scholarly journals Controlled fracture of the medial wall versus structural autograft with bulk femoral head to increase cup coverage by host bone for total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Mou ◽  
Kai Liao ◽  
Hui-lin Chen ◽  
Jing Yang
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Medial Wall ◽  
Host Bone ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Group A ◽  
Controlled Fracture ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Abstract Background Many methods have been proposed to increase cup coverage by host bone during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in hip osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, there was no study comparing the results of controlled fracture of the medial wall with a structural autograft with a bulk femoral head. Methods Sixty-seven hips classified as Crowe II/III were retrospectively included in this cohort study, which consisted of 33 controlled fractures (group A) and 34 structural autografts (group B). The Harris Hip Scores (HHS) were recorded. The radiological assessments were analyzed. Also, complications are assessed. The paired-sample t test was used for data analysis before and after the operation, while the independent sample T test was used for the comparison between the two groups. The Pearson chi-square test or the Fisher exact test was used to analyze the qualitative comparative parameters. Kaplan-Meier was utilized in the analysis of survivorship with the end points as a revision for any component. Results All patients were reconstructed acetabulum at the anatomical location. HHS increased greatly for both groups (p = 0.18). No statistic difference was observed for the two groups in postoperative leg-length discrepancy (0.51 ± 0.29 cm for group A and 0.46 ± 0.39 cm for group B, p = 0.64 ), postoperative height of the hip center (2.25 ± 0.42 cm for group A and 2.09 ± 0.31 cm for group B, p = 0.13), and inclination of the cup (39 ± 4° for group A and 38 ± 3° for group B, p = 0.65 ). The rate of cup coverage for group B (94 ± 2%) was better than for group A (91 ± 5%), (p = .009). The rate of cup protrusio was 48 ± 4% for group A. For both groups, no statistical difference was observed in the cup diameter (p > .05), while group A showed less operation time than group B (p < .001). No complications were observed at the latest follow-up. Conclusion Controlled fracture of the medial wall to increase cup coverage by host bone at the anatomical location can act as an alternative technique for DDH Crowe II/III with the advantage of shorter operation time and less technically demanding.

scholarly journals Controlled fracture of medial wall versus structural autograft with bulk femoral head to increase cup coverage by host bone for total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of hip: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Mou ◽  
Kai Liao ◽  
Hui-Lin Chen ◽  
Jing Yang
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Medial Wall ◽  
Host Bone ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia Of Hip ◽  
Group A ◽  
Controlled Fracture ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Many methods have been proposed to increase cup coverage by host bone during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in hip osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH). However, there was no study comparing results of controlled fracture of medial wall with structural autograft with bulk femoral head. Methods: 67 hips classified as Crowe II/III were retrospectively included in this cohort study, which consisted of 33 controlled fracture (group A) and 34 structural autograft (group B). The Harris Hip Scores (HHS) was recorded. The radiological assessments were analyzed. Also, complications are assessed. The paired sample t test was used for data analysis before and after operation, while independent sample T test was used for the comparison between the two groups. The Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to analyze the qualitative comparative parameters. Kaplan-Meier was utilized in the analysis of survivorship with the end points as a revision for any component.Results: All patients were reconstructed acetabulum at anatomical location. HHS increased greatly for both groups (P=0.18). No statistic difference was observed for two groups in postoperative leg-length discrepancy ((0.51±0.29) cm for group A and (0.46±0.39) cm for group B, P=0.64 ), postoperative height of hip center ((2.25±0.42) cm for group A and (2.09±0.31) cm for group B, P=0.13), inclination of cup ((39±4)°for group A and (38±3)°for group B, P=0.65 ). The rate of cup coverage for group B ((94±2)% ) was better than group A ((91±5)%), ( P=.009). Rate of cup protrusio was (48±4)% for group A. For both groups, No statistic difference was observed in cup diameter (P＞.05), while group A showed less operation time than group B (P＜.001). No complications were observed at the latest follow-up. Conclusion: Controlled fracture of medial wall to increase cup coverage by host bone at anatomical location can act as an alternative technique for DDH Crowe II/III with advantage of shorter operation time and less technically demanding.

scholarly journals Controlled Fracture of Medial Wall Versus Structural Autograft With Bulk Femoral Head to Increase Cup Coverage by Host Bone for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis Secondary to Developmental Dysplasia of Hip: a Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Mou ◽  
Kai Liao ◽  
Hui-Lin Chen ◽  
Jing Yang
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Femoral Head ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Medial Wall ◽  
Host Bone ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia Of Hip ◽  
Group A ◽  
Controlled Fracture ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Many methods have been proposed to increase cup coverage by host bone during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in hip osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH). However, there was no study comparing results of controlled fracture of medial wall with structural autograft with bulk femoral head. Methods: 67 hips classified as Crowe II/III were retrospectively included in this cohort study, which consisted of 33 controlled fracture (group A) and 34 structural autograft (group B). The Harris Hip Scores (HHS) was recorded. The radiological assessments were analyzed. Also, complications are assessed. The paired sample t test was used for data analysis before and after operation, while independent sample T test was used for the comparison between the two groups.Results: All patients were reconstructed acetabulum at anatomical location. HHS increased greatly for both groups (P=0.18). No statistic difference was observed for two groups in postoperative leg-length discrepancy ((0.51±0.29) cm for group A and (0.46±0.39) cm for group B, P=0.64 ), postoperative height of hip center ((2.25±0.42) cm for group A and (2.09±0.31) cm for group B, P=0.13), inclination of cup ((39±4)°for group A and (38±3)°for group B, P=0.65 ). The rate of cup coverage for group B ((94±2)% ) was better than group A ((91±5)%), ( P=.009). Rate of cup protrusio was (48±4)% for group A. For both two groups, no complications were observed at the latest follow-up. Conclusion: Controlled fracture of medial wall to increase cup coverage by host bone at anatomical location can act as an alternative technique for DDH Crowe II/III with advantage of shorter operation time and less technically demanding.

scholarly journals High Hip Center Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type II-III Developmental Dysplasia: Results of Midterm Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junmin Shen ◽  
Jingyang Sun ◽  
Haiyang Ma ◽  
Yinqiao Du ◽  
Tiejian Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Abstract Background: High hip center technique is still controversial about the survivorship of prothesis and postoperative complications. We aimed to show the utility of high hip center technique used in patients with Crowe II-III developmental dysplasia of the hip at the midterm follow-up and evaluated the clinical and radiographic results between different heights of hip center.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 69 patients (85 hips) with Crowe II-III dysplasia who underwent a high hip center cementless total hip arthroplasty at a mean follow up of 8.9 years (range, 6.0-14.1years). The patients were divided into two groups according to the height of hip center, respectively group A (≥22mm and <28mm) and group B (≥28mm). Radiographic, functional and survivorship outcomes were evaluated.Results: The mean location of the hip center from the inter-teardrop was 25.1mm vertically and 30.0mm horizontally in the group A, and 33.1mm vertically and 31.4mm horizontally in the group B. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups in postoperative femoral offset, abductor lever arm, leg length discrepancy and cup inclination. At the final follow up, the mean WOMAC and Harris hip score were significantly improved in both groups. Of the 85 hips, 7 hips (8.2%) showed a positive Trendelenburg sign. Additionally, 6 patients (8.7%) presented with a limp. No significant differences were shown regarding the Harris hip score, WOMAC score, Trendelenburg sign and limp between two groups. The Kaplan-Meier implants survivorship rates at the final follow-up for all-causes revisions in the group A and group B were similar (96.7% [95% confidence interval, 90.5%-100%] and 96.2% [95% confidence interval, 89.0%-100%], respectively).Conclusions: The high hip center technique is a valuable alternative to achieve excellent midterm results for Crowe II-III developmental dysplasia of the hip. Further, we reported good results and could not demonstrate any significant differences in outcomes or survivorship between the groups with differing degrees of HHC in our study, however the relatively small sample size must be considered and larger comparative studies are required to confirm the value of high hip center technique.

scholarly journals High Hip Center Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type II-III Developmental Dysplasia: Results of Midterm Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junmin Shen ◽  
Yonggang Zhou ◽  
Jingyang Sun ◽  
Haiyang Ma ◽  
Yinqiao Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Abstract Background: High hip center technique is still controversial about the survivorship of prothesis and postoperative complications. We aimed to show the utility of high hip center technique used in patients with Crowe II-III developmental dysplasia of the hip at the midterm follow-up and evaluated the clinical and radiographic results between different heights of hip center.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 69 patients (85 hips) with Crowe II-III dysplasia who underwent a high hip center cementless total hip arthroplasty at a mean follow up of 8.9 years (range, 6.0-14.1years). The patients were divided into two groups according to the height of hip center, respectively group A (≥22mm and <28mm) and group B (≥28mm). Radiographic, functional and survivorship outcomes were evaluated.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between two groups in horizontal distance, offset, abductor lever arm, leg length discrepancy and cup inclination. At the final follow up, the mean WOMAC and Harris hip score were significantly improved in both groups. Of the 85 hips, 7 hips (8.2%) showed a positive Trendelenburg sign. Besides, 6 patients (8.7%) presented with a limp. No significant differences were shown regarding the Harris hip score, WOMAC score, Trendelenburg sign and limp between two groups. The Kaplan-Meier implants survivorship rates at the final follow-up for all-causes revisions in group A and group B were similar (96.7% [95% confidence interval, 90.5%-100%] and 96.2% [95% confidence interval, 89.0%-100%], respectively).Conclusions: The high hip center technique is a valuable alternative to achieve excellent midterm results for Crowe II-III developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Anatomical parameters of and differences in the proximal femoral cavity in adult patients with developmental hip dysplasia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Ran Zhao ◽  
Hong Cai ◽  
Hua Tian ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Admin
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Marrow Cavity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip ◽  
Anatomical Parameters

Objective: To explore the anatomical parameters proximal femoral cavity and developmental dysplasia of the hip. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted at Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, and comprised data of adult patients of either gender who underwent total hip arthroplasty from January 2009 to August 2015. Paients with a diagnosis of primary osteoarthrosis or aseptic necrosis of the femoral head were taken as the control group A, while patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip in group B were graded into subgroups I-IV using the Crowe classification. For each patient, the inner diameter of the proximal femoral medullary cavity was measured on preoperative radiographs using Noble’s technique. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. Results: Of the 835 hips, 571(68.4%) were in group A and 264(31.6%) in group B. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 58.3 ± 12.3 years. Overall, there were 404(48.4%) hips of male patients; 59(22.3%) in group B. There were 431(51.6%) hips of female patients; 205(77.7%) in group B. In group B, 186(70.5%) hips were graded I, 38(14.4%)grade II, 22(8.3%)grade III, and 18(6.8%) hips were graded IV. There were significant differences in femoral offset, height of the femoral head, and canal flare index of the metaphysis between groups A and B (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the morphology of the marrow cavity between subgroups II and III.

scholarly journals High Hip Center Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type II-III Developmental Dysplasia: Results of Midterm Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junmin Shen ◽  
Yonggang Zhou ◽  
Jingyang Sun ◽  
Haiyang Ma ◽  
Yinqiao Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Abstract Background: High hip center technique is still controversial about the survivorship of prothesis and postoperative limp. We aimed to show the utility of high hip center technique used in patients with Crowe II-III developmental dysplasia of the hip at the midterm follow-up and evaluated the clinical and radiographic results between different heights of hip center.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 69 patients (85 hips) with Crowe II-III dysplasia who underwent a high hip center cementless total hip arthroplasty at a mean follow up of 8.9 years (range, 6.0-14.1). The patients were divided into two groups according to the height of hip center, respectively group A (≥22mm and <28mm) and group B (≥28mm). Radiographic, functional and survivorship outcomes were evaluated.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between two groups in horizontal distance, offset, abductor lever arm, leg length discrepancy and cup inclination. At the final follow up, the WOMAC and Harris hip scores were excellent in both groups. Of the 85 hips, 7 (8.2%) showed a positive Trendelenburg sign. Besides, 6 patients (8.7%) had a symptom of claudication. No significant differences were shown regarding the Harris hip score, WOMAC score, Trendelenburg sign and claudication between two groups. The Kaplan-Meier 8-year implants survivorship rates for all-causes revisions in group A and group B were similar (96.7% [95% confidence interval, 90.5%-100%] and 96.2% [95% confidence interval, 89.0%-100%], respectively).Conclusions: The high hip center technique is a valuable alternative to achieve excellent midterm results for Crowe II-III developmental dysplasia of the hip, preferably combined with COC interface or high crosslinked polyethylene liner.

scholarly journals Influence of bone cement distribution on outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective matched-cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 030006052110222
Author(s):  
Ling Mo ◽  
Zixian Wu ◽  
De Liang ◽  
Linqiang Y ◽  
Zhuoyan Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Bone Cement ◽  
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Matched Cohort Study ◽  
Cement Distribution ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective To evaluate the influence of insufficient bone cement distribution on outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Methods This retrospective matched-cohort study included patients 50–90 years of age who had undergone PVP for single level vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) from February 2015 to December 2018. Insufficient (Group A)/sufficient (Group B) distribution of bone cement in the fracture area was assessed from pre- and post-operative computed tomography (CT) images. Assessments were before, 3-days post-procedure, and at the last follow-up visit (≥12 months). Result Of the 270 eligible patients, there were 54 matched pairs. On post-operative day 3 and at the last follow-up visit, significantly greater visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were obtained in Group B over Group A, while kyphotic angles (KAs) and vertebral height (VH) loss were significantly larger in Group A compared with Group B. Incidence of asymptomatic cement leakage and re-collapse of cemented vertebrae were also greater in Group A compared with Group B. Conclusions Insufficient cement distribution may relate to less pain relief and result in progressive vertebral collapse and kyphotic deformity post-PVP.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of a Gelatin–Thrombin Matrix Sealant (Floseal®) for Reducing Blood Loss During Microendoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110088
Author(s):  
Kazunori Nomura ◽  
Munehito Yoshida ◽  
Motohiro Okada ◽  
Yosuke Nakamura ◽  
Kenichi Yawatari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Spinal Canal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Postoperative Drainage ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of a gelatin–thrombin matrix sealant (GTMS) during microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). Methods: This study included 158 LSCS cases on hemostasis-affecting medication who underwent MEL by a single surgeon between September 2016 and August 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether GTMS was used (37 cases, Group A) or not (121 cases, Group B). Perioperative data related to bleeding or postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (PSEH) was investigated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for low back pain. Results: The mean intraoperative blood loss per level was greater in Group A (26.0 ± 20.3 g) than in Group B (13.6 ± 9.0 g), whereas the postoperative drainage volume was smaller in Group A (79.1 ± 42.5 g) than in Group B (97.3 ± 55.6 g). No revision surgeries for PSEH were required in Group A, while 2 (1.7%) revisions were required in Group B ( P = .957). The median JOA score improved significantly from the preoperative period to 1-year postoperatively in both Group A and B (total score, 16.0-23.5 and 17.0-25.0 points, respectively). Conclusions: The use of GTMS during MEL for LSCS may be associated with a reduction in postoperative drainage volume. The revision rate for PSEH was not affected significantly by the use of GTMS. Clinical outcomes (represented by the JOA score) were significantly improved after the surgery, regardless of GTMS use during MEL.

scholarly journals Infective complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in relation to preoperative urine culture status

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Birendra Kumar Yadav ◽  
Robin Bahadur Basnet ◽  
Anil Shrestha ◽  
Parish Mani Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stone Characteristics ◽  
Negative Urine Culture ◽  
Infective Complications

Introductions: Fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) secondary to urinary tract infection is a major determinant of overall post PCNL complications. This study aims to analyse infective complications after PCNL in relation to pre-operative urine culture status. Methods: A comparative analysis of post PCNL infective complications in pre-operative urine culture positive (Group A) and negative (Group B) was done for one year during June 2017 to May 2018 in department of urology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. Demographics, stone characteristics, mean operative time, post-operative hospital stay and post-operative complications as per Modified Clavien classification were compared between the two groups. Results: Out of total 136 PCNL patients, 51 were in Group A and 85 in Group B. Infective complications were significantly high, 28 (54.90%) in group A compared to 20 (23.53%) in group B, p=0.004. The most common isolate was Escherichia coli 19 (37.25%), sensitive to amikacin 37 (72.55%). The mean operation time, transfusion and hospital stay was not statically different in two groups. Morality occurred in 1 (1.96%) in group A. Conclusions: Infective complications were significantly high after PCNL in patients with preoperative positive urine culture, even when it was treated to sterile with sensitive antibiotics, compared to patients with preoperative negative urine culture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document