scholarly journals Invasive breast Cancer treatment in Tanzania: landscape assessment to prepare for implementation of standardized treatment guidelines

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupali Sood ◽  
Nestory Masalu ◽  
Roisin M. Connolly ◽  
Christina A. Chao ◽  
Lucas Faustine ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Incidence of breast cancer continues to rise in low- and middle-income countries, with data from the East African country of Tanzania predicting an 82% increase in breast cancer from 2017 to 2030. We aimed to characterize treatment pathways, receipt of therapies, and identify high-value interventions to increase concordance with international guidelines and avert unnecessary breast cancer deaths. Methods Primary data were extracted from medical charts of patients presenting to Bugando Medical Center, Tanzania, with breast concerns and suspected to have breast cancer. Clinicopathologic features were summarized with descriptive statistics. A Poisson model was utilized to estimate prevalence ratios for variables predicted to affect receipt of life-saving adjuvant therapies and completion of therapies. International and Tanzanian guidelines were compared to current care patterns in the domains of lymph node evaluation, metastases evaluation, histopathological diagnosis, and receptor testing to yield concordance scores and suggest future areas of focus. Results We identified 164 patients treated for suspected breast cancer from April 2015–January 2019. Women were predominantly post-menopausal (43%) and without documented insurance (70%). Those with a confirmed histopathology diagnosis (69%) were 3 times more likely to receive adjuvant therapy (PrR [95% CI]: 3.0 [1.7–5.4]) and those documented to have insurance were 1.8 times more likely to complete adjuvant therapy (1.8 [1.0–3.2]). Out of 164 patients, 4% (n = 7) received concordant care based on the four evaluated management domains. The first most common reason for non-concordance was lack of hormone receptor testing as 91% (n = 144) of cases did not undergo this testing. The next reason was lack of lymph node evaluation (44% without axillary staging) followed by absence of abdominopelvic imaging in those with symptoms (35%) and lack of histopathological confirmation (31%). Conclusions Patient-specific clinical data from Tanzania show limitations of current breast cancer management including axillary staging, receipt of formal diagnosis, lack of predictive biomarker testing, and low rates of adjuvant therapy completion. These findings highlight the need to adapt and adopt interventions to increase concordance with guidelines including improving capacity for pathology, developing complete staging pathways, and ensuring completion of prescribed adjuvant therapies.

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin O. Anderson ◽  
Mary M. Austin-Seymour ◽  
Julie R. Gralow ◽  
Roger E. Moe ◽  
David R. Byrd

Background Lymph node metastasis is the single most important factor in assessing breast cancer prognosis and planning systemic therapy. However, lymph node dissection portends significant morbidity, with little or no therapeutic benefit if the nodes prove to be negative for cancer. Methods The authors review indications for avoiding axillary dissection, and they analyze the results from lower-level axillary lymphadenectomy together with the morbidity from full axillary dissection. Results Limited level I dissection depends on surgical technique and limits prognostic information. Three approaches have evolved to identify the sentinel node in breast cancer: perilesional breast injection of radiocolloid alone, blue dye alone, or a combination of radiocolloid and blue dye. These techniques provide high diagnostic accuracy, few false-negative results, and less morbidity. Conclusions Knowledge of axillary status is critical to current breast cancer management and cannot be foregone in the preponderance of patients with advanced breast cancer. Results from lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy are highly encouraging.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1459-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Sawka ◽  
A M O'Connor ◽  
H A Llewellyn-Thomas ◽  
T To ◽  
S P Pinfold ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To examine variations in physicians' recommendations for systemic adjuvant therapy in the treatment of women with node-negative breast cancer (NNBC) and to determine factors used in making specific recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS A questionnaire was sent by mail to all 149 Ontario physicians who actively treated breast cancer in 1993. The questionnaire described 48 clinical scenarios of women with NNBC, which included all possible combinations of the following factors: menopausal status, tumor size, hormone receptor status, histologic and nuclear grade, and lymphatic and/or vascular invasion. Respondents rated the appropriateness of administering tamoxifen, combination chemotherapy, or both tamoxifen and combination chemotherapy on a nine-point scale from extremely inappropriate to extremely appropriate. Respondent agreement and disagreement were tabulated for each scenario, and factors associated with specific treatment ratings were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS The response rate was 87%. Agreement for the appropriateness of specific therapies was most evident where clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy, whereas disagreement was observed in scenarios in which support for a specific treatment is not available in the current literature. Relevant tumor- and patient-specific factors were used in decision-making; personal characteristics of the respondents had no statistically significant impact on appropriateness ratings. CONCLUSION The physicians surveyed had good knowledge of NNBC prognostic factors, but had a range of opinion on optimal therapy for many clinical scenarios, which reflects current knowledge of the benefits of adjuvant therapy for NNBC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 220 (6) ◽  
pp. 1417-1421
Author(s):  
Juan Ruiz ◽  
Gerson Maldonado ◽  
Elizabeth Ablah ◽  
Hayrettin Okut ◽  
Jared Reyes ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21032-e21032
Author(s):  
Asma Latif ◽  
Alexander C. Small ◽  
Erin L. Moshier ◽  
Kerin B. Adelson ◽  
George Raptis ◽  
...  

e21032 Background: Personalized oncology offers the promise of selectively applying therapeutics to patients most likely to benefit, while sparing those unlikely to benefit from potentially toxic therapies. Oncotype DX is a 21-gene assay utilized to identify hormone-receptor positive (HR+), node negative, breast cancer (Br CA) patients who may be successfully treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy alone. We hypothesized that practice patterns with adjuvant therapy have changed since the commercial availability of Oncotype DX in 2004. Methods: The Public National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients age ≥ 50 with stage I or II Br CA diagnosed from 2000 to 2008. Patients were classified by adjuvant therapy including hormone, chemotherapy, hormone and chemotherapy, and no hormone or chemotherapy. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios for the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant therapies from 2000-2003 compared to 2004-2008. Results: 833,018 patients age ≥ 50 with stage I or II Br CA were identified. The application of adjuvant therapies for the periods pre- and post-availability of Oncotype DX are detailed in the Table. Conclusions: There has been significant increase (13%) in the use of hormonal therapy alone as adjuvant therapy for patients age ≥ 50 with HR+ stage I-II Br CA since commercial availability of Oncotype DX. While this has been slightly offset by a decrease in the use of chemotherapy plus hormonal therapy, there has been a larger decrease in the use of “no adjuvant therapy”. Data regarding predictive biomarkers should be captured by registries in an effort to determine the true impact of these tests on treatment utilization. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Archana Radhakrishnan ◽  
Paula Silverman ◽  
Robert R. Shenk ◽  
Cheryl L. Thompson

117 Background: Racial disparities in outcomes continue to persist amongst breast cancer (BC) patients (pts). Standard of care for the surgical evaluation of early BC has changed from axillary lymph node dissection being recommended for axillary staging to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for clinically node-negative pts. SLNB, however, can be deferred if findings would not alter treatment plans. The goal of this study is to determine if SLNB rates differ by race, age, insurer, community vs academic setting or surgeon. Causes contributing to disparities will be considered. Methods: Pts undergoing primary surgery for early stage BC from 2010-2011 at our academic teaching hospital and two affiliated community medical centers were identified from the tumor registry. Data abstracted included demographics, insurance type, medical center and surgeon. For pts without SLNB, clinical information was confirmed with medical record review. Unadjusted comparison of factors for pts who did and did not have SLNB was evaluated with a t-test or chi square test. Logistic regression modeling assessed significance of demographic and clinical factors predicting SLNB. Results: 499 pts were identified; 114 (23%) were black, 373 (75%) white, and 12 (2%) others/unknown race. SLNB was performed in 443 (89%) of total pts, without racial differences (86% of black and 89% of white pts (p=0.31) had SLNB). Average age of pts who had SLNB was younger (60.4) than those who did not (76.3) (p<0.01). As compared to those with managed care insurance (97%) or Medicaid (91%), only 78% of Medicare pts had SLNB (p<0.01). There was no statistical difference in SLNB rates between academic and community medical centers or by surgeon. Chart review determined that the standard of care was met in 55/56 pts who did not have SLNB; reasons for no SLNB include advanced age (range 79-95), in-breast recurrences, and positive nodes pre-operatively. Conclusions: Utilization rates of SLNB did not differ between black and white BC pts. Differences were seen based on age and insurer. Although only 89% of pts had SLNB, careful evaluation for reasons reveals medically appropriate treatment in almost all cases. These results suggest cautionary interpretation of large database findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document