Spanish version of the screening Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation

A recent line of research concerns bedtime procrastination, its effects on sleep quality and duration, and the associated repercussions for health and wellbeing. The Bedtime Procrastination Scale is a brief, self-report instrument developed by Kroese et al. with the aim of evaluating this behavior and exploring its association with insufficient sleep, and hence with health. The aim was to develop and validate a Spanish version of the Bedtime Procrastination Scale (BPS-Sp) and to examine the relationship between bedtime procrastination and both general procrastination and self-control. The original BPS was translated from English into Spanish in accordance with international guidelines on the cross-cultural adaptation of measurement instruments. The sample for the validation study comprised 177 nursing students who completed a questionnaire requesting demographic data and which included the following instruments: the newly developed BPS-Sp, the Tuckman Procrastination Scale, and the Brief Self-Control Scale. Statistical analysis involved tests of normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov), reliability (Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest), construct validity, and confirmatory factor analysis. Scores on the BPS-Sp showed excellent internal consistency (α = .83) and temporal stability (test-retest r = .84), as well as significant correlations with general procrastination ( r = .26; p < .01) and self-control ( r = −.17; p < .05). Confirmatory factor analysis showed an adequate fit for the single-factor solution proposed by Kroese et al. The results suggest that the BPS-Sp is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing bedtime procrastination in the Spanish-speaking population.

Download Full-text

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm9092831 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (9) ◽

pp. 2831 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Roy La Touche ◽

Joaquín Pardo-Montero ◽

Ferran Cuenca-Martínez ◽

Corine M Visscher ◽

Alba Paris-Alemany ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Cultural Adaptation ◽

Temporomandibular Disorders ◽

Pain Catastrophizing ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Mouth Opening ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Spanish Version ◽

Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽

Ceiling Effects

The aim was to perform a translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD-S). The study sample included 110 patients with TMD. We translated and cross-culturally adapted the TSK-TMD-S using standard methodology and analysed its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, floor and ceiling effects, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis extracted two factors and 10 items deemed essential for the scale. The TSK-TMD-S demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α of 0.843, 0.938, and 0.885 for the entire scale, activity avoidance subscale, and somatic focus subscale, respectively; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.81–0.9). No floor or ceiling effects were identified for this final version of the scale. The TSK-TMD-S total score showed moderate positive correlation with the craniofacial pain and disability inventory, visual analogue scale, general TSK and pain catastrophizing scale, and a moderate negative correlation with maximal mouth-opening. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the subclassification employed for the TSK-TMD-S discriminates different kinesiophobia levels with a diagnostic accuracy between sufficient and good. The optimal cut-off point for considering kinesiophobia is 23 points. TSK-TMD-S appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring kinesiophobia in patients with TMD.

Download Full-text

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAMsp)

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-016-0409-7 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Manuel González-Sánchez ◽

Esther Velasco-Ramos ◽

Maria Ruiz-Muñoz ◽

Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas

Keyword(s):

American Academy ◽

Cultural Adaptation ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Spanish Version ◽

Foot And Ankle ◽

Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽

Orthopaedic Surgeons

Download Full-text

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp)

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research ◽

10.1186/s13047-017-0221-6 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Pablo Cervera-Garvi ◽

Ana Belen Ortega-Avila ◽

Jose Miguel Morales-Asencio ◽

Jose Antonio Cervera-Marin ◽

Rob Roy Martin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cultural Adaptation ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Spanish Version ◽

Foot And Ankle ◽

Cross Cultural Adaptation

Download Full-text

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing of the International Sedentary Assessment Tool for the Spanish Population

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph17030758 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (3) ◽

pp. 758

Author(s):

Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas ◽

Cristina Roldán-Jiménez ◽

Jaime Martín-Martín ◽

Manuel González-Sánchez ◽

Daniel Gutiérrez Sánchez

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Cultural Adaptation ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Criterion Validity ◽

Cost Of Care ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Spanish Version ◽

Psychometric Analysis ◽

Early Management ◽

Cross Cultural Adaptation

Sedentary behavior (SB) is currently considered a public health problem with a high cost of care. Evaluating SB is essential for prevention and early management of physical inactivity. The International Sedentary Assessment Tool (ISAT) is an instrument that has been developed to assess SB. The aim of this study was to carry out a cross-cultural adaptation and a psychometric analysis of the Spanish version of the ISAT. A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 432 participants were included in this study. A double forward method and a backward method were used to translate the ISAT. A psychometric analysis of internal consistency and concurrent criterion validity was performed according to the most up-to-date Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). No language difficulties were found in the translation process. The Spanish version of ISAT was readable and acceptable. Internal consistency was satisfactory (α = 0.80). Criterion validity was demonstrated (rho=0.63). The Spanish version of the ISAT is a valid and reliable measure that can be used clinically to assess SB. Further studies assessing other psychometric properties are needed.

Download Full-text

Comments on “Translation, cross‐cultural adaptation, validation, and measurement properties of the Spanish version of the anterior cruciate ligament‐return to sport after injury (ACL‐RSI‐Sp) Scale”

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy ◽

10.1007/s00167-020-06041-1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Fatih Özden

Keyword(s):

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽

Cultural Adaptation ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Return To Sport ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Spanish Version ◽

Measurement Properties ◽

Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽

Anterior Cruciate

Download Full-text

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire

Asian Spine Journal ◽

10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.520 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. 520-530 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Asrin Shafeei ◽

Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia ◽

Azam Maleki-Ghahfarokhi ◽

Leila Piri

Keyword(s):

Correlation Coefficient ◽

Musculoskeletal Pain ◽

Cultural Adaptation ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Face Validity ◽

Screening Questionnaire ◽

Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽

Persian Version

<sec><title>Study Design</title>Observational study.</sec><sec><title>Purpose</title>To cross-culturally translate the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPQ) into Persian and then evaluate its psychometric properties (reliability, validity, ceiling, and flooring effects).</sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title>To the authors' knowledge, prior to this study there has been no validated instrument to screen the risk of chronicity in Persian-speaking patients with low back pain (LBP) in Iran. The OMPQ was specifically developed as a self-administered screening tool for assessing the risk of LBP chronicity.</sec><sec><title>Methods</title>The forward–backward translation method was used for the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original questionnaire. In total, 202 patients with subacute LBP completed the OMPQ and the pain disability questionnaire (PDQ), which was used to assess convergent validity. 62 patients completed the OMPQ a week later as a retest.</sec><sec><title>Results</title>Slight changes were made to the OMPQ during the translation/cultural adaptation process; face validity of the Persian version was obtained. The Persian OMPQ showed excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.89). Its internal consistency was 0.71, and its convergent validity was confirmed by good correlation coefficient between the OMPQ and PDQ total scores (<italic>r</italic>=0.72, <italic>p</italic><0.05). No ceiling or floor effects were observed.</sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title>The Persian version of the OMPQ is acceptable for the target society in terms of face validity, construct validity, reliability, and consistency. It is therefore considered a useful instrument for screening Iranian patients with LBP.</sec>

Download Full-text