Light-dark and activity rhythm therapy for sleep: a study to explore the practicality of delivering the therapy, and participant's experiences and views of whether the intervention is acceptable, in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Faulkner
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Faulkner ◽  
Penny E. Bee ◽  
Richard J. Drake

Abstract BackgroundSleep problems are common in people with diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (> 50%), even during periods of relative stability of psychotic symptoms. Evidence suggests that people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorders are often keen to improve their sleep, but few non-pharmacological sleep treatments are available to patients in specialist mental health services. It has been proposed that occupational therapists may have the relevant skills for the delivery of behavioural sleep interventions. This mixed method, proof-of-concept study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a new intervention, Light-Dark and Activity Rhythm Therapy (L-DART), to improve sleep in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder diagnoses.MethodsA single group of 10 service users with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses and self-reported problems with sleep onset, maintenance, timing or quality will be offered L-DART. L-DART will be delivered over 6–9 in person sessions and 3–6 phonecalls by an occupational therapist. Feasibility measures will comprise recruitment and retention logs, fidelity based on session records, adverse effects, and study attrition. Intervention uptake, engagement and adherence will be measured, and barriers to adherence explored. Acceptability will be assessed though quantitative satisfaction ratings and qualitative interviews. Activity patterns and dynamic light exposure will be measured, as well as self-reported sleep, wellbeing and functioning, to inform outcome selection in a larger trial.DiscussionThe findings will inform any necessary modifications to the intervention and its materials, enabling the development of a stage 2 manual and a therapist training package. The results will support the design of a randomised multi-therapist feasibility trial.Trial registrationISRCTN11998005, assigned registration on 17.02.2020


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Cornblatt ◽  
M. Obuchowski ◽  
S. Roberts ◽  
S. Pollack ◽  
L. Erienmeyer-Kimling

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Carruthers ◽  
Gemma Brunetti ◽  
Susan Rossell

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders are chronic and debilitating mental illnesses characterised by both cognitive impairments and sleep deficits. In this systematic review protocol, we outline an approach to examine the available literature investigating the relationship between sleep and cognition in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.


Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Dark ◽  
Ellie Newman ◽  
Victoria Gore-Jones ◽  
Veronica De Monte ◽  
Marta I. Garrido ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Compensation and adaptation therapies have been developed to improve community functioning via improving neurocognitive abilities in people with schizophrenia. Various modes of delivering compensation and adaptation therapies have been found to be effective. The aim of this trial is to compare two different cognitive interventions, Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) and Computerised Interactive Remediation of Cognition–Training for Schizophrenia (CIRCuiTS). The trial also aims to identify if mismatch negativity (MMN) can predict an individual’s response to the compensation and adaptation programmes. Methods This study will use a randomised, controlled trial of two cognitive interventions to compare the impact of these programmes on measures of neurocognition and function. One hundred clinically stable patients aged between 18 and 65 years with a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder will be recruited. Participants will be randomised to either the CCT or the CIRCuiTS therapy groups. The outcome measures are neurocognition (BACS), subjective sense of cognitive impairment (SSTICS), social functioning (SFS), and MMN (measured by EEG) in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Discussion This trial will determine whether different approaches to addressing the cognitive deficits found in schizophrenia spectrum disorders are of comparable benefit using the outcome measures chosen. This has implications for services where cost and lack of computer technology limit the implementation and dissemination of interventions to address cognitive impairment in routine practice. The trial will contribute to the emerging evidence of MMN as a predictor of response to cognitive interventions. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12618000161224. Registered on 2 February 2018. Protocol version: 4.0, 18 June 2018.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosaria Di Lorenzo ◽  
Anna Girone ◽  
Nunzio Panzera ◽  
Gianluca Fiore ◽  
Margherita Pinelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Caregivers of patients load different kinds of burdens, including emotional distress. Aims of this study were to evaluate both burden and empathy of caregivers who assist patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Methods We selected a sample of 60 caregivers (34 women and 26 men), who assisted patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated in our local Community Mental Health Center for a 1-year minimum period. We administered two scales to our sample, Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES), and collected data of caregivers and their assisted patients in a 3-month period. Data were statistically analyzed. Results We reported a mean ZBI score of 49.68 (±15.03 SD) and a mean BEES score of 14.35 (±9.05 SD), indicating the perception of moderate-severe burden and low level of empathy, respectively. The analysis of internal consistency confirmed the good reliability of both ZBI (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90) and BEES (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.77). The correlation between the two scales was not statistically significant at Spearman test. At our multiple linear regression, many variables of both caregiver and patient showed a significant correlation with the ZBI score. In particular, not living with the assisted patient and female gender of caregiver potentially decreased the burden, whereas clinical severity of assisted patient and two caregiver conditions, middle school education and spouse relationship with patient, could worsen the burden. We highlighted two positive statistically significant correlations between the total score of BEES and caregiver characteristics: being spouse and not living with assisted patient. Conclusions Our study highlights that the caregiver burden of patients with severe psychiatric disorders is high and is associated with low emotional empathy experienced by caregivers, probably due to a defensive psychological mechanism. The conditions of spouse and cohabitation can concomitantly increase both empathy and burden in caregivers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document