scholarly journals Assessment of upper limb use in children with typical development and neurodevelopmental disorders by inertial sensors: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Braito ◽  
Martina Maselli ◽  
Giuseppina Sgandurra ◽  
Emanuela Inguaggiato ◽  
Elena Beani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Typical Development

Endogenous melatonin and sleep in individuals with Rare Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders (RGND): A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 101433
Author(s):  
Emma C. Woodford ◽  
Laurie McLay ◽  
Karyn G. France ◽  
Neville M. Blampied ◽  
Rosina Gibbs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽  
Endogenous Melatonin

Accuracy of Wearable Sensor Technology in Hand Goniometry: A Systematic Review

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110146
Author(s):  
Francisco R. Avila ◽  
Rickey E. Carter ◽  
Christopher J. McLeod ◽  
Charles J. Bruce ◽  
Davide Giardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Infrared Camera ◽  
Wearable Devices ◽  
Sensor Technology ◽  
Accuracy Evaluation ◽  
Wearable Sensor

Background Wearable devices and sensor technology provide objective, unbiased range of motion measurements that help health care professionals overcome the hindrances of protractor-based goniometry. This review aims to analyze the accuracy of existing wearable sensor technologies for hand range of motion measurement and identify the most accurate one. Methods We performed a systematic review by searching PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase for studies evaluating wearable sensor technology in hand range of motion assessment. Keywords used for the inquiry were related to wearable devices and hand goniometry. Results Of the 71 studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies evaluated gloves and 1 evaluated a wristband. The most common types of sensors used were bend sensors, followed by inertial sensors, Hall effect sensors, and magnetometers. Most studies compared wearable devices with manual goniometry, achieving optimal accuracy. Although most of the devices reached adequate levels of measurement error, accuracy evaluation in the reviewed studies might be subject to bias owing to the use of poorly reliable measurement techniques for comparison of the devices. Conclusion Gloves using inertial sensors were the most accurate. Future studies should use different comparison techniques, such as infrared camera–based goniometry or virtual motion tracking, to evaluate the performance of wearable devices.

scholarly journals Inertial Sensor Reliability and Validity for Static and Dynamic Balance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 5167
Author(s):  
Nicky Baker ◽  
Claire Gough ◽  
Susan J. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Postural Sway ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Gait Velocity ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Targeted Interventions

Compared to laboratory equipment inertial sensors are inexpensive and portable, permitting the measurement of postural sway and balance to be conducted in any setting. This systematic review investigated the inter-sensor and test-retest reliability, and concurrent and discriminant validity to measure static and dynamic balance in healthy adults. Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched to January 2021. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was possible for reliability studies only and it was found that inertial sensors are reliable to measure static standing eyes open. A synthesis of the included studies shows moderate to good reliability for dynamic balance. Concurrent validity is moderate for both static and dynamic balance. Sensors discriminate old from young adults by amplitude of mediolateral sway, gait velocity, step length, and turn speed. Fallers are discriminated from non-fallers by sensor measures during walking, stepping, and sit to stand. The accuracy of discrimination is unable to be determined conclusively. Using inertial sensors to measure postural sway in healthy adults provides real-time data collected in the natural environment and enables discrimination between fallers and non-fallers. The ability of inertial sensors to identify differences in postural sway components related to altered performance in clinical tests can inform targeted interventions for the prevention of falls and near falls.

Effects of upper limb exercise programs on the arteriovenous fistula in patients on hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110011
Author(s):  
Francini Porcher Andrade ◽  
Heloíse Benvenutti ◽  
Kacylen Costa da Silva ◽  
Paula Maria Eidt Rovedder
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Handgrip Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Blood Flow Rate ◽  
Exercise Programs ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Limb Exercise

Background: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is a commonly used vascular access for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients; exercise interventions may boost its maturation and help in its maintenance. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on the effects of upper limb exercise programs on the AVF was conducted. Methods: The primary outcomes were draining vein diameter (DVD) and draining vein blood flow rate (DVBFR), and secondary outcomes were handgrip strength (HGS) and brachial artery flow rate (BAFR). Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. When compared to usual care groups, the experimental groups did not improve DVD (mean difference [MD] 0.23, confidence interval [CI] −0.20–0.65). There were significant differences in DVBFR (mL/min) according to the fixed-effect model (MD 141.13, CI 36.84–245.42). HGS (kg) was significantly different between groups (MD 2.95, CI 0.55–5.35), but BAFR (mL/min) was not (MD 91.65, CI −94.72–278.01). Conclusions: Although exercise programs did not improve DVD and BAFR, they increased muscle strength and DVBFR. Therefore, experimental exercise programs should be emphasized for AVF maturation and maintenance. Research Registry number: reviewregistry924.

scholarly journals Tools and Techniques Used With Robotic Devices to Quantify Upper-Limb Function in Typically Developing Children: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 117957272097901
Author(s):  
Stephan CD Dobri ◽  
Hana M Ready ◽  
Theresa Claire Davies
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Upper Limb Function ◽  
Robotic Devices ◽  
Tools And Techniques

Background: Robotic devices have been used to quantify function, identify impairment, and rehabilitate motor function extensively in adults, but less-so in younger populations. The ability to perform motor actions improves as children grow. It is important to quantify this rate of change of the neurotypical population before attempting to identify impairment and target rehabilitation techniques. Objectives: For a population of typically developing children, this systematic review identifies and analyzes tools and techniques used with robotic devices to quantify upper-limb motor function. Since most of the papers also used robotic devices to compare function of neurotypical to pathological populations, a secondary objective was introduced to relate clinical outcome measures to identified robotic tools and techniques. Methods: Five databases were searched between February 2019 and August 2020, and 226 articles were found, 19 of which are included in the review. Results: Robotic devices, tasks, outcome measures, and clinical assessments were not consistent among studies from different settings but were consistent within laboratory groups. Fifteen of the 19 articles evaluated both typically developing and pathological populations. Conclusion: To optimize universally comparable outcomes in future work, it is recommended that a standard set of tasks and measures is used to assess upper-limb motor function. Standardized tasks and measures will facilitate effective rehabilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document