scholarly journals Findings from a three-round Delphi study: essential topics for interprofessional training on complementary and integrative medicine

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Homberg ◽  
Nadja Klafke ◽  
Svetla Loukanova ◽  
Katharina Glassen
Keyword(s):  
Complementary Medicine ◽  
Integrative Medicine ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Natural Medicine ◽  
Interprofessional Training ◽  
Therapeutic Concepts ◽  
Complementary And Integrative Medicine

Abstract Background Integrating complementary medicine into medical care promotes patient-oriented care. A well-informed and collaborative professional healthcare team is essential for effective and patient-safe implementation of these methods. At present, the skills for patient counseling, therapy and care regarding complementary medicine vary among the professional groups involved. Professionals generally feel that they are not sufficiently qualified in this area. Curricular concepts for Complementary and Integrative Medicine (CIM) are virtually non-existent in undergraduate interprofessional training. The aim of this study is to initiate a consensus-building process between various experts (professionals, students, patient and faculty representatives) in order to identify which topics should be the focus of such a curriculum. Methods A three-round Delphi study was carried out from March 2018 to March 2019 to compile the experience and knowledge of experts in the field of integrative patient care and interprofessional education. Sixty-five experts from Germany and German-speaking Switzerland with various professional backgrounds and experiences were asked to name general content, therapy methods and treatment reasons which should be addressed in interprofessional seminars. In the subsequent rounds these were rated on a seven-point Likert scale. The ratings were assigned to relevance groups and discussed in a final workshop in July 2019. Results The response rates for the three rounds were 76% (n = 50), 80% (n = 40) 90% (n = 36); and 21% (n = 11) for the final workshop. The experts suggested that topics could be aligned along the most common treatment reasons such as insomnia, generalized pain, fatigue and back pain. However, it is important that students also receive an overview of the evidence base for different therapeutic concepts, especially in the field of classical natural medicine, acupuncture and mind-body medicine, and that they get an overview of the effects and interactions of frequently used procedures. Conclusion Consensus was reached among the various experts on the most important topics for an interprofessional CIM curriculum. The systematic evaluation of the topics in this study can help to create a curriculum that achieves a high level of acceptance among teachers, lecturers and students, and thus facilitates implementation at universities and medical faculties.

Advancing medical education: connecting interprofessional collaboration and education opportunities with integrative medicine initiatives to build shared learning

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Templeman ◽  
Anske Robinson ◽  
Lisa McKenna
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Integrative Medicine ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Medical Curriculum ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Grounded Theory Method

AbstractBackgroundImproved teamwork between conventional and complementary medicine (CM) practitioners is indicated to achieve effective healthcare. However, little is known about interprofessional collaboration and education in the context of integrative medicine (IM).MethodsThis paper reports the findings from a constructivist-grounded theory method study that explored and highlighted Australian medical students’ experiences and opportunities for linking interprofessional collaboration and learning in the context of IM. Following ethical approval, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 medical students from 10 medical education faculties across Australian universities.ResultsMedical students recognised the importance of interprofessional teamwork between general medical practitioners and CM professionals in patient care and described perspectives of shared responsibilities, profession-specific responsibilities, and collaborative approaches within IM. While students identified that limited interprofessional collaboration currently occurred in the medical curriculum, interprofessional education was considered a means of increasing communication and collaboration between healthcare professionals, helping coordinate effective patient care, and understanding each healthcare team members’ professional role and value.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that medical curricula should include opportunities for medical students to develop required skills, behaviours, and attitudes for interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education within the context of IM. While this is a qualitative study that reflects theoretical saturation from a selected cohort of medical students, the results also point to the importance of including CM professionals within interprofessional collaboration, thus contributing to more person-centred care.

Role competencies in interprofessional undergraduate education in complementary and integrative medicine: A Delphi study

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 102542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Homberg ◽  
Nadja Klafke ◽  
Katharina Glassen ◽  
Svetla Loukanova ◽  
Cornelia Mahler
Keyword(s):  
Integrative Medicine ◽  
Undergraduate Education ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Complementary And Integrative Medicine

scholarly journals GAINING INTERPROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE THROUGH A GERIATRICS CASE CONFERENCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S151-S151
Author(s):  
Amber S McIlwain ◽  
Danielle Backus ◽  
Kristine Marcus ◽  
Jeff Fortner
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Case Conference ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Geriatric Disorder ◽  
Positive Response Rate ◽  
Care Conference

Abstract There is increased demand to provide health professions students with interprofessional education and practice experience. Interprofessional Case Conferences (ICC) allow students to work in teams to learn about different professions while exploring a topic through the lens of an interprofessional core competency. The goal of this particular ICC was to provide students an experience to witness and discuss team-based, person-centered care for a common geriatric disorder. The case was designed to develop the interprofessional competency of teams and teamwork. Students were divided into teams and observed live vignettes of a care conference involving an 80-year old female admitted to a rehabilitation facility following a hip fracture and replacement. Students witnessed how patients, families, and healthcare providers work together during a stressful time. After each vignette, students discussed questions related to miscommunications, motivations of the different actors involved, and how the healthcare team should respond. In the first offering, 93 students participated, increasing to 150 in the next year. Students completed a post-survey to determine if the session delivered a positive interprofessional experience. The average positive response rate was 92.5% (92-94%, n = 53) in year-1 and 93.5% (90-97%, n = 71) in year-2. By allowing students to witness a simulated live care conference, they had a tangible event to dissect instead of discussing hypotheticals. By discussing a geriatrics case in a rehabilitation setting, students witnessed how numerous healthcare professions coordinate care for a patient and her family, thereby demonstrating competence in teamwork.

scholarly journals Expanding Workforce Capacity to Care for Older Veterans: The VA GRECC Interprofessional Training Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Kathryn Nearing ◽  
Sumathi Misra ◽  
Katharina Echt
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Research Education ◽  
Core Curricula ◽  
Interprofessional Training ◽  
Clinical Center ◽  
Workforce Capacity ◽  
Competency Domains

Abstract The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) contributes more to training healthcare professionals in geriatrics/gerontology than any other entity nationally, with the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) network serving as a leader in geriatric-/gerontology-specific interprofessional education. The Associated Health Training (AHT) Program is supported by all GRECCs, training ~427 trainees annually (FY17). Each AHT program brings together a diverse array of trainees – the specific constellation of disciplines unique to each GRECC based on local capacity/expertise. Common to all programs is intentional interprofessional training, aligned with Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) competencies. In 2016, the VA Office of Academic Affiliations (OAA) administered a 22-item survey to characterize the depth and breadth of geriatric-/gerontologic-specific interprofessional education across GRECCs. Questions explored how AHT programs addressed each of the four IPEC competency domains. Responses were de-identified; at least 2 coders independently applied directed coding to responses. Across GRECCs (n=18), 323 interprofessional training activities were coded, of which 9% were didactic; 27%, clinical; and, 63%, combination. Interprofessional education activities were integrated with profession-specific curricula (65.3%) or featured as part of GRECC-specific core curricula (5.4%). GRECC AHT interprofessional programs involved an average of 11 disciplines. GRECC AHT programs provide a vital infrastructure for building workforce capacity through robust, interprofessional training that engages diverse disciplines across a variety of care settings representing the continuum of care for older Veterans. GRECC and OAA efforts are critical to enhancing the quality, and expanding the capacity, of this workforce to meet increasing needs for patient-directed, team-based care for older adults.

scholarly journals A Structured Curriculum for Interprofessional Training of Emergency Medicine Interns

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Rider ◽  
Tiffany Anaebere ◽  
Mariko Nomura ◽  
David Duong ◽  
Charlotte Wills
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Registered Nursing ◽  
Interprofessional Training ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Team Based Care ◽  
Improve Health

Interprofessional education (IPE) has been shown to improve health outcomes and patient satisfaction. IPE is now represented in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s emergency medicine (EM) milestones given the team-based nature of EM. The Highland Allied Health Rotation Program (H-AHRP) was developed by residents to enhance and standardize IPE for EM residents in a single hospital setting. H-AHRP was incorporated into the orientation month for interns starting in the summer of 2016. EM interns were paired with emergency department preceptors in registered nursing (RN), respiratory therapy (RT), pharmacy (PH), laboratory (LAB), and social work (SW) in either a four-hour shadowing experience (RN, RT, PH) or lecture-based overview (LAB, SW). We conducted a survey before and after the program. Overall, the EM interns reported an improved understanding of the scope of practice and day-to-day logistics after working with the preceptors. They found the program helpful to their future as physicians and would recommend it to other residencies. The H-AHRP program allows for the early incorporation of IPE into EM training, enhances interns’ understanding of both the scope and logistics of their colleagues, and is a well-received effort at improving team-based care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document