Outcomes Following Lenalidomide for Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients at Risk of Bleeding Events Because of Multiple Comorbidities or Treatment: A Post-Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the SPRINT (MCL-002) Trial

Abstract Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have limited treatment options, especially those receiving multiple prior therapies. Patients with MCL are mostly an elderly population with various comorbidities who receive multiple medications that may lead to an increased risk of toxicity from underlying disease, as well as drug interactions. These multiple, concomitant conditions introduce complexity into the evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio of available therapies. In the relapsed setting, there is increasing use of new treatment options, such as lenalidomide, which is an immunomodulatory agent with direct and immune-mediated mechanisms of action. Lenalidomide has shown efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in multiple studies of R/R MCL, including the randomized MCL-002 (SPRINT) study comparing lenalidomide vs. investigator's choice (IC) of monotherapy. The objective of this post hoc subgroup analysis from the MCL-002 study was to examine the effect and safety of lenalidomide in patients who are at risk of bleeding events because of multiple comorbidities or treatments (i.e., polymedication) denoted as LEN-CM compared with those not at risk (LEN), LEN-CM being a population with a limited choice of treatment options. Methods: The multicenter MCL-002 study randomized patients 2:1 to lenalidomide vs. single-agent IC of monotherapy (rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, chlorambucil, or cytarabine; NCT00875667). Patients had 1-3 relapses or had failed prior therapy, and were ineligible for intensified chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. Oral lenalidomide was initiated at 25 mg/day on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or as tolerated. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint (per modified 1999 IWG criteria); secondary endpoints included response rates, duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. The current analyses were based on investigator's assessment. Specific patient groups with or without increased bleeding risk due to comorbidities and/or treatment were identified for the subgroup analysis based on pre-existing characteristics at study initiation. Patients in the LEN-CM group included those with hemorrhages (or predispositions to such), concomitant anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and/or current or preexisting atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulants. Results: Of 170 patients originally randomized to lenalidomide treatment, there were 60 (35%) LEN-CM vs. 110 (65%) LEN patients included in this subanalysis. At baseline, patients in both groups generally had a similar baseline patient profile and prior treatment history, although there were some differences between groups: more patients in the LEN-CM group (vs. LEN) were >=65 years of age (78% vs. 62%) and had more high-risk MIPI score at baseline (47% vs. 29%), whereas fewer had positive bone marrow (7% vs. 15%), high tumor burden (37% vs. 54%), or bulky disease (15% vs. 25%). Median PFS by investigator assessment was 10.7 months (95% CI, 4.3-14.0) for LEN-CM and 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.3-14.6) for LEN (Table 1). Overall response rates (ORR) in the LEN-CM vs. LEN patients were 29/60 (48%) and 49/110 (45%) with complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu) rates of 6/60 (10%) and 13/110 (12%), respectively. Median DOR and OS were also similar in both groups of lenalidomide-treated patients. The safety profiles were similar for these subgroups, with similar rates of AEs leading to discontinuations and dose reductions/interruptions. Most common any grade treatment-emergent AEs (>=20%) for LEN-CM vs. LEN groups respectively were 48% vs. 52% neutropenia, 33% vs. 38% thrombocytopenia, 32% vs. 27% anemia, 25% vs. 19% fatigue, 23% vs. 22% diarrhea, and 5% vs. 23% pyrexia. Conclusions: For patients with R/R MCL, there is a high, unmet medical need for effectivetherapy with acceptable toxicity. Overall, the LEN-CM and LEN subgroups showed similar efficacy and safety outcomes. Results from this subgroup analysis of the MCL-002 study show that lenalidomide leads to clinically meaningful PFS and other efficacy outcomes irrespective of the presence or absence of bleeding risk due to comorbidities and/or treatment. Disclosures Walewski: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Belada:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Radford:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Equity Ownership; Astra-Zeneca: Equity Ownership; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jurczak:Morphosys: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celtron: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz-Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Morschhauser:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kaplanov:State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary #1: Employment. Thyss:Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Kuzmin:Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary: Employment. Stelitano:Azienda Ospedaliera: Employment. Marks:Pfizer: Honoraria. Trümper:Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Biyukov:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barnett:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Casadebaig Bravo:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Arcaini:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Low- or Int-1- Risk MDS Results in Reduced Bleeding without Impacting Leukemic Progression: Final Follow-up Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2000.2000 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2000-2000

Author(s):

Hagop Kantarjian ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Jeffrey Szer ◽

Uwe Platzbecker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia occurs in ~50% of patients with low/int-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with reduced survival. In a placebo (PBO)-controlled study, 250 patients with MDS were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly romiplostim or PBO. In the original June 2011 analysis, romiplostim reduced clinically significant bleeding events [hazard ratio (HR) romiplostim vs PBO 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66−1.05, P = 0.13] and platelet transfusions (relative risk 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66−0.88, P<0.001) and increased IWG hematologic improvement platelets (HI-P) incidence (odds ratio 15.6, 95% CI: 4.7−51.8, P<0.001). Peripheral blast count increases >10% were more frequent with romiplostim (25/167, 15%) than PBO (3/83, 3.6%) and resolved after discontinuation in most cases. In February 2011, the DMC recommended that treatment with study drug be discontinued as the potential benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML, and that transient increases in blast cell counts might put patients at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML. Patients were moved into long-term follow-up (LTFU). Previously reported (Giagounidis et al, Cancer 2014) 58-week incidence of AML was 6.0% (N = 10) for romiplostim and 4.9% for PBO (N = 4); HR 1.20 (95% CI: 0.38−3.84). This report provides final 5-year LTFU data. Methods: Eligible patients were receiving only supportive care and had IPSS low/int-1 risk MDS and platelets 1) ≤20 × 109/L or 2) ≤50 × 109/L with a history of bleeding. Disease progression to AML was defined as 1) ≥20% blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood after 4 weeks following discontinuation of romiplostim; 2) pathology consistent with leukemia; or 3) antileukemic treatment. Results are presented by treatment group. Results: At baseline, median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 77) years, the majority (59%) of patients were male; 27.6% were IPSS low risk and 72.4% were int-1 risk. WHO classifications were RCMD: 67.6%, RAEB-1: 13.2%, MDS-U: 11.2%, RA: 4.4%, RCMD-RS: 2.4%, RARS: 0.8%, and RAEB-2: 0.4%. Of 250 patients in the study, 210 entered LTFU and 66 completed the 5 years of LTFU; median (Q1, Q3) follow-up was 27.5 (10.8, 58.7) months. Reasons for discontinuation (death, lost to follow-up, and consent withdrawal) during LTFU were similar in both groups. During the active study period and LTFU, death was reported in 93 (55.7%) patients in the romiplostim group and 45 (54.2%) patients in the PBO group (HR romiplostim vs PBO 1.03, 95% CI: 0.72−1.47) (Figure); mortality rates were greater in those with IPSS int-1 vs low risk for both groups (Table). AML was reported in 20 (11.9%) patients in the romiplostim group and 9 (11.0%) patients in the PBO group (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.48−2.33). The proportions of patients who either died or developed AML were 56.9% (N = 95) in the romiplostim group and 55.4% (N = 46) in the PBO group (HR for AML-free survival 1.04, 95% CI: 0.73−1.48) (Figure). Nearly half (N = 14, 48%) of the 29 AML cases occurred in patients who were RAEB-1 at screening (none RAEB-2), and 6 cases were diagnosed because of anti-AML treatment use alone (Table). In LTFU, patient-reported use of MDS therapy (eg, azacitidine or cyclosporine) was 42.8% (N = 59, 95% CI: 34.4%−51.5%) in the romiplostim group and 31.4% (N = 22, 95% CI: 20.9%−43.6%) in the PBO group. AML therapy (eg, chemotherapy) was used in 14 (10.2%) patients in the romiplostim group and 7 (10.0%) patients in the PBO group. Conclusions: Following the decision in 2011 to stop study drug secondary to increased AML rates at that time and transient blasts increases, final 5-year LTFU HRs (romiplostim vs placebo) for death or progression to AML, respectively, are 1.03 (95% CI: 0.72−1.47) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.48−2.33). In conclusion, romiplostim reduced bleeding events and platelet transfusions, with no increase in AML incidence or impact on survival. Disclosures Kantarjian: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Fenaux:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Szer:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Australia: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kuendgen:Celgene: Research Funding. Gaidano:Morphosys: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak:Angelini: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giagounidis:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

E-Selectin Antagonist GMI-1271 Shows a Favorable Safety, PK and Bleeding Profile in Phase I Studies of Healthy Volunteers

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3826.3826 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3826-3826 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Dana E. Angelini ◽

Sumana Devata ◽

Angela E. Hawley ◽

Susan A. Blackburn ◽

Satwinder Grewal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bleeding Time ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Favorable Safety

Abstract Background : Selectins, among other adhesion-mediated functions, facilitate and augment thrombosis; standard anticoagulants address thrombosis but also increase bleeding risk. Previous work in animal models showed inhibiting E-selectin decreases venous thrombosis (VTE) and vein wall inflammation without adverse bleeding events, making E-selectin inhibition a favorable therapeutic candidate for VTE. GMI-1271 is a potent, specific E-selectin antagonist. Here we report final analysis of safety, PK, biomarker and bleeding risk profile for GMI-1271 in 2 phase 1 studies of healthy subjects. Methods: The first study was a blinded single ascending dose (SAD) evaluation of 2, 5, 20, or 40mg/kg of GMI-1271 (n=4/cohort), vs placebo control saline (n=4) or active control Lovenox 1mg/kg (n=4). The second was an open-label multiple ascending dose (MAD) study of 10 (n=3) or 20mg/kg (n=3) of GMI-1271 QD d 1-5 vs Lovenox 1mg/kg (n=2) d 1-5. Assessments included safety (adverse events [AEs], clinical labs, bleeding time, PT/PTT, vitals, exam); PK (plasma and urine); and biomarkers. Biomarkers included ELISAs (CRP, D-dimer, IL-10, MPO, Prothrombin fragment 1.2, soluble E-selectin (sEsel), soluble P-selectin (sPsel), sICAM, Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), Tissue Factor (TF), TNFα, VWF activity, and sCD40L); PicoGreen Assay for circulating DNA; flow cytometry (Platelet Monocyte Aggregates (PMA), Mac-1, LFA-1, and CD44) and Thromboelastography (TEG). See Table 1 for functional description. SAD remains blinded to GMI-1271 or placebo (GMI-1271/p). In SAD, we measured biomarker values at baseline, 8 and 24 h after dosing. Analysis was performed of biomarkers at each dose level and then pooled by GMI-1271/p vs Lovenox. In MAD, we measured biomarker values at baseline and day 4. Comparisons were made using unpaired t-test. Results: In total, 32 subjects enrolled and received GMI-1271/placebo (GMI-1271/p; 20), GMI-1271 (6) or Lovenox (L; 6). Safety: All subjects completed dosing uneventfully. Safety findings for GMI-1271/p were unremarkable. No moderate or serious AE were seen. AE overall were as expected in healthy volunteers. In SAD, only 1/20 GMI-1271/p subjects experienced an AE possibly related to study drug (mild transient headache); 0/6 in MAD. In the L group we saw expected mild transaminitis and injection site bruising. In all studies, GMI-1271 had no effect on bleeding time, PT, or PTT. PK: Plasma levels, Cmax, and AUC increased in a linear manner. Cl, Vz, and t ½ were not dose dependent; no accumulation was seen with multiple dosing (Fig 1 and 2). TEG: In SAD, there was a tendency to increase R, K, and decrease A and MA with no change in % lysis in L vs GMI-1271/p. In MAD, we saw a similar trend as SAD except for an increase in % lysis in L. In the pooled SAD analysis, there was a statistically significant difference between GMI-1271/p and L (higher values) for R (p<0.001) and K (p<0.001); MA was statistically higher in GMI-1271/p vs L (p<0.05). sEsel: In SAD, there was a trend for sEsel to decrease with treatment in all cohorts (combined GMI-1271/p vs L p= 0.017). In MAD, there was non-significant trend for sEsel to decrease between Day 0 and Day 4 in GMI-1271; sEsel levels trended upward with L in comparison. MPO: In SAD, there was a trend for increased values in L vs GMI-1271/p, except for the 40mg/kg cohort. When pooled, there was a significant difference between GMI-1271/p vs L (higher levels) p<0.01. In MAD, there was a non-significant trend for higher levels in L vs GMI-1271. MAC-1 In SAD, there was no change. In MAD, there was a significant decrease in MAC-1 at the 10mg/kg dose (p<0.01). No other notable trend was seen in the other biomarkers measured. Conclusion: We report a favorable safety, biomarker and bleeding profile for the E-selectin antagonist GMI-1271 in healthy subjects. There is no signal to suggest GMI-1271 increases bleeding potential based on adverse events, PT, PTT, bleeding time, and TEG values, unlike traditional anticoagulants. An additional unblinded analysis of the biomarkers will be presented at ASH. We note a trend for sE-sel to decrease with GMI-1271 treatment even in this healthy volunteer population, consistent with previous experience and as expected based on mechanism of action. A phase 1 study of GMI-1271 is currently ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of E-selectin antagonism for the treatment of patients with calf vein DVT. PK Figures: Figure 1: SAD; Figure 2: MAD. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Hemmer: GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Flanner:GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Employment. Parker:GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Employment. Li:GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Froehlich:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fibromuscular Disease Society of America: Research Funding; Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy. Magnani:GlycoMimetics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thackray:GlycoMimetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sood:Bayer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL) Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR-ABL Mutation: 12-Month Follow-up of the PACE Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.163.163 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 163-163 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽

Philipp le Coutre ◽

Ron Paquette ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Response Rates ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 163 Background: Despite progress in Ph+ leukemia therapy, patients who experience failure of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and those with the T315I BCR-ABL mutation have limited treatment options. Ponatinib is an oral TKI developed using computational and structure-based design with optimal binding to the BCR-ABL active site. At clinically achievable concentrations, ponatinib demonstrated potent in vitro activity against native BCR-ABL and all BCR-ABL mutants tested, including T315I. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg orally once daily) in patients with Ph+ leukemia were evaluated in a phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. Methods: 449 patients resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the T315I mutation confirmed at entry were enrolled and assigned to 1 of 6 cohorts: chronic phase (CP)-CML R/I (N=203), CP-CML T315I (N=64), accelerated phase (AP)-CML R/I (N=65), AP-CML T315I (N=18), blast phase (BP)-CML/Ph+ALL R/I (N=48), BP-CML/Ph+ALL T315I (N=46). Five patients (3 CP-CML, 2 AP-CML) without confirmed T315I and not R/I to dasatinib or nilotinib were treated, but not assigned to a cohort; they were included in safety analyses. The primary endpoint was major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 months for CP-CML and major hematologic response (MaHR) at any time within 6 months for advanced Ph+ leukemia. The trial is ongoing. Data as of 23 July 2012 are reported: median follow-up 11 (0.1 to 21) months; minimum follow-up 9 months. Results: Median age was 59 (18–94) yrs; 53% were male. Median time from diagnosis to ponatinib was 6 (0.3–28) yrs. Patients were heavily pretreated: 96% received prior imatinib, 84% dasatinib, 65% nilotinib; median number of prior TKIs was 3, with 53% exposed to all 3 approved TKIs. In patients previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib (N=427), 88% had a history of resistance and 12% were purely intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib. Best prior response to most recent dasatinib or nilotinib was 26% MCyR or better in CP-CML, and 23% MaHR or better in advanced Ph+ leukemia. Frequent BCR-ABL mutations confirmed at entry were: 29% T315I, 8% F317L, 4% E255K, 4% F359V, 3% G250E. No mutations were detected in 44%. The primary endpoint response rates (see Table) in each cohort exceeded the prespecified statistical criteria for success. In CP-CML and AP-CML R/I (the 3 largest cohorts), 95% CIs exceeded the prespecified response rate. Median time to response (for responders) was 84 days in CP-CML, 112 days in AP-CML, 55 days in BP-CML/Ph+ALL. Responses were durable; the estimated (Kaplan-Meier) probability of responders maintaining the primary endpoint at 1 yr was 91% in CP-CML, 42% in AP-CML, 35% in BP-CML/Ph+ALL. In CP-CML, 46% had complete cytogenetic response and molecular response rates were 32% MMR, 20% MR4, and 12% MR4.5. Response rates were higher in patients exposed to fewer prior TKIs and those with shorter disease duration. Similar response rates were observed in patients with and without BCR-ABL mutations. In CP-CML, response rates were higher in those with T315I; however, a post hoc analysis found that presence of T315I was not a predictor of response. Instead, the difference in response rate was explained by T315I patients' younger age, shorter duration of leukemia, and exposure to less prior therapy. At the time of analysis, 52% of patients remained on therapy (66% CP-CML). The most frequent reasons for discontinuation were progression (18%) and AEs (12%). The most common drug-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (36%), rash (33%), and dry skin (31%). Pancreatitis was the most common drug-related SAE (5%); however, it occurred early and was managed with dose modification (1 patient discontinued due to pancreatitis). Conclusions: Ponatinib has substantial activity and is generally well tolerated in these heavily pretreated Ph+ leukemia patients who have limited available treatment options. Data with a minimum follow-up of 12 months will be presented. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis, BMS, ARIAD, Pfizer, and Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, ARIAD, Il-Yang: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis and BMS: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD: Consultancy. Chuah:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Talpaz:Deciphera: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rea:Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis, and Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Muller:ARIAD: Consultancy. Wong:MolecularMD Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guilhot:ARIAD: Honoraria. Hochhaus:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Amgen: Honoraria. Shah:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Briston-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1/2 Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Romiplostim in Children with Chronic Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.680.680 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 680-680 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

George R. Buchanan ◽

Lisa Bomgaars ◽

James B. Bussel ◽

Diane J. Nugent ◽

David J. Gnarra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Treatment Period ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Chronic Itp ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 680 Introduction: ITP is an autoimmune disorder characterized by thrombocytopenia due to accelerated destruction as well as suboptimal platelet production. Childhood ITP is most commonly an acute illness; however, chronic ITP (duration > 6 months) develops in 20%–30% of ITP cases. Romiplostim, a peptibody protein designed to increase platelet production, is approved for treating chronic ITP in adults. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in the treatment of thrombocytopenia in children with chronic ITP. Patients and Methods: ITP patients aged 12 months to <18 years with persistent severe thrombocytopenia for at least six months before enrollment (mean of 2 platelet counts ≥ 30 × 109/L at baseline) were included in this study. Patients were randomized (3:1) to receive romiplostim or placebo and stratified by age: 12 months - <3 years (N=4), 3 - <12 years (N=8), and 12 - <18 years (N=8). Treatment for a 12 week period was followed by a 4 week pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment period for responding patients (those who achieved a platelet count of >20 × 109/L above baseline for 2 consecutive weeks without rescue therapy at any point during the treatment period). Treatment was initiated at 1 μg/kg once weekly by subcutaneous injection. The dose was adjusted in 2 μg/kg increments every two weeks, to a maximum dose of 10 μg/kg/week based on weekly platelet counts. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) during the 12-week treatment period and the number of patients achieving platelet counts >50 × 109/L for 2 consecutive weeks during the treatment period, or achieving an increase in platelet count >20 × 109/L above baseline for 2 consecutive weeks during the treatment period was recorded. Results: A total of 22 (romiplostim, 17; placebo, 5) patients were randomized; 16 (73%) were boys and 6 (27%) were girls. Eight patients had undergone splenectomy. The mean age was 9.5 (SD: 5.1) years, with 4 subjects aged 12 months - <3 years, 10 aged 3 - <12 years, and 8 aged 12 - <18 years. The median baseline platelet count was 13 × 109/L (range 2 to 29 × 109/L) and the median duration of ITP was 2.4 years (range 0.6 to 14 years). All patients completed the study. Sixteen of 17 patients in the romiplostim arm (94%) and 5/5 in the placebo arm (100%) had at least 1 AE during the treatment period. The most common AEs were (romiplostim, placebo, respectively) headache (35%, 40%), epistaxis (35%, 20%), cough (12%, 40%), and vomiting (12%, 40%). Serious AEs were experienced by 1 patient in the romiplostim arm (moderate influenza and sepsis) and none in the placebo arm. AEs considered to be treatment related were reported for 3 (18%) and 1 (20%) subjects in the romiplostim and placebo arms, respectively; none of the treatment-related AEs were serious or of ≥3 grade severity. No patients died during the study and none tested positive for neutralizing antibodies to romiplostim or thrombopoietin. The same group of patients in the romiplostim-treated arm (15/17, 88.2%, 95% CI: 63.6%, 98.5%) achieved both efficacy endpoints during the treatment period. The median platelet count in the romiplostim-treated arm after 6 weeks of treatment was ≥50 × 109/L. The median weekly platelet count in the placebo arm remained stable at approximately 10 × 109/L. None of the placebo-treated patients achieved either platelet count endpoint. Rescue medication was administered to 2/17 (12%) of romiplostim- and 2/5 (40%) of placebo-treated patients during the 12 week treatment period. Twelve (71%) and 2 (40%) subjects in the romiplostim and placebo arms, respectively, experienced bleeding events. The majority of bleeding events (15/17) in the romiplostim arm occurred in the first 6 weeks of treatment. Most bleeding events (14/17) in the romiplostim arm and all bleeding events in the placebo arm occurred when the platelet count was < 30 × 109/L. A total of 14 patients treated with romiplostim entered the PK assessment period. The romiplostim serum concentration results were not different among the 3 age cohorts. The mean weekly dose of romiplostim in the treatment period was 3.4 (SD: 1.6) μg/kg. Conclusion: Treatment with romiplostim appeared to be well tolerated in pediatric ITP patients, with no new safety concerns observed in this study as compared to adults with chronic ITP. Romiplostim was effective in treating thrombocytopenia in children with chronic ITP. Disclosures: Buchanan: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of romiplostim, a thrombopoietin mimetic, in treatment of thrombocytopenia in pediatric ITP patients. . Bomgaars:Novartis: Research Funding. Bussel:Eisai, Inc: Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Scienta: Speakers Bureau. Nie:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berger:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Biochemical or Symptomatic Relapse at the Time of Enrollment in the Endeavor Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112571 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3243-3243 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Philippe Moreau ◽

David S Siegel ◽

Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Sara Bringhen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Asymptomatic Group ◽

Symptomatic Group ◽

Symptomatic Relapse ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Post Hoc

Abstract Introduction: The randomized phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and health-related quality of life in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) for patients treated with carfilzomib (56 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (Kd56) compared with bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd). In patients with relapsed MM, the time of therapy initiation might impact treatment outcome. Prior studies have demonstrated a median of 5 months between the presence of biochemical and symptomatic relapse (Lopez. Leuk Res Rep. 2015;4:64-69). Herein, we report a post hoc subgroup analysis from the ENDEAVOR study to evaluate the impact of initiating Kd56 therapy upon biochemical relapse. Methods: Adults with RRMM who previously received 1-3 lines of therapy and had measurable disease were eligible to participate in the ENDEAVOR trial. Symptomatic disease was not required for eligibility. Kd56 patients received carfilzomib on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 as a 30-minute intravenous infusion and dexamethasone (20 mg) on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 of a 28-day cycle. Vd patients received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2; intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 and dexamethasone (20 mg) on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of a 21-day cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, physician decision, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. This post hoc subgroup analysis evaluated PFS, OS, and safety in subgroups defined according to the presence of symptoms at the time of enrollment. Patients with RRMM who experienced biochemical progression without CRAB symptoms (hypercalcemia, renal impairment, anemia, or bone lesions) upon relapse were considered asymptomatic, whereas symptomatic patients were those who had CRAB symptoms upon relapse. In each subgroup, PFS and OS were compared between treatment arms using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of the 929 patients enrolled and randomized in ENDEAVOR, 117 (12.6%) were asymptomatic (Kd56, n=60; Vd, n=57) and 812 (87.4%) were symptomatic (Kd56, n=404; Vd, n=408). In the asymptomatic group, the median PFS was not estimable (NE) for Kd56 vs 13.7 months for Vd (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.462; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.232-0.922), and the median OS was NE for either treatment arm (HR: 0.768; 95% CI: 0.350-1.683) (Table). In the symptomatic group, median PFS was 17.7 months for Kd56 vs 8.8 months for Vd (HR: 0.539; 95% CI: 0.439-0.662), and median OS was 44.0 months for Kd56 vs. 36.8 months for Vd (HR: 0.801; 95% CI: 0.653-0.982) (Table). Kaplan-Meier PFS and OS curves are shown in the Figure. The rate of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (Kd56 vs Vd) was 78.3% vs 58.9% in the asymptomatic group and 81.9% vs 72.8% in the symptomatic group (Table). Conclusions: Kd56 demonstrated superior survival outcomes compared with Vd in patients with RRMM, regardless of presence of CRAB symptoms at study randomization. As expected, outcomes were improved when Kd56 was initiated early in the disease course, before CRAB symptoms occurred. The small size of the subgroups in this study is a limitation. However, the findings warrant further investigation. The safety profile of Kd56 in both subgroups was consistent with that in the overall population as previously reported (Dimopoulos. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:27-38; Siegel, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17:e142). Overall, Kd56 had a favorable benefit-risk profile in both patients with biochemical and symptomatic relapse. Disclosures Moreau: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Goldschmidt:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ArtTempi: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Niesvizky:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bringhen:Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Orlowski:Spectrum Pharma: Research Funding; BioTheryX: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy. Blaedel:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dimopoulos:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Selinexor-Containing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma Refractory to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128887 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1854-1854 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ajai Chari ◽

Dan T. Vogl ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Jagoda K. Jasielec ◽

Andrew DeCastro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Car T ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: There are limited data on treatment options for patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has progressed after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Selinexor is a novel, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) that forces nuclear retention and activation of tumor suppressor proteins. Selinexor plus low dose dexamethasone (Sel-dex) was recently approved in the United States based on data from the STORM study wherein, Sel-dex induced an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.2% in patients with penta-exposed, triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. The activity of Sel-dex was preserved regardless of specific prior therapies, as expected given its unique and novel mechanism of action. The efficacy of selinexor after CAR-T therapy remains unknown. Here, we report on observations of the efficacy of Sel-dex alone or administered as a triplet in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib in patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has progressed after CAR-T therapy. Methods: We identified 7 patients across all selinexor myeloma trials who had received lymphodepleting conditioning (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide n=6; Cyclophosphamide n=1) followed by an effective dose of CAR-T cell therapy (>108 CAR-positive cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen) for their multiple myeloma prior to being enrolled in a trial using a selinexor-containing regimen. Four were female and 3 were male. Median age was 64 years (range: 35-70 years). One patient was treated in the STORM study, with selinexor (starting at 80 mg twice-weekly) and dexamethasone (20 mg twice-weekly), 1 patient was treated with selinexor (100 mg once-weekly) plus bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 once-weekly for 4 of 5 weeks) and dexamethasone (40 mg once-weekly) and 5 patients were treated with selinexor (100 mg once-weekly) plus carfilzomib (20/56 mg/m2 or 20/70 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (40 mg once-weekly or 20 mg twice-weekly). Response was assessed by the treating physician per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Results: Patients had a median of 10 prior therapeutic regimens (range:5-15), all had high-risk cytogenetics, and 6 of the 7 had rapidly progressing disease as indicated by the percent increase in paraprotein (17-91%) between screening and Cycle 1 Day 1 (range: 7-22 days). All patients responded to treatment, including 1 unconfirmed complete response (uCR), 2 very good partial responses (VGPR), 3 partial responses (PR), and 1 minimal response (MR). Responses were rapid and typically occurred within the first cycle of treatment (median 28 days; range 14-83 days). At the time of data cutoff, the median time on a selinexor-based regimen was 4.1 monthsange: 2.5-8.0 months); 2 patients' disease had progressed, 1 patient had withdrawn consent, and 4 patients were still responding on therapy. Adverse events were consistent with what has previously been reported with selinexor-containing regimens in heavily-pretreated patients with multiple myeloma and included nausea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia. Conclusions: These results suggest that Sel-dex alone or in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib may offer therapeutic benefit for patients who have exhausted available treatment options, have rapidly progressing disease, and who have progressed after CAR-T therapy. Importantly patients are able to tolerate and remain on therapy with weekly Sel-dex in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib, with time on therapy of >4 months and 4/7 patients remaining on therapy. Although based on a small sample size, the findings of this analysis are intriguing and warrant further investigation in a larger study. Disclosures Chari: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Vogl:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Active Biotech: Consultancy. Jagannath:Merck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy. DeCastro:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Unger:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jakubowiak:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkyLineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; KaryoPharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Association of Bleeding Severity with Mortality with in-Hospital and Extended Thromboprophylaxis in the Medically Ill in the Magellan Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122930 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2441-2441

Author(s):

Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽

Gary E. Raskob ◽

Alexander T Cohen ◽

Walter Ageno ◽

Jeffrey I. Weitz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Bayer Healthcare ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common after hospitalization in acutely ill medical patients, yet extended thromboprophylaxis has not been widely implemented due to concerns about bleeding. The MAGELLAN study (NCT00571649) evaluated whether rivaroxaban (10 mg QD for 35±4 days) compared with enoxaparin (40 mg QD for 10±4 days) followed by placebo could prevent asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, and VTE-related death. Through Day 35, rivaroxaban was superior to enoxaparin/placebo in the modified intent-to-treat population (4.4% vs 5.7%, RR 0.77, 95%CI, 0.62 to 0.96, p=0.02), but there was an increase in clinically relevant bleeding, the composite of major and non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding (4.1% vs 1,7%, RR 2.5, 95%CI 1.85-3.25, p<0.001). Although major bleeding has been associated with increased mortality, the relationship between NMCR bleeding and all-cause mortality (ACM) is not established. We hypothesized that subjects in the MAGELLAN trial with major bleeding but not those with NMCR bleeding, would be at an increased risk of ACM irrespective of treatment group. Methods: We evaluated all bleeding events in subjects taking at least one dose of study drug from randomization until 2 days after the last dose (safety population) and their association with ACM through the Day 90 visit in 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) subjects with no major or NMCR bleeding; (2) subjects whose first event was NMCR bleeding; and (3) subjects whose first event was major bleeding. Subjects only developing minimal or trivial bleeding were grouped with those who had no clinically relevant bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazards model that included the bleeding group variable and baseline covariates significantly associated with ACM at p<0.05 (age, BMI, history of cancer, history of anemia, inflammatory disease, acute ischemic stroke, and acute respiratory insufficiency), we compared the risk of ACM in subjects with and without bleeding events. Results: The incidence of ACM for subjects who had NMCR bleeding was numerically higher but not significantly increased compared with subjects with no bleeding (20/176, 11.4% vs 468/7763, 6.0%, HR 1.41 95%CI 0.88, 2.25, p=0.151), while subjects with major bleeding were at a significantly increased risk of death (28/59, 47.5% vs 468/7763, 6.0%, HR 7.74 95%CI 5.16, 11.59, p<0.0001). Results of landmark analyses from the first bleeding event or end of treatment + 2 days to ACM for the three groups are displayed (Figure). Limitations: This analysis was post hoc and may have been underpowered to detect differences in ACM associated with NMCR bleeding. Conclusion: Major bleeding was associated with a significantly increased risk of ACM but NMCR bleeding was not. This suggests that a modest increase in NMCR bleeding associated with extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban may be acceptable to prevent VTE. Strategies to better select patients at lower risk of bleeding may improve the benefit risk profile of extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban. Disclosures Spyropoulos: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; ATLAS (Colorado Prevention Center): Consultancy; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy. Raskob:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Tetherex: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Anthos: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Consultancy. Cohen:Boston Scientific: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GLG: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; ACI Clinical: Consultancy; Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; McKinsey: Consultancy; Navigant: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Temasek Capital: Consultancy; TRN: Consultancy; UK Government Health Select Committee: Other: advised the UK Government Health Select Committee, the all-party working group on thrombosis, the Department of Health, and the NHS, on the prevention of VTE; Lifeblood: Other: advisor to Lifeblood: the thrombosis charity and is the founder of the European educational charity the Coalition to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism. Ageno:Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference and travel support; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: research support,travel support ; BMS Pfizer: Other: travel support; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Weitz:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spiro:Bayer U.S. LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lu:Janssen R&D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipardi:Janssen Research and Develompent: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barnathan:Janssen Research and Development LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: Rivaroxaban is a Factor Xa inhibitor. It is currently under review by FDA for approval as thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Download Full-text

Treatment with the Thrombopoietin (TPO)-Receptor Agonist Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients (Pts) with Low or Intermediate-1 (Int-1) Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo(PBO)-Controlled Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.117.117 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 117-117 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Ghulam J. Mufti ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Supportive Care ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Clinically Significant

Abstract Abstract 117 Background: There are few therapies for thrombocytopenia in MDS, which is found in ∼50% of pts with low/int-1 MDS and is associated with shortened survival. Methods: IPSS low/int-1 MDS pts receiving supportive care, with platelets 1) ≤20×109/L or 2) ≤ 50×109/L with a history of bleeding, were randomized 2:1 to 750 μg romiplostim:PBO for 26 wk with MDS supportive care, and a 4-wk washout followed by bone marrow (BM) biopsy. Pts continued as randomized, with any MDS therapy, for 24 wk with another 4-wk washout followed by a BM biopsy. The 1° endpoint was the number of clinically significant bleeding events (CSBE, grade ≥2 per modified WHO scale); other endpoints included protocol-defined platelet transfusion events (PTE), platelet response per IWG 2006 (HI-P), survival, and safety, including progression to AML, defined conservatively as: 1) ≥20% blasts in the BM or peripheral blood after 4 wk off romiplostim, or 2) pathology consistent with leukemia (eg, chloroma or leukemia cutis), or 3) anti-leukemic treatment initiation. Results: Of 250 pts enrolled (romiplostim 167, PBO 83): 59% were male, median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 77) year, WHO classes RCMD (68%), RAEB-1 (13%), MDS-U (11%), RA (4.4%), RCMD-RS (2.4%), RARS (0.8%), RAEB-2 (1%), IPSS status low (25%), int-1 (71%), int-2 (0.4%), and IPSS cytogenetics good (78%), intermediate (18%), poor (1.6%). There were more pts who were RAEB-1 (14% vs 11%) and RAEB-2 (1% vs 0%) and fewer who were MDS-U (10% vs 15%) with romiplostim (all NS). Due to DMC concerns regarding the potential for transient increases in blast cell counts and the risk for progression to or treatment for AML, study drug was discontinued in Feb 2011, affecting 28% of pts. Also leading to withdrawal were consent withdrawn (romiplostim 13%, PBO 15%), adverse events (AE) (12%, 5%), and alternative therapy (7%, 11%). The mean number of CSBE/pt was romiplostim 1.47, PBO 1.94 (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66, 1.05, p = 0.13); rates were romiplostim 18.6%, PBO 26.5%. The overall number of bleeding events was reduced with romiplostim (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99, p = 0.026). PTE rates/100 pt-year were romiplostim 748.9, PBO 1013.5 (RR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.88, p<0.001). HI-P rates were romiplostim 36.5% (61 pts), PBO 3.6% (3 pts) (OR 15.6, 95% CI: 4.7, 51.8, p<0.001). From wk 4 on, median platelets with romiplostim were consistently higher than with PBO (p<0.001). The overall 1-year K-M survival was romiplostim 80%, PBO 78% (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.95) (Figure 1), with 28 deaths (17%), none (0%) hemorrhagic and 5 (3%) from AML and MDS disease progression, with romiplostim and 14 deaths (17%), including 4 (4.8%) hemorrhagic and 3 (3.6%) from AML and MDS disease progression, with PBO. Median time on romiplostim was 21.5 wk (range: 1, 50). SAE rates were romiplostim 40%, PBO 27%; those frequent (≥5%) SAE occurring ≥2x more with romiplostim were pneumonia, pyrexia, thrombocytopenia, and atrial fibrillation; those occurring ≥2x more with PBO were diarrhea, dyspnea, and cerebral hemorrhage. Peripheral blast increases are described below (Table). AML rates through 58 wk were romiplostim 6.0%, PBO 2.4% (HR 2.51, 95% CI: 0.55, 11.47). Of the 13 AML cases, 9 (69%) were in pts who were initially RAEB-1 and 4 (31%) were diagnosed by anti-leukemic therapy initiation, which could include hypomethylating agents. Of pts who were RAEB-1 at baseline, 2/9 (22%) PBO pts developed AML vs 7/24 (29%) of romiplostim pts. AML-free survival rates were similar (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.60, 2.13). Conclusion: Romiplostim treatment in low/int-1 MDS pts resulted in a 15-fold increase in achieving HI-P. Although there were more platelet transfusions with PBO (p <0.001), there still was a trend for more clinically significant bleeding events with PBO (p = 0.13) than romiplostim. The AE profile of romiplostim was generally comparable with PBO, with no hemorrhagic deaths with romiplostim. Increases in peripheral blasts >10% occurred more frequently with romiplostim but generally resolved after romiplostim discontinuation. AML was defined conservatively; cases are pending central pathology review. AML occurred primarily in pts who were initially RAEB-1 and in more pts with romiplostim. Overall and AML-free survival rates were similar. Disclosures: Giagounidis: Amgen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Off Label Use: This trial examined the use of romiplostim, which is indicated for use in ITP, in MDS. Mufti:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Amgen: Research Funding. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuendgen:Celgene: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Amgen: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria. Gaidano:Amgen: Honoraria. Jedrzejczak:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hu:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jun:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Association of Bleeding Severity with Mortality with Extended Thromboprophylaxis in the Medically Ill in the Mariner Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122621 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3669-3669

Author(s):

Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽

Walter Ageno ◽

Gregory W. Albers ◽

C. Gregory Elliott ◽

Jonathan L. Halperin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Medical Patients ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Bayer Healthcare ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Prevention Center

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common after hospitalization in acutely ill medical patients, yet extended thromboprophylaxis has not been widely implemented due to concerns about bleeding. The MARINER study (NCT02111564) compared thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban (10mg daily or 7.5mg daily in subjects with creatinine clearance 30-<50ml/min at baseline) vs placebo for 45 days beyond hospital discharge to prevent symptomatic VTE in acutely ill medical patients while reducing bleeding events through patient selection (Spyropoulos AC et al NEJM 2018). Rivaroxaban did not significantly lower the composite of symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death but reduced symptomatic VTE (0.18% vs 0.42%, p=0.023). While major bleeding (MB) was infrequent in both study groups (0.28% vs 0.15% with rivaroxaban vs. placebo, p=0.124), there was more non-major clinically relevant bleeding (NMCRB) with rivaroxaban (1.42% vs 0.85%, HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.17-2.35, p=0.004). Although MB has been associated with increased mortality, the relationship between NMCRB and all-cause mortality (ACM) is not established. We hypothesized that subjects in the MARINER trial with MB but not those with NMCRB would be at an increased risk of ACM irrespective of treatment group. Methods: We evaluated all bleeding events in subjects taking at least one dose of study drug from randomization until 2 days after the last dose (safety population) and their association with ACM through the Day 75 visit in 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) subjects with no MB or NMCRB; (2) subjects whose first event was NMCRB; and (3) subjects whose first event was MB. Subjects only developing minimal or trivial bleeding were grouped with those who had no bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazards model that included the bleeding group variable and baseline covariates that were significantly associated with ACM at p<0.05 (age, sex, history of VTE, history of anemia), we compared the risk of ACM in subjects with and without bleeding events. Results: The incidence of ACM among subjects who had a NMCRB was not increased over that in subjects without bleeding (2/136, 1.5% vs 218/11800, 1.8%, HR 0.41 95%CI 0.10, 1.67, p=0.213), while those experiencing MB had a higher incidence of death (4/26, 15.4% vs 218/11800, 1.8%, HR 3.43 95%CI 1.23, 9.54, p=0.018). Results of landmark analyses from the first bleeding event or end of treatment + 2 days to ACM for the three groups are displayed (Figure). Limitations: This analysis was post hoc and the MARINER trial excluded subjects at a high risk of bleeding. Conclusion: Although few subjects had MB events, those who did had an increased risk of ACM, while those who had NMCRB events did not. This suggests that the modest increase in NMCRB in trials of extended thromboprophylaxis may be an acceptable tradeoff to prevent VTE. Disclosures Spyropoulos: Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; ATLAS (Colorado Prevention Center): Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Ageno:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: research support,travel support ; BMS Pfizer: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference and travel support; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Albers:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy. Elliott:Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; University of Cincinnati: Honoraria; Spectrum Health: Honoraria; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy. Halperin:Ortho-McNeil-Janssen: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; ATLAS (Colorado Prevention Center): Consultancy; NIH: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Hiatt:Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; NIH: Research Funding; Janssen R&D, LLD: Consultancy. Maynard:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy. Steg:Novartis: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amarin: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Weitz:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spiro:Bayer U.S. LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lu:Janssen R&D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sugarmann:Janssen Research and Development LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipardi:Janssen Research and Develompent: Employment, Equity Ownership. Raskob:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tetherex: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Anthos: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria. Barnathan:Janssen Research and Development LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: Rivaroxaban is a Factor Xa inhibitor. The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban post-hospitalization in subjects with an acute medical illness as thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism.

Download Full-text

Rapid and Robust Mobilization of CD34+ HSCs without G-CSF Following Administration of Mgta-145 Alone or in Combination with Plerixafor

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127523 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1961-1961

Author(s):

John F. DiPersio ◽

Jonathan Hoggatt ◽

Steven Devine ◽

Lukasz Biernat ◽

Haley Howell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Single Dose ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Preliminary Data ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fold Change ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Equity Ownership

Background Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the standard of care for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). G-CSF requires 4-7 days of injections and often multiple aphereses to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells for transplant. The number of CD34+ HSCs mobilized can be variable and patients who fail to mobilize enough CD34+ cells are treated with the combination of G-CSF plus plerixafor. G-CSF use is associated with bone pain, nausea, headaches, fatigue, rare episodes of splenic rupture, and is contraindicated for patients with autoimmune and sickle cell disease. MGTA-145 (GroβT) is a CXCR2 agonist. MGTA-145, in combination with plerixafor, a CXCR4 inhibitor, has the potential to rapidly and reliably mobilize robust numbers of HSCs with a single dose and same-day apheresis for transplant that is free from G-CSF. MGTA-145 plus plerixafor work synergistically to rapidly mobilize HSCs in both mice and non-human primates (Hoggatt, Cell 2018; Goncalves, Blood 2018). Based on these data, Magenta initiated a Phase 1 dose-escalating study to evaluate the safety, PK and PD of MGTA-145 as a single agent and in combination with plerixafor. Methods This study consists of four parts. In Part A, healthy volunteers were dosed with MGTA-145 (0.0075 - 0.3 mg/kg) or placebo. In Part B, MGTA-145 dose levels from Part A were selected for use in combination with a clinically approved dose of plerixafor. In Part C, a single dose MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered on day 1 and day 2. In Part D, MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered followed by apheresis. Results MGTA-145 monotherapy was well tolerated in all subjects dosed (Table 1) with no significant adverse events. Some subjects experienced mild (Grade 1) transient lower back pain that dissipated within minutes. In the ongoing study, the combination of MGTA-145 with plerixafor was well tolerated, with some donors experiencing Grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal adverse events commonly observed with plerixafor alone. Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and maximum plasma concentrations increased dose proportionally and were not affected by plerixafor (Fig 1A). Monotherapy of MGTA-145 resulted in an immediate increase in neutrophils (Fig 1B) and release of plasma MMP-9 (Fig 1C). Neutrophil mobilization plateaued within 1-hour post MGTA-145 at doses greater than 0.03 mg/kg. This plateau was followed by a rebound of neutrophil mobilization which correlated with re-expression of CXCR2 and presence of MGTA-145 at pharmacologically active levels. Markers of neutrophil activation were relatively unchanged (<2-fold vs baseline). A rapid and statistically significant increase in CD34+ cells occurred @ 0.03 and 0.075 mg/kg of MGTA-145 (p < 0.01) relative to placebo with peak mobilization (Fig 1D) 30 minutes post MGTA-145 (7-fold above baseline @ 0.03 mg/kg). To date, the combination of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor mobilized >20/µl CD34s in 92% (11/12) subjects compared to 50% (2/4) subjects receiving plerixafor alone. Preliminary data show that there was a significant increase in fold change relative to baseline in CD34+ cells (27x vs 13x) and phenotypic CD34+CD90+CD45RA- HSCs (38x vs 22x) mobilized by MGTA-145 with plerixafor. Mobilized CD34+ cells were detectable at 15 minutes with peak mobilization shifted 2 - 4 hours earlier for the combination vs plerixafor alone (4 - 6h vs 8 - 12h). Detailed results of single dose administration of MGTA-145 and plerixafor given on one day as well as also on two sequential days will be presented along with fully characterized graft analysis post apheresis from subjects given MGTA-145 and plerixafor. Conclusions MGTA-145 is safe and well tolerated, as a monotherapy and in combination with plerixafor and induced rapid and robust mobilization of significant numbers of HSCs with a single dose in all subjects to date. Kinetics of CD34+ cell mobilization for the combination was immediate (4x increase vs no change for plerixafor alone @ 15 min) suggesting the mechanism of action of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor is different from plerixafor alone. Preliminary data demonstrate that MGTA-145 when combined with plerixafor results in a significant increase in CD34+ fold change relative to plerixafor alone. Magenta Therapeutics intends to develop MGTA-145 as a first line mobilization product for blood cancers, autoimmune and genetic diseases and plans a Phase 2 study in multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 2020. Disclosures DiPersio: Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hoggatt:Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Devine:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Protocol development (via institution); Bristol Myers: Other: Grant for monitoring support & travel support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Travel support for advisory board; My employer (National Marrow Donor Program) has equity interest in Magenta. Biernat:Medpace, Inc.: Employment. Howell:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schmelmer:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neale:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boitano:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Cooke:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Goncalves:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Raffel:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Falahee:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Morrow:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Davis:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text