scholarly journals Gene therapy in hemophilia A: a cost-effectiveness analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (14) ◽  
pp. 1792-1798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Machin ◽  
Margaret V. Ragni ◽  
Kenneth J. Smith

Key Points Gene therapy is cost-effective in severe hemophilia A compared with standard factor VIII prophylaxis. Over a 10-year time horizon, gene therapy cost $1M and resulted in 8.33 QALYs gained, whereas prophylaxis cost $1.7M and resulted in 6.62 QALYs gained.

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 555-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Jolly ◽  
Judith Greengard

IntroductionHemophilia A results from the plasma deficiency of factor VIII, a gene carried on the X chromosome. Bleeding results from a lack of coagulation factor VIII, a large and complex protein that circulates in complex with its carrier, von Willebrand factor (vWF).1 Severe hemophilia A (<1% of normal circulating levels) is associated with a high degree of mortality, due to spontaneous and trauma-induced, life-threatening and crippling bleeding episodes.2 Current treatment in the United States consists of infusion of plasma-derived or recombinant factor VIII in response to bleeding episodes.3 Such treatment fails to prevent cumulative joint damage, a major cause of hemophilia-associated morbidity.4 Availability of prophylactic treatment, which would reduce the number and severity of bleeding episodes and, consequently, would limit such joint damage, is limited by cost and the problems associated with repeated venous access. Other problems are associated with frequent replacement treatment, including the dangers of transmission of blood-borne infections derived from plasma used as a source of factor VIII or tissue culture or formulation components. These dangers are reduced, but not eliminated, by current manufacturing techniques. Furthermore, approximately 1 in 5 patients with severe hemophilia treated with recombinant or plasma-derived factor VIII develop inhibitory humoral immune responses. In some cases, new inhibitors have developed, apparently in response to unnatural modifications introduced during manufacture or purification.5 Gene therapy could circumvent most of these difficulties. In theory, a single injection of a vector encoding the factor VIII gene could provide constant plasma levels of factor in the long term. However, long-term expression after gene transfer of a systemically expressed protein in higher mammals has seldom been described. In some cases, a vector that appeared promising in a rodent model has not worked well in larger animals, for example, due to a massive immune response not seen in the rodent.6 An excellent review of early efforts at factor VIII gene therapy appeared in an earlier volume of this series.7 A summary of results from various in vivo experiments is shown in Table 1. This chapter will focus on results pertaining to studies using vectors based on murine retroviruses, including our own work.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 734-734
Author(s):  
John W. Luiza ◽  
Margaret V. Ragni ◽  
Robert F. Sidonio ◽  
Kenneth J Smith

Abstract Abstract 734 Background: Severe hemophilia A is an X-linked congenital bleeding disorder occurring in 1:5,000 male births. Among neonates with severe hemophilia A, failure to recognize hemophilia and associated bleeding may result in severe blood loss anemia from circumcision, central nervous system (CNS) bleeding during the birth process or with head trauma and associated neurologic sequelae, and unrecognized joint bleeding that, when recurrent, increases the risk of joint damage which may lead to chronic disability. In at least one-third of cases, the disease arises as a spontaneous mutation: yet, even among the two-thirds with a family history, most carriers do not undergo carrier testing or prenatal diagnosis, leaving only a minority in whom cord blood screening is performed. About half of newborns with severe hemophilia A have a factor VIII (F.VIII) intron 22 inversion mutation, readily detected by PCR screening. We, therefore, sought to determine the effects of newborn screening by F.VIII intron 22 inversion PCR on early diagnosis in children with severe hemophilia A, specifically, on prevention of early life bleeding and associated cost, morbidity, and quality of life. Methods: We constructed a decision tree model to evaluate the cost effectiveness of newborn F.VIII intron 22 screening for severe hemophilia A. We assumed all newborn males were tested as part of screening, and that treatment modifies the likelihood of bleeding but not bleeding associated morbidity. Rates of major and minor CNS, joint, and procedural/surgical bleeding, including circumcision, morbidity and mortality, cost, and quality of life utilities were obtained from the literature. We assumed the cost of intron 22 PCR testing to be $3.00 per newborn male, that test results were available within 2 days of screening, and that clotting factor was infused prior to procedures and at the first sign of joint bleeding or head trauma. The probability of severe bleeding requiring hospitalization or red blood cell transfusion was estimated to be 5% or less in children with severe hemophilia A. The cost of F.VIII concentrate was based on the average wholesale price, and transfusion and hospitalization costs were based on local data. Outcomes included medical costs for each bleeding event, effectiveness measured as quality-adjusted-life-years (QALY), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over the first two years of life. Sensitivity analysis was used to test the robustness of analysis results. Results: Compared to no screening, screening for hemophilia had an ICER of $96,918/QALY, a value considered economically reasonable. Results were sensitive to variation of screening cost and overall detection of hemophilia A by PCR screening (base case 50%). Effects of varying both these parameters in a two-way sensitivity analysis are shown in the Figure. Using a $100,000 per QALY cost-effectiveness criterion over the depicted ranges for both parameters, screening was favored if screening cost ≤$3 or if ≥56% of all newborns with hemophilia A were detected by screening. Conclusion: It is cost effective to perform factor VIII intron 22 PCR screening to identify severe hemophilia A in newborn males in order to prevent bleeding morbidity, if the cost of the test does not exceed $3.00. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda X. Yin ◽  
William V. Padula ◽  
Shekhar Gadkaree ◽  
Kevin Motz ◽  
Sabrina Rahman ◽  
...  

Objective Laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) is resource-intensive disease. The cost-effectiveness of LTS treatments has not been adequately explored. We aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing open reconstruction (cricotracheal/tracheal resection [CTR/TR]) with endoscopic dilation in the treatment of LTS. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Tertiary referral center (2013-2017). Subjects and Methods Thirty-four LTS patients were recruited. Annual costs were derived from the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University. Cost-effectiveness analysis compared CTR/TR versus endoscopic dilation at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) over 5- and 10-year time horizons. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated with deterministic analysis and tested for sensitivity with univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results Mean LTS costs were $4080.09 (SE, $569.29) annually for related health care visits. The major risk factor for increased cost was etiology of stenosis. As compared with idiopathic patients, patients with intubation-related stenosis had significantly higher annual costs ($5286.56 vs $2873.62, P = .03). The cost of CTR/TR was $8583.91 (SE, $2263.22). Over a 5-year time horizon, CTR/TR gained $896 per QALY over serial dilations and was cost-effective. Over a 10-year time horizon, CTR/TR dominated dilations with a lower cost and higher QALY. Conclusion The cost of treatment for LTS is significant. Patients with intubation-related stenosis have significantly higher annual costs than do idiopathic patients. CTR/TR contributes significantly to cost in LTS but is cost-effective versus endoscopic dilations for appropriately selected patients over a 5- and 10-year horizon.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (10) ◽  
pp. 1245-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonino Cannavò ◽  
Carla Valsecchi ◽  
Isabella Garagiola ◽  
Roberta Palla ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci ◽  
...  

Key Points Nonneutralizing antibodies against FVIII are detected in untreated or minimally treated patients with hemophilia A. The presence of nonneutralizing antibodies is associated with a substantially increased risk of inhibitor development.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy S. Bolous ◽  
Yichen Chen ◽  
Huiqi Wang ◽  
Andrew M. Davidoff ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
...  

Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene therapy is a novel treatment promising to reduce morbidity associated with hemophilia. While multiple clinical trials continue to evaluate efficacy and safety, limited cost-effectiveness data have been published. This study compared the potential cost-effectiveness of AAV-mediated factor IX(FIX)-Padua gene therapy for severe hemophilia B patients in the United States (US) to on-demand FIX replacement and primary FIX prophylaxis, using either standard or extended half-life FIX products. A microsimulation Markov model was constructed and transition probabilities between health states and utilities were informed by published data. Costs were aggregated using a micro-costing approach. An 18-years-old till death time-horizon from the perspective of a third-party payer in the US was conducted. Gene therapy was more cost-effective than both alternatives considering a $150,000/QALY threshold. The price for gene therapy was assumed $2,000,000 in the base-case scenario, yet one of the one-way sensitivity analyses was conducted using observed manufacturing, administration and five-year follow-up cost of $87,198 for AAV-mediated gene therapy vector as derived from the manufacturing facility and clinical practice at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. One-way sensitivity analyses showed 10/102 scenarios in which gene therapy was not cost-effective compared to alternative treatments. Notably, gene therapy remained cost-effective in a hypothetical scenario in which we estimated that the discounted factor concentrate price was 20% of the wholesale acquisition cost in the US. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimated gene therapy cost-effective at 92% of simulations considering $150,000/QALY threshold. In conclusion, based on detailed simulation inputs and assumptions, gene therapy was more cost-effective than on-demand treatment and prophylaxis for patients with severe hemophilia B.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (20) ◽  
pp. 4046-4055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
H. Marijke van den Berg ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Günter Auerswald ◽  
Manuel Carcao ◽  
...  

Key Points High-dose intensive factor VIII treatment increases the risk for inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A. In patients with severe hemophilia A, factor VIII prophylaxis decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (23) ◽  
pp. 3389-3397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Collins ◽  
Benedict P. Palmer ◽  
Elizabeth A. Chalmers ◽  
Daniel P. Hart ◽  
Ri Liesner ◽  
...  

Key Points Kogenate Bayer/Helixate NexGen was associated with a higher inhibitor incidence than Advate in 407 consecutive UK severe hemophilia A previously untreated patients. Other risk factors for inhibitor development were factor VIII genotype, ethnicity, and intensive treatment episodes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document