scholarly journals Luteal phase support for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection fresh cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanglin Wu ◽  
Songying Zhang ◽  
Xiaona Lin ◽  
Shasha Wang ◽  
Ping Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Gnrh Agonists ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Lps Treatment

Abstract Background Various luteal phase supports (LPSs) have been proven to increase the pregnancy rate in fresh cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection; however, there is still significant debate regarding the optimal use of LPS. Methods A systematic review with the use of a network meta-analysis was performed via electronic searching of Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar (up to January 2021) to compare the effectiveness and safety of various LPSs, as well as to evaluate the effects of different initiations of LPSs on pregnancy outcomes. The primary outcomes included live birth and ongoing pregnancy, with the results presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Eighty-nine randomized controlled trials with 29,625 women comparing 14 interventions or placebo/no LPS treatments were included in the meta-analyses. No significant differences were found in terms of the pregnancy outcomes when LPS was started within 48 h after oocyte retrieval versus a delayed initiation between 48 h and 96 h after oocyte retrieval. The addition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to progesterone vaginal pessaries showed a significant benefit in terms of live birth (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.78). Only human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) was found to be more efficacious than the placebo/no LPS treatment in terms of live birth (OR 15.43, 95% CI 2.03 to 117.12, low evidence). Any active LPSs (except for rectal or subcutaneous progesterone) was significantly more efficacious than the placebo/no LPS treatment in terms of ongoing pregnancy, with ORs ranging between 1.77 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.90) for the vaginal progesterone pessary and 2.14 (1.23 to 3.70) for the intramuscular progesterone treatment. Among the comparisons of efficacy and tolerability between the active treatments, the differences were small and very uncertain. Conclusion Delays in progesterone supplementation until 96 h after oocyte retrieval does not affect pregnancy outcomes. The safety of GnRH agonists during the luteal phase needs to be evaluated in future studies before the applications of these agonists in clinical practice. With comparable efficacy and acceptability, there may be several viable clinical options for LPS.

scholarly journals Association between endometrial indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression level and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing first in vitro fertilization treatment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Liu ◽  
Hongxia Wei ◽  
Yuye Li ◽  
Ruochun Lian ◽  
Xiaohui Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Expression Levels

Abstract BackgroundIndoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) has been reported to play a key role in placental development during normal pregnancy. However, the question of whether endometrial IDO expression affects in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes remains unclear. The current study was undertaken to investigate whether there was any association between endometrial IDO expression and IVF treatment outcome.MethodsThis retrospective study was designed to compare pregnancy outcomes among women with different endometrial IDO expression levels under their first IVF treatment. A total of 140 women undergoing their IVF treatment were selected from January 2017 to December 2017. Endometrial samples were collected during mid-luteal phase before IVF cycle. The endometrial IDO expression levels were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, and compared between women who were pregnant or not. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of endometrial IDO expression on live birth.ResultsNo significant differences in the endometrial IDO expression levels were found between women who had clinical pregnancy and those who failed (P>0.05). However, the endometrial IDO expression level was significantly higher among women who had live birth compared with those who had no live birth (P=0.031). Additionally, after adjusting for differences in maternal age, BMI and duration of gonadotropin stimulation, women with higher IDO expression level had an increased live birth rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.863, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.180-6.947). ConclusionsHigher endometrial IDO expression level during mid-luteal phase is associated with an increased live birth rate in women undergoing their first IVF treatment.

scholarly journals Association between endometrial indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression level and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing first in vitro fertilization treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Liu ◽  
Ling Hong ◽  
Yuye Li ◽  
Ruochun Lian ◽  
Xiaohui Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Immunohistochemical Staining ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

Abstract Background Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) has been reported to play a key role in placental development during normal pregnancy. However, the question of whether endometrial IDO expression affects in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes remains unclear. The current study was undertaken to investigate whether there was any association between endometrial IDO immunohistochemical staining and IVF treatment outcome. Methods This retrospective study was designed to compare pregnancy outcomes among women with different endometrial IDO expression levels under their first IVF treatment. A total of 140 women undergoing their IVF treatment were selected from January 2017 to December 2017. Endometrial samples were collected during mid-luteal phase before IVF cycle. The endometrial IDO expression levels were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, and compared between women who were pregnant or not. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of endometrial IDO staining on live birth. Results No significant differences in the endometrial IDO immunohistochemical staining were found between women who had clinical pregnancy and those who failed (P>0.05). However, the endometrial IDO staining was significantly higher among women who had live birth compared with those who had no live birth (P=0.031). Additionally, after adjusting for differences in maternal age, BMI and duration of gonadotropin stimulation, women with higher IDO expression level had an increased live birth rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.863, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.180-6.947). Conclusions Higher endometrial IDO expression level during mid-luteal phase is associated with an increased live birth rate in women undergoing their first IVF treatment.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Cui ◽  
Yonghong Lin ◽  
Fang Wang ◽  
Chen Chen
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reproductive Function ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Control Protocol ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies

Abstract Purpose Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is a new ovarian stimulation protocol that has been used over the last decade to enhance reproductive function. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether PPOS is as effective as conventional protocols (without GnRHa downregulation). Method Search terms included “medroxyprogesterone”, “dydrogesterone”, “progestin-primed ovarian stimulation”, “PPOS”, “oocyte retrieval”, “in vitro fertilization”, “IVF”, “ICSI”, “ART”, and “reproductive”. The selection criteria were nonrandomized studies and randomized controlled studies. For data collection and analysis, the Review Manager software, Newcastle–Ottowa Quality Assessment Scale and GRADE approach were used. Results The clinical pregnancy rates were not significantly different in either RCTs or NRCTs [RR 0.96, 95% CI (0.69–1.33), I2 = 71%, P = 0.81]; [RR 0.99, 95% CI (0.83–1.17), I2 = 38%, P = 0.88]. The live birth rates of RCTs and NRCTs did not differ [RCT: RR 1.08, 95% CI (0.74, 1.57), I2 = 66%, P = 0.69; NRCT: OR 1.03 95% CI 0.84–1.26), I2 = 50%, P = 0.79]. The PPOS protocol had a lower rate of OHSS [RR 0.52, 95% CI (0.36–0.75), I2 = 0%, P = 0.0006]. The secondary results showed that compared to the control protocol, the endometrium was thicker [95% CI (0.00–0.78), I2 = 0%, P = 0.05], the number of obtained embryos was higher [95% CI (0.04–0.65), I2 = 17%, P = 0.03] and more hMG was needed [in NRCT: 95% CI (307.44, 572.73), I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001] with the PPOS protocol. Conclusion The PPOS protocol produces more obtained embryos and a thicker endometrium than the control protocol, with a lower rate of OHSS and an equal live birth rate. The PPOS protocol could be a safe option as a personalized protocol for infertile patients. Trial registration Registration at PROSPERO: CRD42020176577.

scholarly journals Efficacy of intralipid administration to improve in vitro fertilization outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-210
Author(s):  
E Jung Han ◽  
Hye Nam Lee ◽  
Min Kyoung Kim ◽  
Sang Woo Lyu ◽  
Woo Sik Lee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Implantation Failure ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether intralipid administration improved the outcomes of in vitro fertilization. Online databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase) were searched until March 2020. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the role of intralipid administration during in vitro fertilization were considered. We analyzed the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the rates of chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and missed abortion. We reviewed and assessed the eligibility of 180 studies. Five RCTs including 840 patients (3 RCTs: women with repeated implantation failure, 1 RCT: women with recurrent spontaneous abortion, 1 RCT: women who had experienced implantation failure more than once) met the selection criteria. When compared with the control group, intralipid administration significantly improved the clinical pregnancy rate (risk ratio [RR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–1.79), ongoing pregnancy rate (RR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.31–2.53), and live birth rate (RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.44–2.38). However, intralipid administration had no beneficial effect on the miscarriage rate (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48–1.17). A funnel plot analysis revealed no publication bias. Our findings suggest that intralipid administration may benefit women undergoing in vitro fertilization, especially those who have experienced repeated implantation failure or recurrent spontaneous abortion. However, larger, well-designed studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Predictive Model for Live Birth at 12 Months After Starting In-Vitro Fertilization Treatment

MedPharmRes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-20
Author(s):  
Vu Ho ◽  
Toan Pham ◽  
Tuong Ho ◽  
Lan Vuong
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

IVF carries a considerable physical, emotional and financial burden. Therefore, it would be useful to be able to predict the likelihood of success for each couple. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to develop a prediction model to estimate the probability of a live birth at 12 months after one completed IVF cycle (all fresh and frozen embryo transfers from the same oocyte retrieval). We analyzed data collected from 2600 women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at a single center in Vietnam between April 2014 and December 2015. All patients received gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist stimulation, followed by fresh and/or frozen embryo transfer (FET) on Day 3. Using Cox regression analysis, five predictive factors were identified: female age, total dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone used, type of trigger, fresh or FET during the first transfer, and number of subsequent FET after the first transfer. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the final model was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60‒0.65) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.57‒0.63) for the validation cohort. There was no significant difference between the predicted and observed probabilities of live birth (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p > 0.05). The model developed had similar discrimination to existing models and could be implemented in clinical practice.

O-107 Searching for the optimal number of oocytes to reach a life birth following in vitro fertilization: a systematic review with meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Sermondade ◽  
C Sonigo ◽  
M Pasquier ◽  
N Yata-Ahdad ◽  
E Fraison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Study question To investigate the relationship between the number of oocytes and both the live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer and the cumulative live birth rate. Summary answer Above a 15-oocyte threshold, live birth rate (LBR) following fresh transfer plateaus, whereas a continuous increase in cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) is observed. What is known already Several lines of evidence indicate that number of oocytes represents a key point for in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. However, consensus is lacking regarding the optimal number of oocytes for expecting a live birth. This is a key question because it might impact the way practitioners initiate and adjust COS regimens. Study design, size, duration A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 01, 2004, and August 31, 2019 using the search terms: “(intracytoplasmic sperm injection or icsi or ivf or in vitro fertilization or fertility preservation)” and “(oocyte and number)” and “(live birth)”. Participants/materials, setting, methods Two independent reviewers carried out study selection, quality assessment using the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scales, bias assessment using ROBIN-1 tools, and data extraction according to Cochrane methods. Independent analyses were performed according to the outcome (LBR and CLBR). The mean-weighted threshold of optimal oocyte number was estimated from documented thresholds, followed by a one-stage meta-analysis on articles with documented or estimable relative risks. Main results and the role of chance After reviewing 843 records, 64 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 36 studies were available for quantitative syntheses. Twenty-one and 18 studies were included in the meta-analyses evaluating the relationship between the number of retrieved oocytes and LBR or CLBR, respectively. Given the limited number of investigations considering mature oocytes, association between the number of metaphase II oocytes and IVF outcomes could not be investigated. Concerning LBR, 7 (35.0%) studies reported a plateau effect, corresponding to a weighted mean of 14.4 oocytes. The pooled dose-response association between the number of oocytes and LBR showed a non-linear relationship, with a plateau beyond 15 oocytes. For CLBR, 4 (19.0%) studies showed a plateau effect, corresponding to a weighted mean of 19.3 oocytes. The meta-analysis of the relationship between the number of oocytes and CLBR found a non-linear relationship, with a continuous increase in CLBR, including for high oocyte yields. Limitations, reasons for caution Statistical models show a high degree of deviance, especially for high numbers of oocytes. Further investigations are needed to assess the generalization of those results to frozen mature oocytes, especially in a fertility preservation context, and to evaluate the impact of female age. Wider implications of the findings Above a 15-oocyte threshold, LBR following fresh transfer plateaus, suggesting that the freeze-all strategy should probably be performed. In contrast, the continuous increase in CLBR suggests that high numbers of oocytes could be offered to improve the chances of cumulative live births, after evaluating the benefit–risk balance. Trial registration number Not applicable

scholarly journals Reproductive Outcomes of Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Following In-Vitro Fertilization — A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 193-201
Author(s):  
I-Ferne Tan ◽  
Audrey J. R. Lim ◽  
Inthrani R. Indran ◽  
Michael S. Kramer ◽  
Eu-Leong Yong
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Ovarian Hyperstimulation ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Ivf Outcomes ◽  
Ovarian Syndrome

Background: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common cause of infertility in women. In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is required in 20–30% of women with PCOS trying to conceive. This is associated with increased risk of multiple gestation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Improvements in IVF techniques, safety standards, and the increased use of frozen embryos in recent years have lead to improved outcomes for women with PCOS. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these outcomes with women without PCOS. Search Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials, and Scopus databases for all articles published until November 16th, 2017 identified 21 studies comparing IVF outcomes in PCOS and non-PCOS women. Inclusion criteria were Rotterdam criteria PCOS, comparable IVF regimes, immediate IVF outcomes, and pregnancy outcomes. Studies were excluded if the control group included any PCOS criteria, donor oocytes, or in-vitro maturation. Outcomes: No difference was observed in live birth rate per cycle in women with vs. without PCOS (RR [Formula: see text] 1.01 [0.89, 1.16]; [Formula: see text] 82%), but the live birth rate per first cycle in PCOS cycles (RR [Formula: see text] 0.93 [0.88, 0.99]) was slightly lower. There was also no difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.02 [0.89, 1.17]) or biochemical pregnancy rate (RR 1.03 [0.99, 1.08]) observed between the two groups. PCOS was associated with a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference [Formula: see text] 3.6; 95% CI [2.8, 4.4]), risk of miscarriage (RR 2.90 [2.09, 4.02]), and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (RR 3.42 [2.28, 5.13]) per cycle. Conclusion: Despite a widespread perception of poor reproductive potential, women with PCOS experience IVF outcomes similar to those without PCOS. Although there is a slightly lower live birth rate during their first stimulation cycle, success rates are similar after multiple cycles. PCOS is associated with a higher risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Further studies are required to mitigate this risk.

Luteal Phase Support in in vitro Fertilization: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

2005 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saleema Nosarka ◽  
Thinus Kruger ◽  
Igno Siebert ◽  
Debbie Grové
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Luteal Phase Support
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document