scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of in-house real-time PCR assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenhong Wei ◽  
Xiaoping Zhang ◽  
Chaojun Wei ◽  
Liang Yao ◽  
Yonghong Li ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e0143444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Zhao ◽  
Guilian Li ◽  
Chongyun Sun ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Xiaochen Wang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 1103-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A.S. Lira ◽  
F.C.F. Santos ◽  
M.S.Z. Carvalho ◽  
R.A. Montenegro ◽  
J.F.C. Lima ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (9) ◽  
pp. 774-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Uk Kim ◽  
Dae-Shick Ryu ◽  
Choong-Hwan Cha ◽  
Seon-Hee Park

AimsMycobacterium tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are clinically different, and the rapid detection and differentiation of M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and NTM is crucial for patient management and infection control. Given the slow growth of most pathogenic mycobacteria, nucleic acid amplification assays are excellent tools for direct identification of mycobacteria in clinical specimens. Recently, a multiplex real-time PCR assay was developed that can directly detect 20 mycobacterial species in clinical specimens. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the assay for diagnosing mycobacterial disease under routine laboratory conditions.MethodsA total of 3334 specimens collected from 1437 patients suspected of tuberculosis infection were subjected to acid-fast bacilli staining, conventional culture and the multiplex real-time PCR assay. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the assay, the overall diagnosis of tuberculosis was defined by positive culture plus medical history, and the 2007 American Thoracic Society and Infectious Disease Society of America diagnostic criteria for NTM disease were applied.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 87.5%, 99.6%, 96.1% and 98.5%, respectively, for the detection of MTBC isolates and 53.3%, 99.9%, 95.2%, and 98.9%, respectively, for detecting NTM isolates.ConclusionsThus, the assay can correctly differentiate between MTBC and NTM isolates in clinical specimens and would be a useful tool for the rapid differentiation of tuberculosis and NTM disease, despite its limited sensitivity for the diagnosis of NTM disease.


2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (11) ◽  
pp. 6436-6448 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-È. Paradis ◽  
D. Haine ◽  
B. Gillespie ◽  
S.P. Oliver ◽  
S. Messier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Oladipo Babafemi

Abstract Background: COVID-19 has spread globally since its discovery in Hubei province, China in December 2019 and became pandemic in 2020. COVID-19 is a new betacoronavirus and a variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARA- CoV-2). Rapid, accurate and reliable diagnosis of COVID-19 will prevent the spread and allow for appropriate management. The main objective of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and summarise the published evidence on the diagnostic performance and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the diagnosis of current or previous COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We will search MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSIS, LILACS, Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialised Register (CIDG SR), Global Health, and CINAHL for published studies for the diagnosis of COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction assay in LMICs There will be no restriction regarding the language, date of publication, and publication status. We will include retrospective, cross-sectional and cohort observational studies will be included in the review. Selection of studies, data extraction and management, assessment of risk of bias, and quality of evidence will be performed by two independent reviewers (EB and BC). A third researcher (GM) will be consulted in case of discrepancies. Depending on the availability and quality of the data, a meta-analysis will be performed. Otherwise, findings will be qualitatively reported. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the uptake of RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection from clinical samples in human in LMICs. This review will make available evidence on the uptake, accuracy, approach, and interpretation of results of this assay in the context of COVID-19 diagnosis which will meet an urgent need, considering the diagnostic challenges of RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 diagnosis in humans. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021271894


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1362-1369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana L. Sales ◽  
Antônio Augusto Fonseca Júnior ◽  
Lívia Orzil ◽  
Andrea Padilha Alencar ◽  
Marcio Roberto Silva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document