scholarly journals J-curve relationship between long term glycemic control and mortality in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ik Jun Choi ◽  
Eun Ho Choo ◽  
Hwa Jung Kim ◽  
Sungmin Lim ◽  
Donggyu Moon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Strict Glycemic Control ◽  
J Curve ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Intensive glycemic control is generally recommended for diabetic patients to reduce complications. However, the role of glycemic control in the mortality in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remained unclear. Methods We selected diabetic patients who measured HbA1c more than 3 times after AMI among 10,719 patients enrolled in the multicenter AMI registry. Patients (n = 1384) were categorized into five groups: according to mean HbA1c level: ≤ 6.5%, > 6.5 to ≤ 7.0%, > 7.0 to ≤ 7.5%, > 7.5 to ≤ 8.0% and > 8.0%. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results During a median follow-up of 6.2 years, the patients with a mean HbA1c of 6.5 to 7.0% had the lowest all-cause mortality. Compared to patients with mean HbA1c of 6.5 to 7.0%, the risk of all-cause mortality increased in subjects with mean HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–3.95) and in those with mean HbA1c > 8.0% (adjusted HR 3.35, 95% CI 1.78–6.29). In the subgroup analysis by age, the J-curve relationship between mean HbA1c and all-cause mortality was accentuated in elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years), while there was no difference in all-cause mortality across the HbA1c groups in younger patients (age < 65 years). Conclusions The less strict glycemic control in diabetic patients with AMI would be optimal for preventing mortality, especially in elderly patients.

CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AMONG CARDIAC REHABILITATION AND NON CARDIAC REHABILITATION GROUPS-A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-27
Author(s):  
Saroj Mandal ◽  
Vignesh. R ◽  
Sidnath Singh
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

OBJECTIVES To determine clinical outcome and to nd out the association between participation of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in cardiac rehabilitation programme. DESIGN A Prospective observational study. STUDY AREA : Department of Cardiology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research,Kolkata. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent PCI due to AMI. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcomes were subsequent myocardial infarction, revascularisation, all-cause readmission, cardiac readmission, all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. RESULT: The data of 1107 patients were included and 60.07%% of them participated in CR program. The risks of revascularisation, all cause readmission and cardiac readmission among CR participants were compared. The results of those analysis were consistent and showed that the CR participants had lower allcause mortality ,cardiac mortality,all cause readmission, cardiac admission. However no effect was observed for subsequent myocardial infarction or revascularisation. CONCLUSIONS: It was suggested CR participation may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality ,cardiac mortality, all cause readmission and cardiac admission.

scholarly journals Prognostic Analysis for Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao-Jen Lin ◽  
Chun-Yu Chen ◽  
Hau-De Lin ◽  
Han-Ping Wu
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Syntax Score ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Long-term outcome and adverse predictors for outcomes in AMI patients with CS receiving percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are unclear. A total of 482 AMI patients who received PCI were collected, including 53 CS and 429 non-CS. Predictors for AMI patients with CS including recurrent MI, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, all-cause mortality, and repeated-PCI were analyzed. The CS group had a lower central systolic pressure and central diastolic pressure (both P<0.001). AMI patients with hypertension history were less prone to develop CS (P<0.001). Calcium channel blockers and statins were less frequently used by the CS group than the non-CS group (both P<0.05) after discharge. Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality were higher in the CS group than the non-CS group (all P<0.005). For patients with CS, stroke history was a predictor of recurrent MI (P=0.036). CS, age, SYNTAX score, and diabetes were predictors of CV mortality (all P<0.05). CS, age, SYNTAX score, and stroke history were predictors for all-cause mortality (all P<0.05). CS, age, and current smoking were predictors for repeated-PCI (all P<0.05).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document