scholarly journals Enhanced recovery protocol versus standard protocol for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: results of a prospective randomized study

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisham Ibrahim ◽  
Sameh Kotb ◽  
Ahmed Abd Allah ◽  
Ayman Kassem ◽  
Ahmed Salem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Standard Protocol ◽  
Group A ◽  
Enhanced Recovery Protocol ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background To assess patients undergoing radical cystectomy using enhanced recovery protocol and standard protocol in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and complications. Results All operative and postoperative complications were recorded. In group B, time to normal bowel activity ranged from 1 to 4 days, and the mean was 1.8 days (± 1.02), while it ranged from 1 to 5 days, and the mean was 3.17 days (± 1.14) in group A which was statistically significant (p value < 0.001). The length of hospital stay in group B ranged from 6 to 50 days, the mean was 13.16 days (± 7.83), while it ranged from 8 to 35 days, and the mean was 14.71 days (± 5.78) in group A which was statistically significant (p value = 0.033). Postoperative mortality was similar in both groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing radical cystectomy, enhanced recovery protocol is considered as a safe procedure and not associated with any increase in intraoperative and postoperative complications compared to standard protocol. The length of hospital stay and time to return to full diet are reduced.

PD18-06 DECREASING LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY FOLLOWING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY USING MULTIMODAL ENHANCED RECOVERY PROTOCOL

2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hooman Djaladat ◽  
Hamed Ahmadi ◽  
Gus Miranda ◽  
Anne Schuckman ◽  
Siamak Daneshmand
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery Protocol

Alvimopan as an essential component of ERAS protocol to decrease length of hospital stay.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 517-517
Author(s):  
Peter Hanna ◽  
Arveen Kalapara ◽  
Subodh Regmi ◽  
Kalyana Srujana ◽  
Joseph Zabell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Eras Protocol

517 Background: Radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer is the gold standard. However, it is frequently associated with a prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). We study the effect of ERAS protocol implementations and Alvimopan use in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and its impact on length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: Retrospective cohort study involving consecutive patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer at our institution from 2010 through 2018. We evaluated Alvimopan use plus an ERAS protocol post radical cystectomy versus patients who underwent ERAS protocol alone versus those who were managed prior to ERAS protocol implementation. Primary outcome of interest was LOS, controlling for age, sex, smoking status and Charleson comorbidities index. Results: 146 patients (49.32 %) received standard care (non-ERAS) (group A), 102 patients (34.45 %) underwent ERAS protocol alone (group B) and 47 patients (15.87 %) underwent ERAS protocol plus Alvimopan (group C). There was no significant difference in length of stay between group A and group B (p=0.856). However, group C experienced a shorter LOS (16.6%) compared to group A (p=0.015). Similarly, group B was not significantly associated with the days to bowel movements compared to group A (p=0.112), however, group C demonstrated a significantly shorter time (16.3%) to bowel movements compared to group A (p=0.015). On other hand, group c wasn’t significantly associated with time tolerance to regular diet (p=0.068). Limitations include retrospective nature of some of the data, non-randomized approach and confounders such as a mix of robot and open approaches to cystectomy. Conclusions: Of all ERAS protocol components, Alvimopan appeared to be the most significant contributor in accelerating GI recovery and decrease LOS in our cohort.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEBULIZED 3% HYPERTONIC SALINE AND NEBULIZED LEVOSALBUTAMOL IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BRONCHIOLITIS

2020 ◽  
pp. 93-95
Author(s):  
SARA SHIREEN ◽  
SAFURA SULTANA ◽  
KHADIJA AKHTAR OMER ◽  
ATIKA BEGUM QUTUB ◽  
NARAYAN REDDY U
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hypertonic Saline ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Economic Burden Of Disease ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the effects of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline and nebulized levosalbutamol in the management of bronchiolitis. Methods: Seventy children of age 1–24 months admitted into the hospital with the diagnosis of bronchiolitis. Participants were divided into two groups of 35 each. Group A was given nebulized 3% hypertonic saline and Group B was given nebulized levosalbutamol. Modified respiratory distress assessment instrument (RDAI) is used at admission, at 48 h after admission, and at the time of discharge to identify the reduction in scores between two groups. Results: The mean age of patients in the study population was 10.1±6.4 months. The mean birth weight of patients in Group A and Group B was 3.00±0.61 and 3.12±0.75. The percentage of male patients was 57.1% and the percentage of female patients was 42.8%. The modified RDAI score in Group A and Group B at admission, 48 h of admission, and at the time of discharge was 4.34±0.87, 2.4±1.03, and 0.67±0.05 (p=0.04) and 4.11±0.58, 3.60±1.00, and 2.51±0.96 (p=0.12). The hospital stay was observed to be lowered in Group A (3.77±0.88) compared to Group B (5.43±0.92; p=0.04). Conclusion: From the findings of our study, we conclude that nebulized 3% hypertonic saline, as it acts by hindering the pathophysiologic mechanism of bronchiolitis, is more effective in reducing the clinical severity score and length of hospital stay. Further 3% hypertonic saline also have the additional benefit of decreasing the economic burden of disease as it is safe, inexpensive, reduces the inpatient hospital charges by reducing the length of stay.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ONLAY AND RETRORECTUS MESH REPAIR IN THE TREATMENT OF INCISIONAL HERNIAS

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
S. Yashwanth ◽  
S. Dayakar
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

INTRODUCTION: Over the years, surgeons tried the placement of mesh at different locations like On-lay, Under-lay, Sub-lay and pre-peritoneal, retroperitoneal intraperitoneal, Inter-muscular, etc. with each procedure having its advantages and disadvantages. Commonly Onlay and sub lay mesh repairs are done. Though the literature says, sub lay procedures have fewer complications and a high success rate. However, in a few studies, the ideal position for mesh repair appears to be retro muscular, where the force of abdominal pressure holds the mesh against deep surfaces of muscles. In this study, a comparison of both Onlay and retro rectus procedures with regards to the duration of surgery, postoperative complications like seroma, wound infection, wound dehiscence, and also the period of postoperative stay in the hospital. The aim of the study is To compare 'Onlay' versus 'retro rectus' mesh repair in inuencing the outcome in incisional hernia with regards to Duration of surgery, Postoperative complications like seroma formation, wound infection, Postoperative stay, Recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODOLOGY: Type of Study: A Prospective comparative study Study Setting: Department of general surgery, Narayana Medical College & Hospital, Nellore.Study Period: November 2018 to September 2020 Study Sample: 50 cases, divided into two groups by random allocation technique. Groups A and B with 25 patients in each group. RESULTS: The mean age of cases in Group A is 40.48 years. The mean age of patients in Group B is 44.08 years. Youngest was 31 years and 36 years in group A and group B, respectively, and the eldest was 51 years and 53 years in group A and group B, respectively. In Group A, 11 were male, and 14 were female, and in Group B, 11 were male, and 14 were female. The male to female ratio in the study was 1:1.27. The mean Operative Time in Group A was 1.93 Hrs, and that in Group B was 2.98Hrs. Nine patients (36%) in group A and one patient (4%) in group B had seroma formation. Eight patients (32%) in group A and one patient (4%) in group B had a wound infection. The mean Hospital Stay in Group A was 5.44 Days, and Group B was 4.88 days. No short-term recurrences were noted in either of the two groups when followed for six months. CONCLUSION : Retrorectus mesh repair is an excellent alternative to Onlay mesh repair that may apply to incisional hernia. The mesh-related overall complication rate like seroma wound infections and hospital stay is less than Onlay mesh repair.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study between Traditional Care Program and Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program in General Surgery

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A F Abadir ◽  
F M Benjamine ◽  
A H F Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Traditional Care ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programs have been very important to surgeons who are keen to decrease postoperative morbidity, reducing variability in postoperative care and minimizing hospital costs Aim of the Work This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery programs in general surgery in comparison with traditional care. Patients and Methods The present prospective study was conducted at the General Surgery Department, Ain Shams University Hospitals in Cairo, Egypt from September 2017 to June 2018 on 80 patients undergoing general surgical interventions. Patients were randomly distributed into 2 groups: Group A (n = 40) for conventional protocol (control group) and Group B (n = 40) for enhanced recovery protocol (ERAS group). Results Patients of both groups passed the procedure efficiently without any intraoperative complications. The mean operative time was 155 minutes in control group and 160 minutes in ERAS group, this wasn’t statistically significant (P &gt; 0.05). The mean amount of blood loss was 150 ml in control group and 175 ml in ERAS group which was also insignificant (P &gt; 0.05). Mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 3.05 in group A versus 1.2 in group B which was highly significant (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion ERAS pathway was shown to be feasible for application in general surgery as it shortened postoperative hospital stay and showed no increased risk to patients in terms of morbidity or mortality.

The Outcome Comparison of two Groups of total Extraperitoneal and Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2712-2714
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aamir Jamil ◽  
Muhammad Asif ◽  
Imran Yousaf ◽  
Muhammad Faheem Anwer ◽  
Muhammad Waseem Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Total Extraperitoneal ◽  
Outcome Comparison ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Aim: The outcome comparison of total extraperitoneal versus mesh repair for inguinal hernia. Study design: Quasi experimental study. Place and duration of study: Department of Surgery, M. Islam Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala from March 2018 to March 2019. Methodology: After the approval of hospital ethical committee, a total of 50 patients were included and randomly divided into two groups equally. Group A (Total extraperitoneal), Group B (Mesh repair). An informed consent was taken from every patient about operative procedure and the outcome. A detailed history of the patient i.e. clinical examination, routine investigations (CBC, Urine R/E, urea, creatinine) and some specific investigations (chest X-ray, ECG and ultrasound abdomen and prostate) was done for surgery. All data of patients was collected on proforma and was analyzed with the help of a computer SPSS programme 20. Results: The mean age of patients was 34.22±11.54 years in group A and 35.63±11.25 years in group B. All male and female patients included in this study in both groups. Twelve (48%) of patients were direct inguinal hernia in group A 13(22%) were in group B and 14(56%) patients were in group A and 11(44%) patients were in group B. The mean±SD postoperative hospital stay was 24.48±4.62 in group A and 34.65±12.26 hours in group B (p 0.001). The mean±SD postoperative recovery time in weeks was 2.18±0.43 in group A and 2.90±0.46 weeks in group B (p 0.001). Only 2 (4%) patient had postoperative infection on first week and 4 (8%) patients had infection respectively. No recurrence was seen in group A and only 3% recurrence was in group B. Conclusion: It is concluded that group A had shorter hospital stay, recovery time, postoperative time and less infection rate as compared to group B. In group A 13% patients had severe pain and in group B 25% patients. Keywords: Inguinal Hernia, Total extraperitoneal, Mesh repair.

scholarly journals ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 185-192
Author(s):  
TARIQ HASSAN CH ◽  
ASGHAR ALI ◽  
MUNAWAR JAMIL
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Biliary Tree ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Gallstones are common biliary pathology. The Vast majority of subjects are asymptomatic. About 0.2% of the population suffering from gallstones develop acute cholecystitis every year. In case of acute calculous cholecystitis, cholecystectomy can be performed early i.e during the same admission or interval i.e after 6 weeks of conservative management. Objective: To compare the early and interval cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis for morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay and complications. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Setting: Department of Surgery Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Duration of Study: Two year study from December 2007 to December 2009. Subject and Methods: Sixty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for this study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients were managed by early cholecystectomy and group B patients by intervalcholecystectomy. Postoperatively patients were evaluated for postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay and postoperative complications. Results: The mean age of the patients in group A was 42.2 + 10.7 years and in group B was 42.2+ 10.7 years. The Male to female ratio was 1:4 in both groups. The mean postoperative hospital stay in group A was 4.0+ 1.8days and in group B was 3.8+ 1.4 days. The mean total hospital stayin group A was 6.5 + 1.7 days and in group B was 10.2 + 1.3 days. The P value was less than 0.001, which was significant. In distribution of postoperative complications, in group A there were 1(3.3%) injury to biliary tree, 4(13.3%) wound infection,1(3.3%) wound haematoma, 3 (10%) seroma and 1(3.3%) wound dehiscence. While in group B there were 1(3.3%) injury to biliary tree, 3(10%) wound infection,2 (6.7%) wound haematoma, 2(6.7%) & no patient of wound dehiscence. Conclusion: Our study suggests that early cholecystectomy is a better treatment option than interval cholecystectomy because it has less total hospital stay, needs single hospital visit and has no risk of developing complications during wait for surgery.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of nebulised 3% saline versus nebulised 0.9% saline in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1182
Author(s):  
Pragalatha Kumar A. ◽  
Indhuja Rajarathinam ◽  
Aruna Gowdra
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Acute bronchiolitis is the most common respiratory tract infection in young children. Despite the high prevalence of acute bronchiolitis, no consensus exists on the management. Studies have shown that except oxygen therapy, no other treatment found to be effective. Hence, the present study was conducted to find out the efficacy of nebulised 3% saline versus is 0.9% saline for the treatment of acute bronchiolitis.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study of 150 children between the age group of 2 months to 24 months with signs and symptoms of Acute Bronchiolitis admitted to Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore from January 2016 to December 2016 formed the study group, they were randomized into 2 groups, one received 3% saline nebulization and the other received 0.9% saline.Results: A total of 150 children were enrolled in the study, 75 children (group A) received 0.9% saline and 75 children (group B) received 3% saline. At 24 hours, the mean clinical severity score for group A was 2.49±1.03 and group B was 2.16±0.49 (P=0.013). The duration of hospital stay was shorter (1-3 days) in 3% saline with a mean of 2.35 days and was longer (3-5 days) in 0.9% saline with mean value of 4.04 days which was statistically significant (p <0.001).Conclusions: 3% saline nebulization can be used as an effective treatment for acute bronchiolitis. It significantly reduced the clinical severity score and length of hospital stay compared to 0.9% normal saline.

Clinical Results Of A Lamina With Spinous Process And An Iliac Graft As Bone Grafts In The Surgical Treatment Of Single-Segment Lumbar Pyogenic Discitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyang Zhong ◽  
Xinjie Liang ◽  
Xiaolin Wang ◽  
Ke Tang ◽  
Tianji Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Spinous Process ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Segmental Angle

Abstract Background: A retrospective study investigated and compared the results of a lamina withspinous process (LSP) and an iliac graft (IG) as bone grafts in single-segment lumbar pyogenic discitis (LPD) through one-stage-posterior-only approach with radical debridement and internal instrumentation.Methods: Data from 37 patients were reviewed. A LSP was placed in 17 patients (group A), and an IG was implemented in 20 patients (group B). The surgery time, surgery hemorrhage, hospital stay, drainage, and follow-up (FU) were reviewed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, segmental angle, intervertebral height and bony fusion time were compared preoperatively and at the final FU.Results: All patients were followed-up for a mean of 27.94±2.35 months in group A and 30.29±1.89 months in group B, without a difference. The mean age was younger in group A than in group B (P<0.05). The surgery time, surgery hemorrhage, and hospitalization cost were lower in group A than in group B (P<0.05), except for the hospital stay and drainage time. Fever occurred in 10 patients in group A and 12 patients in group B. The ESR, CRP level, and VAS and ODI scores were significantly decreased, and there were no significant differences between the groups at the final FU. The distribution of bacterial agents in blood culture was 1 case of Aerobacter cloacae, 2 of Staphylococcus aureus, 2 of Escherichia coli, and 1 of Streptococcus viridis in group A and 1 of S. aureus，1 of Staphylococcus warneri and 2 of Klebsiella pneumoniae in group B. Pyogenic infection was observed in the pathological findings of all patients. No significant difference was found in the mean segmental angle or mean intervertebral height preoperation and at the final FU between the groups.Conclusion: The use of LSP as a new bone graft is reliable, safe, and effective for surgical management for the LPD while surgery is proposed as a good management strategy for LPD in carefully selected patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document