scholarly journals Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minjian Chen ◽  
Chunhui Ni ◽  
Yanhui Hu ◽  
Meilin Wang ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew McNeill ◽  
Sayed K. Ali ◽  
Daniel E. Banks ◽  
Ishak A. Mansi

Abstract Background Morning report is accepted as an essential component of residency education throughout different parts of the world. Objective To review the evidence of the educational value, purpose, methods, and outcomes of morning report. Methods A literature search of PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library for English-language studies published between January 1, 1966, and October 31, 2011, was performed. We searched for keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms related to medical education, methods, attitudes, and outcomes in regard to “morning report.” Title and abstract review, followed by a full-text review by 3 authors, was performed to identify all pertinent articles. Results We identified 71 citations; 40 articles were original studies and 31 were commentaries, editorials, or review articles; 56 studies (79%) originated from internal medicine residency programs; 6 studies (8%) focused on ambulatory morning report; and 63 (89%) originated from the United States. Identified studies varied in objectives, methods, and outcome measures, and were not suitable for meta-analysis. Main outcome measures were resident satisfaction, faculty satisfaction, preparation for professional examinations, use of evidence-based medicine, clinical effects on patient care, adverse event detection, and utilization of a curriculum in case selection. Conclusions Morning report has heterogeneous purposes, methods, and settings. As an educational tool, morning report is challenging to define, its outcome is difficult to measure, and this precludes firm conclusions about its contribution to resident education or patient care. Residency programs should tailor morning report to meet their own unique educational objectives and needs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Lio ◽  
Xiaohong Ning ◽  
Lianlian Wu ◽  
Ling Fu ◽  
Renslow Sherer ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243897
Author(s):  
Junwei Gao ◽  
Ling Yang ◽  
Jinghui Zhao ◽  
Lian Wang ◽  
Jiao Zou ◽  
...  

Background PBL approach has been widely used in many Chinese universities over the past decade. However, the effects of PBL approach on medical psychology education in China are inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether the PBL approach was superior to the lecture-based teaching method in the context of the medical psychology curriculum in China. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to confirm the effectiveness of PBL in Chinese medical psychology. Corresponding databases were searched for available studies, where data were extracted to calculated Hedges’ g and its 95% confidence interval in total and subgroup analyses. Subgroup analyses were also carried out. Results Nine studies with 551 cases and 496 controls were identified. The total examination scores of students in the PBL approach group were significantly higher compared with students in the traditional lecture-based teaching group under the random effect model (Hedges’ g = 1.510, 95%CI 0.792–2.227, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses based on major and school system exhibited similar results. Conclusions Our study supported the notion that the PBL approach may be applicable to Chinese medical psychology education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document