scholarly journals A multi-band double-inversion radial fast spin-echo technique for T2 cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of the heart

Author(s):  
Mahesh Bharath Keerthivasan ◽  
Sagar Mandava ◽  
Kevin Johnson ◽  
Ryan Avery ◽  
Rajesh Janardhanan ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin P Romney ◽  
Faisal Khosa ◽  
Daniel N Costa ◽  
Peter Chan ◽  
Neil M Rofsky ◽  
...  

Purpose The true prevalence of non-cardiac pathology on clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is not fully defined. While prior studies have shown few non-cardiac findings (NCFs) on CMR reports, this may be an underestimate. We sought to determine the prevalence of NCFs by using a second imaging review with specific attention to NCFs. Materials and Methods The images from all 495 clinical CMR studies performed at our center in 2006 were independently reviewed by a radiologist for the presence of NCFs, defined as benign (e.g., pleural effusion, hiatal hernia), indeterminate (e.g. pleural effusion, enlarged lymph node), or worrisome (e.g. lung nodule, aortic dissection). Data were compared with NCFs listed in the subject’s clinical CMR report, which also included information as to whether a radiologist was physically present at the original reading session. Results The initial clinical CMR reports included 105 NCFs (30 benign, 68 indeterminate, and 7 worrisome). On focused image review, 295 NCFs (144 [49%] benign, 137 [46%] indeterminate, 14 [5%] worrisome) were identified in 212/495 (43%) studies, with 113 studies (23%) containing indeterminate and/or worrisome NCFs. The vast majority (281/295, 95%) of NCFs were visible on either the initial scout images (186/295, 63%) or thoracic T1w axial fast spin echo images (176/295, 60%). Overall, 36% (105/295) of NCFs (21% of benign, 50% of indeterminate, and 50% of worrisome) detected on our image review were included in the original clinical CMR report. NCFs were reported more frequently when a radiologist was present for the joint CMR readout (42% 95/228;vs. 15% 10/67;, p=0.003). Conclusion Indeterminate or worrisome NCFs are more common than previously reported, and involve nearly a quarter of clinical CMR studies. The vast majority of NCFs were visible on scout and T1w axial images. A joint reading session with cardiologists and radiologists improves the detection and reporting of NCFs. These data also highlight the importance of training CMR practitioners to identify NCFs.


1998 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Daniels ◽  
Clough Shelton ◽  
H. Ric Harnsberger

The financial burden for the evaluation of patients for acoustic neuroma in an otolaryngology practice is substantial. Patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss represent a portion of that population seen with unilateral, asymmetric auditory symptoms who require investigation for acoustic neuroma. For these patients, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is the diagnostic gold standard. Auditory brain stem response testing has been used in the past as a screening test for acoustic neuroma, but its apparent sensitivity has fallen as the ability to image smaller acoustic neuromas has improved. Fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging techniques without gadolinium have been shown to be as effective in the detection of acoustic neuroma as contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Limited nonenhanced fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging now provides an inexpensive alternative for high-resolution imaging of the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle. Fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging can now be done at a cost approximating auditory brain stem response testing while providing the anatomic information of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Cost analysis was done in the cases of 58 patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss by comparing the costs for routine workup and screening of acoustic neuroma with the cost of fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging with the use of screening protocols based on literature review. The potential cost savings of evaluating patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss with fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging for acoustic neuroma was substantial, with a 54% reduction in screening costs. In an era of medical economic scrutiny, fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging has become the most cost-effective method to screen suspected cases of acoustic tumors at our institution by improving existing technology while reducing the cost of providing that technology and eliminating charges for impedance audiometry, auditory brain stem response testing, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document