Effective Strategy to Prevent Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants By Using a Combination of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG), Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporine

Abstract Introduction:Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD) is a frequent complication of Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplants (allo-HCT); aGVHD, especially Grade III-IV, can be lethal with increased morbidity and mortality and can occur in upto 40-50% of allo-HCT. GVHD prophylaxis has been used for control of GVHD, with use of calcineurin inhibitors, anti-metabolites and anti T cell antibodies. Use of Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has recently been used extensively in haplo-identical transplant setting with promising results. However, PtCy has mainly been used in patients with BM as the stem cell source. In those patients with PBSC as the stem cell source, alone PTCy has been associated with clinically significant acute and chronic GVHD. As most of our patients use PBSC as the graft source, we hypothesized to combine both ATG and PTCy to reduce incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD in our patient cohort. Here we present a small cohort data using a combination of all these agents to effectively reduce aGVHD in hematological malignancies.. Methods:A total of 28 patients with hematological malignancies, who had an unrelated donor underwent allo-HCT at our center from 1 Oct 2015 to 31 Mar 2016. The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. The conditioning regimen was either myeloablative (MAC, namely FBT400) or Reduced Intensity (RIC, namely FBT200) in patients with age ≤ 60 and >60 years, respectively. After interim analysis when increased non-hematological toxicity was observed in the MAC arm, all patients subsequently received FBT 200 conditioning. Peripheral blood was used as the stem cell source in all patients. Filgrastim was used from day +7 onwards for 13 patients. Special emphasis was given to incidence of acute GVHD, infections, regimen related toxicities and engraftment. Results:Out of total of 28 patients, aGVHD was seen in only 6 (21.4%) patients, five of which had skin involvement (Grade I-II) and one suspected liver involvement (Grade III), all of which responded rapidly to steroids. However, we did observe increased toxicities such as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (32%), bacterial infections (68%) and viral infections (46%; CMV reactivations in 64%). Primary disease relapse, secondary graft failure and EBV reactivations were seen in 10% of cases, with documented Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) in only 2 patients. The overall survival of the entire cohort was 67.8% with a median duration of 6 months (range; 3-8 months). In comparison to MAC, RIC regimen was found to be superior with no Gr III-IV aGVHD, less toxicity and improved survival (RIC-82% vs MAC-45%). Conclusions: Combination of ATG-PTCy-CsA is an effective strategy to reduce aGVHD in unrelated donor transplants, albeit with moderate increase in toxicities. RIC with this combination was associated with less organ damage and superior survival. However, a long term follow up is needed to assess relapse and cGVHD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) with Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) Effectively Reduces the Severe (Grade III-IV) Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) When Compared to ATG Alone in Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3430.3430 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3430-3430 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Uday Deotare ◽

David Loach ◽

Fotios V. Michelis ◽

Dennis D. Kim ◽

Santhosh Thyagu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Cell Source ◽

Grade Iii ◽

Severe Grade

Abstract Introduction: Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD) is a frequent complication of Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplants (allo-HCT). It can be lethal with increased morbidity and mortality and can occur in upto 40-50% of allo-HCT. Various agents such as calcineurin inhibitors, anti-metabolites and anti T cell antibodies, have been variably used for GVHD prophylaxis. Use of Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has recently been used extensively in haplo-identical transplant setting with promising results, but has mainly been used in patients with BM as a stem cell source. In those patients receiving PBSC as a stem cell source, PTCy alone could reduce the risk of acute and chronic GVHD significantly. Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) has been associated with decrease in chronic but not acute GVHD. As most of our patients use PBSC as a graft source, we hypothesized that combination of ATG and PTCy can reduce the incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD. Since we had also used ATG for GVHD prophylaxis in a historical cohort, we compared the results of this approach with the current GVHD prophylaxis regimen. Methods: A total of 28 patients with hematological malignancies, who had an unrelated donor underwent allo-HCT at our center from 1 Oct 2015 to 31 Mar 2016. After interim analysis, when increased non-hematological toxicity was observed with myeloablative conditioning, all patients subsequently received reduced intensity conditioning. Peripheral blood was used as a stem cell source in all patients. The GVHD prophylaxis consisted of a combination of ATG-PTCy-CsA, with rabbit ATG administered on Days -3 (0.5 mg/Kg), -2 (2 mg/Kg) and -1 (2 mg/Kg), PTCy at dose of 50 mg/kg on Days +3 and +4 and CsA from Day+5 onwards. Filgrastim was used from day +7 onwards for 13 patients. Emphasis was given to incidence of acute GVHD, especially Steroid Refractory (SR-GVHD). Results: Out of total of 28 patients, aGVHD was seen in 6 (21.4%) patients, five of which had skin involvement (Grade I- II) and one suspected liver involvement (Grade III), all of which responded rapidly to steroids with no cases of SR-GVHD. Secondary graft failure and EBV reactivations; each were seen in 10% of cases. Primary disease relapse was seen in 3 patients, two of which had minimal residual disease prior to transplantation. These results were then compared to the historical cohort of 27 patients who received a combination of ATG-CsA plus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMf) (Table 1). The incidence of acute GVHD was 26% vs 22% (p=0.99), with severe Grade III-IV aGVHD of 4% vs 20% (p=0.085) in the ATG-PTCy-CsA and ATG-CsA-MMf cohorts, respectively; both were statistically not signifcant. There were five patients with SR-GVHD in the ATG-CsA-MMf cohort and none in the current GVHD prophylaxis arm. In the historical cohort, the main cause of death in 7 out of 11 patients was severe GVHD as compared to 1 out of 9 in the ATG-PTCy-CsA cohort. Conclusions: Combination of ATG-PTCy-CsA is an effective strategy to reduce aGVHD; especially severe Grade III-IV and doesnot increase the risk of SR-GVHD, in unrelated donor transplants as compared to ATG-CsA-MMf. However, a long term follow up is needed to assess relapse and cGVHD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Family Mismatched Donor Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: A Retrospective Analysis of the EBMT Chronic Leukaemia Working Party

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4655.4655 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4655-4655 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kavita Raj ◽

Eduardo Olavarria ◽

Diderik-Jan Eikema ◽

Liesbeth C de Wreede ◽

Linda Koster ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Cell Source ◽

Mismatched Donor

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a treatment option for patients with advanced myelofibrosis. Problems encountered include an increased risk of delayed or poor engraftment and in the mismatched unrelated donor setting a higher rate of GVHD and particularly poor outcomes. As for other indications for allogeneic stem cell transplants, patients for whom either a matched sibling or matched unrelated donor is not available are considered for either a double umbilical cord blood, a mismatched unrelated donor or haploidentical stem cell transplant. Data on the latter option are limited and we reviewed registry data on all family mismatched donor transplants performed between 2001 and 2015 and reported to the EBMT registry. Results: Records retrieved 69 patients with myelofibrosis transplanted between November 2001 and November 2015. 44 (64%) were male. 50 (74%) had primary myelofibrosis,18 (27%) had secondary myelofibrosis (6 from ET, 5 from PRV and 7 others) and unknown 1(2%). Of 25 patients for whom the JAK2 V617F mutation status was known, 15 (22%) harboured the mutation. Patient Karnofsky performance status was > 70% in 98%. Of the mismatched family donors, 47 (68%) were male and 22 (31%) female. Donors were HLA mismatched at 1 locus in 12 (17%) and 2 or more loci in 48 (69%). Donor-recipient serology combinations were CMV -/- in 8 (12%), +/- in 4 (6%), -/+ in 15 (22%) and +/+ in 34 (49%) missing 8 (12%). Bone marrow was the stem cell source in 34 (49%) and peripheral blood in 35 (51%). The median total nucleated cell count (TNC) infused was 7.5x108/kg (range 2.3-21x108/kg) from data available in 17 patients. The median CD34+ cell dose was 6.9x106/kg (range 1.9-18.18x106/kg) from data available in 19 patients. Conditioning was myeloablative in 48 (70%) and RIC in 21 (30%) The conditioning regimes were varied but the predominant ones were Fludarabine, Busulphan, ATG (FBATG) and Thiotepa, Busulphan, Fludarabine (TBF). TBI was administered in 8 (12%) and in vivo T cell depletion in 22 (32%), ex-vivo T cell depletion in 5 (7%) patients. GVHD prophylaxis varied with post transplant Cyclophosphamide administered in 34/67 (49%) and ATG in 19/67 patients (28%). Neutrophil engraftment was established in 53 (82%) at a median of 20 days (range 11-83). Primary graft failure occurred in 8 (12%) and secondary graft failure in 4 (6%). This occurred at a median of 12 months (range 4.5-35 months). Eleven of these patients had a second allograft at a mean interval of 6.4 months. Responses to the first allograft (censoring for patients who had a second allograft) with data available in 45 patients, showed that complete remission was achieved in 35 patients (78%), 6 (13%) were never in CR and 4 (9%) were not evaluable. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD at 100 days was 12% (95% CI 4-21%) and for grade III-IV acute GvHD at 100 days it was 5% (95% CI 3-11%). Data for chronic GVHD was valid in 49 patients. The cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at 2 years was 62% (95% CI 47-76%). The cumulative incidence of limited cGvHD was 45% (95% CI 31-59%) whereas the cumulative incidence of extensive cGvHD was 10% (95% CI 2-19%). The median follow up was 24 months (95% CI 13-35 months). The 2-year OS was 51% (95% CI 37-76%) and the 5-year OS was 38% (95% CI 21-55%). The 2-year RFS was 44% (95% CI 30-59%) and the 5-year RFS was 31% (95% CI 15-48%). The 2 year cumulative incidence of relapse was 14% (95% CI 5-24%). The 2 year NRM was 41% (95% CI 28-55%), which increased to 54% (95% CI 37-72%) at 5 years. The main causes of death were infection (16, 24%), GVHD (7, 10%) organ damage or failure (3, 5%), relapse/disease progression (1, 2%) and secondary malignancy or PTLD (1, 2%). On univariate analysis there was no significant effect of recipient gender, donor gender, degree of HLA mismatch 1 vs >1 Ag MM, CMV matching between donor and recipient, primary or secondary MF, disease stage at transplant (chronic versus advanced phase), conditioning intensity, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis with ATG or post transplant cyclophosphamide or stem cell source on overall survival. Conclusion: Concerns regarding engraftment and secondary graft failure have excluded patients with myelofibrosis from clinical trials of mismatched related donor transplant. The data suggest that engraftment is feasible, and PFS and OS can be attained with limited severe chronic GVHD with family mismatched donors in this setting. Disclosures Ciceri: MolMed SpA: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation From Unrelated Donors in Multiple Myeloma: A Study from the Italian Bone Marrow Transplantation Donor Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2009.2009 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2009-2009

Author(s):

Benedetto Bruno ◽

Roberto Passera ◽

Francesca Patriarca ◽

Francesca Bonifazi ◽

Vittorio Montefusco ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Bone Marrow Transplantation ◽

Marrow Transplantation ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Disease Status ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Cell Source ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Abstract 2009 To evaluate the role of allografting from unrelated donors in the treatment of myeloma we conducted a retrospective study through the Italian Bone Marrow Transplantation Donor Registry. Overall, from 2000 through 2009, 196 myeloma patients, median age 51 years (32–67), for a total of 199 allografts, were transplanted from an unrelated donor at 34 Centers in Italy. Fifty-two (28.1%%), 69 (37.3%), and 64 (34.6%) patients were prepared for transplant with a myeloablative, a reduced-intensity and a non-myeloablative conditioning respectively. Patient characteristics of the 3 cohorts are reported in Table 1.ConditioningMyeloablativeReduced-intensityNon-myeloablativePatient number (%)52/185 (28)69/185 (37)64/185 (35)Median Age455355Previous therapy lines < 2 (%)23 (27)33 (38)30 (35)Previous therapy lines ≥ 2 (%)29 (29)36 (37)34 (34)Stem Cell Source BM (%)24 (57)18 (43)0 (0)Stem Cell Source PBSC (%)28 (19)51 (36)64 (45) Cumulative incidence of acute grade II-IV graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) was 46.4% whereas chronic GVHD was 45.1%. There was no difference in GVHD incidence among the 3 cohorts defined by type of conditioning. Complete and partial remissions in patients who survived at least 3 months post-transplant were 27% and 28% for an overall response rate of 55%. At a median follow up of 32 (0–118) months post-transplant, in the entire study population, median OS from diagnosis was 70.6 months while OS and EFS from the allograft were 18.9 and 14.9 months. Overall, the cumulative incidence of transplant related mortality (TRM) was 29.6% at 1 year and 32.4% at 5 years post-transplant. OS from diagnosis and EFS from transplant were 70.6 and 28.2 months; 66.8 and 9.1 months; and 111.9 and 22.4 months in patients who respectively underwent a myeloablative, a reduced-intensity and a non-myeloablative transplant. One-year and 5-year TRM was 33.3% and 35.7%, 32.2% and 34.4%, and 22.1% and 26.5% respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses, assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, were performed for the following variables: number of previous chemotherapy lines (1,2 vs. ≥3), disease status at transplant, HLA- matched antigens (10/10 vs. 9/10 vs. ≤8/10), recipient/donor gender combinations, hematopoietic cell source (peripheral blood vs. bone marrow), conditioning (myeloablative vs. reduced-intensity vs. non-myeloablative), use of anti-thymoglobulin in the conditioning, acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, best response post-transplant, year of transplant (2000–02 vs. 2003–05vs. 2006–09). By univariate analysis, lower number of chemotherapy lines before the allograft, disease status at transplant, a fully HLA-identical donor, the use of peripheral hematopoietic cells rather than bone marrow were statistically significant variables for better OS whereas disease status at transplant, a fully HLA-identical donor, chronic GVHD (either limited or extensive) were statistically significant for better EFS. However, by multivariate analysis, only the development of chronic GVHD (HR 0.50; p<0.001) and a better response post-transplant (HR 2.11; p<0.03) were significantly associated with longer OS whereas chronic GVHD was the only variable associated with better EFS (HR 0.32; p<0.001). Acute GVHD was associated with both poorer OS (HR 2.35; p<0.001)) and EFS (HR 3.19; p<0.001). In conclusion, with a degree of caution given the retrospective nature of this study, there appears to be a strong association between both limited and extensive chronic GVHD and graft-vs.-myeloma effects. However, long term disease control remains an issue independent of the conditioning employed. Prospective trials may allow to define which patient category may most benefit from an unrelated donor allograft. Disclosures: Patriarca: Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Schering-Plough: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Cytokine Release Syndrome after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111173 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3367-3367

Author(s):

Laura Solán ◽

Elena Landete ◽

Rebeca Bailén ◽

Nieves Dorado ◽

Pascual Balsalobre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Diagnosis And Management ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Cell Source ◽

Grade Ii

Abstract Introduction: Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) is a systemic inflammatory response síndrome related to aberrant immune activation or immune hyperstimulation, leading to elevated cytokine levels (including IL-6, interferon-γ, IL-2) and inflammation. CRS has been described after infusion of T-repleted haploidentical progenitors in post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based conditioning regimens. We analyzed the outcomes of 144 T cell-repleted transplants with PTCy (days +3, +4), MMF and CsA as GVHD prophylaxis in our institution. Patients and methods: A total of 105 haplo-HSCT and 39 HLA-identical HSCT (19 and 20 from sibling and unrelated donor, respectively) with PTCy were analyzed retrospectively in 141 consecutive patients from 2010 to 2017. Two patients with haplo-HSCT were excluded, one due to early death on day +1 and other for lack of information. CRS was defined and graduated according to Lee et al. criteria published in 2014.1 Chi-squared test was used to study the association of different qualitative clinical variables and CRS and Mann-Whitney U test for the association between CRS and total nucleated cells (TNC) infused. The determination of the best cut-off of TNC to stratify patients with CRS was performed with ROC curves. The stadistical program used was R v2.15.0. Results: The characteristics of the 142 transplants analyzed are shown in Table 1. CRS occurred in 77% of haplo-HSCT (79/103) and in 18% of identical HSCT (7/39). Most patients with CRS presented sings and symptoms in the first 24 hours after the infusión.The majority was grade 1. Only 5 patients who underwent haplo-HCT showed grade 2 CRS. They needed vasoactive drug, oxygen therapy (without mechanical ventilation) and low doses of corticosteroids. Of those 5 patients, 4 were lymphomas with a previous autologous transplant. The stem cell source of the 5 patients was peripheral blood (PB). We did not have cases of grades 3-4 CRS. No patient required Tocilizumab. The clinical and analytical characteristics of CRS are shown in Table 2. In the univariate analysis, the use of PB was significantly associated with the development of CRS (p = 0.001). No statistical association was found with other variables (underlying disease, disease status, cryopreserved product, previous autologous or allogeneic transplant, conditioning, age, sex, CD34 infused, etc.). In the haplo-HSCT cohort, patients who presented CRS showed higher content of TNC infused (median (range): 9.1 (1.17-18.77) vs. 6.9 (0.63-26) x108 / kg, p = 0.023). The best cut-off of TNC calculated was 6.02 x108 / kg (S 82%, E 47%, p = 0.02).CI of CRS in patients with TNC greater than 6.02x108 / kg was 84% compared to 53% in lower (HR 6.6, p = 0.0099, Figure1). Patients with CRS developed grade II-IV acute GVHD more frequently than those who did not present CRS (60% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.012). No association was observed between CRS and chronic GVHD, relapse, non relapse mortality, overal survival or event free survival. Conclusion: CRS appears more frequently in patients with haplo-HSCT compared to HLA-identical donors using PTCy and PB as stem cell source. In our experience, cases with grades 3-4 CRS are infrequent. The majority of CRS cases remit after PTCy and progress well with symptomatic treatment. In the haplo-HSCT cohort, the number of cells infused is associated with higher incidence of CRS and with the presentation of EICRa grade II-IV.Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome How I Treat Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood. 2014; 124(2):188-195. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-552729 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of Stem Cell Source in Recipients of T-Cell Depleted Myeloablative Transplants for Leukaemia: No Difference in Mortality Using BM or PBSC.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.46.46 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 46-46

Author(s):

B.E. Shaw ◽

Nigel H. Russell ◽

A. Pagliuca ◽

J. Apperley ◽

G. Cook ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Cell Source ◽

The Impact

Abstract The use of GSCF-mobilised Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) for unrelated donor (UD) transplantation has increased dramatically since 2000. The association of PBSC with more rapid engraftment and with an increase in chronic Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD), compared to bone marrow (BM) has been reported in a number of studies. More recently the use of PBSC has been associated with an increase in transplant related mortality (TRM) and decrease in survival (OS) in T-cell replete transplants. We sought to analyse the impact of PBSC compared to BM in a cohort of UD transplant recipients, where T-cell depleting agents (in-vivo campath in >90%) were included in the transplant conditioning. The study included 145 patients transplanted between January 2000 and March 2006: CML- 35 in 1CP; acute leukaemia (AML in 61, ALL in 49)-110 in CR1 or 2. All had myeloablative conditioning regimens and received grafts with 9–10/10 matched HLA alleles. 86 patients received BM and 59 PBSC. There were no associations between the stem cell source and any transplant variable (including disease and stage). There was a trend to an increased use of PBSC in patients with a single antigen mismatch (p=0.052). All evaluable patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, with a significantly faster time to engraft in recipients of PBSC compared to BM (16 vs 20 days; p=0.0003). The incidence of acute GvHD was 46% (grade I in 50%, II in 41%, III in 8%, IV in 2%). This was significantly higher in recipients of PBSC (60%) compared to BM (36%; p=0.006), however there was no increase in either II/IV (p=0.69) or III/IV (p=0.18) disease in PBSC recipients. In univariate analysis, the presence of a single HLA mismatch (p=0.026) was the only other variable to be associated with an increase in acute GvHD. In a logistic regression model including both these variables, the use of PBSC remained significantly associated with an increase in aGvHD (OR=2.3; 95% CI 1.1,4.7;p=0.020). The TRM was 14%, 27% and 39% at 100 days, 1 and 5 years respectively. At none of these time points was the stem cell source associated with a significant difference in TRM. The 5-year incidence of chronic GvHD was 58% (BM 55%, PBSC 60%; NS), extensive disease in one third, and of relapse was 61% (BM 60%, PBSC 62%; NS). The 5-years OS was 41% with a median follow-up of 3.4 years (0.5–7.1). This was 44% using PBSC and 40% using BM (NS). In conclusion, although we observed an increase in acute GVHD with PBSC this was only of grade 1 disease. We found no association between the use of PBSC and an increased risk of chronic GVHD or of a worse transplant outcome, when compared to BM, in recipients of T-cell depleted myeloablative transplants for leukaemia.

Download Full-text

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Haploidentical Transplantation Using a Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC), T Cell Replete Approach Proves Both Efficacious and Well Tolerated In a Range of Haematological Malignancies.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4584.4584 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4584-4584

Author(s):

John Laurie ◽

Andrew Hodson ◽

Tamara Elston ◽

Carol Black ◽

Ophelia Manwaring ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Viral Loads ◽

Haploidentical Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Cell Source ◽

Relapse Rates ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract Abstract 4584 Haploidentical transplantation is an option for patients who do not have a timely identifiable sibling or volunteer unrelated donor (VUD). Benefits of this stem cell source include donor availability, highly motivated donors and the ability to select the best donor from several relatives taking: age/fitness, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, ABO group and natural killer cell alloreactivity into account. Historically the high level of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity led to increased graft failure and high rates of acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). Luznik et al (Blood 2001) demonstrated that the use of post stem cell return cyclophosphamide in RIC haploidentical transplantation (using bone marrow as a stem cell source) reduced acute and chronic GVHD to acceptable levels, but at the expense of higher relapse rates in their cohort. We postulated that the use of PBSC's with their inherently higher T cell complement would reduce relapse rates compared to bone marrow, whilst post cell return cyclophosphamide would reduce acute and chronic GVHD. We present 5 patients treated at our centre using a RIC T cell replete haploidentical transplant protocol utilising PBSC's and post cell return cyclophosphamide. The patients, (median age 51; range 44–58), were treated for: relapsed follicular non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), secondary acute myeloid leukaemia, Mycosis Fungoides and Adult T-Cell Leukaemia/Lymphoma (ATLL). Four patients had received 1st line chemotherapy only and remained chemotherapy sensitive, 3 of whom were in complete remission, one in a partial response. None had undergone a previous transplant. The NHL patient was chemotherapy insensitive following 4 previous lines of chemotherapy, a splenectomy and 2 rejected sibling allografts. Three patients were a major ABO mismatch, the remaining 2 fully matched. Four patients were CMV +/+ and 1 mismatched. HLA disparity ranged from 2–5 alleles (2 and 3 patients respectively). Median CD34+ cell dose returned was 6.98×106 cells/kg (range 4.81–8.00), with a median CD3+ cell dose of 2.36×108 cells/kg (range 1.19–2.97). The conditioning regime used was that of Luznik et al's (Blood 2001) phase I trial: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 day -6 to -2, cyclophosphamide 14.5mg/kg day -6 to -5, total body irradiation 2 Gray day -1, post stem cell cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg day +3 to +4, tacrolimus 1mg IV day +5 onwards, mycophenolate mofetil 15mg/kg TDS day +5 to +35. Outcomes: Four of 5 (80%) patients were fully donor chimeric by day 28 however graft failure with autologous reconstitution due to previously undetected HLA antibodies occurred in 1 patient. This patient reconstituted autologous neutrophils and platelets at 15 and 26 days respectively. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 16.5 days (range 14–17) and 12 days (range 11–14) respectively. All 5 patients reactivated CMV (the latest at day 112). With pre-emptive treatment however none developed CMV disease. The incidence of acute GVHD grade II – IV and grade III - IV by day 100 was 40% and 20% respectively. Limited chronic GVHD was seen in 3 patients. 2 were assessed as grade I-II and 1 patient grade III. All cases of acute and chronic GVHD were steroid responsive. In both ATLL patients a sustained suppression of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) viral loads was observed post transplant. One patient subsequently died of sepsis at day 113, the patient who had rejected their graft went on to relapse. The remaining 3 patients continue in CR, performance status 0, currently at day 245, 280 and 438. This data shows that RIC T cell replete haploidentical transplantation using PBSC's is well tolerated and enables both early engraftment and full donor chimerism. The rates of acute and chronic GVHD (40 and 60%) are comparable to sibling and fully matched unrelated donors. All of which has resulted in 60% of patients remaining in CR, including both ATLL patients who have gone on to fully suppress their HTLV viral loads. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Outcome After 9/10 Mismatched Unrelated Donor or Cord Blood Cells Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) in the Setting of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.956.956 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 956-956

Author(s):

Florent Malard ◽

Sabine Furst ◽

Marion Loirat ◽

Patrice Chevallier ◽

Jean El-Cheikh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Blood Cells ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Group Versus ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Cell Source ◽

Unrelated Donors ◽

Cord Blood Cells

Abstract Abstract 956 Background. Unrelated umbilical cord blood cells (UCB) have emerged as an alternative stem cell source for allo-SCT in patients who lack a matched-related or unrelated donor (MUD). Several studies found a similar outcome between HLA 4–6/6 matched UCB and HLA 8/8 matched and 7/8 mismatched unrelated donors, mainly in the setting of standard myeloablative conditioning. However, currently it is more common practice in many centres to search for 10/10 or 9/10 MUD or for double UCB. Thus far, no study focussed on the comparison of outcome of patients who received double UCB allo-SCT versus allo-SCT using 9/10 mismatched donors. With this background, this retrospective analysis assessed outcome after allo-SCT using double UCB cells or 9/10 mismatched donors in the setting of a RIC regimen. Patients and Methods. This analysis was performed in a series of 152 consecutive adult patients treated for hematological malignancies in 2 centers adopting similar transplant procedures. 85 patients were males (56%) and the median age at time of allo-SCT was 53 years (range, 16–69). Diagnoses included 59 AML (39%), 21 MDS/MPN (14%), 42 NHL (28%), 5 Hodgkin diseases (3%), 18 ALL (12%) and 7 Myelomas (5%). 35 patients (23%) had standard risk disease and 117 patients (77%) presented with high risk disease. Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and low dose TBI for 108 patients (71%), fludarabine and busulfan for 35 patients (23%); and other regimens in the remaining 9 patients (6%). 50 patients (33%) received antithymocyte globulin. The donor was double UCB in 110 cases (“dUCB” group) and 9/10 mismatched unrelated in 42 cases (“9/10” group). During the study period, both participating centers adopted the same strategy for donor search and choice: in the absence of matched-related siblings or 10/10 MUD, 9/10 donors were searched. UCB cells were used if no 9/10 donor could be identified within a reasonable time frame (usually 2–3 months after search initiation). Results. With a median follow-up of 30.3 months (range, 6–72.4), the Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival (OS) at 2 years was comparable between both groups [52% (95%CI, 42–61%) in the dUCB group versus 48% (95%CI, 32–62%) in the 9/10 group, P=0.55]. The cumulative incidence of NRM was 26% in the dUCB group versus 24% in the 9/10 group (P=0.95). Grade 3–4 acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD incidences were 20% versus 21.4% (P=0.83), and 6% versus 21% (P=0.02), in the dUCB group versus the 9/10 group, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 34% in the dUCB group versus 38% in the 9/10 group (P=0.63). Finally, the estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was 43% (95%CI, 34–52%) in the dUCB group versus 38% (95%CI, 23–53%) in the 9/10 group (P=0.55). In multivariable analysis including the most important parameters associated with outcome (patient's age at transplantation, patient's sex, diagnosis, disease status at transplantation, use of ATG, GVHD prophylaxis), the stem cell source (dUCB versus 9/10) did not have any significant impact on OS (HR=0.92 (95% CI, 0.41–2.08); P=0.86) Conclusion. These data suggest that dUCB is likely a valid alternative graft source compared to 9/10 mismatched unrelated donors in the setting of RIC allo-SCT since both donor types showed similar results in terms of OS, PFS, disease relapse, and acute GVHD incidence. However, the significantly lower incidence of extensive chronic GVHD in the dUCB group is an important and major finding, highlighting the need for a prospective randomized study in this field. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of Stem Cell Source in Adult and Paediatric Recipients of T-Cell Depleted Myeloablative Transplants for Standard Risk Leukaemia: No Difference in Mortality Using BM or PBSC.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1205.1205 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1205-1205

Author(s):

Bronwen E Shaw ◽

Jane Apperley ◽

Nigel H. Russell ◽

Charles F. Craddock ◽

Effie Liakopoulou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Cell Source ◽

Standard Risk

Abstract Abstract 1205 Poster Board I-227 The use of GSCF-mobilised Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) for unrelated donor (UD) transplantation has increased dramatically since 2000. The association of PBSC with more rapid engraftment and with an increase in chronic Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD), compared to bone marrow (BM) has been reported in a number of studies. More recently the use of PBSC has been associated with an increase in non relapse mortality (NRM) and decrease in survival (OS) in T-cell replete transplants. We have previously reported outcome data in 145 patients who received an unrelated donor transplant for leukaemia. In that study we reported an increase in mild acute GvHD using PBSC, but no other significant differences in outcome. We have now doubled the cohort and report our findings on 320 patients here. In this group all of the patients received pre-transplant serotherapy (Alemtuzumab = 306, ATG = 14) as part of myeloablative conditioning prior to an HLA-matched UD allograft. Patients were transplanted between January 2000 and August 2007: CML in 1CP (n=102) and acute leukaemia in CR1/2 (AML in 105, ALL in 144). 190 patients received BM and 130 PBSC. The median age of the recipients was 28.9 years (10months - 58years). There was no significant difference in age between those receiving BM or PBSC.98% and 96% of patients receiving PBSC and BM achieved neutrophil engraftment (NS), with a significantly faster time to engraftment in recipients of PBSC compared to BM (14 vs 20 days; p<0.001). The incidence of acute GvHD was significantly higher in recipients of PBSC (64%) compared to BM (51%; p=0.022), however there was no increase in grade III/IV (p=0.420) disease in PBSC recipients. The incidence of chronic GvHD at 6 years was 61% in the BM recipients and 55% in the PBSC recipients (NS), with no difference in the incidence of extensive disease. The 5-years OS was 55% in BM recipients, with a median follow-up of 59 months, compared to 54% in PBSC recipients at a median follow-up of 38 months (NS). The incidence of neither disease relapse nor NRM was significantly different between groups (relapse at 5 years: BM 44%, PBSC 36%; p=0.112, and NRM at 5 years: BM 22%, PBSC 24%; p=0.751). In view of the fact that there were more CML patients in the BM group and more AML patients who received PBSC (the distribution of ALL patients was similar) (p=0.051), we performed a subgroup analysis. The pattern of results for each outcome, dependant on the use of BM or PBSC, in patients with CML and those with acute leukaemia were similar to those reported in the group overall. In conclusion, we have confirmed the results of our previous smaller study, showing the only significant difference in clinical outcome between PBSC and BM to be a higher incidence in the occurrence (but not grade) of acute GvHD. We found no association between the use of PBSC and an increased risk of chronic GVHD or of a worse transplant outcome, when compared to BM. We suggest that either stem cell source can be used with a similar outcome in adult and paediatric recipients of T-cell depleted allografts for standard risk leukaemia. Disclosures: Apperley: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Influence of Stem Cell Source On GvH and NRM: Comparison of 10/10 HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) with 9/10 HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor (MMUD) and Unrelated Cord Blood (UCB) Transplants.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3135.3135 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3135-3135

Author(s):

Clémence Granier ◽

Emeline Masson ◽

Lucie Biard ◽

Raphael Porcher ◽

Regis Peffault de la Tour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Hla Typing ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Cell Source

Abstract Abstract 3135 Background: When an HLA-matched donor is not available for allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT), the use of an alternative HLA-mismatched stem cell source may be considered. In Europe, HLA compatibility for HSCT is calculated for 10 alleles (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare outcomes after transplantation from 10/10 HLA-MUD, 9/10 HLA-MMUD and UCB performed at the Hospital Saint Louis (Paris, Fr). Methods: Patients receiving a first allogeneic transplantation from a 10/10, 9/10 UD or UCB from 2000 to 2011 were included. High resolution HLA typing was performed by PCR SSO and SSP for HLA loci: A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1. The following variables were studied as risk factors for transplant outcomes: disease, disease risk (standard/high risk), age at transplant, gender, donor/recipient sex-matching, ABO matching, donor/recipient CMV status, conditioning regimen, and use of anti-thymoglobulin (ATG). Results: 355 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies were analyzed. One hundred and ninety-six were transplanted with MUD, 84 with MMUD (mismatches for HLA-A: 16%, -B: 16%, -C: 39%, -DRB1: 8%, -DQB1: 21%) and 75 with UCB (52% with single and 48% with two UCB unit; 87% of all UCB transplants were 4–6/6 HLA-matched). Median patient age was 31 (range: 5–55). Patient characteristics differed between the 3 groups: (i) median age at transplant: 36 in MUD, 31 in MMUD, 22 in UCB (p<0.0001), (ii) high risk disease: 37%, 51%, 68% (p<0.0001), (iii) CMV negative donor/positive recipient: 31%, 36%, 60% (p<0.0001), (iv) use of ATG: 37%, 64%, 55% (p<0.0001). Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GvHD disease (aGvHD) were 61% (66% for MUD, 60% for MMUD and 48% for UCB) and 17% (17%, 24% and 15%), respectively. Three-year cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was 46% (51% for MUD, 49% for MMUD and 29% for UCB). Three-year NRM was 34% (28% for MUD, 31% for MMUD and 51% for UCB). Graft failure occurred in 15% of UCB patient, 8% in MMUD group and 3% in MUD group (significant difference between UCB and MUD: OR=5.44, 95%CI 1.93–15.3, p=0.001). Multivariate analysis is summarized in table 1. It showed that MMUD tented to have a higher incidence of aGvHD III-IV than MUD and UCB. UCB had a lower incidence of cGvHD than MMUD. No significant effect of HSCT source on NRM was demonstrated. Conclusion: Compared to MMUD, UCB-HSCT induces less cGvHD and non significantly increased NRM. Compared to MUD, MMUD and UCB-HSCT did not result in a clear increase of NRM. UCB and 9/10 HLA-MMUD are both suitable stem cell sources for patients who cannot benefit from 10/10 HLA-MUD transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

HLA-DRB4 Mismatch Is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Unrelated Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4540.4540 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4540-4540 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Marie Y. Detrait ◽

Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽

Valerie Dubois ◽

Françoise Dufossé ◽

Myriam Labalette ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Allogeneic Hsct ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Cell Source

Abstract Abstract 4540 Introduction The impact of HLA DRB3 and DRB4 allele mismatch after allogeneic HSCT using unrelated donors is unclear. We therefore examined retrospectively the outcome of 35 patients who received HLA-10/10 unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch between 2005 and 2011. This cohort of 35 patients was a part of a cohort of 132 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT between 2005–2011 with a 10/10-HLA matched donor. There were 18 males (51.4%) and 17 females (48.6%) with a median age of 48 years (range, 6–64), there were 13 (37%) AML, 9 (26%) ALL, 4 (11.5%) MDS, 3 (8.5%) multiple myeloma and 6 (5.7%) other (CML, CLL, NHL). Twenty patients (57%) received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 15 (43%) received a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). At transplantation, 21 patients (60%) were in complete remission (CR), 4 patients (11.5%) in partial remission (PR) and 10 (28.5%) in relapse; 13 (37%) patients received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and 22 (63%) received bone marrow (BM). Twelve (34%) patients had a mismatched DRB4 donor and 23 (66%) patients had a mismatched DRB3 donor. In the remains of 97 patients, there were 55 male (57%) and 42 female (43%), 28 (29%) patients received a MAC and 69 (71%) a RIC as regimen before allogeneic HSCT. The stem cell source was BM for 32 (34%) patients and PBSC for 65 (66%). At transplantation, 34 (35%) patients are in CR and 63 (65%) were in PR. The distribution of diagnosis was acute leukaemia and MDS for 44 (45%), CLL for 2 (2.5%) and other diagnosis (aplastic anemia, NHL, CML, MPS) for 51 patients (52.5%). Results After HSCT, 124 (94%) patients engrafted. After a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range, 0–76), the cumulative incidence of acute GvHD≥2 at 3 months was 20% (95%CI,16.5–24) and the cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at one year was 19 % (95%CI, 15–22). In univariate analysis, the mismatch DRB3 or DRB4 had no effect on engraftment and no effect on acute GvHD (p=0.08) or chronic GvHD (p=0.63). There was no impact of DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch on relapse (p=0.33 and p=0.53, respectively) and on PFS (p=0.63 and p=0.07, respectively). We found an impact of the DRB4 mismatching (p=0.016) on overall survival. The median survival for patient without DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch was 23 months (14-NR), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 32 months (12-NR), and for DRB4 mismatched patients 5 months (3-NR). The probability of survival at 24 months, for patients without mismatch DRB3 or DRB4 is 47% (36–61), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 51% (32–82) and for DRB4 mismatched patients 19% (6–66%). (figure1). The multivariate analysis that studied age, type of disease, DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch, sexmatching, TBI, ATG, disease status at transplantation and type of conditioning and stem cell source showed a significant impact of mismatch DRB4 on survival (HR= 2.5 [95%CI, 1.2–5.5] p=0.019); there was no impact for DRB3 mismatch (HR= 1.3 (95%CI,0.5–3.9 p=0.58). We found also an impact of the DRB4 mismatch on TRM (HR= 3.5; [95%CI, 1.6 –8] p= 0.026). The incidence of TRM at 24 months for patients without DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch is 29% (24–34), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 17% (9–26%) and for DRB4 mismatched patients 50% (34–66%). (figure 2). Conclusion The HLA DRB4 matching donor is relevant for survival of patients who undergo allo-HSCT from unrelated donor in the HLA-10/10 matching settings. In view of the important impact of these loci mismatches on clinical outcome, it seems to be important to consider this matching loci in the unrelated donor selection. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text