Changes in the Hierarchy of Risk Factors with Older Age in De-Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1977-1977
Author(s):  
Thomas Buchner ◽  
Wolfgang E. Berdel ◽  
Claudia Schoch ◽  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
Hubert L. Serve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Older Age ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Risk Profiles ◽  
Age Related ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract After recent reports addressed prognostic factors and outcome in older age AML (Burnett et al. Blood106:162a,2005; Wheatley et al. Blood106:199a,2005; Appelbaum et al. Blood107:3481–5,2006; Farag et al. Blood108:63–73,2006) we evaluated 764 patients of 60–85 (median 66) years reduced to those with de-novo AML, known karyotype, and identical consolidation-maintenance chemotherapy, who were part of the 1992 and 1999 multicenter randomized trials by the German AMLCG (Buchner et al. J Clin Oncol21:4496–504,2003;24:2480–9,2006). 521 patients were 60 -< 70 (median 64) and 243 patients were 70–85 (median 73) years of age. 64% and 50% patients respectively went into complete remission, 24% and 29% remained with persistent AML, 12% and 21% succumbed to early and hypoplastic death (p<.001). The overall survival in the younger (60- < 70y) and older (70+) patients was at a median of 13 vs 6 months and 18% vs 8% survived at 5 years (p<.001). Once in complete remission, the remission duration was 14 vs 12 months (median) and equally 18% at 5 years; the relapse-free survival is 13 vs 11 months (median) and 14% vs 13% at 5 years. While all patients were randomized up-front for 2 versions of induction either by TAD-HAM (HAM, high-dose araC 1g/m2x6 and mitox 10mg/m2x3) or by HAM-HAM, response and survival did not differ between the two arms in neither age group. In contrast to response and survival between the younger (60-<70y) and older (70+y) age group corresponding differences in the risk profiles were missing. Thus, favorable/intermediate/unfavorable karyotypes accounted for 8% vs 4% / 67% vs 73% / and 25% vs 24% of patients (p=.073); WBC > 20.000/ccm was found in 40% vs 39% (p=.52); LDH > 700U/L was remarkably 26% vs 18% (p=.014), and the day 16 b.m. blasts ≥ 10% accounted for 41% and 41% of patients. Conclusion: Approximately 50% of patients 70 years of age or older benefit from standard or intensive chemotherapy by complete remission which continues after 1 year in about 50% of responders. The inferior overall survival in the patients of 70+ versus those of 60- < 70 years is mainly explained by more frequent early and hypoplastic death (21% vs 12%) (p=.0016) and death with persistent AML (26% vs 18%) (p=.0145); while death in remission (7% vs 6%), relapse rate (50% vs 53%) and death after relapse (21% vs 26%) did not show this trend. In contrast to the important differences in outcome, established risk factors such as cytogenetic groups, WBC, and early blast clearance show concordance between the two age groups. The even lower LDH may support assumptions of older age AML as a less proliferative disease (Appelbaum et al. Blood 107:3481–5,2006). Thus, the hierarchical risk profiles cannot predict the age related outcome beyond 60 years in patients with de-novo AML.

Older Age Is An Independent Risk Factor in AML

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 555-555
Author(s):  
Thomas Buchner ◽  
Wolfgang E. Berdel ◽  
Claudia Haferlach ◽  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Risk Profiles ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Younger Age

Abstract Among the entire patients with AML the majority is 60 years of age or older. In present German multicenter AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) trial the proportion of these older patients amounts to 54% of all 2734 patients enrolled and receiving intensive chemotherapy. While older age AML is increasingly recognized as a main challenge the therapeutic outcome unlike that in younger patients has remained constantly poor. Thus, the patients of ≥ 60y show an overall survival (OS) of 13% and a relapse rate (RR) of 82% at 5y versus 40% and 52% in younger patients. Age related differences in treatment and in risk profiles are commonly used to explain the differences in outcome. In the AMLCG 99 trial including 2734 patients 16 to 85 (median 61) years of age we investigated factors determining the disease biology and outcome. For induction treatment patients received standard dose TAD and high-dose AraC 3 (age &lt; 60y) and 1 (≥ 60y) g/m² × 6/mitoxantrone (HAM) or randomly HAM-HAM, for consolidation TAD, and for maintenance monthly reduced TAD randomized (in patients &lt; 60y) against autologous SCT. When compared with patients younger than 60y older patients had more frequent secondary AML (29% vs 17%, p&lt; 0.0001), unfavorable cytogenetics (29% vs 23%, p= 0.0004), less frequent favorable cytogenetics (4% vs 12%, p&lt; 0.0001), and NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDneg status (26% vs 34%, p&lt; 0.009) in those with normal karyotype, and overall even lower median WBC (7.360 vs 12.600/μl, p&lt; 0.0001) and LDH (340 vs 413 U/l, p&lt; 0.0001). A multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors determining therapeutic endpoints such as CR rate, OS, RR, and RFS. With similar results across all endpoints, risk factors for OS were age ≥ 60y (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.75–2.17), AML secondary to MDS or cytotoxic treatment (1.28, 1.14–1.45), unfavorable karyotype (2.17, 1.92– 2.44), WBC &gt; 20×10³/μl (1.15, 1.02– 1.30), LDH &gt; 700U/L (1.32, 1.15– 1.52), favorable karyotype (0.49, 0.38– 0.63) and female gender (0.90, 0.81– 0.99). In the 891 patients with normal karyotype and complete mutation status risk factors for OS were age ≥ 60y (2.00, 1.64– 2.44), and NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDneg (0.39, 0.30– 0.49). Risk factors for RR overall were age ≥ 60y (2.04, 1.75– 2.38), unfavorable karyotype (2.08, 1.47– 2.13), LDH (1.41, 1.16– 1.72) and favorable karyotype (0.40, 0.29– 0.56). In patients with normal karyotype and complete mutation status risk factors for RR were age ≥ 60y (2.00, 1.56– 2.63), and NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDneg (0.32, 0.23– 0.43). Testing the role of older age in favorable subgroups, the 198 patients with CBF leukemia show an OS at 5 years of 27.5 (95% CI 12.0– 43.0) % in the older versus 69.4 (60.7– 78.2) % in the younger age group, and a RR of 56.6 (35.7– 77.3) % versus 25.0 (15.6– 34.4) %. Comparatively, the 264 patients with a normal karyotype and NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDneg show an OS of 37.1 (26.6– 47.5) % in the older versus 71.9 (63.4– 80.4) % in the younger age group, and a RR of 61.0 (47.8– 74.2) % versus 23.0 (14.0– 32.0) %. There was no influence by randomized treatment variables on any therapeutic endpoint. Conclusion: Considering the prognostic spectrum of all major historic or genetic subgroups older age maintains its dominant role not explained by age related differences in risk profiles. Even within CBF leukemias and sole NPM1 mutation as the best prognostic categories older age predicts for markedly shorter OS and higher RR. Thus, understanding older age AML requires further genetic and epigenetic work.

Older-age AML: Disease biology and dose response

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7058-7058
Author(s):  
T. Buchner ◽  
W. E. Berdel ◽  
C. Haferlach ◽  
T. Haferlach ◽  
S. Schnittger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Older Age ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Flt3 Mutation ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Disease Biology ◽  
Age Related ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Sequential Trials

7058 Background: In 2602 pts entering two sequential trials the 47% pts of 60+y compared to the younger pts achieved 55 vs 71% CR, 19 vs 41% OS and 77 vs 54% RR (relapse risk) at 3 years. While the trials addressed various options for both de-novo and secondary AML understanding the age related biology of AML required restriction to pts comparable in history, therapy and availability of risk factors. Methods: We therefore selected from the two trials pts with de-novo AML and known karyotype assigned to one of two different intensity induction regimens, either TAD-HAM (HAM, high-dose araC 3(age <60) and 1(age 60+) g/m2x6), or HAM-HAM. All pts received TAD consolidation and monthly reduced TAD maintenance. Results: In the 1284 selected pts the CR rate is 60% in pts of 60+y and 70% in those of 16 −<60y (p<.001), the OS is 23 vs 41% (log rank p<0.001) and the RR is 73 vs 50% (p<.001). There are advantages for younger pts in favorable (16 vs 7%) and unfavorable (18 vs 24%) karyotypes (p<.001) whereas WBC (p=.002) and LDH (p=.002) are lower in the older pts. Among normal karyotypes (52%) the favorable NPM mutation in absence of Flt3 mutation account for 33% of NPM/Flt3 combinations in older and 37% in younger pts (n.s.). The inferior CR, OS and RR in the older vs younger pts is seen in all prognostic subgroups. Thus, the OS at 3 years is 36 vs 62% in favorable (p=.001), 2 vs 14% in unfavorable karyotypes (p=.001), 25 vs 42% in low WBC (p<.001), 21 vs 38% in high WBC (p<.001), 23 vs 42% in low LDH (p<.001), 16 vs 38% in high LDH (p<.001), 30 vs 43% in low day 16 blasts (p<.001), 19 vs 38% in high day 16 blasts (p<.001) and even 50 vs 63% in pts with NPM+/Flt3- mutation (p=.020). In contrast, outcome does not vary by randomization for TAD-HAM vs HAM-HAM chemotherapy. Conclusions: The lack of dose response and the modest age related differences in defined risk profiles suggest hitherto unknown determinants of the poor outcome in older age AML across all subsets. These experiences may indicate the way toward novel experimental options instead of further escalation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Twice Daily Fludarabine and Cytarabine Combination (BID-FA) Is Effective in Pts with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) AML, High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), and Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-BP)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4939-4939
Author(s):  
Hady Ghanem ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Abstract 4939 Background: High dose cytarabine containing regimens are still considered standard options for pts (pts) with AML relapsing after a first complete remission (CR1) lasting more than 12 months. No standard options exist for pts relapsing after shorter remission duration or with primary refractory disease. We conducted a phase II study assessing the efficacy and safety of twice daily fludarabine and cytarabine (BID FA) in pts with R/R AML, high-risk MDS and CML-BP. Pts and Methods: 147 pts with de Novo AML, R/R AML, intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS, and CML-BP, with a performance status of 3 or less, as well as normal organ functions were eligible. Pts were scheduled to receive fludarabine 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) q12 hrs on days 1 to 5 as well as cytarabine at the dose of 0. 5 g/m2IV over 2 hrs q12 hrs on days 1 to 5. GO was administered at the dose of 3 mg/m2 IV on day 1 for the first 70 pts enrolled. Courses were repeated every 4 to 6 weeks for a maximum of 7 courses. Pts with CML-BP were allowed to receive concomitant tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Four pts with AML who had FLT3 mutation were allowed to receive BID FA and sorafenib. Results: A total of 147 pts were treated. The median age was 63 years (range, 20 to 85 years). 131 (89%) had AML, 7 (5%) had high-risk MDS, and 9 (6%) had CML-BP. Of the 131 AML pts, 17 (12%) were de novo AML, 50 (38%) were in first salvage: first CR duration (CRD1) of less than 12 months in 39 pts (29%), and more than 12 months in 11 (9%) pts. Cytogenetic studies showed diploid karyotype in 52 pts (35%) and unfavorable chromosomal abnormalities involving chromosomes 5 and 7 in 30 pts (20%). 128 pts (87%) had a PS ≥1. Sixty-four pts (44%) had failed previous intensive chemotherapy, while 21 (14%) had failed targeted and hypomethylating agents. Forty-three (29%) pts had failed both. Overall, 34 pts (23%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and 8 (6%) achieved a CR without platelet recovery (CRp), for an overall response rate (ORR) of 29%. 6 pts received reinduction therapy, of which 3 achieved a CR. The CR rates for AML pts with frontline therapy, with relapsed AML with CRD1 ≥12 months, relapsed AML with CRD1< 12 months, and R/R AML beyond first salvage were 47%, 64%, 21%, and 14%, respectively. In CML-BP, 2 (22%) of 9 pts had objective responses (1 CR, 1 CRp). 1 of the 7 pts with MDS responded (Table 1). The treatment was well tolerated with only 7 of the pts experiencing grade 3 and 4 toxicities including mainly skin rash and increased liver enzymes. The overall 4-week mortality rate was 13%. With a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 10 to 33), 20 patients (14%) remained alive. The overall 6-month survival rate was 44%. The median overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were 5 months (range, 0. 1 to 33) and 1 month (range, 0. 1 to 33), respectively. The median CR/CRp duration was 12 months. Median OS for pts with de novo AML, a CRD1≥12 months, pts with CRD1<12 months and pts receiving second salvage and beyond were 8, 12, 5, and 4 months respectively. Median EFS for pts with de novo AML, a CRD1≥12 months, pts with CRD1<12 months and pts receiving second salvage and beyond were 3, 7, 1 and 1 month respectively. Conclusion: BID FA appears to be active with an ORR of 29% in a heavily pre-treated population. This combination is safe with a low rate of 4-week-mortality of 13%. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of the Interaction between DNMT3A mutation and Internal Tandem Duplication of the FLT3 Gene (FLT3-ITD) in Patients with De Novo Mutated NPM1 (NPM1mut) acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1492-1492
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Oñate ◽  
Ana Garrido ◽  
Jordi Esteve ◽  
Rosa Coll ◽  
Montserrat Arnan Sangerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction The association of NPM1mut and FLT3-ITD in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with intermediate-risk cytogenetics has different prognostic impact depending on the FLT3 allelic burden. Previous studies published by our cooperative group showed that patients with de novo AML of intermediate-risk cytogenetics with NPM1mut and FLT3-ITD low ratio (<0.5, FLT3low) at diagnosis presented an overall survival and relapse rate similar to those with NPM1mut and FLT3wt. Therefore, in the CETLAM-2012 protocol, patients with FLT3low NPM1mut AML are not considered for allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1). Recent studies suggest that the co-occurrence of DNMT3A mutation in FLT3-ITD NPM1mut AML patients confers a worse prognosis regardless of FLT3-ITD ratio. We analysed our data to determine whether these findings were confirmed in our cohort, specifically in the low FLT3-ITD ratio patients, since this could have therapeutic implications. Methods and patients A total of 163 patients with de novo AML, intermediate-risk cytogenetics and NPM1mut were analysed (median age 53 years (18-72); male:female 72:91 (0.79)). Eighty patients (49%) harboured an FLT3-ITD, with a high allelic ratio in 42 of 76 patients with available ITD/wt ratio (55%). They were included in the AML-2003 (n=49) and AML-2012 (n=114) CETLAM protocols. Proportion of patients undergoing alloHSCT in CR1 is detailed in table 1. Bone marrow samples from diagnosis were studied for DNMT3A mutations as previously described. The definition of complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and risk of relapse (RR) followed recommended ELN criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution of LFS and OS, for RR cumulative incidence was used. Results Out of the 163 patients with AML of intermediate risk cytogenetics and NPM1mut, 78 presented DNMT3A mutations (48%). Of these, 62 (79%) presented mutations in codon R882 or corresponded to DNA insertions/deletions while 16 (21%) harboured missense mutations. Presence of DNMT3A mutation did not associate with FLT3-ITD (ITD/85 DNMT3Awt vs ITD/78 DNMT3Amut, p=0.394). In the entire cohort, 5-year OS, LFS and RR were 58±4.5%, 59±4.6% and 27±13.9%. FLT3-ITD ratio confirmed its prognostic impact when analysing FLT3wt (n=83) vs FLT3low (n=34) vs FLT3high (n=42) patients (5-year OS of 68±6% vs 62±8.7% vs 37±8.6%; p=0.002; and 5-year RR of 18±9.4% vs 27±16.1% vs 41±23.2%; p=0.023). On the contrary, DNMT3Amut did not exert any effect on overall outcome (5-yr OS DNMT3Awt vs DNMT3Amut 61±6.2% vs 55±6.2%; p=0.234) When DNTM3A mutational status was considered, the impact of FLT3-ITD on outcome was mitigated in wild-type DNMT3A population. Thus, we found that DNMT3Awt patients presented no statistical differences in OS according to FLT3 mutational status or ratio: FLT3wt (n=46) vs FLT3-ITD (n=39) was 67±8.5% vs 57±8.2%; p=0.122, whereas FLT3wt (n=46) vs FLT3low (n=18) vs. FLT3high (n=19) was 67±8.5% vs. 66±11.5% vs 46±11.8%; p=0.088 (image 1A).This was also seen in relation to LFS and RR according to FLT3 ratio: 5-yr LFS of FLT3wt vs FLT3low vs FLT3high was 72±7.9% vs 61±12.6% vs 51±13.4%; p=0.244 and 5-year RR of the same groups: 19±8.8% vs 26±12.5% vs 27±21.9%; p=0.724 (image 2A). In the DNMT3Amut group, patients with FLT3-ITD (n=41) presented shorter OS than those with FLT3wt (n=37) with an OS of 37±10.7% vs 69±7.8%; p=0.028. When FLT3 ratio was considered, FLT3wt (n=37) vs FLT3low (n=16) vs FLT3high (n=23) showed an OS of 69±7.8% vs. 58±13.2% vs 27±13.1%; p=0.038 (image 1B). Similar results were seen in LFS according to FLT3 ratio (FLT3wt (n=29) vs FLT3low (n=16) vs FLT3high (n=20) 71±8.6% vs 53±12.9% vs 18±13.8%; p=0.012). Finally, we observed significant differences in the 5-year RR when considering DNMT3Amut patients in relation to FLT3 ratio (FLT3wt vs FLT3low vs FLT3high 18±10.6% vs 27±20% vs 54±28.8%; p=0.021)(image 2B). Conclusions In this study, patients with NPM1mut and FLT3-ITDlow presented a similar outcome to patients with NPM1mut and FLT3wt regardless of DNMT3A mutational status. These results support the modification of alloHCST policy in CR1 in CETLAM-2012, which do not consider alloHSCT for patients with FLT3low. On the other hand, concurrence of DNMT3A mutation may have an added negative effect in patients with NPM1mut and FLT3-ITDhigh, which should be further confirmed in larger studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Central Nervous System Relapse in Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single Center Experience.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4579-4579
Author(s):  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
Guillermo Martin ◽  
Mari-luz Perez-sirvent ◽  
Jaime Sanz ◽  
Ignacio Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Intrathecal Chemotherapy ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: There is scarce information concerning incidence and risk factors for central nervous system (CNS) relapse in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In acute lymphoblastic leukemia CNS relapse occurs in up to 30% of patients without prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). This has lead to establish its prophylactic use during induction and post-remission phase. Due to the lack of information about incidence of CNS relapse in adult patients with AML, the usefulness of ITC prophylaxis is not clear. Objectives: Analyze incidence and risk factors for CNS relapse in a large cohort of adult patients with newly diagnosed AML. Material y methods: Between 1976 y 2005, 747 adult patients (median 54 years, range 16–81) were diagnosed of de novo AML in our institution. All of them received induction with intensive chemotherapy. Prophylactic ITC was not administered, and cerebrospinal fluid was analyzed only if CNS infiltration was suspected. We analyzed the incidence and risk factors for CNS relapse in patients who reached a complete remission. To calculate the Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival (EFS) we considered as an event the first relapse in CNS, censoring patients at the moment of death or at first relapse in a site different than CNS. Results: 432 patients (58%) obtained complete remission. Between 1976 and 1989 (period 1) 12 of 136 patients (9%) were submitted to autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT), whereas 129 of 296 (44%) received SCT between 1990 and 2005 (period 2). Overall, 8 of 432 patients (2%) had a CNS relapse, 3 isolated in CNS and 5 in bone marrow plus CNS. Of them, only 1 presented CNS infiltration at diagnosis. In univariate analysis, CNS relapse was associated with high LDH (3% vs 0%, p=0.06), lisozyme >30 (8% vs 1%, p=0.06), FAB M4–M5 (5% vs 1%, p=0.04) and period 1 (5% vs 0.3%, p<0.01). The median follow-up of the cohort was 85 months. CNS relapses occurred at a median of 10 months after complete remission (range, 3 to 84 months). The EFS at 10 years was 95%, and it was lower in patients with elevated LDH (91% vs 100%, p=0.02), FAB M4–M5 (88% vs 97%, p<0.01), leukocytes >10 ×109/L (92% vs 98%, p=0.07), no SCT (92% vs 100%, p<0.01), and period 1 (80% vs 99%, p<0.01). In multivariate analysis, AML M4–M5 remained as the only independent prognostic factor for EFS (HR 6.4, p=0.01). Only 1 of 8 patients with CNS relapse is alive (AML M3, 11 years after a second complete remission). Median survival after CNS relapse was 168 days (range, 16 to 3821 days). Conclusion: In adults with de novo AML CNS relapse is an infrequent event. Intensification of post-remission therapy, especially with SCT, during the last decades may have contributed to reduce its incidence. Therefore, administration of prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy should not be recommended, even in patients with high risk of CNS relapse, such as monocytic AML.

Efficacy of a Two Day Induction Regimen for De Novo and Secondary AML with Intermediate and Adverse Cytogenetic Profiles

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4027-4027
Author(s):  
Melissa L. Larson ◽  
Ann M. Thomas ◽  
Nitin Goyal ◽  
Jamile M. Shammo ◽  
John J. Maciejewski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Background: Cytogenetic data remains one of the most powerful prognostic factors for predicting response and survival in adult AML patients. The relationship between cytogenetics and induction response to the standard “7+3” regimen has been analyzed in the past. In a CALGB study, patients with favorable cytogenetics achieved a complete remission (CR) rate of 88%, those with intermediate cytogenetics achieved a 67% CR rate and those with adverse cytogenetics had a 32% CR rate (Byrd et al. Blood100: 4325, 2002). We present a retrospective analysis of the correlation between the hierarchical cytogenetic groups and complete remission rate following induction of AML using a novel induction regimen. This regimen was developed based on the concept of timed sequential therapy. The first pulse of chemotherapy recruits leukemic cells into the cell cycle while the second pulse is given at a time of peak cell recruitment. It utilizes two highly active anti-leukemic drugs: cytarabine, a cell cycle-specific drug, and mitoxantrone, which has a favorable cardiac toxicity profile. Patients and Methods: One hundred four patients with AML were treated with two days of chemotherapy given 96 hours apart from April 1997 to April 2008. Each day consisted of two doses of cytarabine 2gm/m2 (at t=0 and t=12) followed by one dose of mitoxantrone 30 mg/m2 administered after the second cytarabine dose (t=15). Bone marrow biopsies were performed for assessment of leukemia-free state (day 14) and to document remission response. Cytogenetic results were classified into favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable categories based on CALGB data. Responses were defined per the Revised IWG Recommendations (Cheson et al, J Clin Onc21: 4642, 2003). Results: Median age of the 104 patients was 57 years [range 17–79]. There were 47 males and 57 females. Forty-two patients (40%) were 60 years of age and older, and the remaining 62 patients (60%) were younger than 60. Sixty-four patients (61.5%) had de novo AML. Five patients had favorable cytogenetics with 100% of them achieving CR. All of the patients with favorable cytogenetics were less than 60 years of age. For the 61 patients with intermediate cytogenetics, the ORR was 83.6% with a CR of 61%. In patients younger than 60, the ORR was 83.8%% (26 CR, 3 CRi, 2 CRp) with CR of 70%. For patients 60 years and older, the ORR was 83.3% (11 CR, 3 CRi, 5 CRp, 1 RMDS). In the 38 patients with unfavorable cytogenetics, the ORR was 57.9% with CR of 37%. For patients younger than 60 and 60 years and older, the overall responses were 75% and 38.8%, respectively. Of the 40 patients with secondary AML due to pre-existing MDS, the ORR was 65% with CR of 27.5%. In patients with de novo AML, the ORR was 81% with CR of 70%. Patients with prior MDS were more likely to have CRi (20% vs 1.5%), TF due to refractory disease (25% vs 15.6%) or aplasia (7.5% vs 1.5%) as compared to patients without MDS. The rates of CRp (10% vs 9%) were similar for both groups. MDS patients with intermediate cytogenetics had an ORR of 77.7% as compared to 54.5% in those with unfavorable cytogenetics. De novo patients with intermediate cytogenetics had ORR of 86% and those with unfavorable cytogenetics had ORR of 62.5%. Conclusion: Our data reflects the overall effectiveness of high dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone for induction therapy of AML. In the favorable cytogenetic group, the CR rate was higher than previously reported response rates; however, the number of patients was small. In the intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetic groups, the response rates for de novo AML compare favorably to historic controls. Patients with secondary AML respond equally well as compared to those with de novo AML; though, the influence of cytogenetics was similar to that seen in de novo AML. This regimen is very effective in producing a high response rates across cytogenetic categories.

A Clinical Measure of DNA Methylation Predicts Outcome in De Novo AML

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2591-2591
Author(s):  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Phyllis Gimotty ◽  
Catherine Smith ◽  
Alison Loren ◽  
Maria Figueroa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Older Age ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Recurrent Mutations ◽  
The Mean ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Background: Despite advances, the majority of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) will die of their disease. Current genetics-based risk classification schemes inadequately predict outcome. We sought to determine if a novel methylation-based biomarker could enhance risk stratification in AML. Methods: Using a novel methylation assay (xMELP) validated for the clinical laboratory, we performed DNA methylation assessment at 17 previously identified prognostic loci to calculate a summary methylation statistic (M-score, Wertheim et al. Clin Chem 2015) for 166 pts with de novo AML treated at the University of Pennsylvania (UPENN). Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 33 hematologic malignancy-associated genes was performed for a 136 pt subset. The association of M-score with other prognostic variables and outcome [complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS)] was evaluated. Median follow-up was 68.1 mos (range 1.4-150.2) among 38 survivors and 10.5 mos (range 0.1-95.2) among those (n=128) deceased. The optimal M-score for identifying groups with differing OS in the total UPENN cohort defined a binary classifier. The classifier was validated in UPENN subgroups and in a separate ECOG ACRIN E1900 trial cohort. Results: The mean and median M-score for the UPENN cohort was 92.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.4-97.2) and 91.4 (range, 30.8-97.3), respectively; the M-score was not significantly associated with age, gender, specimen type, blast percent, NPM1, or FLT3-ITD. Patients with favorable cytogenetics had a lower mean M-score than those with non-favorable cytogenetics; there was no difference between intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetic groups. Univariate analyses demonstrated that a 10-unit increase in M-score was associated with a 10% increase in the hazard of death (HR 1.1; P<.0001) and a 20% increase in the odds of failing to achieve CR (OR 1.2, P<.0001). In multivariable Cox analysis, higher M-score (HR 1.1, P=.011) and older age (P=.001) were significantly associated with increased hazard of death, while NPM1+/FLT3-ITD-status (P=.031) was associated with decreased hazard of death. In a multivariable logistic analysis, higher M-score (HR, 1.1, P=.034) and older age (P=.007) were associated with increased odds of failing to achieve CR, while favorable cytogenetics (P=.030) was associated with achievement of CR. Based on the maximization of the log-rank statistic, the optimal M-score cutpoint was 86, which defined a binary risk classifier (hazard of death for high vs low M-score: unadjusted HR 2.5, P<.0001; adjusted HR 1.9, P=.003). Median OS was 26.6 vs. 10.6 mos for low and high M-score groups (Figure). The CR rates for low and high M-score groups were 84% and 61%, respectively. The performance of the M-score classifier was confirmed in pts ≤ 60 yrs with intermediate cytogenetics (log-rank P=.001, OS in high vs low M-score groups: 36.4 vs 14.0 mos) and among pts who achieved CR with initial therapy (log-rank P<.00001, OS 43.9 vs 17.2 mos). The M-score classifier identified groups with different outcome regardless of allogeneic transplant. The M-score classifier was validated in the E1900 cohort (n=383). The mean and median M-scores were similar to the UPENN cohort and M-score was significantly associated with OS on multivariable analysis (P<0.0001). The M-score classifier identified E1900 subgroups with different OS (log-rank P<.00001; OS 29.5 vs 12.6 mos), a finding confirmed in the intermediate cytogenetics group, in those aged <50 and ≥50 yrs, and among pts assigned to both standard and high dose daunorubicin. Notably, high dose daunorubicin benefited patients with high M-scores (P=.001), but not those with low M-scores (P=.328). We also evaluated the prognostic value of the M-score in the context of an extended molecular profile. Random forest analysis of the UPENN cohort showed that M-score and age are the most robust predictors of OS, while a subset of recurrent mutations (FLT3-ITD, NPM1, IDH2, TET2, TP53, NRAS, CEBPA) also contribute to prognosis, but to a lesser degree. Conclusion: The M-score and associated classifier represent promising tools for clinical decision-making in AML and deserve further investigation. The prognostic value of the M-score may be superior to mutational analysis. Optimal methods for integration of M-score, clinical and genetic information are being defined. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Loren: Merck: Research Funding. Levine:Foundation Medicine: Consultancy; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Time to Treatment Initiation Predicts Overall Survival in Hospitalized Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients: A California Population-Based Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3982-3982
Author(s):  
Tatini Datta ◽  
Brian A Jonas ◽  
Aaron S Rosenberg ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Ann M Brunson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: The impact of time from diagnosis to chemotherapy initiation (time to treatment, TTT) for AML has been a topic of ongoing debate. A prior study reported that TTT ≥5 days adversely impacted overall survival in younger (<60 years of age), but not older (≥60 years of age), patients. However, subsequent studies found either no effect of TTT on overall survival, regardless of age, or an adverse impact of TTT on overall survival for both younger (>10 days) and older patients (>5 days). Prior data also showed no impact of TTT on early mortality. Given these conflicting findings, consensus on the impact of TTT on survival is lacking and warrants further study. Using prospectively collected population-based data, we analyzed a large cohort of adult AML patients to examine the effect of TTT on overall survival. Methods: Using data from the California Cancer Registry and Patient Discharge Dataset between 1999-2012, patients≥15years diagnosed with de novo AML and who received inpatient treatment between 1-90 days from diagnosis were identified (n=5337). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with TTT>5 days vs 1-5 days with data presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The effect of TTT on overall and 60-day survival was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with TTT (1-5, 6-10,>10 days)considered as a time-dependent variable. Patients were stratified by age group (<60,≥60 years) for all analyses.Multivariable models accounted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, number of comorbidities, marital status, neighborhood socioeconomic status, health insurance type, treatment at National Cancer Institute designated (NCI) vs non-NCI designated facility, use ofleukapheresis, and year of diagnosis. Results: Of the 2659 patients <60 years of age, 61.0% were treated within 5 days and 79.7% within 10 days of diagnosis, compared to 43.8% and 65.0%, respectively, of the 2678 patients≥60 years of age. Patients≥60 years were more likely to have 3+ comorbidities compared to the younger age group (43.3% vs 25.9%, P<0.001). The likelihood of TTT>5 days increased with age in both younger and older patients. Across both age groups, patients requiringleukapheresis(age<60: OR 0.19, CI 0.10-0.34; age≥60: OR 0.23, CI 0.12-0.45), treated at a non-NCI (vs NCI) center (age<60: OR 0.62, CI 0.52-0.73; age≥60: OR 0.64, CI 0.52-0.78) and with 1-2 (vs 0) comorbidities (age<60: OR 0.81, CI 0.67-0.98; age≥60: OR 0.69, CI 0.54-0.88) or 3+ (vs 0) comorbidities (age<60: OR 0.77, CI 0.62-0.97; age≥60: OR 0.52, CI 0.41-0.66) had a lower odds of TTT>5 days. Younger (age<60) African Americans (vs non-Hispanic whites) had a higher odds of TTT >5 days (OR 1.43, CI 1.04-1.97). Delaying chemotherapy >10 days (vs 1-5 days) adversely impacted overall survival in both age groups (age<60: HR 1.26, CI 1.11-1.43; age≥60: HR 1.17, CI 1.06-1.28) (Table). However, TTT of 6-10 days (vs 1-5 days) affected overall survival in young (age<60: HR 1.15, CI 1.02-1.31), but not older patients. A TTT of 6-10 days (vs 1-5 days) adversely impacted 60-day survival in both age groups (age<60: HR 1.70, CI 1.24-2.33; age≥60: HR 1.27, CI 1.05-1.54); 60-day survival results were similar for a TTT >10 days (vs 1-5 days) (Table). Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients with de novo AML, TTT of up to 10 days did not have a negative impact on overall survival in patients over the age of 60. In younger patients (<age 60), TTT >5 days was associated with decreased overall survival. Delaying chemotherapy over 5 days adversely impacted 60-day survival in both age groups. Our observation that patients were more likely to have a shorter TTT at non-NCI designated hospitals may relate to delays associated with transfer to or clinical trial enrollment at NCI centers. Our results suggest that waiting to get results of ancillary testing, such as cytogenetic and molecular mutation analyses, in order to inform treatment decisions for AML patients, may be feasible in some patients with AML. In an era of rapidly evolving prognostic and treatment landscapes for AML, our findings may have implications for personalized therapy, including novel targeted therapies, and clinical trial design for patients withAML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Increasing The Dose Of AraC In Consolidation Therapy Does Not Lead To Higher Overall Survival Or Improved Relapse Incidence In Patients With AML Over The Age Of 60 Years

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2645-2645
Author(s):  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Rainer Krahl ◽  
Christian Jakob ◽  
Thomas Heinicke ◽  
Christoph Kahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Consolidation Chemotherapy ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Wbc Count

Abstract The optimal consolidation chemotherapy in AML patients >60 years has yet to be defined in detail. Although age-adjusted induction chemotherapy results in CR rates comparable to those in younger patients, relapse remains the major hurdle to successful treatment. While the role of stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in elderly patients is currently being evaluated in randomized studies, we focus here on the intensity of consolidation chemotherapy. Patients data from the elderly AML trials OSHO 1997 (n=410) and OSHO 2004 (n=733) were pooled and analyzed. These protocols have identical inclusion/exclusion criteria and induction chemotherapy, but differ in the intensity of consolidation therapy. In the OSHO 1997 trial, Ara-C 120 mg/m2 bid was given from day 1-5 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 from day 1-2 as consolidation. In the OSHO 2004 an intensified consolidation using Ara-C 500 mg/m2 bid on day 1/3/5 was applied together with mitoxantrone as used in the OSHO 1997 study. Of the 1143 patients, 689 entered CR (60% in the OSHO 1997 and 61% in the OSHO 2004) and 536 (OSHO 1997, n=242, OSHO 2004, n=294) did not receive HSCT as consolidation. The analysis concentrated on the dose of AraC used in the consolidation for this elderly population and on the cycles of consolidation applied. Patient characteristics were compared using chi-square test for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous data. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate comparisons were made by means of the log-rank test. Cox regression was used to find any association between consolidation chemotherapy considered as a time-dependent covariate on Overall Survival (OS) or Relapse Incidence (RI). RI and Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) were calculated using the competing risk method, and the Gray test was applied to compare differences. Multivariate modeling was performed by Cox regression analyses with a forward selection method. Median ages in the AML studies were 66 (60-81) years and 69 (60-85) years for the OSHO 1997 and OSHO 2004, respectively. Patients characteristics were balanced except for age and Karnofsky score (p< .0005) and a trend towards more intermediate and high risk karyotypes, more female and less WBC in the OSHO 2004 compared to the OSHO 1997 study (p=0.06). OS at 15 years was 14±2% in all patients with no difference between the two consolidations, but strong dependence on cytogenetic risk factors. In multivariate analyses risk factors for survival were high/intermediate risk karyotypes, male gender, non de-novo AML and less than two consolidations. Patients with two consolidations had better OS than patients with one or no consolidations in the pooled group and in each of the two protocols with no difference between OSHO 1997 and OSHO 2004. Relapse incidence amounted to 79±2% and NRM 10±04% at 15 years with no difference between the two protocols. Relapse incidence was dependent upon cytogenetic risk and the number of consolidations applied in a multivariate model. There were no risk factors predicting TRM in multivariate analysis. Our analysis of patient characteristics according to the number of consolidations showed the distribution of consolidation therapies to be 15.2%, 28.0%, 56.6% and 14.2%, 32.3% and 53.4% for 0, 1 and 2 consolidations in the OSHO 1997 and OSHO 2004 respectively (n.s.). Higher age, higher risk cytogenetics, non-de novo AML type, less CR after one induction cycle and lower WBC count at diagnosis were characteristic of patients receiving none or one as compared to two consolidation therapies. The multivariate analysis revealed cytogenetics and gender as independent risk factors, but not the application of one as opposed to two consolidation treatments. The increase of AraC dose in the OSHO 2004 was unable to either increase survival or improve relapse incidence in the cohort of elderly patients. TRM was not different between the OSHO 1997 and 2004 studies. However, the application of one or two consolidation cycles had a significant impact on survival that was not due to decreased relapse incidence after normalization for risk factors. Interestingly, just above 50% of patients received 2 consolidations as proposed in the protocol with no statistically significant difference between OSHO 1997 and OSHO 2004. Patients receiving fewer consolidation therapy cycles are older, have more non-de novo AML and lower WBC count. Disclosures: Hochhaus: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Decitabine and Sorafenib Therapy in Patients with FLT3-ITD Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia Is Associated with High Response Rates—a Single Institute Experience

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5284-5284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Reddy Muppidi ◽  
Elizabeth A. Griffiths ◽  
James E. Thompson ◽  
Laurie A Ford ◽  
Craig W Freyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Case Series ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Dna Hypomethylating Agent ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) characterized by FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT-3) internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations have poor outcomes, especially in the relapsed setting. Although small molecule inhibitors of FLT-3 have been explored for these patients, many inhibitors have demonstrated limited single-agent efficacy with short response durations. Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor with activity against FLT-3, has previously been evaluated alone and in combination with induction chemotherapy or azacytidine in AML patients. Here we describe our experience with the combination of the DNA hypomethylating agent, decitabine (D), and sorafenib (S) for the treatment of FLT-3 ITD mutant AML. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients with FLT-3 ITD mutant AML who were treated off protocol with decitabine and sorafenib from 2011-present. Descriptive statistics, treatment response, and overall survival were recorded. Results: A total of six patients were identified. Mean age was 56 (range 34-70) years. Two-thirds (4/6) were female. All patients were confirmed to have recurrence of de novo AML characterized by FLT-3 ITD mutations prior to therapy. Patients received at least 1-2 cycles of concurrent decitabine 20 mg/m2 for 10 days and sorafenib 200-400 mg twice a day for 28 days. Five patients had relapsed/refractory AML (RR-AML) following 1-3 prior therapies. One patient had de novo AML in complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi) and received DS as consolidation. The overall response rate was 83%. Eighty percent (4/5) of patients with RR-AML attained CRi. One patient receiving DS consolidation attained complete remission (CR). Two patients received subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation with one individual still alive after 348 days. FLT3 ITD allelic ratio (available on 3 patients) decreased after DS therapy and correlated with CRi. Median overall survival was 111 days (range 59-348) from the initiation of DS to death from any cause or last known follow-up. Two patients developed treatment-related neutropenic fever/sepsis and elevated liver enzymes, respectively, which did not require dose adjustment. One patient developed heart failure of uncertain etiology. Conclusions: In this single institute case series, we demonstrated that the combination of decitabine (10 days) and sorafenib was well tolerated, resulted in high CR/CRi rates (80%), and prolonged overall survival in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory FLT-3 ITD mutant AML. Further investigation of this regimen in clinical trials is warranted. Table 1: Case series Patient Age(years) Sex No. of Prior therapies PriorAlloSCT * Blasts Prior to DS (%) No. of DSCycles Responseto therapy Overall survival (Days) 1 54 Female 3 N BM 70% 1 CRi 141 2 70 Female 1 N PB 53% 2 CRi 82 3 64 Male 1 N BM 68% 2 CRi 62 4 60 Male 1 N BM 2% 1 CR 198 5 34 Female 3 Y PB 48% 1 NR 348 6 58 Female 3 Y NA 2 CRi 59 Figure 1 Figure 1. *Allogeneic stem cell transplantation Disclosures Off Label Use: We are going to discuss the use of decitabine and sorafenib combination in relapsed/refractory FLT3 mutant AML. Decitabine is a DNA hypomethylating agent and sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor, both of which have been evaluated individually in AML patients..

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document