scholarly journals Natural disease progression and novel survival prediction model for hepatocellular carcinoma with spinal metastases: a 10-year single-center study

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phichayut Phinyo ◽  
Chonmavadh Boonyanaruthee ◽  
Permsak Paholpak ◽  
Dumneoensun Pruksakorn ◽  
Areerak Phanphaisarn ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1145
Author(s):  
Erica P. Turse ◽  
Ericka L. Charley ◽  
Tessa Bowie ◽  
Majd Aboona ◽  
Arnold N. Forlemu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bita Geramizadeh ◽  
Mohammad Baghernezhad ◽  
Hamed Salehi ◽  
Saman Nikeghbalian ◽  
Alireza Shamsaeefar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 614-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongping Zhu ◽  
Juan Xiao ◽  
Diteng Luo ◽  
Mingjun Dong ◽  
Tian Sun ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phichayut Phinyo ◽  
Chonmavadh Boonyanaruthee ◽  
Permsak Paholpak ◽  
Dumnoensun Pruksakorn ◽  
Areerak Phanphaisarn ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Individual prediction of life expectancy in patients with spinal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is key for optimal treatment selection, especially when identifying potential candidates for surgery. Most reported prognostic tools provide categorical predictions, and only a few include HCC-related factors. This study aimed to investigate the natural progression of the disease and develop a prognostic tool that is capable of providing individualized predictions.Methods: Patients with HCC-derived metastatic spinal disease were identified from a retrospective cohort of patients with spinal metastases who were diagnosed at Chiang Mai University Hospital between 2006 and 2015. Kaplain–Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to statistically evaluate potential factors. Significant predictors from univariable analysis were included in the flexible parametric survival regression for the development of a prognostic prediction model. Results: Of the 1,143 patients diagnosed with HCC, 69 (6%) had spinal metastases. The median survival time of patients with HCC after spinal metastases was 79 days. In the multivariable analysis, a total of 11 potential clinical predictors were included. After backward elimination, four final predictors remained: patients aged > 60 years, Karnofsky Performance Status, total bilirubin level, and multifocality of HCC. The model showed acceptable discrimination at C-statistics 0.73 (95% Confidence interval 0.68–0.79) and fair calibration. Conclusion: Four clinical parameters were used in the development of the individual survival prediction model for patients with HCC-derived spinal metastases of Chiang Mai University or HCC-SM CMU model. Prospective external validation studies in a larger population are required prior to the clinical implication of the model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document