Significant impact of three-dimensional volumetry of perinephric fat on the console time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Abstract Background To assess the impact of volumetry of perinephric fat (PNF) on the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Methods Between 2016 and 2019, a single surgeon performed RAPN for 128 patients with clinical T1a-b renal tumors at our institution, and the 70 most recent patients were included in this study to minimize the effects of surgical experience. PNF was defined as a fatty area around the kidney within the anatomical structures, including the lateroconal fascia, fusion fascia, psoas muscle, lumbar quadrate muscle and diaphragm, and its volume was calculated based on reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images using the SYNAPSE VINCENT system. Results In this series, the trifecta and MIC (margin, ischemia and complications) score system outcomes were achieved in 69 (98.6%) and 64 patients (91.4%), respectively. The median PNF volume in the 70 patients was 166.05 cm3, which was significantly correlated with both the body mass index (BMI) and Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score (correlation coefficient = 0.68 and 0.74, respectively). There was no significant difference in the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, PNF volume or console time during RAPN among 5 groups consisting of 14 consecutive patients. Of several factors examined, the console time was significantly affected by the sex, MAP score and PNF volume, and only the PNF volume was independently associated with the console time. Conclusion Even if performed by an experienced robotic surgeon beyond the initial learning curve, the PNF volume may influence the console time during RAPN.

Download Full-text

Expanding the Indications of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Highly Complex Renal Tumors: Urologists' Perception of the Impact of Hyperaccuracy Three-Dimensional Reconstruction

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques ◽

10.1089/lap.2018.0486 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 29 (2) ◽

pp. 233-239 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Riccardo Bertolo ◽

Riccardo Autorino ◽

Cristian Fiori ◽

Daniele Amparore ◽

Enrico Checcucci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Three Dimensional Reconstruction ◽

Dimensional Reconstruction ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Analysis of predictors of adherent perinephric fat and its impact on perioperative outcomes in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective case–control study

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-021-02429-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Lu Fang ◽

Huan Li ◽

Tao Zhang ◽

Rui Liu ◽

Taotao Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Warm Ischemia ◽

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Transfusion Rate ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Perinephric Fat

Abstract Background Adherent perinephric fat (APF), characterized by inflammatory fat surrounding the kidney, can limit the isolation of renal tumors and increase the operative difficulty in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of APF and its impact on perioperative outcomes during LPN. Methods A total of 215 consecutive patients undergoing LPN for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from January 2017 to June 2019 at our institute were included. We divided these patients into two groups according to the presence of APF. Radiographic data were retrospectively collected from preoperative cross-sectional imaging. The perioperative clinical parameters were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive factors of APF. Results APF was identified in 41 patients (19.1%) at the time of LPN. Univariate analysis demonstrated that APF was significantly correlated with the male gender (P = 0.001), higher body mass index (P = 0.002), lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.004), greater posterior perinephric fat thickness (P< 0.001), greater perinephric stranding (P< 0.001), and higher Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score (P< 0.001). The MAP score (P< 0.001) was the only variable that remained an independent predictor for APF in multivariate analysis. We found that patients with APF had longer operative times (P< 0.001), warm ischemia times (P = 0.001), and greater estimated blood loss (P = 0.003) than those without APF. However, there were no significant differences in surgical approach, transfusion rate, length of postoperative stay, complication rate, or surgical margin between the two groups. Conclusions Several specific clinical and radiographic factors including the MAP score can predict APF. The presence of APF is associated with an increased operative time, warm ischemia time, and greater estimated blood loss but has no impact on other perioperative outcomes in LPN.

Download Full-text

Tumor volume and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline predict renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-01539-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Haruyuki Ohsugi ◽

Kyojiro Akiyama ◽

Hisanori Taniguchi ◽

Masaaki Yanishi ◽

Motohiko Sugi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Tumor Volume ◽

Characteristic Curve ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Scoring Systems ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Perioperative Morbidity

AbstractThere are several nephrometry scoring systems for predicting surgical complexity and potential perioperative morbidity. The R.E.N.A.L. scoring system, one of the most well-known nephrometry scoring systems, emphasizes the features on which it is based (Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness to collecting system or sinus, Anterior/posterior, and Location relative to polar lines). The ability of these nephrometry scoring systems to predict loss of renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) remains controversial. Therefore, we verified which combination of factors from nephrometry scoring systems, including tumor volume, was the most significant predictor of postoperative renal function. Patients who underwent RPN for cT1 renal tumors in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively (n = 163). The preoperative clinical data (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], comorbidities, and nephrometry scoring systems including R.E.N.A.L.) and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. We also calculated the tumor volume using the equation applied to an ellipsoid by three-dimensional computed tomography. The primary outcome was reduced eGFR, which was defined as an eGFR reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline to 6 months after RPN. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between preoperative variables and reduced eGFR. Of 163 patients, 24 (14.7%) had reduced eGFR. Multivariable analyses indicated that tumor volume (cutoff value ≥ 14.11 cm3, indicating a sphere with a diameter ≥ approximately 3 cm) and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline were independent factors associated with a reduced eGFR (odds ratio [OR] 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69–12.30; P = 0.003 and OR 3.50; 95% CI 1.30–9.46; P = 0.034, respectively). Our classification system using these two factors showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than previous nephrometry scoring systems (AUC = 0.786 vs. 0.653–0.719), and it may provide preoperative information for counseling patients about renal function after RPN.

Download Full-text

Three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: an empirical analysis of 290 patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-26361/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Feiya Yang ◽

Lianjie Mou ◽

Nianzeng Xing

Keyword(s):

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Preoperative Evaluation ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Intraoperative Ultrasound ◽

Operation Time ◽

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A

Abstract Objective To explore the feasibility of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy(LPN) in the treatment of renal hilar tumors. Methods Clinical data of 290 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from January 2013 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 27 patients with renal hilar tumors and 263 patients with non-hilar renal tumors. Perioperative data and follow-up results were compared between the two groups. Results Tumor size in Group A is smaller(2.97±0.88 vs 3.55±1.46,p<0.05), R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of Group A is higher(8.4±1.3 vs 6.5±1.7,p<0.01).The operation time, WIT and intraoperative blood loss in the Group A were slightly higher, but with no statistical difference (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative ultrasound rate, collection system repair rate, drainage time,postoperative hospital stay, and eGFR changes (p>0.05).The median follow-up period was 40 months. One patient with postoperative pathologic report of angiomyolipoma was found tumor recurrence and was currently undergoing regular reexamination. Conclusion Three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors is safe and feasible after detailed preoperative evaluation of the tumor and selection of appropriate surgical strategies.

Download Full-text