Results from Hemato-Oncology Latin America Observational Registry (HOLA) Providing Real World Outcomes for the Treatment of Patients with CLL

Abstract Introduction: There are few reports of standard of care and outcomes in Latin America. The HOLA study is a retrospective chart review of patients with B-cell malignancies in Latin America (LATAM). Methods: The objective of this registry is to describe patient characteristics, diagnostic and treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) from a mix of public and private sites in Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, and Panama. We report 472 patients with CLL diagnosed in the period from January 2006 to March 2016. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range 23 - 95). Male gender predominance (53.6 vs 46.4%). Twenty-three percent of the patients (n=103) were dead, median time from diagnosis to death of 2.4 years (range 0-6.6 years). Seventeen percent (n=19) died before frontline treatment, 35%(39) after first-line treatment, 19%(21) in second-line, 27%(30) at or after third-line treatment. Anemia reported on 34%. Of the 34% (n=162) patients with COOMBS test, it was positive on 13%. Frequent comorbidities were high blood pressure (46%), heart disease (17%) and diabetes (15%). Binet status reported on 63% of patients, Rai status on 55%. (Table 1) Flow cytometry missing on 27% of patients (not performed/missing report). Diagnostic markers were positive as follows: CD23, 94% and CD5, 92%. Prognostic markers: 52% tested for CD38 and 10% ZAP 70, positivity on 24% and 26% of tested patients, respectively. Cytogenetic/FISH test performed on 21% (102), del(17p) was present on 7.4% of tested patients at diagnosis. Seventy two per cent of patients were considered for watch- and-wait approach. Median time from diagnosis to treatment initiation was 113 days (range 1 -2808). Sixty one per cent (288/472) receive front line treatment at any time. Frequent reasons to start treatment were B symptoms (25%), anemia (21%) and lymphocyte doubling time <6 months (17%). (Table 2) Response was assessed by clinical exam and blood count in 95% of patients, CT scan 24 %, abdominal ultrasonography 12%. Twenty-eight per cent of patients (135) relapsed and received second-line treatment. The most frequent second-line treatments were Chlorambucil (Chl) 37%; Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide (FC) 16%, Cyclophosphamide + Vincristine + Prednisone (CVP) 9%. Clinical complete responses were as follows: FC = 4.5%, FCR= 25%. Sixty-five out of 472 patients (14%) received third-line treatment. Most frequently used treatments at this line were: Chlorambucil 23%, FC 20%, CVP 13%, FCR 9.2%, BR 4.6 %, and other chemotherapies 4.6%. Only 7% of patients in the registry relapsed and received fourth-line treatment. Conclusions: HOLA registry describes patterns of demographics, diagnosis and treatments in the real world in Latin America. CLL diagnosis in Latin America is made based on flow cytometry for the majority of the patients. Cytogenetic and FISH test are scarcely performed. For the deceased patients, median time from diagnosis to death was 2.4 years. This could be related to the high risk, but since prognostic tests were not always present this merits further investigation. Watch-and-wait was the most frequent approach. Time elapsed from diagnosis to treatment initiation was less than a year. Lymphocyte doubling time as reason to start treatment was frequent. Chlorambucil remains the most frequently used treatment for elderly in newly diagnosed and relapsed /refractory patients, use is also frequent in the young/fit patient population. Access barriers to innovative drugs and monoclonal antibodies could explain this situation. Disclosures Chiattone: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gomez-Almaguer:Bristol: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Pavlovsky:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squib: Speakers Bureau. Tuna-Aguilar:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Farias:Janssen: Consultancy. Galvez:Novartis: Consultancy. Santos:Janssen: Employment. De La Mora Estrada:Janssen: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Sequential Treatments in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients without Optimal Response after Frontline Nilotinib or Dasatinib: An Italian CML Campus Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141077 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 45-46

Author(s):

Gabriele Gugliotta ◽

Mario Annunziata ◽

Isabella Capodanno ◽

Davide Rapezzi ◽

Immacolata Attolico ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Optimal Response ◽

First Line Treatment

INTRODUCTION: Frontline therapy with second generation (2G) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients demonstrated higher efficacy as compared to imatinib, with less patients experiencing treatment failure and progression to advanced disease. However, limited information are currently available on the management and outcome of those CML pts not achieving an optimal response to first-line treatment with a 2G-TKI. AIM: To describe the clinical outcome of CP CML patients without an optimal response to a frontline 2G-TKI that switched to alternative TKIs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in 22 Centers cooperating within the Italian CML Campus Project. Main inclusion criteria were: 1) diagnosis of CP-CML after 2010; 2) first-line treatment with a 2G-TKI; 3) switch to second-line treatment in case of non-optimal response (either following ELN recommendations or as for clinical practice); 4) CML in CP at the time of switching to second-line treatment. The main exclusion criteria were a switch to second-line treatment for intolerance or for low adherence to therapy. RESULTS: The main findings of this analysis are summarized in the table. Seventy-one pts meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria were identified; the median age of pts at CML diagnosis was 46 (21-80) years. Sokal risk score was low, intermediate, and high in 24 (34%), 30 (42%), and 17 (24%) pts, respectively. First-line treatment was performed with nilotinib in 47 (66%) pts and dasatinib in 24 (34%) pts. According to the ELN 2020 recommendations, 51 (72%) pts fulfilled the criteria for "failure" and 20 (28%) pts those for "warning". BCR-ABL mutations were identified in 12 of 65 (18%) evaluable pts (T315I in 1 pt). Additional chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells were identified in 6 of 54 (11%) evaluable pts. Second-line treatment was started after a median time of 16 (4-72) months, with ponatinib (40 pts, 56%), dasatinib (21 pts, 30%), nilotinib (7 pts, 10%), or bosutinib (3 pts, 4%). Median follow-up from start of second-line treatment was 25 (2-90) months. Best response to second-line treatment was MR2 in 18 (25%) pts and MR3 in 37 (51%) pts. Nineteen (27%) pts (13 for resistance and 6 for intolerance) switched to third-line treatment (ponatinib, 11 pts; nilotinib, 3 pts; dasatinib, 4 pts; imatinib, 1 pt), after a median time of 8 (1-72) months. Mutations were identified in 2 of 17 evaluable pts, and both patients harbored a T315I mutation. MR3 was reached by 9 (47%) of these pts. Lastly, 7 (10%) pts switched (6 for resistance and 1 for intolerance) to fourth-line treatment (asciminib, 4pts; dasatinib, 2 pts, nilotinib, 1 pt). Overall, 44 (62%) patients reached with sequential TKI treatments a MR3 (31/51 pts among "failures"; 13/20 among "warnings"). Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) was performed in 7 (9.5%) pts (6 among "failures"), after a median time of 20 (15-60) months from CML diagnosis. Progression to advanced phase occurred in 2 (3%) pts; both pts previously met the ELN2020 "failure" criteria. Estimated 4-y PFS was 92.5%. Death occurred in 3 (4%) pts (1 after progression to blast phase, 2 for cardiovascular adverse events). Estimated 4-y OS was 93.7% CONCLUSION Our findings show that CP-CML patients not achieving an optimal response to frontline 2G-TKI therapy, despite a complex management, still have a favorable prognosis and survival due to the availability of both multiple TKI options and SCT. Figure Disclosures Gugliotta: Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Galimberti:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria. Abruzzese:Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bms: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bocchia:CELGENE: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Castagnetti:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Di Raimondo:Amgen, Takeda, Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; GILEAD, Incyte: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosti:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Foà:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Saglio:Pfizer: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Breccia:Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Ultra Deep Sequencing (UDS) Allows More Sensitive Detection Of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI)-Resistant BCR-ABL Mutations That Would Influence Therapeutic Decision At The Time Of Switchover To Second- Or Third-Line Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.380.380 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 380-380 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Simona Soverini ◽

Caterina De Benedittis ◽

Katerina Machova Polakova ◽

Adela Brouckova ◽

Fausto Castagnetti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Mutation Screening ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Low Level ◽

Imatinib Resistant ◽

Third Line Therapy ◽

Third Line ◽

Selection Of

Abstract Background According to the 2013 European LeukemiaNet recommendations, BCR-ABL kinase domain (KD) mutation screening by conventional Sanger sequencing (SS) is recommended in all patients (pts) with progression, failure or warning, since detection of second-generation (2G) TKI-resistant mutations (T315I, F317L/V/I/C, V299L, Y253F/H, E255K/V, F359V/I/C) helps in the selection of the most suitable alternative therapy. However, SS has limited sensitivity. A recent study (Parker et al, J Clin Oncol 2011) has shown that low level mutations (i.e., undetectable by SS) may be identified by mass spectrometry and this may aid in more appropriate selection of the second-line treatment strategy for imatinib-resistant pts. Aims We sought to determine i) whether an UDS-based approach for BCR-ABL KD mutation screening might allow more sensitive detection of 2GTKI-resistant mutations at the time of switchover to second or third-line therapy and ii) whether low level mutations identified by UDS undergo clonal expansion, thus predicting for subsequent failure, if the 2GTKI to which they are insensitive to happens to be chosen. Methods To this purpose, we used UDS to scan the BCR-ABL KD in a cohort of 75 chronic myeloid leukemia (n=50) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=25) pts who were treated with a 2GTKI (dasatinib or nilotinib) after having failed first-line (n=62) or second-line (n=13) TKI therapy. A total of 235 samples collected at the time of switchover and at subsequent timepoints during second-or third-line treatment were analyzed. All the samples had already been evaluated by SS. UDS was performed on a Roche GS Junior instrument, according to an amplicon sequencing design and protocol set up and validated in the framework of the IRON-II international study. Runs were designed to achieve high sequencing depth. However, raw data analysis with Amplicon Variant Analyzer software (Roche Applied Science) was performed filtering out variants <1% to reduce the likelihood of amplification artifacts and sequencing errors. Results Forty-three imatinib-resistant pts failed subsequent second- (n=37) or third-line (n=6) treatment with 2GTKIs (dasatinib, n=28; nilotinib, n=15). By routine SS analysis, 32 BCR-ABL KD mutations had been identified in 29/43 (67%) pts at the time of switchover - informing subsequent-line treatment selection in 12 pts who were found to harbor 2GTKI-resistant mutations. At the time of treatment failure (after a median of 9 months; range, 2-30), SS had detected newly acquired 2GTKI-resistant mutations in all 43 pts. We thus wondered how many of these mutations could have been detected at the time of switchover using a more sensitive approach. By UDS re-analysis, 73 mutations were identified in 35/43 (81%) pts at switchover – UDS detected all the 32 mutations previously identified by SS plus 41 low level mutations (i.e., with an abundance between 1 and 15%). Twenty-four of the 41 low level mutations were resistant to the 2GTKI that happened to be selected (T315I=10; E255K=2; E255V=1; Y253H/F=4; F359V=1; F317L=4; V299L=1) and all invariably expanded becoming detectable by SS at relapse, alone or in combination with pre-existing mutations. Thus, mutations that would have influenced therapeutic decision after first or second TKI failure could have been detected in 17 more pts by UDS (p<0.001). Thirty pts who achieved a stable response to second- (n=26) or third-line (n=4) treatment with 2GTKIs after having failed first- or second-line treatment, respectively, were also analyzed for comparison. By UDS, a total of 13 mutations were detected – including 6 mutations (6 pts) that had already been identified by SS plus 7 low level mutations (7 pts). No low level mutation resistant to the 2GTKI the pts actually received was detected. Conclusions In comparison to SS, UDS could identify 2GTKI-resistant mutations at the time of switchover in a significantly greater proportion of pts. Low level mutations (down to 1% abundance) detected by UDS were consistently found to expand when the 2GTKI they are insensitive to happened to be chosen. UDS-based screening of the BCR-ABL KD at switchover might thus have enabled more effective therapeutic tailoring. Further evaluation of whether this technology may be implemented in a diagnostic setting is highly warranted. Supported by PRIN 2009 (prot.2009JSMKY), Fondazione CARISBO, AIL, AIRC, FP7 ‘NGS-PTL’, IGA NT 11555 and 13899. Disclosures: Soverini: Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Machova Polakova:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speaker fees Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speaker fees, Speaker fees Other; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speaker fees, Speaker fees Other; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speaker fees, Speaker fees Other; Teva: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speaker fees Other. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Speaker fees Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speaker fees, Speaker fees Other; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speaker fees, Speaker fees Other; Ariad: Consultancy, Speaker fees, Speaker fees Other.

Download Full-text

Management of Steroid-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease - a Survey By the Transplant Complications Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152305 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2884-2884

Author(s):

Zinaida Peric ◽

Helene Schoemans ◽

Christophe Peczynski ◽

Christian Koenecke ◽

Ivan S. Moiseev ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Working Party ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prospective Trials ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: As there is limited evidence to guide management of patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) there is a broad variability of clinical practices. To document the current practice and assess the impact of emerging new drugs in SR-GVHD, Transplant Complications Working Party (TCWP) of the EBMT performed a survey among EBMT centers that covered specific treatment decisions on first- and second-line treatment of acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD). Methods: The survey was conducted from December 2020 to March 2021 among EBMT centers. A questionnaire was developed by the study authors and used for data collection. It consisted of 40 questions focused on general approach in the first-line treatment, preferred second-line treatment in SR-GVHD and ancillary care in aGVHD and cGVHD. Results: 145 centers from 33 countries agreed to participate and responded to the questionnaire. First-line treatment of aGVHD was reported as rather homogenous; with most centers (68%) starting with lower doses of corticosteroids (CS) (<2mg/kg) in lower grade aGVHD (grade 2a) and most centers (88%) starting with higher doses (2mg/kg) in aGVHD grades >2b. On the other hand, the evaluation of response to CS was more heterogeneous: at 3 days in 33%, at 5 days in 30%, at 7 days in 15% of centers and depending on severity of aGVHD in most other centers. In the presence of SR-aGVHD, 50% of centers consider inclusion of patients in clinical trials. Although as much as 85% of centers reported to have a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SR-aGVHD management, only 45% (n=66) have an established one or 2-agent second-line treatment; most frequently ruxolitinib (n=46) and/or extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) (n=29). All other centers reported a very heterogeneous practice and listed multiple agents (range, 3-10) as second-line treatment options. In total, the most used agents for SR-aGVHD as shown in Figure 1A are ruxolitinib in 68%, ECP in 59%, mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) in 27%, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in 25%, high-dose CS (>2mg/kg) in 15%, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in 14%, etanercept in 13%, infliximab in 11% and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in 10% of centers. Clinical practice in first-line treatment of cGVHD again appeared relatively homogeneous; 58% of centers reported to treat mild forms with topical treatment only, unless affected organs could not be reached topically. In moderate/severe cGVHD, the majority (71%) of centers start with 0.5-1mg/kg of CS, in 45% with addition of CNI, while others use higher doses of CS +/- other agents. The evaluation of response was done before 4 weeks in 41% of centers, between 5-8 weeks in 41%, while a minority performed later response assessment or based the latter on organ affection/severity. In case of SR-cGVHD, 56% of centers would consider the inclusion in clinical trials, while only 65% have a SOP on management of these patients. One third of centers (35%) has an established multidisciplinary cGVHD team. Practices for SR-cGVHD again varied significantly, with most centers reporting on the use of more than 2 agents (range, 3-13) as second-line and with most applied agents as depicted in Figure 1B; ruxolitinib and ECP in 68% of centers, CNI in 40%, MMF in 37%, rituximab in 27%, imatinib in 25%, mTOR inhibitors in 23%, ibrutinib and methotrexate (MTX) in 19%, pulse of CS in 17%, MSC in 12% and PUVA therapy in 10% of centers. Conclusions:In summary, this survey revealed a rather homogenous first-line management of aGVHD and cGVHD based on steroids in the majority of centers. However, when first-line fails, the definition of SR-GVHD remains highly variable and SR-GVHD is still treated with a seemingly "trial and error" approach as demonstrated by significant variability of clinical practices among EBMT centers for second-line treatment. However, in line with recently published prospective trials, ruxolitinib comes forth as one of the most used therapeutic modalities in both SR-aGVHD and cGVHD, together with already widely administered ECP. On the contrary, ibrutinib has not emerged as standard of care in this setting. Future efforts should be invested in finding a standardized approach in SR-GVHD by directly comparing most applied second-line agents in prospective trials as well as evidence-based personalized treatment approaches. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Peric: Therakos, Servier, MSD, Astellas, Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer: Honoraria. Schoemans: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: personal fees , Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants and personal fees; Gilead: Other: travel grants; CIBMTR: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants and personal fees , Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: personal fees; Takeda: Other: personal fees. Koenecke: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; EUSA Pharm: Consultancy. Basak: Saventic Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Greinix: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Therakos: Consultancy. Penack: Omeros: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Priothera: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Therakos: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Benchmark of Progression Free Survival for Multiple Lines of Therapy in Follicular Lymphoma Treated in the Rituximab Era

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2955.2955 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2955-2955 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Anna Alperovich ◽

Connie Batlevi ◽

Katy Smith ◽

Zhitao Ying ◽

Jacob D Soumerai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Third Line ◽

Third Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction In their lifetime, patients with follicular lymphoma frequently require multiple treatments, which have improved their survival over the past few decades. The expected treatment outcome based on lines of treatment in the post-Rituximab era is currently unknown. We analyzed the progression free survival and event free survival by line of treatment to aid estimating clinical endpoints when designing future clinical trials for multiply relapsed patients. Patients and Methods Adults (≥18 years) with de novo follicular lymphoma (FL) treated at our center between 1998 and 2007 were eligible (N=1134). 236 patients with ≤2 visits, mixed histology at initial diagnosis, and active concurrent malignancy were excluded. Of the remaining 898 patients, 105 were observed and did not require treatment during the timeframe of this dataset, and 2 had incomplete data, therefore 791 patients were eligible for response, progression and event free survival (PFS and EFS) analysis (Figure 1). Response was documented by investigators based on clinical or radiographic assessment. Complete response was based on radiographic assessment. PFS was defined as start of treatment to progression of disease or death. Patients with inadequate response to treatment, change of treatment, or stable disease without subsequent documented relapse were censored in the PFS analysis. Events for EFS were defined as progression, change of treatment, and death. PFS and EFS of sequential lines of treatment were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared across lines using log-rank test with adjustment for within-patient correlation. PFS and EFS were compared by other clinical variables using regular log-rank tests. Results Median age of diagnosis was 57.3 years with 1:1 male to female ratio. Median overall survival was not reached with median follow up of 9 years (N=898, range 0.2 - 16.8 years, Figure 1A). Median time to first treatment for the entire group was 2.3 months (range 0 - 13.3 years). In first line treatment of the 791 patients, 51% (N=406) received Rituximab with chemotherapy (R-Chemo), 13% (N=101) received chemotherapy only (Chemo), 19% (N=150) received Rituximab monotherapy (R-Mono), and 17% (N=129) received other treatments including radiation and surgery. For second line treatment, 405 patients were treated with about 37% receiving R-Chemo and 34% receiving R-Mono. As line of treatment increased, the percentage of patients with radiographically assessed complete response diminished from 71% at first line treatment to 25% by fifth line treatment (Figure 1B). Median PFS for first, second and third line treatment are 4.8, 1.6, and 1 year, respectively (Figure 2A). Median EFS for first, second and third line treatment are 3.8, 1.1, 0.8 year, respectively (Figure 2B). For subsequent lines of treatment, both median PFS and EFS were <1 year. Conclusion Follicular lymphoma is an indolent disease often requiring multiple lines of treatment. However, PFS and EFS for multiple lines of treatment in FL has not been described in the post-Rituximab era. The work has benchmarked the median response by line of treatment. After third line treatment, the PFS was ≤1 year. This analysis serves to aide comparison of different therapies for future drug approval in relapsed FL. Disclosures Hamlin: Xencor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Huya: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Celgene: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Moskowitz:Merck: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Moskowitz:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Palomba:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Zelenetz:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Patient Profile and Treatment Patterns in a Commercially Insured Population with Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127237 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5880-5880

Author(s):

Nathan H Fowler ◽

Yanni Hao ◽

Stephen Lim ◽

Guifang Chen ◽

Frank Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Third Line ◽

Line Of Therapy

Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the Western hemisphere. Patient characteristics and burden of FL are incomplete and vary from previous studies. This study evaluated patient profile, including patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and duration using real-world data. Methods: Using the Truven MarketScan® databases, patients with FL who were newly initiated with FL indicated regimens were identified from 1/1/2010-12/31/2013 (initial treatment identification period). Patients were selected if they were ≥18 years old, had 1 FL ICD-9 code (202.0) as primary or secondary diagnosis, at least 1 FL commonly prescribed systemic anti-cancer therapy after the diagnosis, and did not use any FL indicated regimen in the past 6 months prior to first agent included in the initial treatment identification period. These patents were followed ≥3 months or to June 30, 2018. Primary outcomes were the distribution of regimens by line, the number of patients who switched from first- to second-line therapies, and from second- to third-line therapies. The treatment duration by line of therapy and regimen were also analyzed. Discontinuation was defined as 3 months without receiving a regimen after treatment. Results: This study identified 4,970 patients who initiated treatment for FL. Of these patients, 48.1% were female (n=2,390), with a mean age of 62.0 (SD: 14.0) years. The average follow-up time was approximately 2 years (median: 733 days). In this analysis, 4,970 patients with FL received first-line therapy for 153 days (median: 94 days), 1,985 received second-line therapy (39.9% of patients who received first-line therapy) for 208 days (median: 80 days), and 664 received third-line therapy (13.4% of patients who received first-line therapy) for 117 days (median: 43 days). Of the 4,970 patients on first-line therapy, 453 (9.1%) remained on first-line therapy, 2,532 (51.0%) discontinued treatment, and 1,985 (39.9%) patients switched to the next line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 1,985 patients who switched to second-line therapy, 328 (16.5%) remained by the end of follow-up period, 993 (50.0%) discontinued, and 664 (33.4%) switched to the next line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 664 patients who switched to third-line therapy, 125 (18.8%) remained, 269 (40.5%) discontinued, and 270 (40.7%) switched to the next line of therapy. The most common first-line regimens in descending order received by patients were rituximab (n=1,478, 29.7%), R-CHOP (n=1,368, 27.5%), BR (n=1,050, 21.1%), R-CVP (n=371, 7.5%), and FCR (n=63, 1.3%). Second-line treatment regimens were (N=1,985) rituximab (n=992, 50.0%), BR (n=202, 10.2%), R-CHOP (n=138, 7.0%), and R-CVP (n=120, 6.1%). Third-line treatment regimens were (N=664) rituximab (n=228, 34.3%), BR (n=91, 13.7%), R-CHOP (n=75, 11.3%), cyclophosphamide (n=35, 5.3%) and R-CVP (n=31, 4.7%). Conclusion: This data set describes the percentage of patients that transition from first- to second-line and second- to third-line treatment for FL. The primary regimens used across the treatment lines conform to those recommended by the NCCN guidelines. In addition, smaller numbers of non-recommended regimens were reported. Disclosures Fowler: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hao:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lim:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Chen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Employment. Li:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Arcona:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text

Outcomes with Extracorporeal Photopheresis in the Management of Chronic Gvhd: A Multi-Centre Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4595.4595 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4595-4595

Author(s):

David Routledge ◽

John Murray ◽

Fiona Dignan ◽

Amanda Calderwood ◽

Adrian Bloor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽

Diagnostic Group ◽

Organ Involvement ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Extracorporeal Photopheresis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Chronic Leukaemia ◽

Steroid Refractory

Abstract Introduction: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and non-relapse mortality in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients (Allo-HSCT). Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) is now an established second-line treatment for steroid-refractory cGVHD. Here we report a large, multi-centre case series of 115 patients treated with ECP for cGVHD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of patients receiving fortnightly ECP for cGVHD. Method:A retrospective case note audit identified 115 consecutive Allo-HSCT patients who commenced fortnightly ECP for cGVHD between 2007 and 2016 at The Christie and Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trusts. cGVHD was classified and graded using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus response criteria. Results: Median age when starting ECP was 49 years (range 18-75). 61% patients were male (n=70) and 39% Female (n=45). Underlying disease groups undergoing Allo-HSCT included Acute Leukaemia/Myelodysplastic Syndrome (n=69; 60%), Lymphoma (10%; n=12), Chronic leukaemia (13%; n=15) Myeloma (14%; n=16) and Aplastic Anaemia (3%; n=3). 24% of patients had myeloablative conditioning (n=27) and 76% had reduced-intensity conditioning (n=88). 61% (n=70) received stem cells from Voluntary Unrelated Donors (VUD) and 39% (n=45) Siblings (Sib). Patients received post Allo-HSCT GvHD prophylaxis with Calcineurin inhibitors, either alone, or in combination with Methotrexate and/or Mycophenolate Mofetil. Median time to stopping Calcineurin inhibitor post Allo-HSCT was 12 months (range 0-88). 14 patients received Donor Lymphocyte Infusions (DLI). Median time to development of GvHD post Allo-HSCT was 5 months (range 0-33). 94% developed cutaneous cGVHD (n=108), 32% oral cGVHD (n=37), 23% gut cGVHD(n=27), 24% liver cGVHD (n=28), 11% lung cGVHD (n=13) and 26% ocular cGVHD (n=30). 49% (n=57) patients had sclerodermoid disease. 37% (n=43) had one, 31% (n=36) two, 21% (n=24) three, 9% (n=10) four and 2% (n=2) five organ involvement. All 115 patients had been previously treated with immunosuppressive drugs - 109 Prednisolone; 73 Calcineurin Inhibitors; 60 Mycophenolate mofetil and other (ATG, n=1; Basiliximab, n=1; Methotrexate, n=6; Rituximab, n=10; and Thalidomide, n=18). Median duration of ECP treatment was 12 months (range 1-27 months). Response to ECP was assessed using NIH Criteria - 29% (n=33) Complete Response (CR), 19% (n=22) Partial Response (PR), 16% (n=18) Stable Disease (SD), 11% (n=13) Progressive Disease (PD), 17% (n=19) Death and 9% (n=10) Other. As a result of ECP treatment 26% (n=30) were able to stop steroid treatment while the remaining 74% were able to reduce their steroid dose. There was no overall difference in response between the two centres. Patients with cutaneous and oral cGVHD were more likely to achieve a PR or better (cutaneous p=0.03; oral p=0.05) but there was no difference with other organ involvement. The chance of response was not influenced by the number of organs involved. Median Overall Survival (OS) from the date of Allo-HSCT was 110 months (range 8-221). OS was not influenced by age, donor type, diagnostic group (Acute Leukaemia/Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Lymphoma, Chronic Leukaemia, Myeloma and Aplastic Anaemia), gender or the number and type of organs involved. The only exception was oral cGVHD which was associated with a lower OS (p=0.03). Patients with cGVHD achieving a CR/PR with ECP treatment, had a significantly better OS (40 months vs. median not reached, p<0.0001). Conclusion: ECP is an effective second line treatment for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent cGVHD with a 50% response rate. This is not affected by the underlying diagnostic group or pattern of organ involvement, however patients with cutaneous and oral cGVHD seem to respond better. As response to ECP translates into better OS, this most likely reflects the reduction in immunosuppressive related complications. Therefore it is worth considering the use ECP treatment early in the management of cGVHD. Disclosures Routledge: Celgene: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Dignan:Jazz: Honoraria; Adienne: Speakers Bureau; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: Cl for GvHD Study. Bloor:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tholouli:Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Giles: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Potentially Cured Follicular Lymphoma (PC-FL). an Analysis of 56 Cases with Prognostic Factors Evaluation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114896 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5328-5328

Author(s):

Samantha Ferrari ◽

Alessandra Tucci ◽

Gloria Valimberti ◽

Antonella Anastasia ◽

Chiara Bottelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Younger Age ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: Advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally considered incurable. Although multiple remissions after treatment are possible, relapse is considered the rule, and the time to progression tends to become shorter after each relapse (Johnson, JCO 1995). Over the last decades, after the introduction of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies and of better treatment programs, the prognosis of FL has markedly improved from a median OS of 7 years to a 10-year OS rate >80%. Moreover, clinical observations of patients (pts) experiencing very long progression-free periods despite more than one previous treatment failure, have become not rare, suggesting that some pts could achieve operational FL cure. To assess the frequency of those prolonged long-term remissions and search for potential predictive factors, we have retrospectively analyzed the consecutive series of pts with FL seen at our institution. Methods: FL pts, aged >18 years, in maintained remission for more than 5 years after at least two lines of treatment were selected as "potentially cured" FL (PC-FL) and analyzed in detail. Their main characteristics at diagnosis and at last relapse, the different lines of treatment received and the time intervals (time to next treatment: TTNT) between them, were recorded and compared with those of FL pts seen in the same period (control group). Treatment strategies used were grouped and defined as follows: radiotherapy or surgery, for stage I-II (local), anthracycline and/or alkylating agents regimens (Alk/Ant), purine analogues regimens (Pur), monoclonal antibodies/radioimmunoconjugates as single agent (MoAb), autologous transplantation (ASCT). Results and discussion: Among 385 consecutive FL pts seen from January 1987 to December 2011, 56 (14,5%) met criteria for PC-FL. Their clinicopathological features at diagnosis, compared to controls, are shown in Table I. There were no significant differences except for a younger age (51 vs 58 years, p<0.00016) and for a lower frequency of grade 3a histology (p=0.04) in PC-FL pts. First line treatment used did also not differ (p=0.29). Among PC-FL pts, 33 received two, 16 received 3 and 7 more than 3 treatment lines. The median duration of last complete remission was 118+ months, whereas the median duration of the remission preceding the last treatment had been 24 months; disease duration from diagnosis to the last relapse preceding long term remission had been 50,5 months. The last treatments received before long-term remission were variable including local in 10 (18%), Alk/Ant in 5 (9%), Pur in 11 (19%), MoAb in 10 (18%) and ASCT in 20 (36%). Pts characteristics at last relapse and remission duration were similar among different treatment subgroups, except that more pts in localized stage received local treatments. Comparing clinicopathological characteristics of PC-FL pts at diagnosis and at last relapse there were no differences except for FLIPI score, which was significantly lower at relapse (low FLIPI 34% at diagnosis, 68% at relapse, p=0.002). First-line and last treatments were similar except that more pts underwent ASCT as last treatment, as expected since frontline ASCT is not recommended. In 10 pts TTNT after first-line was longer than 5 years and 7 of them are still in prolonged remission (median 11+ years) after second-line treatment, representing a particularly favorable subgroup. In 26 (46%) of PC-FL pts TTNT was shorter than 24 months after first line therapy. Among 14 of them who received R-chemo at diagnosis (POD24, Casulo, JCO 2015), 8 (57%) obtained long remission after ASCT, given in second line in six. Conversely, ASCT was used in only 1 of 12 pts not receiving Rituximab at diagnosis. Conclusions: Approximately 15% of FL pts could currently achieve a very prolonged remission of about 10 years, even after multiple relapses. Its duration was 5x that of the last treatment line and more than twice that of active lymphoma, strongly suggesting the possibility of having achieved lymphoma cure. Younger age and grade 1-2 FL histology at diagnosis, and FLIPI low risk at relapse favored the achievement of PC-FL status. No specific treatment was associated with PC-FL and even an early relapse after first line treatment did not preclude to reach PC-FL, although early ASCT may be more effective for POD24 patients. Whether the achievement of PC-FL status may be related to biological factors will be interesting to be investigated in the next future. Disclosures Rossi: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Second-Line Lenalidomide Following Initial Relapse in the MM-015 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.944.944 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 944-944 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Meletios A Dimopoulos ◽

Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽

Robin Foa ◽

John V. Catalano ◽

Martin Kropff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Second Line ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Third Line Therapy ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Third Line ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 944 Background: MM-009/010 established lenalidomide (LEN) + dexamethasone (DEX) as a standard of care in the treatment (Tx) of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; Dimopoulos, NEJM. 2007; Weber, NEJM. 2007). The greatest benefits were observed when LEN + DEX was used at first relapse (Stadtmauer, Eur J Haematol. 2009). MM-015 is a pivotal, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide followed by lenalidomide maintenance (MPR-R) with fixed-cycle melphalan-prednisone (MP) and melphalan-prednisone-LEN (MPR) in elderly patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplant. The final analysis demonstrated unprecedented improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pts receiving MPR-R vs MP (31 vs 13 months [mos]; P < 0.001) with manageable toxicity (Palumbo, NEJM. 2012). The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to assess post-progression outcomes by second-line Tx and by initial MM-015 Tx arm (MPR-R, MPR, and MP). Methods: Induction and maintenance Tx has been described (Palumbo, NEJM. 2012). Pts with progressive disease during MM-015 could enroll in an open-label extension phase (OLEP) to receive LEN 25 mg (D1-21) ± DEX 40 mg (D1-4, 9–12, and 17–20) or could receive any other anti-myeloma Tx outside of the protocol. This analysis includes data up to Apr 10, 2012 (median follow-up: 48 mos after initial randomization). Time to progression (TTP) was assessed from randomization to disease progression as assessed by investigator. Time from start of second line to start of third-line Tx was assessed as a surrogate for TTP in second line. Safety data were assessed only for pts enrolled in the OLEP. Results: A total of 459 pts were enrolled in MM-015. Consistent with the superior PFS of MPR-R, fewer pts from the MPR-R arm progressed compared with the MPR and MP arms: 54% (81/150) vs 77% (117/152), and 83% (127/153) respectively. Compared with the overall population, pts receiving second-line Tx had shorter median first-line TTP (29 vs 20 mos), particularly for the MPR-R arm. This suggests that the present subset of pts in the MPR-R arm who started second-line therapy represents the early progressors, those with worse prognosis or more aggressive disease (Table). More pts received second-line Tx in the MP (72%) and MPR (58%) arms vs MPR-R arm (30%, Table); second-line Tx type was heterogeneous for MPR-R pts. Median time from second- to third-line Tx was significantly longer for LEN-based Tx vs non-LEN-based Tx across the 3 arms: MPR-R (18 vs 13 mos; P = 0.044), MPR (23 vs 8 mos; P = 0.02), and MP (18 vs 10 mos; P = 0.001). Median time from second- to third-line therapy with bortezomib (BORT)-based regimens was 14, 16, and 12 mos, respectively. This corresponded to higher proportions of pts remaining on second-line LEN at 2 yrs (38%, 44%, and 40%) vs non-LEN (15%, 30%, and 13%) for MPR-R, MPR, and MP, respectively. When evaluating second-line BORT, 22%, 33%, and 17%, respectively, had not progressed from second- to third-line therapy at 2 years. Prior LEN maintenance did not appear to induce resistant relapses as time from second- to third-line Tx was similar for all arms (Table) and all comparisons: MPR-R vs MP (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.924; P = 0.69), MPR-R vs MPR (HR = 1.076; P = 0.71), and MPR vs MP (HR = 0.895; P = 0.53). With limited follow-up, no significant differences in post-relapse OS have been detected. Newly occurring grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) reported for ≥ 5% of pts entering the OLEP (n = 153) were neutropenia (11%) and anemia (5%). Grade 3/4 deep vein thrombosis and peripheral neuropathy occurred in 3% and 1% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: LEN-based Tx was active in the second line, with comparable efficacy regardless of first-line therapy (MPR-R, MPR, or MP). Although pt numbers are relatively small, and this is a non-randomized comparison, results with second-line LEN-based therapy compared favorably to outcomes with other Tx. The OLEP tolerability profile was favorable, with limited newly occurring grade 3/4 AEs. Importantly, LEN maintenance does not appear to induce resistant relapses. These results support the known activity of LEN as second-line MM therapy. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Celgene Corp: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide as frontline treatment of multiple myeloma. Petrucci:Celgene Corp: Honoraria. Foa:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Catalano:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yu:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Herbein:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palumbo:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Association between Quality of Response and Outcome in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111044 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1873-1873

Author(s):

Paolo Strati ◽

Mariela Sivina ◽

Ekaterina Kim ◽

Michael J. Keating ◽

William G. Wierda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Initiation ◽

Treatment Discontinuation ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Genetics Research ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Introduction. In the context of chemoimmunotherapy, complete remission (CR) is more common and is associated with improved survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). CR is less frequent in CLL patients treated with ibrutinib, and the prognostic significance of achieving CR with ibrutinib is indeterminate. Methods. We prospectively analyzed 208 CLL patients treated on a phase 2 study (NCT02007044) of first-line (deletion 17p only; n=27) or salvage ibrutinib (n=181), with or without rituximab, between 12/2013 and 01/2018. Response was assessed by international workshop on CLL 2018 guidelines. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from treatment initiation to disease progression and/or death, and Kaplan-Meier curves compared using the log-rank test. A landmark analysis at median time of CR achievement (best response) was performed for PFS. Results. After a median follow-up of 34 months (range, 3-48 months), response was evaluable in 194 patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 99%, and CR rate was 24%, with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) in 3% of patients; median time to response was 10 months (range, 3-45 months) and median time to CR was 21 months (5-45 months). None of the patients' baseline characteristics associated with achievement of CR (Table). Among the 47 patients in CR, 7 (15%) discontinued treatment, after a median time from treatment initiation of 19 months (range, 10-39); the main cause of discontinuation was toxicity (5 patients), with second cancer (metastatic melanoma) and disease progression prompting treatment discontinuation only in 2 patients. Among the 145 patients in PR, 50 (34%) discontinued treatment, after a median time from treatment initiation of 14 months (range, 4-45 months); while the main cause of discontinuation was again toxicity (26 patients), 2nd cancers and progressive disease prompted treatment discontinuation in 5 and 14 patients, respectively. Remaining causes of treatment discontinuation among patients in PR were loss to follow-up (3 patients) and consolidation therapy (2 patients). Median PFS was not reached and 28 patients (13%) progressed and/or died. Achievement of CR significantly associated with prolonged PFS (4-year PFS 98% vs 78%, p=0.03)(Figure). The association between CR and prolonged PFS was also confirmed on a landmark analysis (21 months)(p=0.05). Among baseline characteristics shown in the Table, the only factor associated with prolonged PFS was absence of complex karyotype (4-year PFS 80% vs 40%, p=0.05). Median OS has not been reached and 16 (8%) patients have died; of these, only 1 patient was in CR (and cause of death was metastatic melanoma), whereas the remaining 15 were in PR. Among patients in PR, causes of death were: infections in 7 patients, 2nd cancers in 2 patients, Richter transformation in 2 patients and other in 4 patients (small bowel obstruction, colon perforation, intracranial hemorrhage, bradyarrhythmia). Conclusions. This is the first study showing that achievement of CR is a desirable endpoint for patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib, associating with prolonged PFS. Our results support the development of future combination studies, aimed at achieving higher rates of CR in patients treated with ibrutinib. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Wierda: AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Jain:Infinity: Research Funding; Novimmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologioes: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologioes: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novimmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Systemic Mastocytosis: Management and Outcome. Data Analysis from the Greek Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116693 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5463-5463

Author(s):

Ioannis Tsonis ◽

Nikolaos Kanellias ◽

Vasileios Lazaris ◽

Panayiotis Panayiotidis ◽

Damianos Sotiropoulos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Systemic Mastocytosis ◽

Cell Leukaemia ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Travel Grant

Abstract Background and Methods: Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) is a rare haematologic malignancy characterized by the abnormal growth and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells in one or more organs. The cKIT D816V mutation is a common genetic finding in most cases. A subset of patients appears to be at increased risk for mediator release related symptoms as well as organ dysfunction, including skeletal problems such as osteoporosis, osteolytic lesions and fractures. The diversity of clinical manifestations results in both delayed diagnosis and therapeutic dilemmas. SM cases diagnosed in Greece, between 1987 and 2018, are presented. This project is included in the current activities of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Working Party of Hellenic Society of Haematology for registry and research development. The medical files of the patients were retrospectively evaluated for disease characteristics, treatment and outcome. Results: Overall 59 patients, median age 52.0 years, with SM were included in the study. Median time of symptoms onset to diagnosis was two years. Twenty-one patients were categorized as indolent SM (ISM), 19 as SM with an associated haematological neoplasm (SM-AHN), 18 as aggressive SM (ASM) and one with mast cell leukaemia (MCL). The main characteristics of the disease are shown in Table 1. Several haematologic neoplasms were associated with SM. Although myeloid malignancies were the most common, including MDS or MDS/MPN (n=9), CMML (n=2), AML (n=1), CML (n=1) and ET (n=1), lymphoid malignancies were also reported and included NHL (n=3), HL (n=1) and B-ALL (n=1). SM and the AHN were diagnosed simultaneously in 12 cases. AHN diagnosis preceded the diagnosis of SM in 4 cases (median time: 22 months), while the opposite occurred in three cases (median time: 7.0 months). Most of the patients with ISM (16/21) did not receive any specific treatment. As far as the remaining five are concerned, one was treated with imatinib, one with hydroxyurea and the rest three received corticosteroids to control the mediators' related symptoms. One of the latter had diarrhoea without infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract and received consecutively Interferon alpha (IFNα), imatinib and corticosteroids without resolution of the syndrome. Eight patients with SM-AHN received treatment for both the SM and the co-existing haematological neoplasm, six only for the AHN, three only for SM, while three did not require treatment yet. The most common treatment for SM was IFNα (n=6), followed by imatinib (n=4), cladribine (2-CdA) (n=3) and dasatinib (n=1). Patients with ASM received either IFNα (n=8) or 2-CdA (n=5) as first line treatment. Second line treatment included imatinib (n=2), 2-CdA due to IFNα intolerance (n=1) and corticosteroids (n=2). Two patients with vertebrae fractures required surgical intervention. All patients with skeletal involvement received additionally biphosphonates. The patient with MCL received consecutively 2-CdA, chemotherapy (FLAG-Ida) and dasatinib achieving partial response and proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. He died 6 months later due to complications related to graft versus host disease. With a median follow-up of 31 months the median overall survival in the entire cohort is not reached. The median follow-up for patients with ISM and ASM is 33.5 and 18.5 months respectively, and all of them are alive with adequate disease control. Seven deaths were reported only in the group of patients with SM-AHN. Six patients died due to acute leukaemia and one due to infection, indicating that the aggressiveness of the underlying haematological malignancy is the strongest factor that affects survival in this group. Conclusion: Systemic Mastocytosis is a rare disease with variable manifestations and outcome. Nowadays, several therapeutic modalities are available for effective disease management over time. Novel targeted therapies seem to be promising to further improve the outcome, but still early and accurate diagnosis, in accordance to WHO classification, remains important. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Gavriilaki: European Hematology Association: Research Funding. Terpos:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Patents & Royalties; Genesis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Patents & Royalties; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text