scholarly journals Independent and sensitive gait parameters for objective evaluation in knee and hip osteoarthritis using wearable sensors

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon J. Boekesteijn ◽  
José M. H. Smolders ◽  
Vincent J. J. F. Busch ◽  
Alexander C. H. Geurts ◽  
Katrijn Smulders

Abstract Background Although it is well-established that osteoarthritis (OA) impairs daily-life gait, objective gait assessments are not part of routine clinical evaluation. Wearable inertial sensors provide an easily accessible and fast way to routinely evaluate gait quality in clinical settings. However, during these assessments, more complex and meaningful aspects of daily-life gait, including turning, dual-task performance, and upper body motion, are often overlooked. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate turning, dual-task performance, and upper body motion in individuals with knee or hip OA in addition to more commonly assessed spatiotemporal gait parameters using wearable sensors. Methods Gait was compared between individuals with unilateral knee (n = 25) or hip OA (n = 26) scheduled for joint replacement, and healthy controls (n = 27). For 2 min, participants walked back and forth along a 6-m trajectory making 180° turns, with and without a secondary cognitive task. Gait parameters were collected using 4 inertial measurement units on the feet and trunk. To test if dual-task gait, turning, and upper body motion had added value above spatiotemporal parameters, a factor analysis was conducted. Effect sizes were computed as standardized mean difference between OA groups and healthy controls to identify parameters from these gait domains that were sensitive to knee or hip OA. Results Four independent domains of gait were obtained: speed-spatial, speed-temporal, dual-task cost, and upper body motion. Turning parameters constituted a gait domain together with cadence. From the domains that were obtained, stride length (speed-spatial) and cadence (speed-temporal) had the strongest effect sizes for both knee and hip OA. Upper body motion (lumbar sagittal range of motion), showed a strong effect size when comparing hip OA with healthy controls. Parameters reflecting dual-task cost were not sensitive to knee or hip OA. Conclusions Besides more commonly reported spatiotemporal parameters, only upper body motion provided non-redundant and sensitive parameters representing gait adaptations in individuals with hip OA. Turning parameters were sensitive to knee and hip OA, but were not independent from speed-related gait parameters. Dual-task parameters had limited additional value for evaluating gait in knee and hip OA, although dual-task cost constituted a separate gait domain. Future steps should include testing responsiveness of these gait domains to interventions aiming to improve mobility.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Boekesteijn ◽  
J.M.H. Smolders ◽  
V.J.J.F. Busch ◽  
A.C.H. Geurts ◽  
K. Smulders

AbstractObjectiveTo identify non-redundant gait parameters sensitive to end-stage knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA), with a specific focus on turning, dual task performance, and upper body motion in addition to straight-ahead gait.DesignGait was compared between individuals with unilateral, end-stage knee (n=25) or hip OA (n=26) scheduled for joint replacement, and healthy controls (n=27). For 2 minutes, subjects walked back-and-forth along a 6 meter trajectory making 180° turns, with and without a secondary cognitive task. Gait parameters were collected using 4 inertial measurement units on the feet and trunk. The dataset was reduced using factor analysis. One gait parameter from each factor was selected based on factor loading and effect size of the comparison between OA groups and healthy controls.ResultsFour independent domains of gait were obtained: speed-spatial, speed-temporal, dual task cost, and upper body motion. Turning parameters did not constitute a separate domain. From these domains, stride length (speed-spatial) and cadence (speed-temporal) had the strongest factor loadings and effect sizes for both knee and hip OA, and lumbar sagittal range of motion (upper body motion) for hip OA only.ConclusionsStride length, cadence, and lumbar sagittal range of motion were non-redundant and sensitive parameters, representing gait adaptations in individuals with knee or hip OA. Turning or dual task parameters had no additional value for evaluating gait in knee and hip OA. These findings hold promise for the objective evaluation of gait in the clinic. Future steps should include testing of responsiveness to interventions aiming to improve mobility.


Author(s):  
Oscar Crisafulli ◽  
Carlo Trompetto ◽  
Luca Puce ◽  
Lucio Marinelli ◽  
Stefania Costi ◽  
...  

AbstractDay-to-day walking-related activities frequently involve the simultaneous performance of two or more tasks (i.e., dual task). Dual task ability is influenced by higher order cognitive and cortical control mechanisms. Recently, it has been shown that the concomitant execution of an attention-demanding task affected postural control in subject with cervical dystonia (CD). However, no study has investigated whether dual tasking might deteriorate gait performance in CD patients. To investigate whether adding a concomitant motor and cognitive tasks could affect walking performance in CD subjects.17 CD patients and 19 healthy subjects (HS) participated in this pilot case–control study. Gait performance was evaluated during four walking tasks: usual, fast, cognitive dual task and obstacle negotiation. Spatiotemporal parameters, dual-task cost and coefficients of variability (CV%) were measured by GaitRite® and were used to detect differences between groups. Balance performance was also assessed with Mini-BEST and Four Step Square tests. In CD participants, correlation analysis was computed between gait parameters and clinical data. Significant differences in complex gait and balance performance were found between groups. CD patients showed lower speed, longer stance time and higher CV% and dual-task cost compared to HS. In CD, altered gait parameters correlated with balance performance and were not associated with clinical features of CD. Our findings suggest that complex walking performance is impaired in patients with CD and that balance and gait deficits might be related


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 2891-2896
Author(s):  
Binita Lama ◽  
◽  
Paul Daniel VK ◽  
Priya Desai ◽  
◽  
...  

Motor Control ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-604
Author(s):  
Jongil Lim ◽  
Jiyeon Kim ◽  
Kyoungho Seo ◽  
Richard E.A. van Emmerik ◽  
Sukho Lee

The aim of this study was to examine how usage of mobile devices while simultaneously walking affects walking characteristics and texting performance of normal weight (NW) and obese (OB) individuals. Thirty-two OB (body mass index [BMI] = 34.4) and NW (BMI = 22.7) adults performed two 60-s walking trials at three-step frequencies along a rectangular walkway in two conditions (No Texting and Texting). Dual-task cost as well as unadjusted spatial and temporal gait characteristics were measured. Dual-task costs for the gait parameters as well as texting performance were not different between the groups, except for the lateral step variability showing a larger variability at the preferred frequency in OB individuals. For the unadjusted variables, OB exhibited longer double support, longer stance time, and lower turn velocity compared with NW. Overall, the results highlight a similar dual-task cost for the OB individuals compared with the NW individuals, in spite of underlying differences in gait mechanics.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Foley ◽  
Reiner Kaschel ◽  
Sergio Della Sala

Several studies have found dual tasking to be impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but unaffected by healthy ageing. It is not known if this deficit is specific to AD, or also present in other neurodegenerative disorders that can occur in later life, such as Parkinson's disease (PD). Therefore, this study investigated dual tasking in 13 people with PD, 26 AD and 42 healthy age-matched controls. The people with AD demonstrated a specific impairment in dual tasking, which worsened with increasing disease severity. The people with PD did not demonstrate any deficits in dual tasking ability, when compared to healthy controls, suggesting that the dual task impairment is specific to AD.


Basal Ganglia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Gaßner ◽  
Franz Marxreiter ◽  
Zacharias Kohl ◽  
Johannes Schlachetzki ◽  
Bjoern Eskofier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marek Zak ◽  
Szymon Krupnik ◽  
Waldemar Brola ◽  
Dorota Rebak ◽  
Tomasz Sikorski ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) affects 10–20% of the individuals over the age of 65; this proportion being higher in the institutional care facilities than within a general population. Aim To assess whether dual-task cost in the individuals affected by MCI depends exclusively on gait, or possibly some other functional capacity components might also come into play, as compared to the healthy controls also remaining in the institutional care. Methods The study was conducted in five nursing facilities, involving 88 subjects in total, i.e. 44 subjects affected by MCI (mean age of 83.8 years; 34 women (77.3%) and 10 men (22.7%), and 44 healthy controls (mean age 81.67 years; 38 women (84.4%) and 7 men (15.6%). Cognitive functions were assessed through Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE), while gait by Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT). Gait speed was calculated by the 10 Meter Walk Test, and the fear of falling with the Falls Efficacy Scale International. Dual tasks were assessed by TUGTMAN (Timed Up and Go Test Manual) and TUGCOG (Timed Up and Go Test Cognitive). Dual Task Cost (DTC) of TUGTMAN and TUGTCOG was established. Statistical analyses were completed with STATISTICA Package v. 10. Results Individuals affected by MCI differed significantly from the unaffected ones with regard to their gait test results, when assigned a single-task activity, and dual-task activities, as well as in the gait speed. Dual Task Cost Manual (DTCMAN) in the MCI group was significantly higher, as compared to the subjects unaffected by MCI. Around 25% of the variance of DTCMAN result regarding the MCI group was accounted for by gait performance in the single-task conditions (TUGT). In the case of Dual Task Cost Cognitive (DTCCOG), this value equalled to approx. 10%. A 1% change in DTCMAN corresponded to approx. 0.5 s change in TUGT, whereas a 1% change in DTCCOG entailed approx. 0.35 s change in TUGT walking time. Conclusion Individual functional capacity affected the dual-task performance, especially the motor-motor tasks. Dual-task cost in the subjects affected by MCI was significantly reduced, being more dependent on the gait speed in the motor-motor tasks, which entailed visual memory, than in the motor-cognitive tasks.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Cristina Udina ◽  
Emmeline Ayers ◽  
Marco Inzitari ◽  
Joe Verghese

Background: Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) combines slow gait and cognitive complaints and has been proposed as a predementia syndrome. The nature of dual-task performance in MCR has not been established. Objective: To assess differences in dual-task performance between participants with and without MCR and to study the prefrontal cortex (PFC)-based brain activity during dual-task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Methods: Cohort study of community-dwelling non-demented older adults included in the “Central Control of Mobility in Aging” study. Comprehensive assessment included global cognition and executive function tests along with clinical variables. Dual-task paradigm consisted in walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet (WWT) on an electronic walkway. We compared dual-task performance between MCR (n = 60) and No MCR (n = 478) participants and assessed the relationship of dual-task performance with cognitive function. In a subsample, we compared PFC oxygenation during WWT between MCR (n = 32) and No MCR (n = 293). Results: In our sample of 538 high-functioning older adults (76.6±6.5 years), with 11.2% prevalence of MCR, dual-task cost was not significantly different, compared to No MCR participants. Among MCR participants, no significant relationship was found between WWT velocity and cognitive function, whereas No MCR participants with better cognitive function showed faster WWT velocities. PFC oxygenation during WWT was higher in MCR compared to No MCR (1.02±1.25 versus 0.66±0.83, p = 0.03). Conclusion: MCR participants showed no significant differences in the dual-task cost while exhibiting higher PFC oxygenation during dual-task walking. The dual-task performance (WWT velocity) in MCR participants was not related to cognition.


Motor Control ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Cagla Ozkul ◽  
Arzu Guclu-Gunduz ◽  
Kader Eldemir ◽  
Yasemin Apaydin ◽  
Cagri Gulsen ◽  
...  

This study aimed to investigate the dual-task cost of both motor and cognitive performances in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and in healthy controls and to determine their relationships with clinical features in PwMS. The participants performed motor tasks (postural stability, walking, and manual dexterity) and cognitive tasks (mental tracking and verbal fluency) under single- and dual-task conditions. The results showed that postural stability under dual-task conditions did not change, whereas walking and manual dexterity deteriorated, regardless of the concurrent cognitive task, in PwMS (median Expanded Disability Status Scale score: 1) and the healthy controls. Verbal fluency decreased during postural stability, whereas it increased during walking, and it was maintained during manual dexterity in both groups. Mental tracking did not change during walking; it declined during manual dexterity in both groups. Mental tracking during postural stability deteriorated in PwMS, while it did not change in the healthy controls. In general, dual-task costs were associated with baseline performances of tasks rather than clinical features. Therefore, baseline performances of both tasks should be increased for improving dual-task performance in PwMS.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S77-S77
Author(s):  
A. Oliveira-Maia ◽  
I. Coelho ◽  
J.B. Barahona-Corrêa ◽  
V. Paixão ◽  
M. Camacho ◽  
...  

IntroductionMethods for measuring cognitive reserve (CR) are limited and controversial. Dual task cost (DTC) paradigms, assessing links between gait and cognition, are increasingly regarded as robust measures of CR.ObjectivesHere, we aimed to validate a simplified methodology for a DTC paradigm in healthy volunteers for application in clinical settings as a measurement of CR.MethodsWe tested if subtracting by 7's (cognitive task) while walking (motor task) induced a DTC in a sample of 39 healthy young adults. For the cognitive task, we recorded the number of correct and incorrect subtractions, as well as the latency between subtractions. Gait parameters were recorded on a tri-axial accelerometer fixed to the left ankle. Both tasks were performed separately (single task) and simultaneously (double task) to assess the DTC. A battery for neuropsychological assessment and questionnaires to assess quality of life and affective symptoms were also applied, to measure possible correlations with the DTC.ResultsSubtracting 7's while walking caused significant changes in gait parameters and in cognitive task performance. A significant decrease in the autocorrelation of the accelerometer signal during the dual task was also found (DTC = 37.92 ± 7.56%; P < 0.0001). This measure has not been previously used and may be a more sensitive measure of the dual task induced disturbance of the gait periodic signal pattern. Correlations between DTC and quality of life, affective or cognitive measures were not significant.ConclusionOur study provides an effective, portable and non-intrusive DTC experimental protocol that can be easily applied in clinical settings.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document