scholarly journals Second-hand smoking, hypertension and cardiovascular risk: findings from Peru

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz ◽  
Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco

Abstract Background Second-hand smoking has not been detailedly studied in Peru, where smoking is prohibited in all indoor workplaces, public places, and public transportation. Second-hand smoke exposure may occur at home or any other places. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of second-hand smoking and assess its association with hypertension and cardiovascular risk in Peru. Materials and methods Secondary analysis of a nationally-representative population-based survey including individuals aged 18–59 years. There were two outcomes: hypertension and 10-year cardiovascular risk using the Framingham and the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) risk scores. The exposure was self-reported second-hand smoking during the 7 days before the survey. The association between second-hand smoking and hypertension was quantified with Poisson models reporting prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI); the association between second-hand smoking and cardiovascular risk was quantified with linear regressions reporting coefficients and their 95% CI. Results Data from 897 individuals, mean age: 38.2 (SD: 11.8) years, and 499 (55.7%) females, were analyzed, with 8.7% subjects reporting second-hand smoking at home and 8.3% at work or any other place. Thus, 144 (15.5%; 95% CI: 12.8%-18.6%) subjects reported any second-hand smoking. In multivariable model second-hand smoking was associated with hypertension (PR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.25–4.67), and with 1.2% higher Framingham cardiovascular risk, and 0.2% higher 2019 WHO risk score. Conclusions There is an association between second-hand smoking and hypertension as well as with cardiovascular risk, and 15% of adults reported second-hand smoke exposure overall with half of them exposed at home. There is a need to guarantee smoking-free places to reduce cardiovascular risk.

2010 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan L. Bottorff ◽  
Joy L. Johnson ◽  
Joanne Carey ◽  
Peter Hutchinson ◽  
Debbie Sullivan ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Kabir ◽  
P J Manning ◽  
J Holohan ◽  
P G Goodman ◽  
L Clancy

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 84-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montse Ballbè ◽  
Jose M. Martínez-Sánchez ◽  
Antoni Gual ◽  
Cristina Martínez ◽  
Marcela Fu ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Gorini ◽  
Antonio Gasparrini ◽  
Elizabeth Tamang ◽  
Manel Nebot ◽  
Maria José Lopez ◽  
...  

Aims and Background A law banning smoking in enclosed public places was implemented in Italy on January 10, 2005. The aim of this paper is to present a cross-sectional survey on two representative samples of non-smokers of two Italian towns (Florence and Belluno), conducted one year after the introduction of the ban, in order to assess prevalence of second-hand smoke exposure, to record the attitudes towards the ban, and the perception about its compliance in a representative sample of non-smokers. Methods Computer-assisted telephone interviews were carried out in March 2006, from a random sample of households from telephone registries. Respondents were 402 non-smokers from Belluno and 1,073 from Florence. Results About 12% of Florentines and 7% of Belluno respondents were exposed at home; 39% and 19%, respectively, at work; 10% and 5% in hospitality venues; 20% and 10% in cars. The smoke-free law was almost universally supported (about 98%) even if a smaller proportion of people (about 90%) had the perception that the ban was observed. Conclusions Second-hand smoke exposure at home and in hospitality premises has dropped to ≤10%, whereas exposure at work remained higher. These results suggest the need for more controls in workplaces other than hospitality venues.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shervin Assari ◽  
Mohsen Bazargan

Introduction: Educational attainment and poverty status are two strong socioeconomic status (SES) indicators that protect individuals against exposure to second-hand smoke. Minorities’ Diminished Returns (MDRs), however, refer to smaller protective effects of SES indicators among ethnic minority groups such as Hispanics and Blacks, compared to non-Hispanic Whites. This study explored ethnic differences in the effects of educational attainment and poverty status on second-hand smoke exposure in the homes of American adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 18,274 non-smoking adults who had participated in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH; 2013). The independent variables were educational attainment and poverty status. The dependent variable was secondhand smoke exposure at home. Age and region of residence were the covariates. Ethnicity was the moderator. Results: Overall, individuals with a higher educational attainment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.74-0.79) and those who lived out of poverty (OR = 0.56, 95% CI =0.51-0.62) had lower odds of second-hand smoke exposure at home. Hispanic ethnicity showed significant interactions with both SES indicators, suggesting that the protective effects of education and poverty on second-hand smoke exposure at home are smaller for Hispanics (ORs for interaction with education and poverty status = 1.30 and 1.26, P < 0.05) than for Non-Hispanics. Conclusion: In the US, high SES Hispanics remain at high risk of exposure to second-hand smoke at home despite a high education and income. High SES better reduces environmental exposures for non-Hispanic than for Hispanic individuals.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Tayu Lee ◽  
Sutapa Agrawal ◽  
Sanjay Basu ◽  
Stanton A Glantz ◽  
Christopher Millett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document