Alvimopan as an essential component of ERAS protocol to decrease length of hospital stay.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 517-517
Author(s):  
Peter Hanna ◽  
Arveen Kalapara ◽  
Subodh Regmi ◽  
Kalyana Srujana ◽  
Joseph Zabell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Eras Protocol

517 Background: Radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer is the gold standard. However, it is frequently associated with a prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). We study the effect of ERAS protocol implementations and Alvimopan use in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and its impact on length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: Retrospective cohort study involving consecutive patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer at our institution from 2010 through 2018. We evaluated Alvimopan use plus an ERAS protocol post radical cystectomy versus patients who underwent ERAS protocol alone versus those who were managed prior to ERAS protocol implementation. Primary outcome of interest was LOS, controlling for age, sex, smoking status and Charleson comorbidities index. Results: 146 patients (49.32 %) received standard care (non-ERAS) (group A), 102 patients (34.45 %) underwent ERAS protocol alone (group B) and 47 patients (15.87 %) underwent ERAS protocol plus Alvimopan (group C). There was no significant difference in length of stay between group A and group B (p=0.856). However, group C experienced a shorter LOS (16.6%) compared to group A (p=0.015). Similarly, group B was not significantly associated with the days to bowel movements compared to group A (p=0.112), however, group C demonstrated a significantly shorter time (16.3%) to bowel movements compared to group A (p=0.015). On other hand, group c wasn’t significantly associated with time tolerance to regular diet (p=0.068). Limitations include retrospective nature of some of the data, non-randomized approach and confounders such as a mix of robot and open approaches to cystectomy. Conclusions: Of all ERAS protocol components, Alvimopan appeared to be the most significant contributor in accelerating GI recovery and decrease LOS in our cohort.

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with ureteral obstruction secondary to muscle invasive bladder cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 523-523
Author(s):  
Marshall Strother ◽  
Alexander Kutikov ◽  
Bianca Lewis ◽  
Mengying Deng ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Ureteral Obstruction ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Muscle Invasive ◽  
Group B

523 Background: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cystectomy is the standard of care for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC). 15-35% of MIBC patients present with ureteral obstruction. Poor renal function increases cisplatin toxicity. It is unknown whether patients with ureteral obstruction which has been relieved (whether by nephrostomy tube or nephroureteral stent) have the same risk of toxicity as patients without ureteral obstruction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed an institutional database of all patients undergoing NAC for MIBC with either dose dense MVAC (ddMVAC) or gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) from January 2004 through May 2017. Patients without ureteral obstruction prior to initiation of NAC (Group A) were compared to those who had ureteral obstruction which was relieved prior to undergoing NAC (Group B). Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. The primary outcome was premature discontinuation of NAC, which was defined as failure to complete all planned cycles. Logistic regression was used to test for differences between the groups in this outcome adjusting for age, ECOG performance status, and baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results: 160 patients in Group A and 59 patients in Group B were identified. Baseline age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, race, smoking status, and ECOG performance status were similar. Patients in Group B had lower GFR (99.2% vs 78.8% p <0.001) and were more likely to be female (21.9% vs 27.3% p <0.025) and to receive ddMVAC (65.0% vs. 83.1% p =0.012). There was no significant difference between groups in rates of premature NAC discontinuation (15.8% vs 22.0% p = 0.284) or grade ≥3 adverse events (23.4% vs 30.5% p = 0.285). Adjusted analysis showed no significant difference between the groups in frequency of premature NAC discontinuation (OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.84-4.57 p=0.12). Conclusions: We detected no difference in frequency of premature discontinuation of NAC in patients with relieved malignant ureteral obstruction relative to patients without obstruction. NAC for MIBC is likely safe in this population.

scholarly journals Does Clarithromycin Use in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis Shorten Length of Hospital Stay?

2020 ◽  
pp. 62-65
Author(s):  
Gülnur Esenülkü ◽  
Fatma Hancı
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Pediatric Clinic ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

Introduction: Acute bronchiolitis is the most common cause of hospitalization among infants. Although antibiotics are not recommended in the absence of secondary bacterial infection, rates of antibiotic usage is high rate in clinical practices Objectives: To test the hypothesis that clarithromycin use in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis shortens length of hospital stay. Materials and Methods: One hundred sixty-seven patients aged 1-24 months hospitalized for treatment with a diagnosis of acute viral bronchiolitis at pediatric clinic between April 2017 and May 2018 were investigated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two separate groups, Group A (122 patients), using clarithromycin therapy during hospitalization, and Group B (45 patients), which did not receive clarithromycin (Group B). Demographic and clinical data, treatments received, and duration of hospital stay were obtained from patients’ records. Results: The rate of clarithromycin use in this study was 73%. No statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay was determined between patients receiving clarithromycin and those receiving no antibiotic therapy. However, length of hospital stay decreased with age. Clarithromycin use elicited no statistically significant decrease in hospital stay in patients with acute viral bronchiolitis. Conclusions: The routine use of clarithromycin is not recommended in acute viral bronchiolitis in the light of its cost and side-effects, and the fact is has no impact on clinical status and hospital stay

scholarly journals Effects of perioperative enteral glutamine on surgical outcome in gastrointestinal cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 903
Author(s):  
Raghavendra . ◽  
Raghupathi S.
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancer ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Previous trials have shown that perioperative glutamine could protect patients from infectious complications after gastrointestinal cancer operations.Methods: 54 patients with a planned elective operation for gastrointestinal cancer were divided into two groups: GROUP A: patients given glutamine enriched enteral nutrition perioperatively (n=27), GROUP B: patients given enteral feed without glutamine (n=27). Patients were assessed in terms of post-operative complications like infective complications, anastomotic leak, need for reintervention, length of hospital stay and mortality.Results: In group A seven patients and in group B six patients had surgical site infection post operatively (p=0.750). In group A five patients and in group B three patients had lung and urinary tract infection post operatively (p=0.444). In group A three patients and in group B five patients had intra-abdominal abscess/collection post operatively (p=0.444). In group A one patient and in group B three patients had anastomotic leak post operatively (p=0.299). In group A three patients and in group B three patients had reintervention in form of ultrasound guided aspiration and ultrasound guided pigtail aspiration for intra-abdominal collection (p=1.000). In group A and in group B mean length of hospital stay was 26 days and 23 days respectively (p=0.346). In group A and in group B mean length of post-operative hospital stay was 13 and 12 days respectively (p=0.642). There was no mortality in our study. No significant difference between the groups was found in complication rates, length of hospital stay.Conclusions: Routine perioperative glutamine to the patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery is not beneficial.

scholarly journals Enhanced recovery protocol versus standard protocol for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: results of a prospective randomized study

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisham Ibrahim ◽  
Sameh Kotb ◽  
Ahmed Abd Allah ◽  
Ayman Kassem ◽  
Ahmed Salem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Standard Protocol ◽  
Group A ◽  
Enhanced Recovery Protocol ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background To assess patients undergoing radical cystectomy using enhanced recovery protocol and standard protocol in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and complications. Results All operative and postoperative complications were recorded. In group B, time to normal bowel activity ranged from 1 to 4 days, and the mean was 1.8 days (± 1.02), while it ranged from 1 to 5 days, and the mean was 3.17 days (± 1.14) in group A which was statistically significant (p value < 0.001). The length of hospital stay in group B ranged from 6 to 50 days, the mean was 13.16 days (± 7.83), while it ranged from 8 to 35 days, and the mean was 14.71 days (± 5.78) in group A which was statistically significant (p value = 0.033). Postoperative mortality was similar in both groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing radical cystectomy, enhanced recovery protocol is considered as a safe procedure and not associated with any increase in intraoperative and postoperative complications compared to standard protocol. The length of hospital stay and time to return to full diet are reduced.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of nebulised 3% saline versus nebulised 0.9% saline in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1182
Author(s):  
Pragalatha Kumar A. ◽  
Indhuja Rajarathinam ◽  
Aruna Gowdra
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Acute bronchiolitis is the most common respiratory tract infection in young children. Despite the high prevalence of acute bronchiolitis, no consensus exists on the management. Studies have shown that except oxygen therapy, no other treatment found to be effective. Hence, the present study was conducted to find out the efficacy of nebulised 3% saline versus is 0.9% saline for the treatment of acute bronchiolitis.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study of 150 children between the age group of 2 months to 24 months with signs and symptoms of Acute Bronchiolitis admitted to Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore from January 2016 to December 2016 formed the study group, they were randomized into 2 groups, one received 3% saline nebulization and the other received 0.9% saline.Results: A total of 150 children were enrolled in the study, 75 children (group A) received 0.9% saline and 75 children (group B) received 3% saline. At 24 hours, the mean clinical severity score for group A was 2.49±1.03 and group B was 2.16±0.49 (P=0.013). The duration of hospital stay was shorter (1-3 days) in 3% saline with a mean of 2.35 days and was longer (3-5 days) in 0.9% saline with mean value of 4.04 days which was statistically significant (p <0.001).Conclusions: 3% saline nebulization can be used as an effective treatment for acute bronchiolitis. It significantly reduced the clinical severity score and length of hospital stay compared to 0.9% normal saline.

Clinical Results Of A Lamina With Spinous Process And An Iliac Graft As Bone Grafts In The Surgical Treatment Of Single-Segment Lumbar Pyogenic Discitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyang Zhong ◽  
Xinjie Liang ◽  
Xiaolin Wang ◽  
Ke Tang ◽  
Tianji Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Spinous Process ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Segmental Angle

Abstract Background: A retrospective study investigated and compared the results of a lamina withspinous process (LSP) and an iliac graft (IG) as bone grafts in single-segment lumbar pyogenic discitis (LPD) through one-stage-posterior-only approach with radical debridement and internal instrumentation.Methods: Data from 37 patients were reviewed. A LSP was placed in 17 patients (group A), and an IG was implemented in 20 patients (group B). The surgery time, surgery hemorrhage, hospital stay, drainage, and follow-up (FU) were reviewed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, segmental angle, intervertebral height and bony fusion time were compared preoperatively and at the final FU.Results: All patients were followed-up for a mean of 27.94±2.35 months in group A and 30.29±1.89 months in group B, without a difference. The mean age was younger in group A than in group B (P<0.05). The surgery time, surgery hemorrhage, and hospitalization cost were lower in group A than in group B (P<0.05), except for the hospital stay and drainage time. Fever occurred in 10 patients in group A and 12 patients in group B. The ESR, CRP level, and VAS and ODI scores were significantly decreased, and there were no significant differences between the groups at the final FU. The distribution of bacterial agents in blood culture was 1 case of Aerobacter cloacae, 2 of Staphylococcus aureus, 2 of Escherichia coli, and 1 of Streptococcus viridis in group A and 1 of S. aureus，1 of Staphylococcus warneri and 2 of Klebsiella pneumoniae in group B. Pyogenic infection was observed in the pathological findings of all patients. No significant difference was found in the mean segmental angle or mean intervertebral height preoperation and at the final FU between the groups.Conclusion: The use of LSP as a new bone graft is reliable, safe, and effective for surgical management for the LPD while surgery is proposed as a good management strategy for LPD in carefully selected patients.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Efficiency between Povidone Iodine and Normal Saline Lavage in the Treatment of Acute Peritonitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Haridas Saha ◽  
Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil ◽  
Aminul Islam ◽  
Abdullah Al Mamun ◽  
Md Margub Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Acute Peritonitis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Saline Lavage

Background: Control of the primary site of sepsis is the main determinant of good surgical outcome. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficiency between povidone iodine and normal saline lavage in the treatment of acute peritonitis. Methodology: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients with acute peritonitis due to gastrointestinal causes who were admitted in the different units of Dhaka Medical College Hospital during the study period were selected as study population. Among them patients who were treated with povidone iodine were enrolled in the present study in group A and patients who were treated with conventional normal saline were in group B. Results: A total number of 1050 patients were recruited for this study. Among them 100 patients were enrolled in the present study of which group A (50 patients) for povidone iodine and group B (50 patients) for conventional normal saline. On 7th POD wound infection was found in Group A and Group B were 11(22.4%) and 21(44.7%) respectively. Statistically significant difference in post operative complication of wound infection was observed on 7th POD between the groups (p<0.05). Post operative hospital stay in Group A and Group B were 11.50 ± 4.48 and 13.46 ± 5.13 days respectively. There is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Statistically significant difference observed in post operative complication of wound infection and burst abdomen on 7th POD between the groups. The present study there is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups also observed. Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases 2017;4(1):15-20

scholarly journals Comparison of conventional fenestration discectomy with Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation:minimum 2-year long-term follow-up in 1100 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanyi Li ◽  
Yongchun Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Purpose To compare the efficacy of conventional interlaminar fenestration discectomy (IFD) with transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods The clinical data of 1100 patients who had been diagnosed with LDH between January 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. IFD was performed on 605 patients in Group A, whereas TELD was performed on 505 patients in Group B. The Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analogue Scale for pain and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the outcomes. The surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative off-bed activity and postoperative length of hospital stay were recorded. Results The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 60 months, with an average of 43 months. The excellent and good outcome rates were 93.5% in Group A and 92.6% in Group B. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the groups (P > 0.05). However, Group B had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter bed rest duration and postoperative length of hospital stay than Group A (P < 0.05). There were two cases of postoperative recurrence in Group A and three in Group B. Conclusions Although conventional IFD and TELD had similar levels of efficacy in treating LDH, TELD had several advantages. There was less intraoperative bleeding, shorter length of hospital stay and shorter bed rest duration. It can be considered a safe and effective surgical option for treating LDH.

Open cystectomy is still alive and well: Outcomes from a single-centre 6-year review

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-245
Author(s):  
Alexios Dosis ◽  
Blessing Dhliwayo ◽  
Patrick Jones ◽  
Iva Kovacevic ◽  
Jonathan Yee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Objectives: To compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a single-centre setting. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective cohort (level 2b evidence) non-randomised review of 228 radical cystectomies that were performed between January 2010 and February 2016. Primary outcome measures were operative time, complications, blood loss and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS v21.0. Quantitative values were compared with Student’s t-test; categorical variables with the chi-square test. Statistical significance was considered a result of an alpha value less than 0.05. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also conducted. Results: Intraoperative blood loss was lower in laparoscopic surgery (855±673 vs. 716±570 mL, P=0.15), which had a significant impact on transfusion rates ( P=0.02). Operative times were lower in open surgery (339±52.9 vs. 353.1±67.1 minutes, P=0.10), while hospital stay was lower in the laparoscopic group (14.2±11.2 vs. 16.0±13.6 days, P=0.28). Five-year survival rates were superior for patients who underwent an open procedure but were not statistically significant ( P=0.10). Conclusion: This is, so far, the largest cohort to compare laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy. The laparoscopic approach can reduce the need for transfusion; however, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay or intraoperative blood loss, survival and margin positivity. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

scholarly journals Evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol on patients having radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie Liu ◽  
Trustin Domes ◽  
Kunal Jana
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Eras Protocol

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal perioperative care protocols that are designed to shorten recovery time and reduce complication rates.1,2 An ERAS protocol was implemented in the Saskatoon Health region for radical cystectomy patients in 2013. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the protocol for patients having radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Methods: Length of stay (LOS), early in-hospital complication rates, 30-day readmission rates, age, and gender were collected for patients seen for bladder cancer requiring radical cystectomy in Saskatoon between January 2007 and December 2016. Of these patients, 176 were pre-ERAS implementation (control group) and 84 were post-ERAS implementation (experimental group). The data from each variable was compared between the groups using a Z-test. Results: There was no significant difference in age or gender of patients between the groups. Average LOS pre-ERAS was 14.25±14.57 days, which is significantly longer than the post-ERAS average of 10.91±8.56 days (p=0.043). There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission rate (19.87% pre-ERAS vs. 19.05% post-ERAS; p=0.873) or complication rate (51.7% pre-ERAS vs. 46.4% post-ERAS; p=0.425). Conclusions: The implementation of an ERAS protocol for radical cystectomy reduces LOS, with no effect on early complication rates or 30-day readmission rates. This indicates that the protocol is safe for patients when compared to previous practices and is an effective means of reducing LOS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document