scholarly journals A family based tailored counselling to increase non-exercise physical activity in adults with a sedentary job and physical activity in their young children: design and methods of a year-long randomized controlled trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taija Finni ◽  
Arja Sääkslahti ◽  
Arto Laukkanen ◽  
Arto Pesola ◽  
Sarianna Sipilä
2014 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarojini Maria Dos Remedios Monteiro ◽  
Jonine Jancey ◽  
Satvinder S. Dhaliwal ◽  
Peter A. Howat ◽  
Sharyn Burns ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amy S. Ha ◽  
Chris Lonsdale ◽  
David R. Lubans ◽  
Florrie F. Ng ◽  
Johan Y. Y. Ng

Abstract Background Physical activity is related to many positive health outcomes, yet activity levels of many children are low. Researchers have suggested that family-based interventions may improve physical activity behaviors of both children and their parents. In this study, we evaluated the “Active 1 + FUN” program, which was designed based on tenets of self-determination theory. Intervention components included free sporting equipment, ten coach-led workshops and activity sessions, and one booster session. Methods We evaluated the intervention program using a randomized controlled trial. One hundred seventy-one families were randomly allocated to either an experimental group or a wait-list control group. Participants were exposed to program contents over a nine-month period, while families in the control did not receive any form of intervention. Measured constructs included moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, co-physical activity behaviors, fundamental movement skills, BMI, and several self-reported questionnaire outcomes. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to compare changes in measured outcomes across the two groups. Results No significant intervention effects were found for children’s and parents’ accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, or their co-physical activity. However, in terms of children’s fundamental movement skills, a significant Time*Group interaction (B = 0.52, 95% CI [0.07, 0.96] for Times 1 to 2; B = 0.24, 95% CI [0.01, 0.48] for Times 1 to 3) in favor of the experimental group was found. Conclusions Results suggested that the “Active 1 + FUN” program was effective in improving children’s fundamental movement skills. Additional research is needed to examine how family-based initiatives could effectively improve physical activity behaviors too. Trial registration ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001524280. Registered 11 September 2018, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375660.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-127
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Hoffman ◽  
Ellyn M. Schmidt ◽  
Diego J. Arguello ◽  
Mara N. Eyllon ◽  
Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 851-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Chasan-Taber ◽  
Bess H. Marcus ◽  
Edward Stanek ◽  
Joseph T. Ciccolo ◽  
David X. Marquez ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eric Andrew Finkelstein ◽  
Robyn Su May Lim ◽  
Dianne Stanton Ward ◽  
Kelly R. Evenson

Abstract Background Insufficient physical activity is a global public health concern. Research indicates incentives can increase physical activity levels of children but has not tested whether incentives targeted at children can be leveraged to increase physical activity levels of their parents. This study evaluates whether a novel incentive design linking children’s incentives to both their and their parent’s physical activity levels can increase parent’s physical activity. Methods We conducted a two-arm, parallel, open-labelled randomized controlled trial in Singapore where parent-child dyads were randomly assigned to either (1) rewards to child contingent on child’s physical activity (child-based) or (2) rewards to child contingent on both child’s and parent’s physical activity (family-based). Parents had to be English-speaking, computer-literate, non-pregnant, full-time employees, aged 25–65 years, and with a participating child aged 7–11 years. Parent-child dyads were randomized within strata (self-reported low vs high weekly physical activity) into study arms in a 1:1 ratio. Participants were given activity trackers to assess daily steps. The outcome of interest was the between-arm difference in the change from baseline in parent’s mean steps/day measured by accelerometry at months 6 and 12 (primary endpoint). Results Overall, 159 and 157 parent-child dyads were randomized to the child-based or family-based arms, respectively. Outcomes were evaluated on an intent-to-treat basis. At month 6, there was a 613 steps/day (95% CI: 54–1171) differential in favour of family-based parents. At month 12, our primary endpoint, the differential was reduced to 369 steps/day (95% CI: − 88–1114) and was no longer statistically significant. Conclusions Our findings suggest that novel incentive designs that take advantage of group dynamics may be effective. However, in this design, the effectiveness of the family-based incentive to increase parent’s physical activity was not sustained through one year. Trial registration NCT02516345 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on August 5, 2015.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e0141124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arto Laukkanen ◽  
Arto Juhani Pesola ◽  
Risto Heikkinen ◽  
Arja Kaarina Sääkslahti ◽  
Taija Finni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document