scholarly journals Durvalumab (MEDI 4736) in combination with extended neoadjuvant regimens in rectal cancer: a study protocol of a randomised phase II trial (PRIME-RT)

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Hanna ◽  
Sean M. O’Cathail ◽  
Janet S. Graham ◽  
Mark Saunders ◽  
Leslie Samuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Treatment Compliance ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumour Microenvironment ◽  
Main Trial ◽  
Permanent Stoma

Abstract Background Advances in multi-modality treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have resulted in low local recurrence rates, but around 30% of patients will still die from distant metastatic disease. In parallel, there is increasing recognition that with radiotherapy and systemic treatment, some patients achieve a complete response and may avoid surgical resection, including in many cases, the need for a permanent stoma. Extended neoadjuvant regimes have emerged to address these concerns. The inclusion of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting has the potential to further enhance this strategy by priming the local immune microenvironment and engaging the systemic immune response. Methods PRIME-RT is a multi-centre, open label, phase II, randomised trial for patients with newly diagnosed LARC. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either: short course radiotherapy (25 Gray in 5 fractions over one week) with concomitant durvalumab (1500 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks), followed by FOLFOX (85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 350 mg folinic acid and 400 mg/m2 bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given on day 1 followed by 2400 mg/m2 5-FU infusion over 46–48 h, all administered intravenously every 2 weeks), and durvalumab, or long course chemoradiotherapy (50 Gray to primary tumour in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with concomitant oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice per day on days of radiotherapy) with durvalumab followed by FOLFOX and durvalumab. The primary endpoint is complete response rate in each arm. Secondary endpoints include treatment compliance, toxicity, safety, overall recurrence, proportion of patients with a permanent stoma, and survival. The study is translationally rich with collection of bio-specimens prior to, during, and following treatment in order to understand the molecular and immunological factors underpinning treatment response. The trial opened and the first patient was recruited in January 2021. The main trial will recruit up to 42 patients with LARC and commence after completion of a safety run-in that will recruit at least six patients with LARC or metastatic disease. Discussion PRIME-RT will explore if adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with LARC can prime the tumour microenvironment to improve complete response rates and stoma free survival. Sequential biopsies are a key component within the trial design that will provide new knowledge on how the tumour microenvironment changes at different time-points in response to multi-modality treatment. This expectation is that the trial will provide information to test this treatment within a large phase clinical trial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04621370 (Registered 9th Nov 2020) EudraCT number 2019-001471-36 (Registered 6th Nov 2020)

A multicenter phase Ib/II study of DNA-PK inhibitor peposertib (M3814) in combination with capecitabine and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.

scholarly journals Phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOX) as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (CORONA II)

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norifumi Hattori ◽  
Goro Nakayama ◽  
Keisuke Uehara ◽  
Toshisada Aiba ◽  
Kiyoshi Ishigure ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Treatment Compliance ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
R0 Resection

Abstract Objective This multicenter, single-arm phase II study (UMIN000008429) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOX) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods Patients with resectable clinical Stage II or III rectal cancer were enrolled to receive eight cycles of CapOX therapy (130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 and 2000 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 1–14, every 3 weeks) after curative surgical resection. The primary endpoint was 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate, and secondary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, treatment compliance, and safety. Results A total of 40 patients (Stage II, 21; Stage III, 19) were enrolled between September 2012 and November 2015 from seven institutions. Thirty-nine patients (97%) received R0 resection, and 32 patients (84%) received postoperative CapOX therapy. The completion rate of all eight cycles of CapOX therapy was 66%. Relative dose intensities were 87% for oxaliplatin and 84% for capecitabine. At a median follow-up period of 46 months, disease recurrence was observed in nine patients, including three with local recurrence. Three-year RFS and OS rates were 75% (95% CI 57–86%) and 96% (95% CI 80–99%), respectively. Frequencies of Grade ≥ 3 hematological and non-hematologic adverse events were 19% and 38%, respectively. Conclusion CapOX therapy is feasible as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Radiotherapy plus concurrent irinotecan (CPT-11) and capecitabine (CAP) as preoperative downstaging treatment for locally advanced inoperable rectal cancer: A phase I/II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13519-13519 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. W. Gollins ◽  
S. Myint ◽  
E. Levine ◽  
J. Bishop ◽  
B. Haylock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Defunctioning Stoma

13519 Background: Preoperative downstaging chemoradiation has become standard treatment for locally advanced unresectable rectal cancer. Oral CAP is potentially more convenient as a radiation sensitiser than infusional fluoropyrimidine regimes. This study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of daily CAP plus weekly i.v. CPT-11 when used in combination with RT in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Patients had an adenocarcinoma of the rectum (lower limit within 12 cm of the anal verge) which on MRI was T3 within 2 mm of the mesorectal outer edge, T4, or any T3 within 5 cm of the anal verge. There were no distant metastases on staging investigations. Patients received planned pelvic RT to 45 Gy in 25 daily fractions over five weeks, concurrent with oral CAP daily throughout RT (including weekends) and a 60 minute infusion of i.v. CPT-11 weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. Doses of CAP and CPT-11 were gradually escalated in cohorts of three patients. Results: The most common DLT was diarrhoea. Initially dose level (D/L) 3 was chosen as the recommended dose for phase II. However, unacceptable toxicity was encountered in the first 12 patients treated at D/L 3 (see Table). Thus D/L 2 is now being expanded to 60 patients for phase II. 40 patients have thus far potentially been eligible for resection: 5 (13%) could not be resected (2 deteriorated, 2 developed metastases, 1 died during treatment), 32 (80%) had R0 and 3 (7%) R1 resection. 9 (25%) had a pathological complete response (pCR) and 7 (20%) ‘near’ pCR. 5 (9%) of 57 patients had a defunctioning stoma pre-RT. Conclusions: The RD for this regime is 60 mg/m2 i.v. CPT-11 weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 650 mg/m2 bd of oral CAP daily. This demonstrates promising signs of efficacy. The RD is currently being studied in an expanded phase II cohort of 60 patients. D=diarrhea; F=febrile neutropenia; A=anorexia; L=lethargy; N=nausea/vomiting. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

INNOVA: A phase II randomized study comparing INterval versus NeOadjuVAnt chemotherapy in magnetic resonance imaging-defined high risk rectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS879-TPS879
Author(s):  
Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri ◽  
Trivadi S. Ganesan ◽  
Arunkumar M N ◽  
Shirley Sundersingh
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Rectal Cancers

TPS879 Background: Patients with rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy are not exposed to systemic doses of chemotherapy until very late in the treatment schedule. Preoperative chemotherapy, either in the neoadjuvant or interval setting can lead to early treatment of micrometastasis, improve the tumor response and possibly the overall survival. Phase II studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer have shown good response to chemotherapy with no tumor progression and good compliance. A phase II study evaluating the effect of giving chemotherapy in the interval waiting period between chemoradiation and surgery has shown acceptable toxicity and high pathological complete response rates. Methods: This single centre, randomized, open label, phase II trial compares the safety and efficacy of two pre-operative regimens in locally advanced MRI defined high-risk rectal cancers. Based on the Simon optimal two-stage design, 94 patients will be randomised to either Arm A [3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) followed by chemoradiation (50.4 Gy with capecitabine) and then surgery] or Arm B [neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by 3 cycles of interval chemotherapy and then surgery]. Patients in both arms receive 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end-point is the pathological complete response rate. Secondary end-points include frequency and severity of adverse events, RO resection rates, tumor regression grading and compliance to treatment. The inclusion criteria: age 18 to 70 years; ECOG performance status 0-2; non-metastatic, locally advanced rectal cancer with any one of the following features on high-resolution thin slice MRI: any T3/T4 tumor in the lower rectum, T3c/T3d/T4 tumor in the mid rectum, N2 disease, threatened mesorectal fascia, or extramural vascular invasion. Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two intervention arms in a 1:1 ratio. Prespecified activity goal for the first stage of accrual was met; second stage accrual began in July 2017. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2015/01/005385.

Phase I/II Trial of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Radiation for Rectal Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 3098-3104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Rödel ◽  
Gerhard. G. Grabenbauer ◽  
Thomas Papadopoulos ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Sphincter Preservation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX-RT) in patients with rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) or low-lying rectal cancer received preoperative RT (total dose, 50.4 Gy). Capecitabine was administered concurrently at 825 mg/m2 bid on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 35, with oxaliplatin starting at 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 with planned escalation steps of 10 mg/m2. End points of the phase II study included downstaging, histopathologic tumor regression, resectability of T4 disease, and sphincter preservation in patients with low-lying tumors. Results: Dose-limiting grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in two of six patients treated with 60 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin. Thus, 50 mg/m2 was the recommended dose for the phase II study. Toxicities observed at this dose level were generally mild, with only two cases of short-lived grade 3 diarrhea. Myelosuppression, mainly leukopenia, was restricted to grade 2 in 19% of patients. T-category downstaging was achieved in 17 (55%) of 31 operated patients, and 68% of patients had negative lymph nodes. Pathologic complete response was found in 19% of the resected specimens. Radical surgery with free margins could be performed in 79% of patients with T4 disease, and 36% of patients with tumors ≤ 2 cm from the dentate line had sphincter-saving surgery. Conclusion: Preoperative XELOX-RT is a feasible and well tolerated treatment. This regimen is proposed for phase III evaluation comparing standard fluorouracil-based therapy with XELOX chemoradiotherapy.

Phase II study of preoperative radiation with concurrent capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab followed by surgery and postoperative 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), and bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E3204).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3605-3605
Author(s):  
Steven J. Cohen ◽  
Yang Feng ◽  
Jerome Carl Landry ◽  
Charles A. Staley ◽  
Richard Whittington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Postsurgical Complications

3605 Background: Oxaliplatin and bevacizumab potentiate the antitumor activity of fluoroyprimidines and radiotherapy in preclinical and clinical studies of colorectal cancer. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of the preoperative combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab with radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Methods: Eligibility: resectable T3/T4 adenocarcinoma of the rectum ≤ 12 cm. from anal verge. Preoperative treatment was capecitabine (825 mg/m² bid M-F), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m² weekly), bevacizumab (5 mg/kg D1,15,29), and pelvic external beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). Surgery was performed within 6-8 weeks. Within 12 weeks of surgery, patients received 12 cycles of FOLFOX + bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) Q2 weeks. Pathologic complete response (path CR) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included resection rate and toxicity. Results: Fifty-seven patients (pts) enrolled from 7/06 to 5/10 and 54 were eligible. Clinical staging: T3/4 (50/4), NX0/1/2 (2/16/31/5). Most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities during treatment were rectal pain (9), fatigue (8), and diarrhea (7). Two patients died of aspiration. Nine pts had early postsurgical complications (9 wound infections, 6 dehiscence, 1 abscess) and 23 had late surgical complications (23 non-healing wounds, 12 dehiscence, 5 bowel obstruction/ileus, 2 abscess). Pathologic staging: T0/1/2/3 (11/3/15/19), N0/1/2 (32/10/7). Nine pts had path CRs (17%, 90% CI:[9%-27%]. Surgery was LAR (38) and APR (11). Twenty-two pts did not receive postoperative chemotherapy (39%), 16 due to adverse events. Five local recurrences have been reported. RFS and OS data are immature. Conclusions: The addition of oxaliplatin and bevacizumab to capecitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer resulted in downstaging for the majority of pts but did not improve the pathologic complete response rate compared to historical controls. The combination resulted in significant early and late postsurgical complications.

scholarly journals An expansion study of genotype-driven weekly irinotecan and capecitabine in combination with neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer with UGT1A1 *1*1 genotype

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175628481985229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Guan ◽  
Yunzhu Shen ◽  
Ye Xu ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Jingwen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Compliance ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tumour Regression

Background: In our previous dose-escalation study, we uncovered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly irinotecan was escalated to 80 mg/m2 and 65 mg/m2 for UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) *1*1 and *1*28 rectal cancer patients in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This is an expansion study for *1*1 patients. Methods: Patients with clinical stage T3–4, N0–2 rectal cancer eligible for preoperative chemoradiotherapy were screened for the UGT1A1*28 genotype. A total of 52 patients with the *1*1 genotype were enrolled. Whole-pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy was given in 50 Gy/25 fractions. Concurrently, irinotecan of 80 mg/m2 and capecitabine of 625 mg/m2 twice daily from Monday to Friday were administered weekly. Primary endpoint was toxicities; secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR), tumour-regression grading, treatment compliance, overall survival, local recurrence and disease-free survival. Results: All patients completed capecitabine-based radiotherapy as scheduled, and 42 (81%) patients completed more than three cycles of weekly irinotecan. Overall, grade 3/4 toxicities were observed in 20 cases, including 11 leucopenia, 10 neutropenia and 12 diarrhoea. Forty-three patients (83%) underwent a radical surgery, and 12 were evaluated as pCR. Another four patients accepted a watch-and-wait strategy because of clinical complete response (CCR). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated manageable toxicities and an encouraging CCR rate for UGT1A1 *1*1 genotype in an enhanced neoadjuvant therapy. A phase III trial is ongoing to evaluate the value of irinotecan in neoadjuvant therapy (CinClare) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02605265].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document