Prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 under invasive mechanical ventilation and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieta Cabral Amaral Cunha ◽  
Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz ◽  
Guadalupe Nery De Sant'Anna ◽  
Adriana Claudia Lunardi ◽  
Larissa Padrão Isensee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Multicenter Cohort

Lung transplantation for acute respiratory distress syndrome – a retrospective European Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 2102078
Author(s):  
Jens Gottlieb ◽  
Philipp M. Lepper ◽  
Cristina Berastegui ◽  
Beatriz Montull ◽  
Alexandra Wald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Lung Transplantation ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study

BackgroundThe published experience of lung transplantation (LTX) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the contemporary results of LTX attempts in ARDS in major European centers.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of all patients listed for LTX between 2011 and 2019. We surveyed 68 centers in 22 European countries. All patients admitted to the waitlist for lung transplantation with a diagnosis of “ARDS//pneumonia” were included. Patients without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or mechanical ventilation were excluded. Patients were followed until October 1st 2020 or death. Multivariable analysis for 1-year survival after listing and lung transplantation were performed.ResultsForty-eight centers (74%) with a total transplant activity of 12 438 lung transplants during the 9-year period gave feedback. Forty patients with a median age of 35 years were identified. Patients were listed for LTX in 18 different centers in 10 countries. Thirty-one-patients underwent LTX (0·25% of all indications) and 9 patients died on the waitlist. Ninety percent of transplanted patients were on ECMO in combination with mechanical ventilation before LTX. On multivariable analysis, transplantation during 2015 until 2019 was independently associated with better 1-year survival after LTX (odds ratio 10.493, 95% CI 1.977, 55.705, p=0.006). Sixteen survivors out of 23 patients with known status (70%) returned to work after LTX.ConclusionLTX in highly selected ARDS patients is feasible and outcome has improved in the modern era. The selection process remains ethically and technically challenging.

scholarly journals Effects of Cytokine Blocking Agents on 30-Day Mortality in Patients Admitted to ICU With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome by SARS-CoV2 Infection: An Observational Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Coloretti ◽  
Stefano Busani ◽  
Emanuela Biagioni ◽  
Sophie Venturelli ◽  
Elena Munari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Blocking Agents

Abstract Background The use of cytokine-blocking agents has been proposed to modulate the inflammatory response in patients with COVID19. Tocilizumab and Anakinra were included in the local protocol as an optional treatment in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by SARS-CoV2 infection. This cohort study evaluated the effects of therapy with cytokine blocking agents on in-hospital mortality in COVID19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and admitted to intensive care unit. Methods The association between therapy with Tocilizumab or Anakinra and in-hospital mortality was assessed in consecutive adult COVID19 patients admitted to our ICU with moderate to severe ARDS. The association was evaluated by comparing patients who receive to those who did not receive Tocilizumab or Anakinra and by using different multivariable Cox models adjusted for variables related to poor outcome, for the propensity to be treated with Tocilizumab or Anakinra and after patient matching. Results Sixty-six patients who received immunotherapy (49 Tocilizumab, 17 Anakinra) and 28 patients who did not receive immunotherapy were included. The in-hospital crude mortality was 30,3% in treated patients and 50% in non-treated (OR 0,77, 95% CI 0,56-1,05, p=0,069). The adjusted Cox model showed an association between therapy with immunotherapy and in-hospital mortality (HR 0,35, 95% CI 0,16-0,77, p=0,009). This protective effect was further confirmed in the analysis adjusted for propensity score, in the propensity-matched cohort and in the cohort of patients with invasive mechanical ventilation within 2 hours after ICU admission. Conclusions Although important limitations, our study showed that cytokine-blocking agents seem to be safe and to improve survival in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU with ARDS and the need of mechanical ventilation.

scholarly journals Effects of Cytokine Blocking Agents on Hospital Mortality in Patients Admitted to ICU With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome by SARS-CoV2 Infection: An Observational Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Coloretti ◽  
Stefano Busani ◽  
Emanuela Biagioni ◽  
Sophie Venturelli ◽  
Elena Munari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Blocking Agents

Abstract Background The use of cytokine-blocking agents has been proposed to modulate the inflammatory response in patients with COVID19. Tocilizumab and Anakinra were included in the local protocol as an optional treatment in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by SARS-CoV2 infection. This cohort study evaluated the effects of therapy with cytokine blocking agents on in-hospital mortality in COVID19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and admitted to intensive care unit. Methods The association between therapy with Tocilizumab or Anakinra and in-hospital mortality was assessed in consecutive adult COVID19 patients admitted to our ICU with moderate to severe ARDS. The association was evaluated by comparing patients who receive to those who did not receive Tocilizumab or Anakinra and by using different multivariable Cox models adjusted for variables related to poor outcome, for the propensity to be treated with Tocilizumab or Anakinra and after patient matching. Results Sixty-six patients who received immunotherapy (49 Tocilizumab, 17 Anakinra) and 28 patients who did not receive immunotherapy were included. The in-hospital crude mortality was 30,3% in treated patients and 50% in non-treated (OR 0,77, 95% CI 0,56-1,05, p=0,069). The adjusted Cox model showed an association between therapy with immunotherapy and in-hospital mortality (HR 0,35, 95% CI 0,16-0,77, p=0,009). This protective effect was further confirmed in the analysis adjusted for propensity score, in the propensity-matched cohort and in the cohort of patients with invasive mechanical ventilation within 2 hours after ICU admission. Conclusions Although important limitations, our study showed that cytokine-blocking agents seem to be safe and to improve survival in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU with ARDS and the need of mechanical ventilation.

scholarly journals Effects of cytokine blocking agents on hospital mortality in patients admitted to ICU with acute respiratory distress syndrome by SARS-CoV-2 infection: retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Coloretti ◽  
Stefano Busani ◽  
Emanuela Biagioni ◽  
Sophie Venturelli ◽  
Elena Munari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Blocking Agents

Background: The use of cytokine-blocking agents has been proposed to modulate the inflammatory response in patients with COVID-19. Tocilizumab and anakinra were included in the local protocol as an optional treatment in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by SARS-CoV-2 infection. This cohort study evaluated the effects of therapy with cytokine blocking agents on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and admitted to intensive care unit.Methods: The association between therapy with tocilizumab or anakinra and in-hospital mortality was assessed in consecutive adult COVID-19 patients admitted to our ICU with moderate to severe ARDS. The association was evaluated by comparing patients who received to those who did not receive tocilizumab or anakinra and by using different multivariable Cox models adjusted for variables related to poor outcome, for the propensity to be treated with tocilizumab or anakinra and after patient matching.Results: Sixty-six patients who received immunotherapy (49 tocilizumab, 17 anakinra) and 28 patients who did not receive immunotherapy were included. The in-hospital crude mortality was 30,3% in treated patients and 50% in nontreated (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.56-1.05, p=0.069). The adjusted Cox model showed an association between therapy with immunotherapy and in-hospital mortality (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.83, p=0.015). This protective effect was further confirmed in the analysis adjusted for propensity score, in the propensity-matched cohort and in the cohort of patients with invasive mechanical ventilation within 2 hours after ICU admission.Conclusions: Although important limitations, our study showed that cytokine-blocking agents seem to be safe and to improve survival in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU with ARDS and the need for mechanical ventilation.   *Modena Covid-19 Working Group (MoCo19): Intensive Care Unit: Massimo Girardis, Alberto Andreotti, Emanuela Biagioni, Filippo Bondi, Stefano Busani, Giovanni Chierego, Marzia Scotti, Lucia Serio, Annamaria Ghirardini, Marco Sita, Stefano De Julis, Lara Donno, Lorenzo Dall’Ara, Fabrizio Di Salvo, Carlotta Farinelli, Laura Rinaldi, Ilaria Cavazzuti, Andrea Ghidoni, Antonio Buono, Elena Ferrari, Daniela Iseppi, Anna Maria Ardito, Irene Coloretti, Sophie Venturelli, Elena Munari, Martina Tosi, Erika Roat, Ilenia Gatto, Marco Sarti.Immuno-Lab: Andrea Cossarizza, Caterina Bellinazzi, Rebecca Borella, Sara De Biasi, Anna De Gaetano, Lucia Fidanza, Lara Gibellini, Anna Iannone, Domenico Lo Tartaro, Marco Mattioli, Milena Nasi, Annamaria Paolini, Marcello Pinti. Infectious Disease Unit: Cristina Mussini, Giovanni Guaraldi, Marianna Meschiari, Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri, Jovana Milic, Marianna Menozzi, Erica Franceschini, Gianluca Cuomo, Gabriella Orlando, Vanni Borghi, Antonella Santoro, Margherita Di Gaetano, Cinzia Puzzolante, Federica Carli, Andrea Bedini, Luca Corradi. Respiratory Diseases Unit: Enrico Clini, Roberto Tonelli, Riccardo Fantini, Ivana Castaniere, Luca Tabbì, Giulia Bruzzi, Chiara Nani, Fabiana Trentacosti, Pierluigi Donatelli, Maria Rosaria Pellegrino, Linda Manicardi, Antonio Moretti, Morgana Vermi, Caterina Cerbone.Virology and Molecular Microbiology Unit: Monica Pecorari, William Gennari, Antonella Grottola, Giulia Fregni Serpini.

scholarly journals Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of COVID-19 patients with pre-existing cirrhosis: A multicenter cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolong Qi ◽  
Yanna Liu ◽  
Jonathan A. Fallowfield ◽  
Jitao Wang ◽  
Jianwen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Direct Bilirubin ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Multicenter Cohort

SummaryBackgroundPatients with pre-existing cirrhosis are considered at increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but the clinical course in these patients has not yet been reported. This study aimed to provide a detailed report of the clinical characteristics and outcomes among COVID-19 patients with pre-existing cirrhosis.MethodsIn this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, we consecutively included all adult inpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and pre-existing cirrhosis that had been discharged or had died by 24 March 2020 from 16 designated hospitals in China.Demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiographic findings on admission, treatment, complications during hospitalization and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between survivors and non-survivors.FindingsTwenty-one patients were included consecutively in this study, of whom 16 were cured and 5 died in hospital. Seventeen patients had compensated cirrhosis and hepatitis B virus infection was the most common etiology. Lymphocyte and platelet counts were lower, and direct bilirubin levels were higher in patients who died than those who survived (p= 0·040, 0·032, and 0·006, respectively). Acute respiratory distress syndrome and secondary infection were both the most frequently observed complications. Only one patient developed acute on chronic liver failure. Of the 5 non-survivors, all patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and 2 patients progressed to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.InterpretationLower lymphocyte and platelet counts, and higher direct bilirubin level might represent poor prognostic indicators in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with pre-existing cirrhosis.

An Evidence-Based Protocol for Manual Prone Positioning of Patients With ARDS

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Patrick Ryan ◽  
Cynthia Fine ◽  
Christine DeForge
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Unplanned Extubations

Background Manual prone positioning has been shown to reduce mortality among patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, but it is associated with a high incidence of pressure injuries and unplanned extubations. This study investigated the feasibility of safely implementing a manual prone positioning protocol that uses a dedicated device. Review of Evidence A search of CINAHL and Medline identified multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that demonstrated both the reduction of mortality when prone positioning is used for more than 12 hours per day in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and the most common complications of this treatment. Implementation An existing safe patient-handling device was modified to enable staff to safely perform manual prone positioning with few complications for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. All staff received training on the protocol and use of the device before implementation. Evaluation This study included 36 consecutive patients who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit at a large academic medical center because of hypoxemic respiratory failure/acute respiratory distress syndrome and received mechanical ventilation and prone positioning. Data were collected on clinical presentation, interventions, and complications. Sustainability Using the robust protocol and the low-cost device, staff can safely perform a low-volume, high-risk maneuver. This method provides cost savings compared with other prone positioning methods. Conclusions Implementing a prone positioning protocol with a dedicated device is feasible, with fewer complications and lower costs than anticipated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document