scholarly journals Effect of poor glycemic control in cognitive performance in the elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Mexican Health and Aging Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto J. Mimenza-Alvarado ◽  
Gilberto A. Jiménez-Castillo ◽  
Sara G. Yeverino-Castro ◽  
Abel J. Barragán-Berlanga ◽  
Mario U. Pérez-Zepeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Elderly Persons ◽  
Aging Study

Abstract Background Cognitive impairment is twice more frequent in elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). This study was conducted to determine the association between glycemic control and cognitive performance among community-dwelling elderly persons in Mexico. Methods Cross-sectional study conducted in individuals aged 60 years or elderly participating in the 2012 Mexican Health and Aging Study. Type 2 DM participants were classified in 3 groups according to their glycated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c): < 7% (intensive control), 7–7.9% (standard control) or ≥ 8% (poor control), and cognitive performance: low (CCCE ≤44 points), intermediate (44.1–59.52 points), or high (≥59.53 points). Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to determine this association. Results Two hundred sixteen community-dwelling adults aged 60 and older with type 2 diabetes were selected. Subjects in the low cognitive performance group were older (69.7 ± 6.6 vs 65.86 ± 5.18 years, p < .001) and had a lower educational level (2.5 ± 2.6 vs 7.44 ± 4.15 years, p < .000) when compared to the high cognitive performance participants. HbA1c ≥ 8% was associated with having low (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.17, 95% CI 1.17–8.60, p = .024), and intermediate (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.27–8.20, p = .014) cognitive performance; this trend was not found for HbA1c 7.0–7.9% group. The multinomial regression analysis showed that the presence of HbA1c ≥ 8% (poor glycemic control) was associated with low (OR 3.17, 95% CI = 1.17–8.60, p = .024), and intermediate (OR 3.23, 95% CI = 1.27–8.20, p = .014) cognitive performance. After adjusting for confounding variables. Conclusions Glycemic control with a HbA1c ≥ 8% was associated with worse cognitive performance.

scholarly journals Effect of poor glycemic control in Cognitive Performance in the elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Mexican Health and Aging Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto J Mimenza-Aguilar ◽  
Gilberto A Jimenez-Castillo ◽  
Sara G Yeverino-Castro ◽  
Abel Barragán-Berlanga ◽  
Mario U Perez-Zepeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Elderly Persons ◽  
Aging Study

Abstract BackgroundCognitive impairment is twice more frequent in elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). This study was conducted to determine the association between glycemic control and cognitive performance among community-dwelling elderly persons in Mexico.MethodsCross-sectional study conducted in individuals aged 60 years or elderly participating in the 2012 Mexican Health and Aging Study. Type 2 DM participants were classified in 3 groups according to their glycated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c): <7% (intensive control), 7-7.9% (standard control) or ≥ 8% (poor control), and cognitive performance: low (CCCE ≤44 points), intermediate (44.1-59.52 points), or high (≥59.53 points). Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to determine this association.Results216 community-dwelling adults aged 60 and older with type 2 diabetes were selected. Subjects in the low cognitive performance group were older (69.7 ± 6.6 vs 65.86 ± 5.18 years, p <.001) and had a lower educational level (2.5 ± 2.6 vs 7.44 ± 4.15 years, p <.000) when compared to the high cognitive performance participants. HbA1c ≥8% was associated with having low (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.17, 95% CI 1.17-8.60, p=.024), and intermediate (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.27-8.20, p=.014) cognitive performance; this trend was not found for HbA1c 7.0-7.9% group.The multinomial regression analysis showed that the presence of HbA1c ≥8% (poor glycemic control) was associated with low (OR 3.17, 95% CI = 1.17-8.60, p=.024), and intermediate (OR 3.23, 95% CI = 1.27-8.20, p=.014) cognitive performance. After adjusting for confounding variables.ConclusionsGlycemic control with a HbA1c ≥ 8% was associated with worse cognitive performance.

scholarly journals Effect of Poor Glycemic Control Incognitive Performance Inthe Elderly With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Mexican Health and Aging Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto J Mimenza-Aguilar ◽  
Gilberto A Jimenez-Castillo ◽  
Sara G Yeverino-Castro ◽  
Abel Barragán-Berlanga ◽  
Mario U Perez-Zepeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Elderly Persons ◽  
Aging Study

Abstract Background Cognitive impairment is twice more frequent in elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). This study was conducted to determine the association between glycemic control and cognitive performance among community-dwelling elderly persons in Mexico. Methods Cross-sectional study conducted in individuals aged 60 years or elderly participating in the 2012 Mexican Health and Aging Study. Type 2 DM participants were classified in 3 groups according to their glycated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c): <7% (intensive control), 7-7.9% (standard control) or ≥ 8% (poor control), and cognitive performance: low (CCCE ≤ 44 points), intermediate (44.1-59.52 points), or high (≥ 59.53 points). Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to determine this association. Results Out of 946 subjects, 216 were selected. Subjects in the low cognitive performance group were older (69.7 ± 6.6 vs 65.86 ± 5.18 years, p < .001) and had a lower educational level (2.5 ± 2.6 vs 7.44 ± 4.15 years, p < .000) when compared to the high cognitive performance participants. HbA1c ≥8% was associated with having low (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.17–8.60, p = .024), and intermediate (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.27–8.20, p = .014) cognitive performance; this trend was not found for HbA1c 7.0-7.9% group. Conclusions Glycemic control with a HbA1c ≥ 8% was associated with worse cognitive performance.

scholarly journals Laboratory Parameters of Hemostasis, Adhesion Molecules, and Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Correlation with Glycemic Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Palella ◽  
Rossella Cimino ◽  
Salvatore A. Pullano ◽  
Antonino S. Fiorillo ◽  
Elio Gulletta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Adhesion Molecules ◽  
Adhesion Molecule ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Pai 1

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by a prothrombotic state, predisposing to vascular complications. Some related markers, linking thrombophilia to hemostasis and inflammation, however, have been poorly explored in relation to patients’ glycemia. We therefore investigated the association of laboratory hemostatic parameters, circulating adhesion molecules (ADMs), white blood cell (WBC) count, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with T2DM and glycemic control. Research design: In this study, 82 subjects, grouped into T2DM patients (n = 41) and healthy individuals (n = 41) were enrolled. To evaluate glycemic control, the T2DM cohort was expanded to 133 patients and sub-classified according to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7% and ≥ 7% (n = 58 and n = 75, respectively). We assessed glycemia, HbA1c, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), platelet and leukocyte parameters, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), and selectins (E-, P-, L-). Results: PT % activity, PAI-1, VCAM-1, WBC, and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in T2DM patients than in healthy subjects. Poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%) was correlated with increased PT activity (p = 0.015), and higher levels of E-selectin (p = 0.009), P-selectin (p = 0.012), and NLR (p = 0.019). Conclusions: Both T2DM and poor glycemic control affect some parameters of hemostasis, inflammation, and adhesion molecules. Further studies are needed to establish their clinical utility as adjuvant markers for cardio-vascular risk in T2DM patients.

scholarly journals Utility of Triglyceride-Glucose index in predicting glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1444-1448
Author(s):  
Santosh Timalsina ◽  
Shishir Mahato ◽  
Sandesh Nepal
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tyg Index

Introduction: Insulin resistance (IR) and glycemic control are two very important aspects to be considered during management of patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index has been proposed as a simple and inexpensive parameter that correlates well with IR and glycemic control. Objectives: To explore the association of TyG index (and other TyG derived indices) with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and evaluate their predictive ability for glycemic control in patients with T2DM. Methodology: This cross-sectional study comprised of 160 adult patients diagnosed with T2DM visiting the medical outpatient department of Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Chitwan between July–December 2019. Socio-demographic data and anthropometric measurements were collected. Glycemic control was assessed by HbA1c. TyG index was calculated by the formula: ln [fasting TG (mg/dl) x fasting glucose (mg/dl)/2]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to analyze the predictive ability of TyG-index for poor glycemic control. Results: One hundred and sixty patients (mean age: 53.6 ± 10.7 years, 55.0% males) were included in the study. Eighty (50.0%) had good glycemic control (HbA1c <7.0%). TyG index, along with TyG-BMI and TyG-WC (other TyG derived indices) were significantly increased in the poor glycemic control group. TyG index had a good predictive ability for poor glycemic control (AUC: 0.803, 95% CI: 0.731 – 0.874). A TyG cutoff ≥ 9.12 was optimal for predicting poor glycemic control, with 86.1% sensitivity and 61.5% specificity. Conclusion: TyG index could be a simple and cost-effective screening tool for assessment of glycemic control in patients with T2DM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document