scholarly journals Unfractionated Heparin Use in Children: Clinical Outcomes in a Pediatric Cohort Managed Using an Anti-Factor Xa Based Nomogram

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 701-701
Author(s):  
Surbhi Saini ◽  
Katherine L Harsh ◽  
Joseph R Stanek ◽  
Sarah O'Brien ◽  
Amy L. Dunn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Educational Grant

Abstract Background: Given its short half-life and immediate, complete reversibility with protamine sulfate, unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the anticoagulant of choice for critically-ill children. The American College of Chest Physicians recommends that a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) range in children on treatment doses of UFH should reflect an anti-FXa level of 0.35-0.7 IU/mL. A previous study from our institution showed moderate correlation between APTT and anti-FXa, prompting an institution-wide change to an anti-FXa based nomogram. Per the new nomogram, APTT and anti-FXa levels were simultaneously collected at pre-specified time points, though dose titrations were made on anti-FXa levels alone. In this study, we present our 20-month experience using this nomogram. Objectives: To assess the utility of anti-FXa based UFH dosing guidelines in children over a 20-month period (September 2015-May 2017). Methods: Permission for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. Data was abstracted for all pediatric patients (age<21 yrs.) receiving therapeutic dosing of UFH (≥18 u/kg/hr) at Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) over the study period. Patients receiving UFH for <24 hrs, patients with mechanical circuits (ECMO and ventricular assist devices), and patients receiving concomitant anti-platelet therapy were excluded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparisons were made using non-parametric methods. Correlations were assessed using the Bland-Altman method for repeated measures. Results: Over a 20-month period, 176 patients received UFH therapy at NCH. Of these, 95 patients met our pre-specified inclusion criteria. These 95 patients had 1102 simultaneous APTT and anti-FXa measurements performed. Baseline demographic information is described in Table 1. Mean duration of UFH therapy was 5.2 days (range: 1-45 days). Median UFH dose required to reach therapeutic anti-FXa goal was 22 units/kg/hr (range: 18-55 units/kg/hr), and was significantly higher in infants (<1yr of age) compared to older children (33.9 u/kg and 20 u/kg respectively; p<0.0001). Median time to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa was 10 hours (range: 2-96 hours), and was significantly shorter in patients who received a bolus (n=44) compared to those who did not (5 hrs and 12 hrs respectively; p=0.03). Five patients never achieved therapeutic anti-FXa levels. In patients with thrombo-embolism (n=75), 65 had end-of-therapy imaging (complete response: 36; partial or no response: 29). Time to achieve therapeutic anti-FXa was not predictive of radiological response (p=0.27). Moderate linear correlation between the APTT and anti-FXa (r = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.71-0.77) (Figure 1) was noted for the entire cohort. Eleven (10.6%) major and non-major bleeding events and 10 (10.5%) minor bleeding events were noted. When comparing coagulation parameters of patients with major and non-major bleeding to those with no-bleeding and minor bleeding age, indication for anticoagulation, peak anti-FXa, peak APTT, lowest platelet count and fibrinogen were not predictive of bleeding. Critically high APTT (>250 sec) was noted on 43 occasions in 21 unique patients and not associated with an increased risk of major and non-major bleeds (p=0.07). Conclusions: UFH monitoring is challenging in children. Time to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation and bleeding risk in our cohort is consistent with previous publications. Contrary to previous publications, extreme elevation of APTT was not associated with increased bleeding risk. Disclosures O'Brien: Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: study of direct oral anticoagulant in treatment of pediatric VTE; Glaxo Smith Kline: Other: DSMB for Arixtra Study in Pediatric VTE; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: advisory board - von Willebrand Disease diagnosis & management; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: study of direct oral anticoagulant in prevention of pediatric VTE, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: advisory board - VWD diagnosis and management. Dunn: Alnylam: Other: Unrestricted educational grant; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: Unrestricted educational grant; Kedrion: Other: Unrestricted educational grant; NovoNordisk: Other: Unrestricted educational grant; Octapharma: Other: Unrestricted educational grant; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Unrestricted educational grant, Research Funding; Biogen: Other: Unrestricted educational grant, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Other: Unrestricted educational grant; World Federation of Hemophilia USA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar: Bayer: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study: A Perioperative Management Plan for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. LBA-5-LBA-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Douketis ◽  
Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽  
Joanne M Duncan ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Gregoire Le Gal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Perioperative Management ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Arterial Thromboembolism ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Introduction: The perioperative management of patients who are taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and require an elective surgery/procedure is uncertain. No studies have addressed the timing of perioperative DOAC interruption and resumption, and if perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing are needed. The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study hypothesized that a simple, standardized perioperative management strategy, based on DOAC-specific interruption and resumption intervals, that foregoes perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing, is safe for patient care, with associated low rates of major bleeding (1%) and arterial thromboembolism (0.5%). We postulated that this management yields a high proportion of patients (>90%) with a minimal to no DOAC level at surgery/procedure. Methods: PAUSE is a prospective study with 3 parallel DOAC cohorts of patients with AF taking apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban and requiring anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure. Patients were managed using a standardized protocol based on DOAC pharmacokinetic properties, procedure-associated bleeding risk (Appendix 1) and creatinine clearance (CrCl). DOACs were interrupted for 1 day before and after surgery for a low bleed risk surgery and 2 days before and after a high bleed surgery; longer interruption was done in patients on dabigatran with a CrCl<50 mL/min (Figure 1). A blood sample was obtained just before the procedure to measure residual DOAC levels (Appendix 2). Heparin bridging and preoperative coagulation testing were not used to manage patients. Patient follow-up occurred weekly for 30 days post-procedure for the primary clinical outcomes of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism (Appendix 3). The incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of clinical outcomes was determined for each DOAC cohort using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (interrupted at least 1 DOAC dose) and per-protocol analysis (adhering to DOAC interruption and resumption protocol). Results: We enrolled 3007 patients from 23 sites in Canada, the U.S. and Europe (Appendix 4). The patient characteristics were (Figure 2): mean age 72.5 years; 66.1% male; 33.5% high bleeding risk surgery/procedure, with 1257 patients in the apixaban cohort, 668 in the dabigatran cohort and 1082 in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 1). DOAC interruption and resumption intervals are shown in Table 2. The 30-day postoperative rate (95% CI) of major bleeding was 1.35% (0-2.00) in the apixaban cohort, 0.90% (0-1.73) in the dabigatran cohort and 1.85% (0-2.65) in the rivaroxaban cohort; the rate (95% CI) of arterial thromboembolism was 0.16% (0-0.48) in the apixaban cohort, 0.6% (0-1.33) in the dabigatran cohort and 0.37% (0-0.82) in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 3). There were 2541 (84.5%) patients with preoperative DOAC levels measured: a level <50 ng/ml occurred in 90.5% of patients in the apixaban cohort, in 95.1% of the dabigatran cohort and in 96.8% of the rivaroxaban cohort. Of 1007 patients having a high bleeding risk procedure, 832 (82.6%) had DOAC levels measured: 98.8% had a level <50 ng/mL (Table 4). Rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism in the per protocol analysis were comparable to those of the ITT analysis (Table 5). Conclusions: In patients with AF who were taking a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) and required anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure, using a standardized DOAC-specific perioperative management strategy was safe for patient care, with associated low rates of perioperative MB (<2%) and ATE (<1%). Further, a high proportion of patients (>90% overall; 98.8% at high bleeding risk) had a minimal or no residual DOAC level at the time of the surgery/procedure. PAUSE is the largest study, to date, that addresses how to manage the common problem of perioperative DOAC management. It is likely to have a practice-changing impact and will inform future practice guidelines in perioperative care. Study Funding: CIHR (313156) and the H&S Foundation of Canada (G-14-0006136). Aniara-Hyphen Biomed (assays). Acknowledgments: We thank Drs. Walter Ageno, David Garcia, Lehana Thabane, Wendt Lim, Lori Linkins, William Ristevski, and Demetrios J. Sahlas. Also, Kayla Lucier, Grace Wang, Tara McDougall, and HRLMP and CRLB. Supported by CanVector and REDCap. Disclosures Douketis: Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Biotie: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; The Medicines Company: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Astra-Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board; Portola: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board. Spyropoulos:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy. Carrier:Bayer: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vanassche:Bayer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; BMS/Pfizer: Consultancy. Verhamme:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medtronic: Honoraria; Portola: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shivakumar:Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria. Gross:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Lee:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Le Templier:BMS-pfizer: Honoraria. Wu:Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS-Pfizer: Honoraria. Coppens:Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Other: non-financial support, Research Funding; Uniqure BV: Research Funding. Arnold:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Caprini:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recovery Force: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen R&D: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Summer:Octapharma: Honoraria. Schulman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Major Bleeding Complications Among Patients Treated with Ibrutinib and Concomitant Antiplatelet, Anticoagulant, or Supplemental Therapy

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4387-4387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Pavlik ◽  
Hallie Barr ◽  
Emily Dotson ◽  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib, an orally bioavailable small molecular inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), is an approved therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and Waldenstrӧm's macroglobulinemia (WM). Beyond B lymphocytes, BTK signaling is important for collagen-mediated platelet activation, and BTK inhibition has been associated with primary hemostatic bleeding events (Levade et al Blood 2014). Although serious bleeding events have been uncommon (1-5%) in clinical trial populations, there is limited data describing the potential for increased serious bleeding incidence when ibrutinib is co-administered with other agents affecting the clotting cascade or platelet function. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of major bleeding in patients receiving ibrutinib concomitantly with antiplatelet agents (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, ADP inhibitors), anticoagulants (heparins, warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants), or supplements with potential anticoagulant activity (vitamin E and fish oil). Major bleeding events were identified using criteria developed by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Schulman et al J Thromb Haemost 2005). Patients 18-89 years of age and treated with ibrutinib for CLL, MCL, or WM between March 1, 2010 and March 1, 2015 were included. The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of major bleeding events, but we also sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of major bleeding, focusing on potential drug interactions. Based on the historic prevalence of major bleeding in ibrutinib clinical studies, we calculated that at least 20 major bleeding events would need to be identified in order to perform blinded multinomial regression on the collected data of an estimated 400 patients. Results: 437 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Patients were overwhelmingly male (71.4%) and white (94.8%), with a mean age of 67.1 years (range: 29-89). 53.1% received ibrutinib as participants of a clinical trial, and the remainder received standard-of-care ibrutinib treatment. The table (upper panel) summarizes use of concomitant antihemostatic agents by presence or absence of major bleeding events. Characteristics of the major bleeding events are further detailed in the lower panel. The most commonly observed concomitant antihemostatic medication was aspirin, with 147 patients (33.6%) being exposed to aspirin within the study period. Fourteen instances of major bleeding were observed, corresponding to an overall incidence of 3.2%. These major bleeding events all occurred in CLL patients receiving ibrutinib at the standard dose of 420 mg daily. Two patients had platelet counts less than 50 k/µL at time of the bleeding event. One-half of the major bleeding events were observed in the absence of an antihemostatic medication, and 2 of the observed major bleeding events resulted in death (1 received concomitant warfarin). Fourteen patients (3.3%) in the group without major bleeding were on anticoagulation, 4 being warfarin. The most common sites of major bleeding were gastrointestinal (50%), intracranial (14.3%) and thoracic (14.3%). While most patients developing major bleeding permanently discontinued ibrutinib (57.1%), approximately one third of the patients who developed major bleeding subsequently resumed ibrutinib following resolution of the bleeding event. Subsequently, these patients did not experience a recurrent major bleeding event. The rate of major bleeding did not meet power to detect statistical differences in bleeding events when comparing concomitant therapy, Conclusions: Our observed incidence of major bleeding is consistent with previous controlled clinical trials, suggesting similar safety profile when ibrutinib is used outside of a controlled setting. Major bleeding events were uncommon despite the frequent co-administration of antiplatelet agents. However, because we modified practice early to avoid therapeutic anticoagulation during ibrutinib therapy whenever possible, the number of patients receiving such drugs in combination was small and precludes inferences regarding safety. Table Table. Disclosures Blum: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Awan:Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy. Woyach:Acerta: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding. Christian:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Thrombotic and Bleeding Outcomes Following Perioperative Interruption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation - a Comparative Analysis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1234-1234
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Shaw ◽  
Tinghua Zhang ◽  
Gregoire Le Gal ◽  
James Douketis ◽  
Marc Carrier
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Chads2 Score ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common disorder that will affect up to 5.6 million patients in the U.S. by 2050. Both direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), typically warfarin, are used for stroke prevention in AF and such patients frequently undergo invasive procedures requiring anticoagulant interruption. Temporary interruption of anticoagulants can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the form of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. DOACs have a short half-life and fast onset of action, thereby facilitating their perioperative management as compared to VKAs. Despite important differences in perioperative management and pharmacokinetics between DOACs and VKAs, there is a paucity of data comparing perioperative outcomes in DOAC and VKA-treated patients. Methods: We undertook a single-center, retrospective chart review that compared consecutive DOAC- or warfarin-treated patients with AF who underwent perioperative anticoagulant interruption for invasive procedures between January 2017 and March 2018. Perioperative warfarin interruption was done as per CHEST guidelines (Douketis et al. Chest 141,2 Suppl). Perioperative bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin was only used for patients with CHADS2 scores of 5-6 or in patients with stroke within the past 6 months. Perioperative interruption of DOACs was done as per Thrombosis Canada guidelines, with anticoagulation held for 3 half-lives prior to low bleeding risk procedures and 5 half-lives for high bleeding risk procedures. Primary outcomes included the 30-day post-operative thromboembolic and major bleeding rates. Secondary outcomes included the 30-day clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) andl mortality rates. Major bleeding and CRNMB were defined according to ISTH definitions. Procedural bleeding risk was defined as per Schulman et al (Circulation 2015; 132(3)). Outcome events were independently adjudicated by two investigators. Outcomes from patients on DOACs and VKAs were compared. Demographic data was analyzed on a per-patient basis, p-values were calculated using independent T-Test, Chi-Square/Fisher's Exact Test where appropriate. Outcome data was analyzed on a per-interruption basis. P-values for unadjusted and adjusted comparisons were calculated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for correlation between multiple procedures on the same patients. Results: 325 DOAC patients and 199 warfarin patients underwent 351 and 221 periprocedural interruptions, respectively. Warfarin patients had a significantly higher mean age, CHADS2 score, and proportion with renal dysfunction (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day post-operative rates of thromboembolism, CRNMB, and overall mortality, but warfarin patients had a significantly higher rate of major bleeding (Table 2). This latter result remained statistically significant following multivariate logistic regression correction for age, CHADS2 score and level of renal dysfunction. All bleeding events occurred post-procedure, with major bleeding events occurring from post-operative day 1 to post-operative day 25. None of the warfarin patients with major bleeding received perioperative bridging; the mean international normalized ratio (INR) at the time of major bleeding was 3.3. Most major bleeding events (7/8) in the VKA arm were surgical, with a single non-surgical major-bleed (spontaneous ICH on post-operative day 15 following urological surgery). Conclusions: The perioperative interruption of warfarin was associated with a higher 30-day rate of major bleeding as compared with DOAC interruption. Re-initiation of warfarin should be done judiciously following high bleeding risk procedures, and close INR monitoring may be warranted. Disclosures Shaw: Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Douketis:Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Portola: Other: Advisory Board; The Medicines Company: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board; Biotie: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Astra-Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board. Carrier:Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Research Funding.

Outcomes Following Lenalidomide for Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients at Risk of Bleeding Events Because of Multiple Comorbidities or Treatment: A Post-Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the SPRINT (MCL-002) Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2978-2978
Author(s):  
Marek Trneny ◽  
Thierry Lamy ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
David Belada ◽  
Jiri Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have limited treatment options, especially those receiving multiple prior therapies. Patients with MCL are mostly an elderly population with various comorbidities who receive multiple medications that may lead to an increased risk of toxicity from underlying disease, as well as drug interactions. These multiple, concomitant conditions introduce complexity into the evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio of available therapies. In the relapsed setting, there is increasing use of new treatment options, such as lenalidomide, which is an immunomodulatory agent with direct and immune-mediated mechanisms of action. Lenalidomide has shown efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in multiple studies of R/R MCL, including the randomized MCL-002 (SPRINT) study comparing lenalidomide vs. investigator's choice (IC) of monotherapy. The objective of this post hoc subgroup analysis from the MCL-002 study was to examine the effect and safety of lenalidomide in patients who are at risk of bleeding events because of multiple comorbidities or treatments (i.e., polymedication) denoted as LEN-CM compared with those not at risk (LEN), LEN-CM being a population with a limited choice of treatment options. Methods: The multicenter MCL-002 study randomized patients 2:1 to lenalidomide vs. single-agent IC of monotherapy (rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, chlorambucil, or cytarabine; NCT00875667). Patients had 1-3 relapses or had failed prior therapy, and were ineligible for intensified chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. Oral lenalidomide was initiated at 25 mg/day on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or as tolerated. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint (per modified 1999 IWG criteria); secondary endpoints included response rates, duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. The current analyses were based on investigator's assessment. Specific patient groups with or without increased bleeding risk due to comorbidities and/or treatment were identified for the subgroup analysis based on pre-existing characteristics at study initiation. Patients in the LEN-CM group included those with hemorrhages (or predispositions to such), concomitant anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and/or current or preexisting atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulants. Results: Of 170 patients originally randomized to lenalidomide treatment, there were 60 (35%) LEN-CM vs. 110 (65%) LEN patients included in this subanalysis. At baseline, patients in both groups generally had a similar baseline patient profile and prior treatment history, although there were some differences between groups: more patients in the LEN-CM group (vs. LEN) were >=65 years of age (78% vs. 62%) and had more high-risk MIPI score at baseline (47% vs. 29%), whereas fewer had positive bone marrow (7% vs. 15%), high tumor burden (37% vs. 54%), or bulky disease (15% vs. 25%). Median PFS by investigator assessment was 10.7 months (95% CI, 4.3-14.0) for LEN-CM and 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.3-14.6) for LEN (Table 1). Overall response rates (ORR) in the LEN-CM vs. LEN patients were 29/60 (48%) and 49/110 (45%) with complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu) rates of 6/60 (10%) and 13/110 (12%), respectively. Median DOR and OS were also similar in both groups of lenalidomide-treated patients. The safety profiles were similar for these subgroups, with similar rates of AEs leading to discontinuations and dose reductions/interruptions. Most common any grade treatment-emergent AEs (>=20%) for LEN-CM vs. LEN groups respectively were 48% vs. 52% neutropenia, 33% vs. 38% thrombocytopenia, 32% vs. 27% anemia, 25% vs. 19% fatigue, 23% vs. 22% diarrhea, and 5% vs. 23% pyrexia. Conclusions: For patients with R/R MCL, there is a high, unmet medical need for effectivetherapy with acceptable toxicity. Overall, the LEN-CM and LEN subgroups showed similar efficacy and safety outcomes. Results from this subgroup analysis of the MCL-002 study show that lenalidomide leads to clinically meaningful PFS and other efficacy outcomes irrespective of the presence or absence of bleeding risk due to comorbidities and/or treatment. Disclosures Walewski: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Belada:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Radford:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Equity Ownership; Astra-Zeneca: Equity Ownership; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jurczak:Morphosys: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celtron: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz-Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Morschhauser:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kaplanov:State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary #1: Employment. Thyss:Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Kuzmin:Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary: Employment. Stelitano:Azienda Ospedaliera: Employment. Marks:Pfizer: Honoraria. Trümper:Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Biyukov:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barnett:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Casadebaig Bravo:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Arcaini:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Research Funding.

scholarly journals ASXL1 Mutation Is a Novel Risk Factor for Bleeding in Patients with Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3637-3637
Author(s):  
Amro Elshoury ◽  
Han Yu ◽  
Wenyan Ji ◽  
James E. Thompson ◽  
Elizabeth A. Griffiths ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Abstract Background: Bleeding and thrombosis are prevalent across all myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) subtypes and have significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Although risk factors for thrombosis are well established, bleeding risk factors in these patients are poorly characterized. Identifying MPN patients at higher risk for bleeding could guide the duration of anticoagulation for patients with MPN associated thrombosis (balancing the risk between bleeding and thrombosis), select individuals at higher risk for bleeding during prophylactic anticoagulation, and predict for bleeding complications with surgical procedures. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of bleeding risk factors among consecutive adult MPN patients treated at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center. Bleeding events were classified as minor or major events as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH). The primary outcome of interest was time to initial bleeding after MPN diagnosis. Patient characteristics were summarized as range and medians (for continuous variables) and counts with percentages (for categorical variables) (Table 1). Cox regression was used to examine the associations between candidate risk factors with identified bleeding events in univariate and multivariable analyses. Variables with p&lt;0.1 in univariate analyses were selected for multi-variate analysis. A time-dependent variable of thrombosis status was included in the model. A stepwise feature selection based on Akaike Information Criterion was used for model selection. Continuous variables were dichotomized at median for the regression analyses. Results: A total of 170-consecutive adult MPN patients were identified between 2005 and 2021. Median follow-up was 43.5 months (range 0.66-485.72). The rate of bleeding (major and minor) was 4.9/100 patient-years and rate of thrombosis was 5.4/100 patient-years (5.4/100 patient-years for arterial thrombosis and 2.9/100 patient-years for venous thrombosis). In univariable analysis, predictors of bleeding included age &gt; 60 years (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.47-5.34; p=0.001), diagnoses of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (HR 2.98; 95% CI 1.29-6.9; p=0.01) and myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS-MPN) overlap syndrome (HR 4.56, 95% CI1.91-10.88; p=0.0004), prior history of thrombosis (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.27-8.8; p=0.01) and presence of ASXL1 (HR 4.13, 95% CI 2.13-8.04; p=0.0001), JAK2 V617F (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.31-1.08; p=0.08) and TET2 mutations (HR 3.46; 95% CI 1.5-7.9; p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, the presence of JAK2 V617F (HR 4.8; 95% CI 1-21.5; p=0.03) and ASXL1 (HR 12.7, 95% CI 1.7-93; p=0.01) mutations were associated with increased risk of bleeding (Figure 2). Patients with polycythemia vera were at lower risk of bleeding (HR -3.5, 95% CI 0-0.8; p=0.03). Since ASXL1 mutation was associated with a higher risk of bleeding, we studied the association between ASXL1 mutation and other clinical variables. Patients with ASXL1 mutations were more likely to have a diagnosis of PMF and MDS-MPN overlap syndrome (p=0.0001), age &gt; 60 years (p=0.0001), risk for thrombosis (p=0.04), lower hematocrit (p=0.009) and platelets (p=0.0003) but higher white blood cell count (WBC) (p= 0.04) (Figure 3). We then studied the correlation between ASXL1 mutation and factor VIII/Von Willebrand complex and factor V, the two most described abnormal coagulation factors in MPN. ASXL1 mutation was not associated with a statistically significant lower VWF Ag (p=0.07) or factor V (p=0.1) that could potentially explain the higher risk of bleeding seen with this mutation (figure 4). Conclusion: ASXL1 mutations are associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding in adult MPN patients. The risk of bleeding with ASXL1 mutations was independent of prior thrombosis and was not associated with abnormalities in VWF profile or factor V. Confirmation of these findings in additional patients and studies of underlying platelet function to identify the possible mechanism of ASXL1 associated bleeding in these patients are ongoing. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Elshoury: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Other: advisory board. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Griffiths: Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Wang: Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, steering committee, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data safety monitoring committee; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Genentech: Consultancy; MacroGenics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Management and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Receiving Ibrutinib for Hematologic Malignancies at a Single Center

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2040-2040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy E Wiczer ◽  
Lauren B Levine ◽  
Jessica Brumbaugh ◽  
Jessica Coggins ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Major Bleeding Events ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Ibrutinib (IB) is Food and Drug Administration approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). High overall response rates, extended progression free survival, and an acceptable adverse event profile make IB an impactful therapy for these malignancies. Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been identified as a less common but serious adverse effect of IB with reported incidence ranging from 2-16% in clinical trials and post-marketing experience. AF can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including congestive heart failure and embolic events such as stroke. Data regarding the management of AF in this patient population is thus far limited. Embolic stroke prevention poses a particular clinical challenge as IB carries an inherent bleeding risk that may be increased by antiplatelet therapy and therapeutic anticoagulation. We report the management and outcomes of a large cohort of patients who developed AF while on IB therapy. Methods Patients with hematological malignancies and incident or recurrent AF while on IB therapy at the Ohio State University were identified retrospectively. Incident AF was defined as new onset AF in patients without a history AF and recurrent AF as an AF event requiring new intervention in patients with a prior history of AF. Data pertaining to patient demographics, comorbid conditions, AF events, AF management, stroke prevention strategies, and complications of AF therapy were collected. AF events were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 andcongestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, stroke (CHADs2) scores were calculated. Major bleeding was defined as a decrease in hemoglobin of 2g/dL or more, requiring a transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells or whole blood, occurring in a critical site, or contributing to death. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding events were graded according to CTCAE criteria. Management strategies and outcomes are summarized. Results Seventy-two patients with incident or recurrent AF were identified. Fifty-nine patients developed incident AF while 13 patients developed recurrent AF while on IB. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1.Patients with recurrent AF were older, had worse baseline ECOG performance status, and longer baseline PR interval on electrocardiogram assessment.Patients were followed for a median of 4.3 years from the start of ibrutinib and 1.7 years from AF event.Ninety-three percent of the AF events were grade 1-2 and 7% were grade 3. First-line therapy forAF included rate-control for 54 (75%) patients, interventional procedural strategies for 8 (11.1%), and rhythm-control for 3 (4.2%). Seven (9.7%) patients required no intervention. Twenty-two patients (30.5%) required a second and 4 (5.5%) required third-line AF management intervention. Among those with a secondary AF management strategy, rhythm control was the most frequently utilized (n=10, 45.5%). During the AF events, 31 (43.1%) patients continued IB, 35 (48.6%) temporarily held IB, 5 (6.9%) discontinued IB, and one patient had the dose reduced. Stroke prevention strategies are described in Table 2. Patients with recurrent AF were less likely to be treated with anticoagulation when compared to patients with incident AF. Six (8.3%) patients had a major bleeding event and 2 of these patients went on to have a second major bleed. Of the 8 major bleeding events, 3 occurred with concomitant antiplatelet therapy and no patients were on anticoagulation therapy at the time of bleeding. Eighteen (25%) patients developed a total of 25 clinically relevant non-major bleeding events (9 grade 1 events, 13 grade 2 events, 2 grade 3 events, and 1 could not be graded). Only one potential embolic event occurred in a patient with a CHADs2 score of 1 on aspirin 325mg who developed symptoms consistent with stroke. Conclusions AF events in patients being treated with IB are generally manageable and in the majority of cases did not result in IB discontinuation. Clinically relevant bleeding events are common, and caution must be exercised when initiating routine antiplatelet therapy and/or anticoagulation in patients with IB. Risk of ischemic stroke was low in our patient population, though follow up was limited. The optimum strategy for stroke prophylaxis in patients with concurrent IB is unclear. Disclosures Christian: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Porcu:miRagen: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; celgene: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Millenium: Other: investigator in a clinical trial. Woyach:Morphosys: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Jones:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Awan:Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Association of Bleeding Severity with Mortality with in-Hospital and Extended Thromboprophylaxis in the Medically Ill in the Magellan Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2441-2441
Author(s):  
Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽  
Gary E. Raskob ◽  
Alexander T Cohen ◽  
Walter Ageno ◽  
Jeffrey I. Weitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Bayer Healthcare ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common after hospitalization in acutely ill medical patients, yet extended thromboprophylaxis has not been widely implemented due to concerns about bleeding. The MAGELLAN study (NCT00571649) evaluated whether rivaroxaban (10 mg QD for 35±4 days) compared with enoxaparin (40 mg QD for 10±4 days) followed by placebo could prevent asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, and VTE-related death. Through Day 35, rivaroxaban was superior to enoxaparin/placebo in the modified intent-to-treat population (4.4% vs 5.7%, RR 0.77, 95%CI, 0.62 to 0.96, p=0.02), but there was an increase in clinically relevant bleeding, the composite of major and non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding (4.1% vs 1,7%, RR 2.5, 95%CI 1.85-3.25, p<0.001). Although major bleeding has been associated with increased mortality, the relationship between NMCR bleeding and all-cause mortality (ACM) is not established. We hypothesized that subjects in the MAGELLAN trial with major bleeding but not those with NMCR bleeding, would be at an increased risk of ACM irrespective of treatment group. Methods: We evaluated all bleeding events in subjects taking at least one dose of study drug from randomization until 2 days after the last dose (safety population) and their association with ACM through the Day 90 visit in 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) subjects with no major or NMCR bleeding; (2) subjects whose first event was NMCR bleeding; and (3) subjects whose first event was major bleeding. Subjects only developing minimal or trivial bleeding were grouped with those who had no clinically relevant bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazards model that included the bleeding group variable and baseline covariates significantly associated with ACM at p<0.05 (age, BMI, history of cancer, history of anemia, inflammatory disease, acute ischemic stroke, and acute respiratory insufficiency), we compared the risk of ACM in subjects with and without bleeding events. Results: The incidence of ACM for subjects who had NMCR bleeding was numerically higher but not significantly increased compared with subjects with no bleeding (20/176, 11.4% vs 468/7763, 6.0%, HR 1.41 95%CI 0.88, 2.25, p=0.151), while subjects with major bleeding were at a significantly increased risk of death (28/59, 47.5% vs 468/7763, 6.0%, HR 7.74 95%CI 5.16, 11.59, p<0.0001). Results of landmark analyses from the first bleeding event or end of treatment + 2 days to ACM for the three groups are displayed (Figure). Limitations: This analysis was post hoc and may have been underpowered to detect differences in ACM associated with NMCR bleeding. Conclusion: Major bleeding was associated with a significantly increased risk of ACM but NMCR bleeding was not. This suggests that a modest increase in NMCR bleeding associated with extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban may be acceptable to prevent VTE. Strategies to better select patients at lower risk of bleeding may improve the benefit risk profile of extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban. Disclosures Spyropoulos: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; ATLAS (Colorado Prevention Center): Consultancy; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy. Raskob:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Tetherex: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Anthos: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Consultancy. Cohen:Boston Scientific: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GLG: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; ACI Clinical: Consultancy; Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; McKinsey: Consultancy; Navigant: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Temasek Capital: Consultancy; TRN: Consultancy; UK Government Health Select Committee: Other: advised the UK Government Health Select Committee, the all-party working group on thrombosis, the Department of Health, and the NHS, on the prevention of VTE; Lifeblood: Other: advisor to Lifeblood: the thrombosis charity and is the founder of the European educational charity the Coalition to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism. Ageno:Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference and travel support; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: research support,travel support ; BMS Pfizer: Other: travel support; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Weitz:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spiro:Bayer U.S. LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lu:Janssen R&D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipardi:Janssen Research and Develompent: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barnathan:Janssen Research and Development LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: Rivaroxaban is a Factor Xa inhibitor. It is currently under review by FDA for approval as thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

scholarly journals Preclinical Evaluation of Gilteritinib on NPM1-ALK Driven Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Cells

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2865-2865
Author(s):  
Sudhakiranmayi Kuravi ◽  
Janice Cheng ◽  
Kishore Polireddy ◽  
Gabrielle Fangman ◽  
Roy A Jensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Apoptotic Protein ◽  
Large Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Alk Positive

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is an aggressive type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) comprising 2-8% of adult and 10-20% of pediatric and adolescent NHL. More than three-fourths of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive ALCL express (nucleophosmin1) NPM1-ALK fusion gene as a result of t(2;5) chromosomal translocation. The self-dimerization of fusion kinase NPM1-ALK mediates constitutive activation of the chimeric tyrosine kinase activity leading to downstream signaling pathways responsible for lymphoma cell proliferation and survival. The current standard treatment regimen for ALK+ ALCL is CHOP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxy doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy. Oftentimes, resistance and failure of remission occur with CHOP therapy, making it a suboptimal treatment regimen for many patients. Therefore, an alternative therapeutic approach is warranted to better address the needs of the ALK+ ALCL population. Gilteritinib is a recently FDA approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of FMS-like tyrosine kinase (FLT3) mutation-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Along with inhibition of FLT3, gilteritinib also inhibits other tyrosine kinases such as AXL and ALK. In this study, for the first time, we demonstrated gilteritinib mediated growth inhibitory effects on NPM1-ALK driven ALCL cells. We have used a total of five cell lines in our study: NPM1-ALK endogenously expressing human ALCL cell lines (SUDHL-1, SUP-M2, SR-786, and DEL), and our laboratory generated ectopically overexpressing Ba/F3-FG-NPM1-ALK, a murine cell line. Gilteritinib treatment (5-20 nM) inhibited NPM1-ALK fusion kinase phosphorylation, which resulted in downregulation of downstream survival signaling pathways including AKT, ERK1/2, and STAT3 leading to induced apoptosis and decreased clonogenic survival. Gilteritinib mediated apoptosis was associated with caspase 3/9 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage with increased pro-apoptotic protein BAD and decreased anti-apoptotic protein MCL-1. Increased expression of c-Myc is associated with ALK-positive ALCL and gilteritinib treatment decreased c-Myc levels in a dose dependent manner. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated gilteritinib treatment induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase with a concomitant decrease in G2/M and S phases. In summary, our preclinical results suggest gilteritinib has therapeutic potential for the treatment of ALCL cells expressing NPM1-ALK and other ALK /ALK-fusion driven hematologic or solid malignancies. Disclosures Lin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ganguly:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. McGuirk:ArticulateScience LLC: Other: Assistance with manuscript preparation; Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Multicenter Analysis of Treatment and Outcomes for Patient with TP53 Mutated AML in the Era of Novel Therapies; Significant Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation on Survival

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 797-797
Author(s):  
Talha Badar ◽  
Mark R. Litzow ◽  
Rory M. Shallis ◽  
Jan Philipp Bewersdorf ◽  
Antoine Saliba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Novel Therapies ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tp53 Mutations

Abstract Background: TP53 mutations occur in 10-20% of patients with AML, constitute high-risk disease as per ELN criteria, and confer poorer prognosis. Venetoclax combination therapies and CPX-351 were recently approved for AML treatment and lead to improved outcomes in subsets of high-risk AML, however the most effective approach for treatment of TP53-mutated (m) AML remains unclear. In this study we explored the clinical outcome of TP53m AML patients treated over the last 8 years as novel therapies have been introduced to our therapeutic armamentarium. Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational study in collaboration with 4 U.S. academic centers and analyzed clinical characteristics and outcome of 174 TP53m AML patients diagnosed between March 2013 and February 2021. Mutation analysis was performed on bone marrow specimens using 42, 49, 199, or 400 gene targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Patients with an initial diagnosis of AML were divided into 4 groups (GP) based on the progressive use of novel therapies in clinical trials and their approvals as AML induction therapy during different time periods: 2013-2017 (GP1, n= 37), 2018-2019 (GP2, n= 53), 2019-2020 (GP3, n= 48) and 2020-2021 (GP4, n= 36) to analyze difference in outcome. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different across different GP, as shown in Table 1. Median age of patients was 68 (range [R], 18-83), 65 (R, 29-88), 69 (R, 37-90) and 70 (R, 51-97) years in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.40). The percentage of patients with de novo AML/secondary AML/therapy-related AML in GP1-4 was 40/40/20, 36/29/24, 37.5/37.5/25 and 28/52/20, respectively (p=0.82). The proportion of patients with complex cytogenetics (CG) was 92%, 89%, 96% and 94% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.54). The median TP53m variant allele frequency (VAF) was 48% (range [R], 5-94), 42% (R, 5-91), 45% (R, 10-94) and 60% (R, 8-82) in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.38). Four (11%), 13 (24.5%), 10 (21%) and 9 (25%) patients had multiple TP53 mutations in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.33). The proportion of patients who received 3+7 (30%, 16%, 6% & 8%; p=0.01), HMA only (11%, 18%, 2% & 8%; p=0.06), venetoclax-based (2.5%, 12%, 48%, & 61%; p &lt;0.01) and CPX-351 induction (16%, 40%, 28% & 5%; p&lt;0.001) were varied in GP1-4, respectively. The rate of CR/CRi was 22%, 26%, 28% and 18% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.63). Treatment related mortality during induction was observed in 3%, 7%, 10% and 17% of patients in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.18). Overall, 28 (16%) patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) after induction/consolidation: 22%, 15%, 17% and 11% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.67). In subset analysis, there was no difference in the rate of CR/CRi with venetoclax-based regimens vs. others (39% vs 61%, p=0.18) or with CPX-351 vs. others (25% vs 75%, p=0.84). The median progression-free survival was 7.7, 7.0, 5.1 and 6.6 months in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.60, Fig 1A). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.4, 6.1, 4.0 and 8.0 months in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.29, Fig 1B). In univariate analysis for OS, achievement of CR/CRi (p&lt;0.001) and alloHCT in CR1 (p&lt;0.001) associated with favorable outcome, whereas complex CG (p=0.01) and primary refractory disease (p&lt;0.001) associated with poor outcome. Multiple TP53 mutations (p=0.73), concurrent ASXL1m (p=0.86), extra-medullary disease (p=0.92), ≥ 3 non-TP53m mutations (p=0.72), TP53m VAF ≥ 40% vs. &lt; 40% (p=0.25), induction with CPX-351 vs. others (p=0.59) or venetoclax-based regimen vs. others (p=0.14) did not show significance for favorable or poor OS in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, alloHCT in CR1 (hazard ratio [HR]=0.28, 95% CI: 0.15-0.53; p=0.001) retained an association with favorable OS and complex CG (HR 4.23, 95%CI: 1.79-10.0; p=0.001) retained an association with dismal OS. Conclusion: We present the largest experience with TP53m AML patients analyzed by NGS. Although outcomes were almost universally dismal, alloHCT appears to improve the long-term survival in a subset of these patients. Effective therapies are warranted to successfully bridge patients to alloHCT and to prolong survival for transplant ineligible patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badar: Pfizer Hematology-Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Litzow: Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Pluristem: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Shallis: Curis: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Goldberg: Celularity: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aptose: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Atallah: BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Foran: revolution medicine: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Research Funding; kura: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; aptose: Research Funding; actinium: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; trillium: Research Funding; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; certara: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1589-1589
Author(s):  
Fabian Frontzek ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Maike Nickelsen ◽  
Bettina Altmann ◽  
Bertram Glass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document