scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Tricco ◽  
Roberta Cardoso ◽  
Sonia M. Thomas ◽  
Sanober Motiwala ◽  
Shannon Sullivan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Care Managers

Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 35-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Lavis ◽  
Huw Davies ◽  
Andy Oxman ◽  
Jean-Louis Denis ◽  
Karen Golden-Biddle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
Health Care Management ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Executive Summary ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Care Managers

Objectives To identify ways to improve the usefulness of systematic reviews for health care managers and policy-makers that could then be evaluated prospectively. Methods We systematically reviewed studies of decision-making by health care managers and policy-makers, conducted interviews with a purposive sample of them in Canada and the United Kingdom (n=29), and reviewed the websites of research funders, producers/purveyors of research, and journals that include them among their target audiences (n=45). Results Our systematic review identified that factors such as interactions between researchers and health care policy-makers and timing/timeliness appear to increase the prospects for research use among policy-makers. Our interviews with health care managers and policy-makers suggest that they would benefit from having information that is relevant for decisions highlighted for them (e.g. contextual factors that affect a review's local applicability and information about the benefits, harms/risks and costs of interventions) and having reviews presented in a way that allows for rapid scanning for relevance and then graded entry (such as one page of take-home messages, a three-page executive summary and a 25-page report). Managers and policy-makers have mixed views about the helpfulness of recommendations. Our analysis of websites found that contextual factors were rarely highlighted, recommendations were often provided and graded entry formats were rarely used. Conclusions Researchers could help to ensure that the future flow of systematic reviews will better inform health care management and policy-making by involving health care managers and policy-makers in their production and better highlighting information that is relevant for decisions. Research funders could help to ensure that the global stock of systematic reviews will better inform health care management and policy-making by supporting and evaluating local adaptation processes such as developing and making available online more user-friendly ‘front ends’ for potentially relevant systematic reviews.

scholarly journals Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Marquez ◽  
Alekhya Mascarenhas Johnson ◽  
Sabrina Jassemi ◽  
Jamie Park ◽  
Julia E. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Care Managers

scholarly journals Analyzing U.S. nurse turnover: Are nurses leaving their jobs or the profession itself?

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olena Mazurenko ◽  
Gouri Gupte ◽  
Guogen Shan
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
National Sample ◽  
Sample Survey ◽  
P Value ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Care Managers

Objective: To examine and compare factors associated with making the decision to vacate a job (organizational turnover) versus leaving the profession (professional turnover) among registered nurses (RN) in the United States (U.S.).Methods: Nationally representative data from the 2008 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses was used. The sample consisted of 8,796 RNs who held an active RN license as of March 10, 2008, but changed a place of work or left the profession entirely. The analysis has been performed using SAS, version 9.3.Results: The results of binary logistic regression revealed that RNs who reported work-related disability (OR = 14.51; p-value: < .001), illness (OR = 3.32; p-value: < .001), experienced high physical demands (OR = 1.57; p-value: < .001) or burnout (OR = 1.39; p-value: < .001), were unsatisfied with their schedule (OR = 2.16; p-value: < .001), or staffing arrangements (OR = 1.41; p-value: < .001) were more likely to leave the profession. Whereas RNs who reported high levels of stress (OR = 0.59; p-value: < .001) were unsatisfied with the organization’s leadership (OR = 0.22; p-value: < .001), unsatisfied with their opportunity to advance their career (OR = 0.56; p-value: < .001), or were not adequately compensated (OR = 0.63; p-value: < .001), were more likely to leave the organization.Conclusions: Policy makers and health care managers should be aware of the different factors that are associated with RNs’ decision to leave the profession or an organization. Health care managers involved in the development of nurse retention strategies should address organizational leadership and consider development of comprehensive career development programs. Policy makers should consider allocating additional resources to ensure that RN workforce is of adequate size, is qualified, and is able to provide high quality care in the U.S..

Europe: Barbara Stocking King's Fund Centre for Health Services Development

1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-152
Author(s):  
Bernard S. Bloom ◽  
H. David Banta ◽  
Paul F. Gross ◽  
Jorge Peña-Mohr ◽  
Jane E. Sisk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Assurance ◽  
International Society ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Modern Technology ◽  
National Society ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Society Meeting ◽  
Care Managers

May and June were busy months in Europe for technology assessors. Following the International Society meeting in Rotterdam, many people went on to the quality assurance meeting at WHO in Copenhagen and the International Hospital Federation Congress in Helsinki. “Modern Technology—How Much and for Whom,” was one of the main themes of the congress; with an attendance of about 400 there was an opportunity to get the ideas about technology assessment across to a large group of health care managers and professionals. For those of us who spoke it was also a chance to meet members of the Finnish Society for Technology Assessment. This may be the only national society for health technology assessment, and with 70 members, it is clearly going to be influential.

scholarly journals Inappropriate requests for tumor markers in patients aged 50 years and older: lessons not learned

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valter Paz Nascimento-Júnior ◽  
Einstein Francisco Camargos
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Private Health Insurance ◽  
Medical Specialty ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
Care Managers ◽  
Previous Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate, within a private health insurance, the ordering frequency and the costs related to inappropriate TM test orders. METHODS: This study analyzed data regarding TM requests within a private health insurance between 2010 and 2017. Patients included in this analysis were ≥ 50 years old, had available medical records, and had at least 1 TM tested within the study period. Tests were considered inappropriate when TMs were used in screening for neoplasms, ie, when there was no previous diagnosis. We evaluated data regarding age, sex, the ordering physician’s medical specialty, and test costs. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, 1,112 TM tests were performed and increased from 52 to 262 per year. Our sample consisted mostly of women (69.50%) with a mean age of 59.40 (SD, 8.20) years. Most orders were inappropriate (87.80%) and represented 79.40% of all expenses with TM tests. Cardiology professionals were the medical specialty that requested the most TM tests (23.90%), followed by internal medicine specialists (22.70%) and gynecologists (19.20%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high percentage of inappropriate test orders in the study period, resulting in elevated costs. Studies of this nature deserve the attention of health care managers, and interventions should be performed in order to reduce the inappropriate use of TM tests in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Practice in Primary Health Care From The Managerial Point of View: – A National Survey

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Abelsson ◽  
Helena Morténius ◽  
Ann-Kristin Karlsson ◽  
Stefan Bergman ◽  
Amir Baigi
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Care Managers ◽  
Primary Health

Abstract Background: The vast availability of and demand for evidence in modern primary health care forces clinical decisions to be made based on condensed evidence in the form of policies and guidelines. Primary health care managers play a key role in implementing these governing documents. Thus, the aim of this article was to investigate the use and availability of evidence-based practice resources from the perspective of first-line primary health care managers.Methods: The study utilized a quantitative method based on a national survey of primary health care managers. The study population was recruited nationally from Sweden and consisted of 186 respondents. The data were analysed using empirically constructed themes and validated using factor analysis. To determine the statistical significance in making comparisons, the chi-square test was utilized. Associations between variables were calculated using Spearman’s correlation. All tests were two-sided, and the significance level was set to 0.05.Results: A majority (97%) of managers stated there was an impact of guidelines and policy documents on primary health care; 84% of managers could see a direct influence in daily practices. Most of the managers (70%) stated that some adaptation had to be made when new evidence was introduced. The managers emphasised the importance of keeping themselves updated and open to new information about work routines (96%). Conclusions: Evidence-based practice has a fundamental impact on Swedish primary health care. The study illustrated a nearly unanimous response about evidence influencing daily practice. The emphasis on the importance of all staff members keeping their professional knowledge up to date can be seen as a direct result of this. An information-dense organization such as a primary health care organization would have much to gain from cooperation with regional information resources such as clinical libraries.Trial registration: Not applicable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document