CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AMONG CARDIAC REHABILITATION AND NON CARDIAC REHABILITATION GROUPS-A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-27
Author(s):  
Saroj Mandal ◽  
Vignesh. R ◽  
Sidnath Singh
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

OBJECTIVES To determine clinical outcome and to nd out the association between participation of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in cardiac rehabilitation programme. DESIGN A Prospective observational study. STUDY AREA : Department of Cardiology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research,Kolkata. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent PCI due to AMI. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcomes were subsequent myocardial infarction, revascularisation, all-cause readmission, cardiac readmission, all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. RESULT: The data of 1107 patients were included and 60.07%% of them participated in CR program. The risks of revascularisation, all cause readmission and cardiac readmission among CR participants were compared. The results of those analysis were consistent and showed that the CR participants had lower allcause mortality ,cardiac mortality,all cause readmission, cardiac admission. However no effect was observed for subsequent myocardial infarction or revascularisation. CONCLUSIONS: It was suggested CR participation may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality ,cardiac mortality, all cause readmission and cardiac admission.

scholarly journals In-hospital cardiac rehabilitation and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e039096
Author(s):  
Natsuko Kanazawa ◽  
Hiroaki Iijima ◽  
Kiyohide Fushimi
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectivesTo verify the associations between participation in an in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme and clinical outcomes among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).DesignA retrospective cohort study using the Japanese administrative claims database.SettingJapanese acute-care hospitals.ParticipantsPatients aged ≥18 years who underwent PCI due to AMI and survived to discharge.Primary and secondary outcome measureThe primary outcomes were revascularisation, all-cause readmission and cardiac readmission (median follow-up period: 324 days, 236 days and 263 days, respectively). The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality (median follow-up period: both were 460 days).ResultThe data of 13 697 patients were extracted from the database, and 65.4% of them participated in an in-hospital CR. The risks of revascularisation, all-cause readmission and cardiac readmission among CR participants were compared with those of non-participants using two statistical techniques: matched-pair analysis based on propensity score and a 30-day landmark analysis. The results of those analysis were consistent and showed that the CR participants had lower risk of revascularisation (adjusted HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.84), all-cause readmission (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.88) and cardiac readmission (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.85). However, all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality were not associated with participation in the CR.ConclusionsIt was suggested that in-hospital CR participation may reduce the risk of revascularisation, all-cause readmission and cardiac readmission among patients with AMI after PCI. In-hospital CR may expand the potential benefits of CR in addition to outpatient CR.

scholarly journals Prognostic Analysis for Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao-Jen Lin ◽  
Chun-Yu Chen ◽  
Hau-De Lin ◽  
Han-Ping Wu
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Syntax Score ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Long-term outcome and adverse predictors for outcomes in AMI patients with CS receiving percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are unclear. A total of 482 AMI patients who received PCI were collected, including 53 CS and 429 non-CS. Predictors for AMI patients with CS including recurrent MI, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, all-cause mortality, and repeated-PCI were analyzed. The CS group had a lower central systolic pressure and central diastolic pressure (both P<0.001). AMI patients with hypertension history were less prone to develop CS (P<0.001). Calcium channel blockers and statins were less frequently used by the CS group than the non-CS group (both P<0.05) after discharge. Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality were higher in the CS group than the non-CS group (all P<0.005). For patients with CS, stroke history was a predictor of recurrent MI (P=0.036). CS, age, SYNTAX score, and diabetes were predictors of CV mortality (all P<0.05). CS, age, SYNTAX score, and stroke history were predictors for all-cause mortality (all P<0.05). CS, age, and current smoking were predictors for repeated-PCI (all P<0.05).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document