scholarly journals A two-step timed sequential treatment for acute myelocytic leukemia

Blood ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 1499-1506 ◽  
Author(s):  
RB Geller ◽  
PJ Burke ◽  
JE Karp ◽  
RL Humphrey ◽  
HG Braine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Acute Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Since 1980, adults with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) have been treated on two clinical studies using intensive timed sequential therapy. All patients ages 16 to 80, including those with secondary AML (SAML) and those with AML preceded by a hematologic disorder (AHD), were treated, regardless of medical complications at the time of diagnosis. The first study combined high doses of cytarabine (ara-C, AC) and daunorubicin (DRN, D) in sequence (Ac2-D-Ac) and resulted in a complete remission rate of 55%. A group of these patients selected by functional status was able to receive a second course of therapy in remission, which resulted in a disease-free survival (DFS) of greater than 40% at 7 years. Because of toxicity in that study, 114 patients were entered on a second trial initiated 4 years ago, using a less aggressive first course, with amsacrine, to achieve a stable remission (Ac2-D-Amsa). This first treatment was followed by a more intensive second course (Ac6-D-Ac). With this two-step approach, a higher complete remission (CR) rate (76% for de novo AML and 54% for SAML-AHD) was achieved, and more patients were able to receive the second course of therapy. At the current median follow-up of 26 months, the median duration of DFS and overall survival are 11 and 14 months for patients with de novo AML. Age less than or equal to 55 is the most significant prognostic factor for both prolonged DFS and overall survival, with median durations of 17 and 18 months, respectively, for these younger patients. Patients with SAML-AHD remain relatively refractory to treatment despite aggressive chemotherapy, with median durations of DFS and overall survival of 9 months and 5 months, respectively.

scholarly journals A two-step timed sequential treatment for acute myelocytic leukemia

Blood ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 1499-1506
Author(s):  
RB Geller ◽  
PJ Burke ◽  
JE Karp ◽  
RL Humphrey ◽  
HG Braine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Acute Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
To Receive

Since 1980, adults with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) have been treated on two clinical studies using intensive timed sequential therapy. All patients ages 16 to 80, including those with secondary AML (SAML) and those with AML preceded by a hematologic disorder (AHD), were treated, regardless of medical complications at the time of diagnosis. The first study combined high doses of cytarabine (ara-C, AC) and daunorubicin (DRN, D) in sequence (Ac2-D-Ac) and resulted in a complete remission rate of 55%. A group of these patients selected by functional status was able to receive a second course of therapy in remission, which resulted in a disease-free survival (DFS) of greater than 40% at 7 years. Because of toxicity in that study, 114 patients were entered on a second trial initiated 4 years ago, using a less aggressive first course, with amsacrine, to achieve a stable remission (Ac2-D-Amsa). This first treatment was followed by a more intensive second course (Ac6-D-Ac). With this two-step approach, a higher complete remission (CR) rate (76% for de novo AML and 54% for SAML-AHD) was achieved, and more patients were able to receive the second course of therapy. At the current median follow-up of 26 months, the median duration of DFS and overall survival are 11 and 14 months for patients with de novo AML. Age less than or equal to 55 is the most significant prognostic factor for both prolonged DFS and overall survival, with median durations of 17 and 18 months, respectively, for these younger patients. Patients with SAML-AHD remain relatively refractory to treatment despite aggressive chemotherapy, with median durations of DFS and overall survival of 9 months and 5 months, respectively.

Phase I/II Study of Clofarabine Combined with Standard Dose Cytarabine as Remission Induction Therapy of De Novo AML in Elderly Patients ≥60 Years.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4635-4635
Author(s):  
James M. Foran ◽  
Angeline S. The ◽  
Marcel Devetten ◽  
Sreelatha Meleth ◽  
Jeff Worrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Level I ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Abstract Despite significant advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in younger adults, there has been little progress in the treatment of older patients (age≥60 years), who comprise the majority of those with the disease. Clofarabine is a purine nucleoside analog with single agent activity in patients with relapsed AML. In addition, clofarabine potentiates Ara-C cytotoxicity in vitro through increased intracellular Ara-CTP accumulation, making this an attractive combination. A phase I/II study has therefore been initiated combining clofarabine with standard dose cytarabine (100mg/m2/day x 7) in pts age ≥60 years with de novo AML. The starting dose of clofarabine was 30mg/m2/day x 5 beginning on day 2 (Dose level I). Patients were accrued in cohorts of 3–6 to establish dose limiting toxicity (DLT); cohort expansion at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is planned in phase II using a Simon 2-stage design. Detailed plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics were performed during induction therapy with Ara-C alone (day 1), and following the addition of clofarabine (day 2) to determine the effect of clofarabine on intracellular Ara-CTP accumulation. Pts with residual AML on d14–21 restaging bone marrow (BM) biopsy were eligible to receive Re-Induction with 5 days of clofarabine & Ara-C. Those achieving complete remission were also eligible to receive 1–2 cycles of consolidation with Ara-C (d1–5) & clofarabine (total 3 cycles of planned therapy). Dose limiting toxicity was encountered at dose level I (see Table 1). 2/4 pts achieved CR, in 1 case with residual cytogenetic abnormality, and there were 2 treatment-related deaths from infxn (culture neg sepsis, n=1; Candida tropicalis, n=1). In the latter case (pt 4), BM aplasia was achieved, but the pt died on d25 prior to hematologic recovery. In view of the DLT, the protocol has therefore been amended to allow 25% dose de-escalation of clofarabine to Dose Level -I (22.5mg/m2/day x 5), and to limit eligibilty to pts age 60–75 yrs inclusive. Routine use of aggressive pre-hydration and antibiotic and antifungal prophylaxis is now mandated. Clofarabine & cytarabine is a highly active induction regimen in older adults age ≥60 yrs with de novo AML, but has significant myelosuppressive and infectious toxicity. The study is proceeding in phase I at Dose Level -I to establish the MTD. Phase I, Dose Level I PT AGE, GENDER FAB CYTOGENETICS F/U BM TOXICITY (Gr.III/IV) OUTCOME MLD - multilineage dysplasia; F&N - fever & neutropenia; CR - complete remission 1 66M M2 Diploid D21: residual AML renal, infxn Death 2 61M M2 Complex D14: aplastic F&N CR 3 69M M2 with MLD Intermediate Risk D21: recovering F&N CR 4 77F M2 Diploid D14: aplastic renal, infxn, capillary leak Death

Changes in the Hierarchy of Risk Factors with Older Age in De-Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1977-1977
Author(s):  
Thomas Buchner ◽  
Wolfgang E. Berdel ◽  
Claudia Schoch ◽  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
Hubert L. Serve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Older Age ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Risk Profiles ◽  
Age Related ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract After recent reports addressed prognostic factors and outcome in older age AML (Burnett et al. Blood106:162a,2005; Wheatley et al. Blood106:199a,2005; Appelbaum et al. Blood107:3481–5,2006; Farag et al. Blood108:63–73,2006) we evaluated 764 patients of 60–85 (median 66) years reduced to those with de-novo AML, known karyotype, and identical consolidation-maintenance chemotherapy, who were part of the 1992 and 1999 multicenter randomized trials by the German AMLCG (Buchner et al. J Clin Oncol21:4496–504,2003;24:2480–9,2006). 521 patients were 60 -< 70 (median 64) and 243 patients were 70–85 (median 73) years of age. 64% and 50% patients respectively went into complete remission, 24% and 29% remained with persistent AML, 12% and 21% succumbed to early and hypoplastic death (p<.001). The overall survival in the younger (60- < 70y) and older (70+) patients was at a median of 13 vs 6 months and 18% vs 8% survived at 5 years (p<.001). Once in complete remission, the remission duration was 14 vs 12 months (median) and equally 18% at 5 years; the relapse-free survival is 13 vs 11 months (median) and 14% vs 13% at 5 years. While all patients were randomized up-front for 2 versions of induction either by TAD-HAM (HAM, high-dose araC 1g/m2x6 and mitox 10mg/m2x3) or by HAM-HAM, response and survival did not differ between the two arms in neither age group. In contrast to response and survival between the younger (60-<70y) and older (70+y) age group corresponding differences in the risk profiles were missing. Thus, favorable/intermediate/unfavorable karyotypes accounted for 8% vs 4% / 67% vs 73% / and 25% vs 24% of patients (p=.073); WBC > 20.000/ccm was found in 40% vs 39% (p=.52); LDH > 700U/L was remarkably 26% vs 18% (p=.014), and the day 16 b.m. blasts ≥ 10% accounted for 41% and 41% of patients. Conclusion: Approximately 50% of patients 70 years of age or older benefit from standard or intensive chemotherapy by complete remission which continues after 1 year in about 50% of responders. The inferior overall survival in the patients of 70+ versus those of 60- < 70 years is mainly explained by more frequent early and hypoplastic death (21% vs 12%) (p=.0016) and death with persistent AML (26% vs 18%) (p=.0145); while death in remission (7% vs 6%), relapse rate (50% vs 53%) and death after relapse (21% vs 26%) did not show this trend. In contrast to the important differences in outcome, established risk factors such as cytogenetic groups, WBC, and early blast clearance show concordance between the two age groups. The even lower LDH may support assumptions of older age AML as a less proliferative disease (Appelbaum et al. Blood 107:3481–5,2006). Thus, the hierarchical risk profiles cannot predict the age related outcome beyond 60 years in patients with de-novo AML.

Twice Daily Fludarabine and Cytarabine Combination (BID-FA) Is Effective in Pts with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) AML, High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), and Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-BP)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4939-4939
Author(s):  
Hady Ghanem ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Abstract 4939 Background: High dose cytarabine containing regimens are still considered standard options for pts (pts) with AML relapsing after a first complete remission (CR1) lasting more than 12 months. No standard options exist for pts relapsing after shorter remission duration or with primary refractory disease. We conducted a phase II study assessing the efficacy and safety of twice daily fludarabine and cytarabine (BID FA) in pts with R/R AML, high-risk MDS and CML-BP. Pts and Methods: 147 pts with de Novo AML, R/R AML, intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS, and CML-BP, with a performance status of 3 or less, as well as normal organ functions were eligible. Pts were scheduled to receive fludarabine 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) q12 hrs on days 1 to 5 as well as cytarabine at the dose of 0. 5 g/m2IV over 2 hrs q12 hrs on days 1 to 5. GO was administered at the dose of 3 mg/m2 IV on day 1 for the first 70 pts enrolled. Courses were repeated every 4 to 6 weeks for a maximum of 7 courses. Pts with CML-BP were allowed to receive concomitant tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Four pts with AML who had FLT3 mutation were allowed to receive BID FA and sorafenib. Results: A total of 147 pts were treated. The median age was 63 years (range, 20 to 85 years). 131 (89%) had AML, 7 (5%) had high-risk MDS, and 9 (6%) had CML-BP. Of the 131 AML pts, 17 (12%) were de novo AML, 50 (38%) were in first salvage: first CR duration (CRD1) of less than 12 months in 39 pts (29%), and more than 12 months in 11 (9%) pts. Cytogenetic studies showed diploid karyotype in 52 pts (35%) and unfavorable chromosomal abnormalities involving chromosomes 5 and 7 in 30 pts (20%). 128 pts (87%) had a PS ≥1. Sixty-four pts (44%) had failed previous intensive chemotherapy, while 21 (14%) had failed targeted and hypomethylating agents. Forty-three (29%) pts had failed both. Overall, 34 pts (23%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and 8 (6%) achieved a CR without platelet recovery (CRp), for an overall response rate (ORR) of 29%. 6 pts received reinduction therapy, of which 3 achieved a CR. The CR rates for AML pts with frontline therapy, with relapsed AML with CRD1 ≥12 months, relapsed AML with CRD1< 12 months, and R/R AML beyond first salvage were 47%, 64%, 21%, and 14%, respectively. In CML-BP, 2 (22%) of 9 pts had objective responses (1 CR, 1 CRp). 1 of the 7 pts with MDS responded (Table 1). The treatment was well tolerated with only 7 of the pts experiencing grade 3 and 4 toxicities including mainly skin rash and increased liver enzymes. The overall 4-week mortality rate was 13%. With a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 10 to 33), 20 patients (14%) remained alive. The overall 6-month survival rate was 44%. The median overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were 5 months (range, 0. 1 to 33) and 1 month (range, 0. 1 to 33), respectively. The median CR/CRp duration was 12 months. Median OS for pts with de novo AML, a CRD1≥12 months, pts with CRD1<12 months and pts receiving second salvage and beyond were 8, 12, 5, and 4 months respectively. Median EFS for pts with de novo AML, a CRD1≥12 months, pts with CRD1<12 months and pts receiving second salvage and beyond were 3, 7, 1 and 1 month respectively. Conclusion: BID FA appears to be active with an ORR of 29% in a heavily pre-treated population. This combination is safe with a low rate of 4-week-mortality of 13%. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of the Interaction between DNMT3A mutation and Internal Tandem Duplication of the FLT3 Gene (FLT3-ITD) in Patients with De Novo Mutated NPM1 (NPM1mut) acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1492-1492
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Oñate ◽  
Ana Garrido ◽  
Jordi Esteve ◽  
Rosa Coll ◽  
Montserrat Arnan Sangerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction The association of NPM1mut and FLT3-ITD in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with intermediate-risk cytogenetics has different prognostic impact depending on the FLT3 allelic burden. Previous studies published by our cooperative group showed that patients with de novo AML of intermediate-risk cytogenetics with NPM1mut and FLT3-ITD low ratio (<0.5, FLT3low) at diagnosis presented an overall survival and relapse rate similar to those with NPM1mut and FLT3wt. Therefore, in the CETLAM-2012 protocol, patients with FLT3low NPM1mut AML are not considered for allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1). Recent studies suggest that the co-occurrence of DNMT3A mutation in FLT3-ITD NPM1mut AML patients confers a worse prognosis regardless of FLT3-ITD ratio. We analysed our data to determine whether these findings were confirmed in our cohort, specifically in the low FLT3-ITD ratio patients, since this could have therapeutic implications. Methods and patients A total of 163 patients with de novo AML, intermediate-risk cytogenetics and NPM1mut were analysed (median age 53 years (18-72); male:female 72:91 (0.79)). Eighty patients (49%) harboured an FLT3-ITD, with a high allelic ratio in 42 of 76 patients with available ITD/wt ratio (55%). They were included in the AML-2003 (n=49) and AML-2012 (n=114) CETLAM protocols. Proportion of patients undergoing alloHSCT in CR1 is detailed in table 1. Bone marrow samples from diagnosis were studied for DNMT3A mutations as previously described. The definition of complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and risk of relapse (RR) followed recommended ELN criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution of LFS and OS, for RR cumulative incidence was used. Results Out of the 163 patients with AML of intermediate risk cytogenetics and NPM1mut, 78 presented DNMT3A mutations (48%). Of these, 62 (79%) presented mutations in codon R882 or corresponded to DNA insertions/deletions while 16 (21%) harboured missense mutations. Presence of DNMT3A mutation did not associate with FLT3-ITD (ITD/85 DNMT3Awt vs ITD/78 DNMT3Amut, p=0.394). In the entire cohort, 5-year OS, LFS and RR were 58±4.5%, 59±4.6% and 27±13.9%. FLT3-ITD ratio confirmed its prognostic impact when analysing FLT3wt (n=83) vs FLT3low (n=34) vs FLT3high (n=42) patients (5-year OS of 68±6% vs 62±8.7% vs 37±8.6%; p=0.002; and 5-year RR of 18±9.4% vs 27±16.1% vs 41±23.2%; p=0.023). On the contrary, DNMT3Amut did not exert any effect on overall outcome (5-yr OS DNMT3Awt vs DNMT3Amut 61±6.2% vs 55±6.2%; p=0.234) When DNTM3A mutational status was considered, the impact of FLT3-ITD on outcome was mitigated in wild-type DNMT3A population. Thus, we found that DNMT3Awt patients presented no statistical differences in OS according to FLT3 mutational status or ratio: FLT3wt (n=46) vs FLT3-ITD (n=39) was 67±8.5% vs 57±8.2%; p=0.122, whereas FLT3wt (n=46) vs FLT3low (n=18) vs. FLT3high (n=19) was 67±8.5% vs. 66±11.5% vs 46±11.8%; p=0.088 (image 1A).This was also seen in relation to LFS and RR according to FLT3 ratio: 5-yr LFS of FLT3wt vs FLT3low vs FLT3high was 72±7.9% vs 61±12.6% vs 51±13.4%; p=0.244 and 5-year RR of the same groups: 19±8.8% vs 26±12.5% vs 27±21.9%; p=0.724 (image 2A). In the DNMT3Amut group, patients with FLT3-ITD (n=41) presented shorter OS than those with FLT3wt (n=37) with an OS of 37±10.7% vs 69±7.8%; p=0.028. When FLT3 ratio was considered, FLT3wt (n=37) vs FLT3low (n=16) vs FLT3high (n=23) showed an OS of 69±7.8% vs. 58±13.2% vs 27±13.1%; p=0.038 (image 1B). Similar results were seen in LFS according to FLT3 ratio (FLT3wt (n=29) vs FLT3low (n=16) vs FLT3high (n=20) 71±8.6% vs 53±12.9% vs 18±13.8%; p=0.012). Finally, we observed significant differences in the 5-year RR when considering DNMT3Amut patients in relation to FLT3 ratio (FLT3wt vs FLT3low vs FLT3high 18±10.6% vs 27±20% vs 54±28.8%; p=0.021)(image 2B). Conclusions In this study, patients with NPM1mut and FLT3-ITDlow presented a similar outcome to patients with NPM1mut and FLT3wt regardless of DNMT3A mutational status. These results support the modification of alloHCST policy in CR1 in CETLAM-2012, which do not consider alloHSCT for patients with FLT3low. On the other hand, concurrence of DNMT3A mutation may have an added negative effect in patients with NPM1mut and FLT3-ITDhigh, which should be further confirmed in larger studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Expression of the Lung Resistance Protein Predicts Poor Outcome in De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 1508-1513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Filipits ◽  
Gudrun Pohl ◽  
Thomas Stranzl ◽  
Ralf W. Suchomel ◽  
Rik J. Scheper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lung Resistance Protein ◽  
P Glycoprotein ◽  
Lung Resistance ◽  
Resistance Protein ◽  
Disease Free

The 110-kD lung resistance protein (LRP) is overexpressed in P-glycoprotein–negative multidrug-resistant cell lines and most likely involved in the multidrug resistance (MDR) of these cell lines. To determine the clinical significance of LRP, we have studied LRP expression of leukemic blasts and its association with clinical outcome in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). LRP expression of leukemic blasts obtained from peripheral blood or bone marrow of previously untreated patients (n = 86) was determined by immunocytochemistry by means of monoclonal antibody LRP-56. LRP expression at diagnosis was detected in 31 (36%) patients. LRP expression was independent of age and sex of the patients, French-American-British subtype, cytogenetic abnormalities, and lactate dehydrogenase levels, but correlated with white blood cell count (P = .01). Eighty-two patients received standard induction chemotherapy that included cytarabine and MDR drugs (daunorubicin in most patients, additional etoposide in the majority of patients). The complete remission rate of induction chemotherapy was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 61% to 82%) for the total study population. The complete remission rate was 81% (95% CI = 67% to 91%) for patients without LRP expression but only 55% (95% CI = 36% to 74%) for patients with LRP expression (P = .01). Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated according to Kaplan-Meier in 82 and 59 patients, respectively. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients without LRP expression than in patients with LRP expression. At a median follow-up of 16 months, median overall survival was 17 months (95% CI = 12 to 38 months) for LRP-negative patients but only 8 months (95% CI = 4 to 12 months) for -positive patients (P = .006). Disease-free survival was 9 months (95% CI = 7 to 11 months) for LRP-negative patients and 6 months (95% CI = 5 to 8 months) for -positive patients (P = .078). Outcome was best in patients lacking both LRP and P-glycoprotein expression. In conclusion, LRP predicts for poor outcome and thus theLRP gene appears to be another clinically relevant drug resistance gene in AML.

A Phase II Study of Twice Daily Cytarabine and Fludarabine and Gentuzumab Ozogamycin (GO) In Patients (pts) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2188-2188
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Hady Antoine Ghanem ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Abstract 2188 Background: Treatment options for pts with refractory/relapsed (R/R) AML are limited. High dose cytarabine (A) containing regimens are still considered standard options for pts with AML relapsing after a first complete remission (CR) lasting more than 12 months. The combination of A with fludarabine (F) was found to be superior to A alone in this setting, particularly when administered twice daily (BID). In addition, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) has been shown to be active in combination or as single agent in pts with R/R AML. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study assessing the efficacy and safety of BID FA-GO. Patients and Methods: Pts with R/R AML, de novo AML patients unfit for other medical therapies, intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS, and chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast crisis (CML-BC), with a performance status (PS) of 3 or less, as well as normal organ functions were eligible. Pts were scheduled to receive F 15 mg/m2 IV q12 hrs day 1 to 5 as well as A at the dose of 0.5 g/m2 IV over 2 hrs q12 hrs day 1 to 5. GO was administered at the dose of 3 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Treatment course was shortened to 4 days in pts older than 65 years and to 3 days in pts with a PS of 3. Courses were repeated every 4 to 6 weeks for a maximum of 7 courses. Pts with CML were allowed to receive concomitant tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Results: Sixty-five evaluable pts were enrolled: 6 (9%) with de novo AML, 5 (8%) with AML in first relapse with a duration of 1st CR (CRD1) of ≥12 months, 21 (32%) with AML with CRD1 <12 months, 24 (37%) with AML in second relapse and beyond, 3 (5%) with MDS, and 6 (9%) with CML-BC. Median age was 60 years (range, 19 to 80); 58 pts (89%) had a PS ≥1. Cytogenetic analyses were abnormal in 63 % including chromosomes 5 and 7 abnormalities in 17%. The overall response (OR) rate was 31% including CR in 17 pts (26%) and CR without platelet recovery (CRp) in 3 (5%). The overall 4-week mortality rate was 8%. The OR rates for pts with de novo AML, relapsed AML with CRD1 ≥12 months, relapsed AML with CRD1< 12 months, and R/R AML beyond first salvage (S) were 43%, 60%, 35%, and 19%, respectively. The CR rates were 29%, 60%, 27%, and 19%, respectively. The 4-week mortality rates were 19% for pts with R/R AML beyond the first salvage and 0% for the rest (Table1). With a median follow-up of 8 months (range, 1 to 27), the 16-week event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and complete remission duration (CRD) rates were 25%, 61%, and 89%, respectively. The median EFS and OS for the responding pts were 27 weeks (4-31 weeks). When compared to historical match cohort pts treated at our institution, BID FA-GO was better, with an ORR rate of 60 % in pts with AML in first relapse with CRD1 ≥12 months compared to an expected rate of 50%, 19% in pts with relapsed AML with CRD1< 12 months compared to 11%, and 35% in pts with AML beyond the first salvage compared to 7% (Table 2). The treatment was well tolerated with only 3% of the pts experiencing grade 3 and 4 toxicities including mainly skin rash. The main toxicities were of gastro-intestinal origin and all were of grade 1 and 2. There was no case of veno-occlusive disease reported. Conclusion: BID FA-GO appears to be active with an ORR of 31% in heavily pre- treated population. This combination appears to be safe as well with a low rate of 4-week-mortality of 5%. Ongoing studies are exploring the role of the new generation of nucleoside analogues in this setting. Disclosures: Cortes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Attempts to improve treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients: the results of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 1302-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony H. Goldstone ◽  
Alan K. Burnett ◽  
Keith Wheatley ◽  
Alastair G. Smith ◽  
R. Michael Hutchinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Acute Myeloid

In an attempt to improve induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML),1314 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 induction treatments for 2 courses of DAT (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and thioguanine) 3 + 10, ADE (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) 10 + 3 + 5, or MAC (mitoxantrone-cytarabine). The remission rate in the DAT arm was significantly better than ADE (62% vs 50%; P = .002) or MAC (62% vs 55%;P = .04). This benefit was seen in patients younger and older than 70 years. There were no differences between the induction schedules with respect to overall survival at 5 years (12% vs 8% vs 10%). A total of 226 patients were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or placebo as supportive care from day 8 after the end of treatment course 1. The remission rate or survival were not improved by G-CSF, although the median number of days to recover neutrophils to 1.0 × 109/L was reduced by 5 days. Patients who entered remission (n = 371) were randomized to stop after a third course (DAT 2 + 7) or after 6 courses, ie, a subsequent COAP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cytarabine, and prednisolone), DAT 2 + 5, and COAP. The relapse risk (81% vs 73%), disease-free survival (16% vs 23%), and overall survival at 5 years (23% vs 22%) did not differ between the 3-course or 6-course arms. In addition to a treatment duration randomization, 362 patients were randomized to receive 12-month maintenance treatment with low-dose interferon, but no benefit was seen with respect to relapse risk, disease-free survival, or overall survival.

Unrelated Hematopoietic Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) in First Remission.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3141-3141
Author(s):  
Gerhard Ehninger ◽  
Walter E. Aulitzky ◽  
Heinrich Bodenstein ◽  
Martin Bornhaeuser ◽  
Hermann Einsele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Donor Group ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Between 1996 and 2003, 994 patients aged under 60 years with de novo AML received a double induction chemotherapy consisting of MAV (mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 day 4–8, Ara-C 100 mg/m2 continuous infusion day 1–8, etoposide 100 mg/m2 day 4–8) and MAMAC after an interval of at least 14 days (Ara-C 1 g/m2 q. 12 hrs day 1–5, amsacrine 100 mg/m2 day 1–5). A cytogenetic high risk profile (complex aberrations, −5/del(5q), −7/del(7q), hypodiploid karyotypes other than −5, −7, −X, −Y, abnl3q, abnl1q, abnl12p, t(6;9), t(9;22), t(9;11), +11, +13, +21, +22) was present in 252 patients (de novo AML [N=160], prior MDS [N=41], and secondary AML [N=51]). 119 out of 252 (47%) were in complete remission after 2 induction cycles. 35 (14%) additional patients showed complete remission after a further cycle. Patients with a HLA matched sibling donor (N=37) or an unrelated donor (N=34) received an allogeneic transplantation as consolidation therapy. The conditioning protocol consisted of 12 Gy TBI and cyclophosphamide. Cyclosporine and methotrexate were used as GvH prophylaxis. The actuarial survival at 5 years is 42% (CI: 26%–58%) in the related donor group and 53% (CI: 36%–70%) in the unrelated donor group. The disease free survival at 5 years is 40% (CI: 24%–56%) in the related group and 43% (CI: 26%–60%) in the unrelated group (for both, p=ns). In conclusion, the results after unrelated donor transplants are comparable with those after related donor transplants in patients with high risk AML. These data of the AML’96 study will be compared with the experience of our current upfront concept using allogeneic transplantation in aplasia after the 1st or 2nd induction cycle in high risk AML.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document