scholarly journals An unusual case of bipolar segmental clavicle fracture

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karishma Sethi ◽  
Simon D.S. Newman ◽  
Rajarshi Bhattacharya

Segmental clavicle fractures are uncommon injuries. When they do present, they tend to comprise a distal and mid-shaft fracture. A clavicular injury with proximal and distal fractures is a rarer presentation still which is sparsely covered in the literature. These injuries, which have been termed bipolar, are easily missed at presentation and due to their infrequency the optimal method of management for these patients is unclear. We describe the successful non-operative management of a bipolar clavicle fracture and review the existing literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Behnam Sharareh ◽  
Christopher Perkins

Abstract Background There exists a wide variety of opinions on the appropriate management of diaphyseal humeral and clavicular fractures amongst orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a preference amongst orthopedic traumatologists on treatment of diaphyseal humerus and clavicle fractures with respect to various patient populations. Methods A 6-question survey was created using Surveymonkey.com and distributed via the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) website to fellowship trained orthopedic surgery traumatologists to survey the preferred management of a simple oblique middle 1/3rd diaphyseal humerus fracture and a middle 1/3rd displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture in the following 3 clinical settings: a healthy laborer, an older patient with co-morbidities, and if the surgeon themselves sustained the injury. The ratio of operative to non-operative management was calculated for all 6 questions. A chi-square value was performed to determine if the results are clinically significant based on the clinical scenario. Results There was 56 responses to the survey that were included in the analysis. Overall, there was a statistically significant trend towards surgical management of the surgeon’s own diaphyseal humerus fractures (55%) compared to that of healthy patients (41%) and those with medical comorbidities (21%) (p = 0.02) A similar trend was noted for operative management for diaphyseal clavicle fractures by the surgeon on their own fractures (43%) compared to that of healthy patients (38%) and those with medical comorbidities (18%) (p = 0.02). Conclusion While there are an increasing number of relative indications for treatment of diaphyseal humerus shaft and clavicle fractures, the results of this survey indicate that fellow-ship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons prefer surgical management of simple humerus and clavicular fractures in young, healthy patients as well as in themselves.



2017 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 8-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Masui ◽  
Suguru Fukahori ◽  
Kimio Asagiri ◽  
Shinji Ishii ◽  
Nobuyuki Saikusa ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-202
Author(s):  
Woo Jin shin ◽  
Young Woo Chung ◽  
Seon Do Kim ◽  
Ki-Yong An

Simple clavicle shaft fracture typically achieves satisfactory union after treatment and does not result in complication with conservative treatment. Non-union or malunion can occur in displaced clavicle fractures or comminuted shaft fractures. Treatment of displaced comminuted clavicle shaft fractures is performed by holding together the free fragments with interfragmentary screws or wires and fixing them to the clavicle with a plate. Therefore, we performed interfragmentary fixation using open reduction and internal fixation with bioresorbable screws (Mg-Ca alloy, Resomet Bioresorbable bone screw; U&I Corp.) and bioresorbable wires (Mg-Ca alloy, Resomet Bioresorbable K-wire and pin, U&I Corp.) for displaced comminuted clavicle fractures (Robinson type 2B) and additionally used a metal plate. We expected decreased irritation and infection due to absorption after surgery. We report four cases that were treated in this way.



Author(s):  
Sachin Y. Kale ◽  
Prasad Chaudhari ◽  
Shikhar D. Singh ◽  
Sanjay B. Dhar ◽  
Prakash D. Samant ◽  
...  

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Fractures of the clavicle have been traditionally treated non- operatively but has been associated with various postoperative complications. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of the operative management and compare its results with conservative treatment considering it as standard treatment option.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The present study was carried out at the Department of Orthopedics, DY Patil Medical College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai. Open fractures, fractures associated with complication like head injury with associated other bone injuries were included in this study. We excluded patients less than 18 years of age, patients with middle third fracture of clavicle and patients with medial end clavicle fracture. The fractures were classified according to Robinson’s classification. Patients were followed up every week for 4 weeks then at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. The functional outcomes were assessed by Constant and Murley score.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> We included 48 patients in the study, 34 of which were males, average age of the patients was 37.53±7.64 years. 23 injuries were on the left. There was statistically significant better union times with operative management (p=0.034). Various complications were observed like infection, implant failure, man union, non-union, deformity and skin infections, statistically seen more in patients who underwent conservative management. Overall, patients experienced excellent and good results with operative management in 6 and 12 patients respectively.</p><strong>Conclusions:</strong>Operative treatment gave statistically significant functional outcome and early healing compared to conservatively treated in displaced, communited lateral end clavicle fractures. <p> </p>



Injury ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1104-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Bhardwaj ◽  
Gaurav Sharma ◽  
Ashok Patil ◽  
Vaijnath Rahate


Injury ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koushik Narayan Subramanyam ◽  
Abhishek Vasant Mundargi ◽  
K.U. Gopakumar ◽  
Thatipamula Bharath ◽  
Milind Vittal Prabhu ◽  
...  


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harish S. Hosalkar ◽  
Gaurav Parikh ◽  
Bernd Bittersohl

The literature available on patient-orientated outcomes of operative management for clavicle fractures in adolescents is fairly limited. Open surgical treatment of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle continues to be a topic of controversy. Traditional treatment of clavicle fractures has been via non-operative methods in both children and adults. Management in adolescent patients remains controversial, and rightly so, as the traditional experience from non-operative methods has been regarded as satisfactory, while the literature on the more recent approach towards fixing some of these fractures is evolving. We present a review of relevant literature.



2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2f) ◽  
pp. 594-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish M Patel ◽  
Jignesh J Patel ◽  
Anshul K Gupta ◽  
Shaishav S Shah ◽  
Sunny Shethna


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document