scholarly journals Multiple tumor marker protein chip detection system in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangfeng Liu ◽  
Futian Du ◽  
Xiao Chen
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. e22565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaochuan Wang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Liangqi Sun ◽  
Shuaiping Wang ◽  
Jing Nie ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Sivakumar ◽  
B. Prabasheela ◽  
R. Arivazhagan

1993 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 759-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Friess ◽  
Markus Büchler ◽  
Bernhard Auerbach ◽  
Alexander Weber ◽  
Peter Malfertheiner ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1222-1227
Author(s):  
Yoshito Yamashita ◽  
Young-Suk Chung ◽  
Hideaki Yokomatsu ◽  
Bunzo Nakata ◽  
Tetsuzi Sawada ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsu Wu ◽  
Jhe-Cyuan Guo ◽  
Shih-Hung Yang ◽  
Yu-Wen Tien ◽  
Sung-Hsin Kuo

Background: Pancreatic cancer is a catastrophic disease with high recurrence and death rates, even in early stages. Early detection and early treatment improve survival in many cancer types but have not yet been clearly documented to do so in pancreatic cancer. In this study, we assessed the benefit on survival resulting from different patterns of surveillance in daily practice after curative surgery of early pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had received curative surgery between January 2000 and December 2013 at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into one of four groups, based on surveillance strategy: the symptom group, the imaging group, the marker group (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and/or carcinoembryonic antigen), and the intense group (both imaging and tumor marker assessment). Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and post-recurrence overall survival (PROS) were evaluated. Results: One hundred and eighty-one patients with documented recurrence or metastasis were included in our analysis. The median OS for patients in the symptom group, imaging group, marker group, and intense group were 21.4 months, 13.9 months, 20.5 months, and 16.5 months, respectively (p = 0.670). Surveillance with imaging, tumor markers, or both was not an independent risk factor for OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no significant difference in median RFS (symptom group, 11.7 months; imaging group, 6.3 months; marker group, 9.3 months; intense group, 6.9 months; p = 0.259) or median PROS (symptom group, 6.9 months; imaging group, 7.5 months; marker group, 5.0 months; intense group, 7.8 months; p = 0.953) between the four groups. Multivariate analyses identified poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (≥1), primary tumor site (tail), and tumor grade (poor differentiation) were poor prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Surveillance with regular imaging, tumor marker, or both was not an independent risk factor for OS of pancreatic cancer patients who undergo curative tumor resection.


2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sawaki ◽  
R. Takayama ◽  
N. Mizuno ◽  
M. Tajika ◽  
N. Hoki ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14650-e14650
Author(s):  
Yann Godfrin ◽  
David Liens ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Florence Joly

e14650 Background: L-asparaginase (L-asp) efficacy is based on sensitivity of tumoral cells to asparagine deprivation due to a lack of asparagine synthethase (ASNS). However its use is hampered by significant toxicities of which allergic reaction, coagulation disorders and pancreatic impairment take a prominent place. Deficiency in ASNS and therefore potential sensitivity to L-asp treatment has been reported in multiple tumor cell lines including pancreatic cancer, however tentative to use L-asp in solid tumor, and especially in pancreatic cancer is reported in the literature but all attempts so far have failed due to toxicity. Recently, a new formulation of L-asp loaded inside RBC (GRASPA) has shown a very promising safety profile in leukemic patients. Methods: GRASPANC is the first phase I clinical study with GRASPA in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Primary objective was to find the Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) of this cell-based formulation in this setting. Secondary objectives were to assess overall safety profile and activity (defined as serum asparagine depletion) of GRASPA. Patients with non resectable, relapsed pancreatic cancer were included by cohort of 3 and treated with one injection of increasing dose (25, 50, 100 or 150 IU/kg) of GRASPA. An independent Safety Monitoring Board assessed toxicities at the end of follow-up of each cohort to decide for next dose. Results: Twelve patients were included between Dec 2009 and Feb 2011 by 3 centres in France. Mean age was 60.4 years (min: 42.6; max: 71.9) with 9 Male and 3 female. No limiting toxicity has been found up to the GRASPA highest dose (150 IU/kg) planned in the study and the DLT was not reached. No specific other unexpected non limiting toxicity was evidenced. In addition, at all doses GRASPA was shown to be effective at depleting serum asparagine with a trend toward longer activity with increasing dose. Conclusions: Preliminary conclusion is that the dose of 150 IU/kg of GRASPA is safe and appears suitable for further clinical development in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. In order to maximise potential efficacy of this new therapy, selection of patients should be made according to their screening for a none or low expression of ASNS in their tumour cells.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document