scholarly journals Variation in management of humeral and clavicular shaft fractures amongst fellowship trained orthopedic traumatologists

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Behnam Sharareh ◽  
Christopher Perkins
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Orthopedic Trauma ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Medical Comorbidities ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Non Operative Management ◽  
Trauma Surgeons

Abstract Background There exists a wide variety of opinions on the appropriate management of diaphyseal humeral and clavicular fractures amongst orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a preference amongst orthopedic traumatologists on treatment of diaphyseal humerus and clavicle fractures with respect to various patient populations. Methods A 6-question survey was created using Surveymonkey.com and distributed via the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) website to fellowship trained orthopedic surgery traumatologists to survey the preferred management of a simple oblique middle 1/3rd diaphyseal humerus fracture and a middle 1/3rd displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture in the following 3 clinical settings: a healthy laborer, an older patient with co-morbidities, and if the surgeon themselves sustained the injury. The ratio of operative to non-operative management was calculated for all 6 questions. A chi-square value was performed to determine if the results are clinically significant based on the clinical scenario. Results There was 56 responses to the survey that were included in the analysis. Overall, there was a statistically significant trend towards surgical management of the surgeon’s own diaphyseal humerus fractures (55%) compared to that of healthy patients (41%) and those with medical comorbidities (21%) (p = 0.02) A similar trend was noted for operative management for diaphyseal clavicle fractures by the surgeon on their own fractures (43%) compared to that of healthy patients (38%) and those with medical comorbidities (18%) (p = 0.02). Conclusion While there are an increasing number of relative indications for treatment of diaphyseal humerus shaft and clavicle fractures, the results of this survey indicate that fellow-ship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons prefer surgical management of simple humerus and clavicular fractures in young, healthy patients as well as in themselves.

scholarly journals An unusual case of bipolar segmental clavicle fracture

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karishma Sethi ◽  
Simon D.S. Newman ◽  
Rajarshi Bhattacharya
Keyword(s):  
Unusual Case ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Shaft Fracture ◽  
Optimal Method ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Non Operative Management

Segmental clavicle fractures are uncommon injuries. When they do present, they tend to comprise a distal and mid-shaft fracture. A clavicular injury with proximal and distal fractures is a rarer presentation still which is sparsely covered in the literature. These injuries, which have been termed bipolar, are easily missed at presentation and due to their infrequency the optimal method of management for these patients is unclear. We describe the successful non-operative management of a bipolar clavicle fracture and review the existing literature.

scholarly journals Solid organ injury in blunt trauma abdomen: an etiological evaluation and success rate of non-operative management

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1350
Author(s):  
Ramachandra M. L. ◽  
Krishna S. R.
Keyword(s):  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Abdominal Injury ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Road Traffic Accidents ◽  
Non Operative Management

Background: Trauma remains the most common cause of death for all individuals between the ages of 1 and 44 years. 10% of these fatalities are attributable to abdominal injury. The Indian fatality rates for trauma are 20 times that for developed countries. The management of patients with blunt abdominal injury has evolved greatly over the last few decades from complete surgical management historically to present non operative management in most of the cases. In view of increasing number of road traffic accidents, rampant increase in construction work, accidental fall from height, this study is conducted to look into the causes of such incidents and also to strengthen the already established rules of non operative management in cases of blunt trauma abdomen.Methods: This is a prospective study of 53 patients who presented to K. R. Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, for management of blunt trauma abdomen over the period of January 2016 to June 2017. Unstable patients with initial resuscitation underwent Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma. Failed resuscitation with free fluid in abdomen confirmed by FAST immediately shifted to operation theatre for laparotomy and proceed. Hemodynamically stable patients underwent computerized tomography of abdomen. Organ injuries were scaled according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma and these patients were managed conservatively after ruling out hollow viscus perforation.Results: Majority of the patients belonged to male sex (85%) and of the age group 21-40 years constituting 58.3% of patients. Road traffic accident was the most common mode of injury which included 35 patients (66%). A total of 19 cases had splenic injury out of which 13 (68.5%) underwent non operative management and 6 (31%) underwent emergency Splenectomy. liver injury was present in 15 patients and all were managed conservatively. In total non operative management was done in 73.5% of cases and surgical management was done in 26.5% of cases.Conclusions: The presence of free fluid with organ injury always does not mandate laparotomy. Patient selection, early diagnosis and repeated clinical examination and use of appropriate investigations forms the key in non operative management of blunt trauma abdomen. RTA being the most common mode of injury, adequate measures should be taken to prevent road traffic accidents by strict action and traffic norms and citizen education.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Conservative Vs Surgical Management of Clavicle Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Vivek Phanswal
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Delayed Fracture ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Conservative Group ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Radiological Union

Background: Clavicle Fractures is one of the common fractures of upper limb accounting for approximately 40 % of all shoulder fractures. Till recently all clavicle fracture were treated conservatively, but now interest in surgical management is rising. This study was carried out to see if Surgical management outweighs the conservative treatment of Fractures Of Clavicle. Methods: A total of 40 cases satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Alternate patients were allocated to operative and conservation groups. In total 20 patients were operated operatively and 20 patients were treated conservatively. Outcome was analysed in terms of radiological union and functional outcome of the patient. Constant and Murley score was used as a score to evaluate final outcome. Results: In this study, the 20 patients who were operated upon had an average union time of 7.8 weeks; 1 patient had delayed fracture union by 12 wks. 20 patients in conservative group had normal union of fractures with 1 patient going into non-union. Average union time in the conservative group was 9.4 weeks, which was more than the 7.8 weeks seen in the group treated operatively. Mal-union was present in 7 of the 20 patients treated conservatively, and 5 of these 7 had a visible deformity. Out of these patients with mal-union 1 had poor functional outcome, 3 had good to excellent outcome and 3 had satisfactory functional outcome. 4 of these had restricted movements terminally and 2 had pain on movement. Conclusions: From our study based on patients of clavicle fractures, it can be concluded that the operative group had significantly higher excellent outcomes as compared to the conservatively- managed group, based on the Constant and Murley score. Keywords: Clavicle Fractures, Constant and Murley Score, Operative Clavicle Fracture Management, Clavicle Fracture Functional Outcome.

scholarly journals Comparing functional outcome in lateral end clavicle fracture after conservative and plating

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 833
Author(s):  
Sachin Y. Kale ◽  
Prasad Chaudhari ◽  
Shikhar D. Singh ◽  
Sanjay B. Dhar ◽  
Prakash D. Samant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Skin Infections ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Early Healing

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Fractures of the clavicle have been traditionally treated non- operatively but has been associated with various postoperative complications. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of the operative management and compare its results with conservative treatment considering it as standard treatment option.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The present study was carried out at the Department of Orthopedics, DY Patil Medical College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai. Open fractures, fractures associated with complication like head injury with associated other bone injuries were included in this study. We excluded patients less than 18 years of age, patients with middle third fracture of clavicle and patients with medial end clavicle fracture. The fractures were classified according to Robinson’s classification. Patients were followed up every week for 4 weeks then at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. The functional outcomes were assessed by Constant and Murley score.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> We included 48 patients in the study, 34 of which were males, average age of the patients was 37.53±7.64 years. 23 injuries were on the left. There was statistically significant better union times with operative management (p=0.034). Various complications were observed like infection, implant failure, man union, non-union, deformity and skin infections, statistically seen more in patients who underwent conservative management. Overall, patients experienced excellent and good results with operative management in 6 and 12 patients respectively.</p><strong>Conclusions:</strong>Operative treatment gave statistically significant functional outcome and early healing compared to conservatively treated in displaced, communited lateral end clavicle fractures. <p> </p>

scholarly journals Lactate clearance: its relationship with the success of non-operative management in patient with blunt abdominal trauma

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1738
Author(s):  
Reno Rudiman ◽  
Nova Saragih ◽  
Andriana Purnama
Keyword(s):  
Hemorrhagic Shock ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Lactate Clearance ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
History Of ◽  
Non Operative Management

Background: Occult ongoing bleeding has become the second highest cause of death in blunt abdominal trauma. Undetected abdominal injury has caused morbidity and mortality in patients at the early phases of trauma. Non-operative Management (NOM) in solid organ trauma is safe and effective, and this strategy has become widely used. Lactate clearance (LC) has important clinical benefits in patients with acute trauma that is superior to initial lactate examination.  Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study of patients with history of hemorrhagic shock caused by blunt abdominal trauma that came to emergency room of Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung from August 2015 to July 2016. The tests were including initial blood lactate, 2 hours, and 4 hours post-resuscitation and then calculation of LC. Analysis using SPSS with chi square for the significance of relationships and Spearman correlation to determine the strength of the relationship between variables. Comparison test between LC2 and LC4 were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests.Results: During one year period, from August 2015 to July 2016, there were 34 patients. Age was in the range of 15-65 years, with a range of 15-25 years were 19 (55.8%), 25-50 years were 11 (32.4%), and >50 years as many as four (11.8%). By sex, there were 28 (82.4%) male gender and 6 (17.6%) women. Based on the type of trauma, there were 11 (32.4%) single trauma patients and 23 (67.6%) multiple trauma patients. Based on the results of statistical analysis with chi square, there was a significant correlation between lactate clearance 2 hours (LC2) and lactate clearance 4 hours (LC4) with the success of NOM (p <0.001) with the Odds Ratio (OR) are 3.750 and 6.500 respectively. Based on non-parametric test (Mann Whitney) showed that there were no significant differences between the LC2 and LC4 in determining the successful of NOM (p>0.05).Conclusions: There was a significant relationship between lactate clearance 2 hours (LC2) and lactate clearance 4 hours (LC4) in determining the success of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with history of hemorrhagic shock caused by blunt abdominal trauma. In addition, there are no significant differences between the LC2 and LC4 in determining the success of the NOM, so that either LC2 or LC4 may be used in predicting the success of NOM, as LC4 is the first preference. The low level of lactate clearance may be used as one of indicators to terminate non-operative management and proceed with surgery right before all symptoms of hemorrhagic shock arise.

Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults – is non-operative management enough?

Injury ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koushik Narayan Subramanyam ◽  
Abhishek Vasant Mundargi ◽  
K.U. Gopakumar ◽  
Thatipamula Bharath ◽  
Milind Vittal Prabhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Management ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Non Operative Management

scholarly journals Surgical fixation of displaced clavicle fracture in adolescents: a review of literature

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harish S. Hosalkar ◽  
Gaurav Parikh ◽  
Bernd Bittersohl
Keyword(s):  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Traditional Treatment ◽  
Operative Methods ◽  
Recent Approach ◽  
Surgical Fixation ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Open Surgical Treatment ◽  
Displaced Clavicle Fracture

The literature available on patient-orientated outcomes of operative management for clavicle fractures in adolescents is fairly limited. Open surgical treatment of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle continues to be a topic of controversy. Traditional treatment of clavicle fractures has been via non-operative methods in both children and adults. Management in adolescent patients remains controversial, and rightly so, as the traditional experience from non-operative methods has been regarded as satisfactory, while the literature on the more recent approach towards fixing some of these fractures is evolving. We present a review of relevant literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document