scholarly journals Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of tibia intramedullary nailing: a retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiliang Cui ◽  
Xingyi Hua ◽  
Florian Schmidutz ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Zongsheng Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Tibial Shaft ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Special Surgery ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

Abstract Background Tibial shaft fractures are routinely managed with intramedullary nailing (IMN). An increasingly accepted technique is the suprapatellar (SP) approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of knee joint after tibia IMN through an suprapatellar (SP) or traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed in patients with tibial shaft fractures that were treated with IMN through a SP or IP approach between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2016. The clinical and functional outcomes of the knee were assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score. Secondary outcomes included the operation time and intraoperative blood loss. Results A total of 50 patients/fractures (26 IP and 24 SP) with a minimum follow-up of 15 months were evaluated. All fractures were OTA 42. No significant differences were found between the two groups in age, gender, side of fractures, operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and follow-up time. No significant difference was seen in HSS score (P = 0.62) between them. Sub analysis of all the HSS components scores revealed no significant differences between pain (P = 0.57), the stand and walk (P = 0.54), the need for walking stick (P = 0.60) and extension lag (P = 0.60). The other HSS components showed full scores (IP 10 vs. SP 10) in both approaches, including muscle force, flexion deformity and stability components. The range of motion (ROM) component score was superior in the IP group (P = 0.04) suggesting a higher ROM. Conclusions Both SP and IP approach results in equivalent overall HSS knee scores. However, for the HSS component, the IP approach was superior to SP approach regarding the ROM.

scholarly journals Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of tibia intramedullary nailing ： A retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiliang Cui ◽  
Xingyi Hua ◽  
Florian Schmidutz ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Zongsheng Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Tibial Shaft ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Special Surgery ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

Abstract Background: Tibial shaft fractures are routinely managed with intramedullary nailing (IMN). An increasingly accepted technique is the suprapatellar (SP) approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of knee joint after tibia IMN through an suprapatellar (SP) or traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in patients with tibial shaft fractures that were treated with IMN through a SP or IP approach between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2016. The clinical and functional outcomes of the knee were assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score. Secondary outcomes included the operation time and intraoperative blood loss. Results: A total of 50 patients/fractures (26 IP and 24 SP) with a minimum follow-up of 15 months were evaluated. All fractures were OTA 42. No significant differences were found between the two groups in age, gender, side of fractures, operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and follow-up time. No significant difference was seen in HSS score ( P = 0.62) between them. Sub analysis of all the HSS components scores revealed no significant differences between pain ( P = 0.57), the stand and walk ( P = 0.54), the need for walking stick ( P = 0.60) and extension lag ( P = 0.60). The other HSS components showed full scores (IP 10 vs. SP 10) in both approaches, including muscle force, flexion deformity and stability components. The range of motion (ROM) component score was superior in the IP group ( P = 0.04) suggesting a higher ROM. Conclusions: Both SP and IP approach results in equivalent overall HSS knee scores. However, for the HSS component, the IP approach was superior to SP approach regarding the ROM.

scholarly journals Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of tibia intramedullary nailing: A retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiliang Cui ◽  
Xingyi Hua ◽  
Florian Schmidutz ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Zongsheng Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Knee Score ◽  
Tibial Shaft ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

Abstract Background: Tibial shaft fractures are routinely managed with intramedullary nailing (IMN). An increasingly accepted technique is the suprapatellar (SP) approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of knee joint after tibia IMN through an suprapatellar (SP) or traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in patients with tibial shaft fractures that were treated with tibia IMN through a SP or IP approach (1/2014-11/2016). The clinical and functional outcomes of knee joint were assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score. Further evaluation included the operation time, intraoperative blood loss. Results: A total of 50 patients/fractures (26 IP and 24 SP) with a follow-up for a minimum of 15 months were evaluated. All fractures were OTA 42. No significant differences were found between the two groups in age, gender, side of fractures, operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and follow-up time. No significant difference was seen in HSS score ( P = 0.62) between them. Analysis of all the HSS components scores revealed no significant differences between them concerning the pain ( P = 0.57), the stand and walk ( P = 0.54), the need for walking stick ( P = 0.60) and extension lag ( P = 0.60). The other HSS components showed full scores (IP 10 vs. SP 10) in both approaches, including muscle force, flexion deformity and stability components. The range of motion (ROM) component score was superior in the IP group ( P = 0.04) suggesting a higher ROM. Conclusions: The SP and IP approaches can get equivalent knee functional outcomes in the treatment of tibial shaft fracture concerning the overall HSS knee score. However, for the HSS component, the IP approach was superior to SP approach regarding the ROM.

scholarly journals Semi-extended Intramedullary Nailing of the Tibia Using an Infrapatellar Approach

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Lu ◽  
Yi-jun Gao ◽  
Hong-zhen Wang ◽  
Zhi-qiang Wu ◽  
Chong Li
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Delayed Union ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Tibial Shaft ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

Abstract Background The semi-extended tibial intramedullary nailing method would enable easier and improved reductions for tibial fractures as well as facilitate fluoroscopic imaging; however, its in-articular nature remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of the semi-extended infrapatellar (SEIP) approach and hyper-flexed infrapatellar (HFIP) approach for intramedullary nailing to treat tibial shaft fractures.MethodsThis study involved the retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients with tibial shaft fractures that were fixed through either the SEIP approach or the HFIP approach of intramedullary nailing and who were admitted to a level 1 trauma center. The minimum patient follow-up period was 12 months and the clinical and functional outcomes were estimated at the 12-month visit. ResultsOf the 80 patients whose medical records were analyzed, 40 (50%) underwent SEIP nailing and the remaining 40 (50%) underwent the traditional HFIP nailing. Compared with the HFIP group, patients in the SEIP group had a higher Lysholm knee score (median, 92 [interquartile range, 88-95] vs median, 88 [interquartile range, 81-92]; p = .01), a shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time (median, 93 [interquartile range, 78-105] s, vs median, 136 [interquartile range, 110-157] s; p < .001), and operation time (mean, 88.1 [SD, 17.8] min vs mean, 98.7 [SD, 19.3] min; p = .01). The VAS score was significantly lower in the SEIP group (median, 0; interquartile range, 0-0) than in the HFIP group (median, 0; interquartile range, 0-2) (p = .03). There were two cases (5%) in the SEIP group and 10 cases (25%) in the HFIP group of moderate AKP (p = .03). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in malalignment, nonunion, delayed union, infection, and other complications, as well as SF-36 physical and mental scores.ConclusionWe found that the SEIP approach to tibia intramedullary nailing was superior to the HFIP approach based on the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Thus, this novel technique provides an infrapatellar option for semi-extended tibial nailing.

scholarly journals Functional Outcomes in Suprapatellar Intramedullary Nailing for the Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Garg ◽  
Ankur Sahu ◽  
Aditya Seth ◽  
Ipanshu Malik ◽  
Rahul Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Tibial Shaft ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Suprapatellar Approach ◽  
Safe Technique ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of suprapatellar intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.Material and Methods: The present retrospective study included 10 cases aged more than 20 years, who were operated for tibial shaft fractures over last 3 years with suprapatellar tibial nailing. Patients were retrospectively followed up with all their previous surgical records and radiographs.Results: The mean age was 41.57±16.51 with a range of 20-72 years. Mean operating time was 81±10.15 minutes. Mean blood loss was 110±20.5 ml. Mean time for union was 15.15±1.35 weeks. No deep infection was noted. 1 patient had anterior knee pain. The mean Lysholm knee score was 87.91 ± 5.75.Conclusion: The suprapatellar approach is good and safe technique for nailing in the tibial fractures.

Long-Term Follow-up of Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Nailing

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 525-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A Lefaivre ◽  
Pierre Guy ◽  
Holman Chan ◽  
Piotr A Blachut
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Tibial Shaft ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

scholarly journals Randomized Controlled Trial of the Clinical Recovery and Biodegradation of Polylactide-co-glycolide Implants Used in the Intramedullary Nailing of Children’s Forearm Shaft Fractures with at Least Four Years of Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 995
Author(s):  
Marja Perhomaa ◽  
Tytti Pokka ◽  
Linda Korhonen ◽  
Antti Kyrö ◽  
Jaakko Niinimäki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Intramedullary Nails ◽  
Metal Implants ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Significant Difference

The preferred surgical fixation of forearm shaft fractures in children is Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN). Due to known disadvantageous effects of metal implants, a new surgical method using biodegradable polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) intramedullary nails has been developed but its long-term outcomes are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of Biodegradable Intramedullary Nailing (BIN) to ESIN and assess the biodegradation of the study implants via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The study population of the prospective, randomized trial consisted of paediatric patients whose forearm shaft fractures were treated with BIN (n = 19) or ESIN (n = 16). Forearm rotation at minimally four years’ follow-up was the main outcome. There was no clinically significant difference in the recovery of the patients treated with the BIN as compared to those treated with the ESIN. More than half of the implants (57.7%, n = 15/26) were completely degraded, and the rest were degraded almost completely. The PLGA intramedullary nails used in the treatment of forearm shaft fractures in this study resulted in good function and anatomy. No unexpected disadvantages were found in the degradation of the implants. However, two implant failures had occurred in three months postoperatively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document