients. 37 (43.5%) were transplanted from a matched related donor, and 48 (56.5%) from a matched unrelated donor. A myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 24 (28%) patients, and 61 (72%) received a reduced intensity regimen. The median concentrations of CsA in the blood at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after allo-SCT were 348 (range, 172–733), 284 (range, 137–535), 274 (range, 107–649), and 247 (37–695) ng/mL respectively. All patients engrafted at a median of 17 (range, 0–42) days after allo-SCT. With a median follow-up of 16 (range, 5–29) months, grade 2–4 acute GVHD occurred in 36 patients (42%) at a median of 29 (range, 6–100) days after allo-SCT. The incidence of severe grade 3–4 acute GVHD was 23% (95%CI, 14–32%). In this cohort, all acute GVHD risk factors (age, donor-recipient gender, CMV serostatus, ABO compatibility, diagnosis, disease status, stem cell source, donor type, conditioning regimen type, GVHD prophylaxis regimen, CsA concentrations) were assessed. In multivariate analysis, we found that higher whole-blood CsA concentration in the first week following graft infusion, and before onset of acute GVHD was the strongest parameter significantly associated with a reduced the risk of severe grade 3–4 acute GVHD (P=0.01; RR=0.24; 95%CI, 0.08–0.73). Despite its retrospective nature, these data strongly indicate a close relationship between CsA trough blood concentration during the early post allo-SCT period and the severity of acute GVHD. Inadequate or insufficient early exposures of CsA can be a serious risk for developing severe acute GVHD. Therefore, precise monitoring of CsA concentrations and achievement of a high CsA target concentration may be an effective tool to prevent the onset of severe acute GVHD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document