scholarly journals 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola de’Angelis ◽  
Fausto Catena ◽  
Riccardo Memeo ◽  
Federico Coccolini ◽  
Aleix Martínez-Pérez ◽  
...  

AbstractBile duct injury (BDI) is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life. BDIs have an estimated incidence of 0.4–1.5%, but considering the number of cholecystectomies performed worldwide, mostly by laparoscopy, surgeons must be prepared to manage this surgical challenge. Most BDIs are recognized either during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period. However, some BDIs may be discovered later during the postoperative period, and this may translate to delayed or inappropriate treatments. Providing a specific diagnosis and a precise description of the BDI will expedite the decision-making process and increase the chance of treatment success. Subsequently, the choice and timing of the appropriate reconstructive strategy have a critical role in long-term prognosis. Currently, a wide spectrum of multidisciplinary interventions with different degrees of invasiveness is indicated for BDI management. These World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines have been produced following an exhaustive review of the current literature and an international expert panel discussion with the aim of providing evidence-based recommendations to facilitate and standardize the detection and management of BDIs during cholecystectomy. In particular, the 2020 WSES guidelines cover the following key aspects: (1) strategies to minimize the risk of BDI during cholecystectomy; (2) BDI rates in general surgery units and review of surgical practice; (3) how to classify, stage, and report BDI once detected; (4) how to manage an intraoperatively detected BDI; (5) indications for antibiotic treatment; (6) indications for clinical, biochemical, and imaging investigations for suspected BDI; and (7) how to manage a postoperatively detected BDI.

2019 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-101
Author(s):  
Julie Navez ◽  
Jean-François Gigot ◽  
Pierre H. Deprez ◽  
Pierre Goffette ◽  
Laurence Annet ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1312-1321 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Halle-Smith ◽  
James Hodson ◽  
Lewis G. Stevens ◽  
Bobby Dasari ◽  
Ravi Marudanayagam ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. de Reuver ◽  
O. R. C. Busch ◽  
E. A. Rauws ◽  
J. S. Lameris ◽  
Th. M. van Gulik ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 4294-4299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Halbert ◽  
Maria S. Altieri ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Ziqi Meng ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-1114
Author(s):  
Caitlin A. Halbert ◽  
Maria Altieri ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Ziqi Meng ◽  
Mark A. Talamini ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Barbier ◽  
R. Souche ◽  
K. Slim ◽  
P. Ah-Soune

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1758-1768

Objective: Surgical management remains the mainstay treatment for bile duct injury (BDI) post-cholecystectomy. Achieving long-term patency and lessening anastomotic failure depends on important factors including the types of repairs, timing of repairs, and surgical expertise. The present study focused on the impact of these factors on the surgical outcomes of BDI repair. Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine patients who were treated with BDI post cholecystectomy at the surgical department between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were categorized as 11 in-house and 48 referral patients, of which 22 patients had bile duct repairs prior to referral. Surgical outcomes and factors, including types of repairs, timing of repairs, and surgical expertise, impacting on the treatment results were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 47.6 years. The BDI incidence in the authors’ hospital was 0.14%. Complications occurred in 21 patients (35.6%), of which intraabdominal collection was the most common at 10 patients (16.9%). The median length of hospital stay was 16 days for in-house patients and 17 days for the referral group (p=0.542). The mortality rate was 1.7%. The overall patency was 93% with mean follow up 106.4 months. Concerning the primary patency rate, the partial segments IV/V liver resection and hepaticojejunostomy techniques had better long-term patency compared to primary repairs at 92.3% versus 37.5% (p=0.017), and biliary bypass at 92.3% versus 80% (p=0.44). BDI repairs performed by primary surgeons increased the risk of anastomotic failure in comparison to those done by hepatobiliary surgeons with 10-year patency at 53.3% versus 95.4% (p=0.014). Delayed repairs longer than six weeks after injury offered positive long-term outcomes compared to early repairs done within six weeks after injury, with a 10-year patency at 85.4% versus 31.3% (p<0.001). Conclusion: Delayed repair performed by the hepatobiliary surgeon with appropriate surgical techniques decreased anastomosis stricture and achieved good overall surgical outcomes in the management of post cholecystectomy BDI. Keywords: Bile duct injury; Cholecystectomy; Surgical management


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document