scholarly journals Development and validation of the General Rehabilitation Adherence Scale (GRAS) in patients attending physical therapy clinics for musculoskeletal disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atta Abbas Naqvi ◽  
Mohamed Azmi Hassali ◽  
Syed Baqir Shyum Naqvi ◽  
Sadia Shakeel ◽  
Madiha Zia ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 110-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Weinman ◽  
Selina Graham ◽  
Martha Canfield ◽  
Maria Kleinstäuber ◽  
Anna I. Perera ◽  
...  

Physiotherapy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Kolt ◽  
Britton W. Brewer ◽  
Tania Pizzari ◽  
Adrian M.M. Schoo ◽  
Nick Garrett

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1463-1471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Piano ◽  
Filippo Maselli ◽  
Antonello Viceconti ◽  
Silvia Gianola ◽  
Aldo Ciuro

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e50328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxv Yin ◽  
Xiaochen Tu ◽  
Yeqing Tong ◽  
Rui Yang ◽  
Yunxia Wang ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Brouwer ◽  
Renée-Louise Franche ◽  
Sheilah Hogg-Johnson ◽  
Hyunmi Lee ◽  
Niklas Krause ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 672-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Riddle ◽  
Paul W. Stratford ◽  
Tracy L. Carter ◽  
Joshua A. Cleland

BackgroundThe Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log (OPTIMAL) is a recently developed self-report outcome instrument designed to measure the extent of activity limitation as defined by the World Health Organization.ObjectiveThe purposes of the study were to replicate some aspects of the original study of the OPTIMAL Difficulty and Confidence scales and to conduct additional psychometric tests.DesignA cross-sectional design was used in the study.MethodsOf a total of 1,150 patients who received treatment at 4 outpatient centers over the study period, 1,030 patients were recruited for this study and completed the OPTIMAL instrument and previously validated region-specific functional status measures. A variety of analytic methods were used to examine the extent of redundancy between the OPTIMAL Difficulty and Confidence scales, as well as the internal consistency reliability, standard error of measurement, known-groups validity, and convergent validity of OPTIMAL Difficulty Scale scores.ResultsThe OPTIMAL Difficulty and Confidence scale scores were found in a factor analysis to be load-based on anatomical region rather than on difficulty and confidence concepts. Internal consistency reliability for the subscales of the Confidence Scale varied and was .80 or higher for the lower-extremity subscale but .50 or less for the trunk and upper-extremity subscales.LimitationsOnly cross-sectional relationships were examined, and another pure measure of activity limitation was not used for comparison.ConclusionsThe findings generally did not support the psychometric properties of the OPTIMAL instrument. Although not conclusive, the data suggested that the OPTIMAL Difficulty and Confidence scales demonstrate substantial overlap. Reliability was generally low, with the exception of the lower-extremity subscale. Scores for the subscales of the Difficulty Scale differentiated among patients with lower-extremity versus trunk or upper-extremity diagnoses, but associations with previously validated region-specific measures were generally weak or absent. Clinicians treating outpatients with musculoskeletal disorders should consider alternative measures when attempting to quantify the extent of activity limitations.


Author(s):  
Filippo Maselli ◽  
Leonardo Piano ◽  
Simone Cecchetto ◽  
Lorenzo Storari ◽  
Giacomo Rossettini ◽  
...  

Direct access to physical therapy (DAPT) is the patient’s ability to self-refer to a physical therapist, without previous consultation from any other professional. This model of care has been implemented in many healthcare systems since it has demonstrated better outcomes than traditional models of care. The model of DAPT mainly focuses on the management of musculoskeletal disorders, with a huge epidemiological burden and worldwide healthcare systems workload. Among the healthcare professionals, physical therapists are one of the most accessed for managing pain and disability related to musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, the most updated guidelines recommend DAPT as a first-line treatment because of its cost-effectiveness, safety, and patients’ satisfaction compared to other interventions. DAPT was also adopted to efficiently face the diffuse crisis of the declining number of general practitioners, reducing their caseload by directly managing patients’ musculoskeletal disorders traditionally seen by general practitioners. World Physiotherapy organization also advocates DAPT as a new approach, with physical therapy in a primary care pathway to better control healthcare expenses. Thus, it is unclear why the Italian institutions have decided to recognize new professions instead of focusing on the growth of physical therapy, a long-established and autonomous health profession. Furthermore, it is unclear why DAPT is still not fully recognized, considering the historical context and its evidence. The future is now: although still preliminary, the evidence supporting DAPT is promising. Hard skills, academic paths, scientific evidence, and the legislature argue that this paradigm shift should occur in Italy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document