scholarly journals Understanding the influence of parent-clinician communication on antibiotic prescribing for children with respiratory tract infections in primary care: a qualitative observational study using a conversation analysis approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie Cabral ◽  
Jeremy Horwood ◽  
Jon Symonds ◽  
Jenny Ingram ◽  
Patricia J. Lucas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Conversation Analysis ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Clinician Communication ◽  
Tract Infections

Clinicians prescribe antibiotics for childhood respiratory tract infection based on assessment, rather than parental expectation

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. l6768
Author(s):  
Rob Cook ◽  
Peter Davidson ◽  
Alicia White
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Conversation Analysis ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Parental Expectation ◽  
Primary Care Research ◽  
Clinician Communication ◽  
Tract Infections

The studyCabral C, Horwood J, Symonds J, et al. Understanding the influence of parent-clinician communication on antibiotic prescribing for children with respiratory tract infections in primary care: a qualitative observational study using a conversation analysis approach. BMC Fam Pract 2019;20:102.This project was funded by the NIHR School for Primary Care Research Programme (project number SPCR204).To read the full NIHR Signal, go to: https://discover.dc.nihr.ac.uk/content/signal-000829/gps-assessment-not-parental-expectation-drives-antibiotic-prescribing

scholarly journals Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein Testing to Reduce Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 610
Author(s):  
Nahara Anani Martínez-González ◽  
Ellen Keizer ◽  
Andreas Plate ◽  
Samuel Coenen ◽  
Fabio Valeri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Tract Infections

C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care testing (POCT) is increasingly being promoted to reduce diagnostic uncertainty and enhance antibiotic stewardship. In primary care, respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are the most common reason for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, which is a major driver for antibiotic resistance. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on the impact of CRP-POCT on antibiotic prescribing for RTIs in primary care. Thirteen moderate to high-quality studies comprising 9844 participants met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed that CRP-POCT significantly reduced immediate antibiotic prescribing at the index consultation compared with usual care (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.90, p = 0.0003, I2 = 76%) but not during 28-day (n = 7) follow-up. The immediate effect was sustained at 12 months (n = 1). In children, CRP-POCT reduced antibiotic prescribing when CRP (cut-off) guidance was provided (n = 2). Meta-analyses showed significantly higher rates of re-consultation within 30 days (n = 8, 1 significant). Clinical recovery, resolution of symptoms, and hospital admissions were not significantly different between CRP-POCT and usual care. CRP-POCT can reduce immediate antibiotic prescribing for RTIs in primary care (number needed to (NNT) for benefit = 8) at the expense of increased re-consultations (NNT for harm = 27). The increase in re-consultations and longer-term effects of CRP-POCT need further evaluation. Overall, the benefits of CRP-POCT outweigh the potential harms (NNTnet = 11).

scholarly journals Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in Dutch primary care in relation to patient age and clinical entities

2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1116-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemiek E. Akkerman ◽  
Johannes C. van der Wouden ◽  
Marijke M. Kuyvenhoven ◽  
Jeanne P. Dieleman ◽  
Theo J. M. Verheij
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Patient Âgé ◽  
Tract Infections

scholarly journals Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: an updated and expanded meta-ethnography

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (674) ◽  
pp. e633-e645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evi Germeni ◽  
Julia Frost ◽  
Ruth Garside ◽  
Morwenna Rogers ◽  
Jose M Valderas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Acute Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Context Sensitive ◽  
Quality Improvement Interventions ◽  
Tract Infections

BackgroundReducing unnecessary prescribing remains a key priority for tackling the global rise of antibiotic-resistant infections.AimThe authors sought to update a 2011 qualitative synthesis of GPs’ experiences of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), including their views of interventions aimed at more prudent prescribing. They expanded the original scope to encompass all primary care professionals (PCPs) who can prescribe or dispense antibiotics for ARTIs (for example, nurses and pharmacists).Design and settingSystematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies.MethodA systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ASSIA, and Web of Science. No date or language restrictions were used. Identified studies were grouped according to their thematic focus (usual care versus intervention), and two separate syntheses were performed.ResultsIn all, 53 articles reporting the experiences of >1200 PCPs were included. Analysis of usual-care studies showed that PCPs tend to assume multiple roles in the context of ARTI consultations (the expert self, the benevolent self, the practical self), depending on the range of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual situations in which they find themselves. Analysis of intervention studies identified four possible ways in which PCPs may experience quality improvement interventions (compromise, ‘supportive aids’, source of distress, and unnecessary).ConclusionContrary to the original review, these results suggest that the use of the same intervention is experienced in a totally different way by different PCPs, and that the same elements that are perceived as benefits by some could be viewed as drawbacks by others. Acceptability of interventions is likely to increase if these are context sensitive and take into account PCPs’ varying roles and changing priorities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document