scholarly journals Discontinuation of Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Deep Molecular Responses for at Least 2 Years: A Multicenter Phase 2 Stop Nilotinib (Nilst) Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 790-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norimitsu Kadowaki ◽  
Tatsuya Kawaguchi ◽  
Junya Kuroda ◽  
Hirohisa Nakamae ◽  
Itaru Matsumura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Deep Molecular Response ◽  
Treatment Free Remission

Abstract Background Sustained treatment-free remission (TFR) has been reported in 40-60% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase (CML-CP) after discontinuation of imatinib or dasatinib following at least 1-2 years of deep molecular response (MR). We investigated safety and efficacy of discontinuing nilotinib treatment after 2 years of sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.0032%) on nilotinib in patient for whom MR4.5 was achieved by prior treatment with imatinib or nilotinib. Methods The Stop Nilotinib (NILSt) trial was a single-arm multicenter phase 2 study in Japan. CML-CP patients who obtained MR4.5 by treatment with imatinib or nilotinib were enrolled, and were further treated with nilotinib for 2 years. The patients who maintained MR4.5 during those 2 years were eligible for discontinuation of nilotinib. After treatment discontinuation, maintenance of MR4.5 was monitored by quantitative RT-PCR every month during the 1st year and every 2 months during the 2nd year. Nilotinib was reintroduced in patients who lost MR4.5. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained MR4.5 at 1 year after the discontinuation. This study is registered, number UMIN000007141. Results 112 patients were enrolled between April 11, 2012 and November 30, 2012, and were treated with nilotinib for 2 years. 90 of those patients maintained MR4.5 during the entire 2-year period and were eligible to discontinue treatment, among which 87 patients actually discontinued nilotinib to intend a treatment-free remission period. Median follow-up after the discontinuation was 13.4 months (range 4.8-20.1). At 1 year, 53 patients (58.9%, 90% CI 49.7-67.7) maintained MR4.5, whereas 34 patients experienced loss of MR4.5 mostly within 6 months after the discontinuation (Figure 1). Thirty-two of those 34 patients (94.1%) regained MR4.5 2.2 months (median, 95% CI 1.5-2.6) after reintroduction of nilotinib. The following parameters did not significantly predict the probability of MR4.5 at 1 year after the discontinuation: age, sex, Sokal, Hasford, EUTOS scores, history of IFN-a therapy, total duration of imatinib or nilotinib therapy, time to MR4.5, or trough concentrations of nilotinib in sera. Notably, the percentages of patients maintaining MR4.5 for one year without treatment did not improve significantly with longer duration of prior MR4.5 on treatment; even some patients with a duration of prior deep MR on treatment exceeding 10 years experienced loss of MR4.5 after treatment discontinuation (Table 1). The rates of all grade (grade 3/4 in parentheses) cardiovascular events were 5.5% (2.7%), fluid retention were 14.1% (0%), and musculoskeletal pain were 9.7% (1.8%) during the 2-year treatment periods. Conclusion Nilotinib can be discontinued without relapse in more than half of the patients who maintained MR4.5 for at least 2 years. However, relapse occurred after the discontinuation following even more than 10 years of sustained deep MR in the rest of the patients. This suggests that the period of deep MR after which nilotinib can be discontinued without relapse is considerably long, if any, in a substantial proportion of patients. Biomarkers to detect such patients are awaited. Furthermore, additional strategies may be required to safely discontinue nilotinib as early as possible in such patients, in order to avoid serious adverse events caused by prolonged administration. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier estimates of TFR after discontinuation of nilotinib Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier estimates of TFR after discontinuation of nilotinib Table 1. Rates of MR4.5 maintenance at 1 year after discontinuation of nilotinib in relation to the duration of deep molecular response before the discontinuation Table 1. Rates of MR4.5 maintenance at 1 year after discontinuation of nilotinib in relation to the duration of deep molecular response before the discontinuation Disclosures Kawaguchi: Novartis: Honoraria. Kuroda:Janssen: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nakamae:Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharma KK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel/accommodation/meeting expenses, Research Funding. Matsumura:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma K.K: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Honoraria. Kanakura:Bristol Myers: Research Funding; Alexionpharma: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Shionogi: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Fujimotoseiyaku: Research Funding; Toyama Chemical: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Asciminib (ABL001) As an Add-on to Imatinib Versus Continued Imatinib Versus Switch to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Who Have Not Achieved a Deep Molecular Response with Frontline Imatinib

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5910-5910
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Jan Geissler ◽  
Shruti Kapoor ◽  
Anne-Sophie Longin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Atp Binding Site ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Deep Molecular Response ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Background: In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), the efficacy of ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has resulted in treatment-free remission (TFR) as a primary treatment goal for those with a sustained deep molecular response (DMR). However, most patients treated with imatinib fail to achieve a sustained DMR, meaning that they cannot benefit from TFR. Asciminib is a potent and specific inhibitor of BCR-ABL1. Unlike BCR-ABL1 TKIs that target the ATP binding site, asciminib binds to the myristate pocket of ABL1. Preclinical data showed that the combination of asciminib with ATP-competitive TKIs may provide more potent BCR-ABL1 inhibition and prevent emergence of resistance mutations (Wylie et al. Nature. 2017;543:733-737). In an ongoing phase 1 study (NCT02081378), asciminib demonstrated clinical activity and was well tolerated as a single agent (Hughes et al. Blood. 2016;128 [abstract 625]). In the same study, asciminib in combination with imatinib showed promising preliminary efficacy and a good safety profile in patients resistant/intolerant of ≥2 prior TKIs (Cortes et al. HemaSphere. 2019;3(S1) [abstract S388]). These findings informed the dose of asciminib to be further evaluated in combination with imatinib. An ongoing phase 3 study (NCT03106779) is evaluating asciminib vs bosutinib in patients previously treated with ≥2 ATP-binding site TKIs (Mauro et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37 [abstract TPS7070]). Here, we describe the ASCiminib add-on 4-arm study evaluating MOlecular REsponse (ASC4MORE) in patients. This is a phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy of adding asciminib to ongoing imatinib therapy in patients with CML-CP who have not achieved DMR with long-term frontline imatinib (CABL001E2201; NCT03578367). Methods: Study participants are aged ≥18 years, have CML-CP, and have been treated with frontline imatinib for ≥12 months. Study entry requires patients to be receiving imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD) at randomization, have BCR-ABL1 transcript levels in the range of ≤1% to >0.01% on the International Scale (IS), no prior achievement of MR4 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤0.01%) confirmed by two consecutive tests, and no prior treatment failure. Overall, ~80 patients will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four arms (Figure): either asciminib 40 mg QD or 60 mg QD added to imatinib 400 mg QD; continued treatment with imatinib 400 mg QD; or switch to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. Study treatment will continue until treatment resistance or intolerance, or up to 96 weeks after the last randomized patient has begun treatment. The primary objective of this study is to assess whether asciminib add-on to imatinib is more effective than imatinib continuation; the primary endpoint is the rate of MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤0.0032%) at 48 weeks. Secondary objectives include: to estimate the efficacy of switch to nilotinib; to estimate the difference in efficacy between asciminib add-on to imatinib and switch to nilotinib; and to characterize the safety of asciminib add-on to imatinib. Exploratory objectives include TFR eligibility at the end of the study and patient-reported outcomes. Patients in the imatinib continuation arm who have not achieved MR4.5 at 48 weeks may cross over to receive add-on asciminib. This study is ongoing, with 23 patients randomized as of 22 July 2019. Disclosures Saglio: BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Hughes:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel. Geissler:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Biomarin: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; UCB: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy. Kapoor:Novartis: Employment. Longin:Novartis: Employment. Mukherjee:Novartis: Employment. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals BCL2L11 (BIM) Deletion Polymorphism Is Associated with Molecular Relapse after ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Discontinuation in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with Complete Molecular Response

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1797-1797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiichiro Katagiri ◽  
Tetsuzo Tauchi ◽  
Yuu Saito ◽  
Tamiko Sugro ◽  
Michiyo Asano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Deletion Polymorphism ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Treatment Free Remission ◽  
Tki Discontinuation ◽  
Complete Molecular Response

Abstract Background: The inhibition of BCR-ABL1 kinase with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has markedly improved the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Recently, it has been recognized that some CML patients with a complete molecular response (CMR) are able to maintain treatment-free remission (TFR) after discontinuation of TKIs. However, no predictive prognostic factors for successful discontinuation of the treatment have yet been identified. We set out to further clarify the role of predictive biomarkers in molecular relapse and non-relapse after ABL TKI discontinuation. Materials and methods: Patients in sustained CMR (MR 4.5) undergoing TKI therapy were eligible for inclusion in the study. Molecular relapse was defined as loss of major molecular response (MMR) of at least one point. Genomic DNA was obtained from whole blood using a DNA Extractor WB Kit (Wako, Osaka, Japan), and was subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using primers designed to detect a deletion site (2903 bp) in intron two of the BCL2L11 gene (forward: 5′-AATACCACAGAGGCCCACAG-3′; reverse: 5′-GCCTGAAGGTGCTGAGAAAG-3′) and JumpStart RedAccuTaq LA DNA polymerase (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Results: 32 CML patients (17 men, 15 women, median age 58.4 years) were included in this study (Sokal category; low 24, intermediate 7, high 1). Six patients were treated with IFNα before TKI treatment, and 3 were treated with IFNα after stopping TKI. Median duration from TKI initiation to discontinuation was 79.3 months (range; 22 to 138 months); median duration of CMR before TKI discontinuation was 47.3 months (range; 5 to 97 months). Seven patients showed loss of MMR; 6 relapsed within 6 months and one showed late relapse at 25 months after discontinuation. The cumulative incidence of MMR loss was estimated as 18.8% at 12 months and at 24 months. Fluctuation of BCR-ABL transcript levels below the MMR threshold (> two consecutive positive values) was observed in 6.25% of patients at 24 months after ABL TKI discontinuation. Treatment-free remission was estimated as 81.2% at 12 months and at 24 months. The median period of restoration of second CMR was 6.0 months in re-treated patients. No patient died during the follow-up period. TKI-free remission was estimated as 78.1% at 30 months. There was only a significant difference in BCL2L11 (BIM) deletion polymorphism between the patients who maintained and those who lost MMR (p = 0.0253). No significant difference was observed in prior IFNα therapy, time to complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), time to MMR, and time to CMR between relapsing and non-relapsing patients. Conclusion: Our study shows a specific association between BCL2L11 (BIM) deletion polymorphism and clinical outcome after ABL TKI discontinuation in patients with long-lasting molecular undetectable residual disease. BCL2L11 (BIM) deletion polymorphism may predict relapse after ABL TKI discontinuation, which may have an impact on future ABL TKI discontinuation trials. These results further illustrate the importance of single nucleotide polymorphisms in successful long-term treatment of CML. Disclosures Ohyashiki: Bristol-Myers Squibb KK : Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis KK: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Current Strategies and Future Directions to Achieve Deep Molecular Response and Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Antonella Gozzini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Deep Molecular Response ◽  
Treatment Free Remission

scholarly journals A randomized controlled trial comparing peginterferon-α-2a versus observation after stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with deep molecular response for at least two years

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jew Win Kuan ◽  
Kian Meng Chang ◽  
Chin Lee Phan ◽  
Shu Ping Wong ◽  
Soo Min Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
National Medical ◽  
Deep Molecular Response ◽  
Treatment Free Remission

Abstract BackgroundInterferon (IFN) is a logical possibility to increase treatment free remission (TFR) rate in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We conducted the first randomized controlled trial comparing the use of pegIFN versus observation in CML patients attempting TFR.MethodsAdult CML patients with stable deep molecular response for ≥ 2 years with ≥ 2 readings of MR4.5 were randomized into two arms -- subcutaneous pegIFN-α-2a starting at 180 µg weekly for a year, followed by observation, or observation.ResultsA total of 30 patients were recruited (pegIFN n = 15, observation n = 15). Median follow-up was 38.1 months (range 15.9–49.4) and 23.8 (1.5–51.0) in pegIFN and observation arm, respectively. A total of 11 patients relapsed (pegIFN n = 4, observation n = 7). The median time of relapse was 13.1 months (range 9.2 to 25.5) and 4.4 (1.2 to 13.6) in pegIFN and observation arm, respectively. Only 8 out of 15 (53%) patients completed 52 doses of pegIFN with mean dose of 43 out of 52 doses (range 20 to 52). Dose of tolerable pegIFN was age dependent.ConclusionPegIFN is a potential consolidative therapy to increase TFR.Trial registration:(1) Malaysia National Medical Research Register (NMRR): NMRR-13-1186-15491. Approved 23rd September 2014, https://www.nmrr.gov.my/fwbLoginPage.jsp(2) ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02381379. Registered on 24th Feb 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT02381379&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=

scholarly journals Duration of Major Molecular Response and Discontinuation in Deep Molecular Response (MR4.5) Were Associated with Longer Treatment-Free Survival after Imatinib Discontinuation - Results from Two Prospective Brazilian Trials

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1655-1655
Author(s):  
Katia B Pagnano ◽  
Fernanda S Seguro ◽  
Eliana C Miranda ◽  
Ana Beatriz Pascoal Lopes ◽  
Andre Abdo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Deep Molecular Response ◽  
Treatment Free Remission

Several trials have demonstrated the feasibility of discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) with deep molecular response. Aims: to report the results of two Brazilian imatinib (IM) discontinuation trials and to evaluate factors impacting in treatment-free remission (TFR) and treatment-free survival (TFS) after IM discontinuation. Methods:Between September 2016 and January 2019, 60 CML pts were included in two ongoing phase II, single arm, prospective Brazilian discontinuation trials: Pilot Study of Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With Deep Molecular Response - Evaluation of Pioglitazone in Treatment-free Remission (TFR) (EDI-PIO UNICAMP)(NCT02852486)and Imatinib Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Phase With Sustained MR4log(USP) (NCT03239886). Inclusion criteria: age >18 years, chronic phase, minimum of 3 years of IM therapy, deep molecular response for ≥ 2 years (confirmed by 4 tests in the last 2 years, defined as MR4.0 in USP trial and MR4.5 in EDI-PIO). Patients participating in EDI-PIO trial used pioglitazone 30 mg/day plus IM for 3 months before IM discontinuation (n=30). After discontinuation, pts were monitored by quantitative RQ-PCR monthly in the first year, every 2 months in the second year and every 3 months in the third year. Criteria for IM re-initiation: loss of MMR (in one test), loss of cytogenetic response, loss of hematologic response, disease progression or confirmed loss of MR4.0 (this criteria used only in EDI-PIO trial). TFR was calculated from the date of discontinuation until first event (loss of MMR; IM reintroduction; death any cause or last follow-up); TFS was calculated from the date of IM discontinuation until reintroduction or last follow-up (censoring deaths not related to CML). Adverse events after IM discontinuation were reported according to CTCAE. Results:Data cut-off for analysis was February 2019. In the 1stanalysis 48 pts who discontinued IM in MR4.5 were analyzed. Patient's characteristics from EDIPIO (n=30) and USP (n=18) trials were: 57% vs. 67% male, median age of 55 (29-77) and 56 (33-95) years (29-95) at discontinuation; 16% and 33% had used previously Interferon; median duration of IM treatment of 10 (3-16) vs. 10 (5-15) years; median duration of MMR 95 (30-149) vs. 93 (57-130) months; MR4.0 was 90 (26-135) vs. 89 (30-123) months; and MR4.5 was 76 (23-135) vs. 75 (30-102) months; none variable had statistical difference.One patient died in MMR due to cardiac failure. TFR was 61% (95% CI 47-75) at 20 months. Sixteen (33%) out 48 re-initiated IM (2 with confirmed loss of MR4.0 and 14 with loss of MMR) in a median time of 20 (1-26) months. All relapsed pts recovered MMR after IM reintroduction, in a median time of 2 months (0-4). There was no transformation to advanced phases. No serious adverse events were reported during pioglitazone treatment. In the Cox regression the duration of MMR was associated with a longer TFR HR: 0.96 (beta-) (CI 95%:0.94-0.99, P= 0.006). Gender, age at diagnosis, age at discontinuation, treatment with pioglitazone, Sokal and EUTOS scores, BCR-ABL transcripts type, duration of IM therapy, duration of MR4.0 and MR4.5 and previous use of Interferon did not affect TFR.In the second analysis all 60 pts were included. TFS was 56% and was higher in pts who discontinued IM in sustained MR4.5 vs. MR4.0 (63% vs. 33%, P=0.04)(Figure). The independent factors for TFR in the multivariate analysis by Cox-regression were the duration of MMR [HR: 0.97 (beta-), 95%CI: 0.95-0.98, P=0.001] and intermediate/high risk Sokal [HR 3.14 95%CI: 1.08-9.11, P= 0.035]. Twenty-four out of 60 pts (40%) re-initiated IM (2 with confirmed loss of MR4.0 and 22 with loss of MMR).Adverse events occurred in 38 (63%) pts, 30% attributed to withdrawal syndrome. Some pts presented more than one event. Grade 1-2: arthralgia or muscular pain (17), hyperglycemia (4), hypertriglyceridemia (2), polycythemia (2), hypertension (3), and others (11). Four pts had grade 3-4 event: arthralgia (1), death for cardiac failure (1), abortion and hypertriglyceridemia (1). Conclusions:both trials demonstrated the feasibility and safety of IM discontinuation in pts in sustained deep molecular response. The duration of MMR was associated with a higher TFR and TFS rate. Imatinib discontinuation was more successful in pts in stable MR4.5. Figure Disclosures Pagnano: Pint Pharma: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy. Delamain:Novartis: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document