Randomised trial of extended antibiotic prophylaxis for fracture fixation and joint replacement: clinical benefits versus ecological risks

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Davey
BMJ ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 304 (6832) ◽  
pp. 959-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grant ◽  
C. Hoddinott

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 543-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Slover ◽  
Michael S. Phillips ◽  
Richard Iorio ◽  
Joseph Bosco

Heart ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Mounsey ◽  
M J Griffith ◽  
M Tynan ◽  
F K Gould ◽  
A F MacDermott ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 628-636
Author(s):  
Diane M. Deely ◽  
William B. Morrison

AbstractEvaluation of postoperative images of any joint can be a daunting task, and the elbow is no exception. Patients may be imaged with a complication of the repair, or the postoperative changes may be incidentally observed as the patient is imaged for other reasons. We divide the postoperative elbow into soft tissue procedures (covering ligament and tendon repairs, as well as compartmental release and nerve transposition), joint-related procedures (osteochondral lesion treatment, ostectomy, and joint replacement), and bone procedures (fracture fixation). We summarize the procedures and their indications, show normal imaging appearances, and finally cover common complications.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e033718
Author(s):  
Trisha Peel ◽  
Sarah Astbury ◽  
Allen C Cheng ◽  
David Paterson ◽  
Kirsty Buising ◽  
...  

IntroductionResistant Gram-positive organisms, such as methicillin-resistant staphylococci, account for a significant proportion of infections following joint replacement surgery. Current surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines recommend the use of first-generation or second-generation cephalosporin antibiotics, such as cefazolin. Cefazolin, however, does not prevent infections due to these resistant organisms; therefore, new prevention strategies need to be examined. One proposed strategy is to combine a glycopeptide antibiotic with cefazolin for prophylaxis. The clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of this combination therapy compared with usual therapy, however, have not been established.Methods and analysisThis randomised, double-blind, parallel, superiority, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial will compare the incidence of all surgical site infections (SSIs) including superficial, deep and organ/space (prosthetic joint) infections, safety and cost-effectiveness of surgical prophylaxis with cefazolin plus vancomycin to that with cefazolin plus placebo. The study will be performed in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. In the microbiological sub-studies, we will examine the incidence of SSIs in participants with preoperative staphylococci colonisation (Sub-Study 1) and incidence of VRE acquisition (Sub-Study 2). The trial will recruit 4450 participants over a 4-year period across 13 orthopaedic centres in Australia. The primary outcome is the incidence of SSI at 90 days post index surgery. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of SSI according to joint and microorganism and other healthcare associated infections. Safety endpoints include the incidence of acute kidney injury, hypersensitivity reactions and all-cause mortality. The primary and secondary analysis will be a modified intention-to-treat analysis consisting of all randomised participants who undergo eligible surgery. We will also perform a per-protocol analysis.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was reviewed and approved by The Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/Alfred/102) on 9 July 2018. Study findings will be disseminated in the printed media, and learnt forums.Trial registration numberACTRN12618000642280


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document