scholarly journals Predicting the impact of outdoor vector control interventions on malaria transmission intensity from semi-field studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Denz ◽  
Margaret M. Njoroge ◽  
Mgeni M. Tambwe ◽  
Clara Champagne ◽  
Fredros Okumu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vector Control ◽  
Malaria Transmission ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Vectorial Capacity ◽  
Personal Protection ◽  
Pull System ◽  
Host Seeking ◽  
Spatial Repellents ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Semi-field experiments with human landing catch (HLC) measure as the outcome are an important step in the development of novel vector control interventions against outdoor transmission of malaria since they provide good estimates of personal protection. However, it is often infeasible to determine whether the reduction in HLC counts is due to mosquito mortality or repellency, especially considering that spatial repellents based on volatile pyrethroids might induce both. Due to the vastly different impact of repellency and mortality on transmission, the community-level impact of spatial repellents can not be estimated from such semi-field experiments. Methods We present a new stochastic model that is able to estimate for any product inhibiting outdoor biting, its repelling effect versus its killing and disarming (preventing host-seeking until the next night) effects, based only on time-stratified HLC data from controlled semi-field experiments. For parameter inference, a Bayesian hierarchical model is used to account for nightly variation of semi-field experimental conditions. We estimate the impact of the products on the vectorial capacity of the given Anopheles species using an existing mathematical model. With this methodology, we analysed data from recent semi-field studies in Kenya and Tanzania on the impact of transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons, the odour-baited Suna trap and their combination (push–pull system) on HLC of Anopheles arabiensis in the peridomestic area. Results Complementing previous analyses of personal protection, we found that the transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons act mainly by killing or disarming mosquitoes. Depending on the actual ratio of disarming versus killing, the vectorial capacity of An. arabiensis is reduced by 41 to 96% at 70% coverage with the transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons and by 38 to 82% at the same coverage with the push–pull system, under the assumption of a similar impact on biting indoors compared to outdoors. Conclusions The results of this analysis of semi-field data suggest that transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons are a promising tool against malaria transmission by An. arabiensis in the peridomestic area, since they provide both personal and community protection. Our modelling framework can estimate the community-level impact of any tool intervening during the mosquito host-seeking state using data from only semi-field experiments with time-stratified HLC.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Impact of Two Generalist Predators on the Leafhopper Erasmoneura vulnerata Population Density

Insects ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
Stefan Cristian Prazaru ◽  
Giulia Zanettin ◽  
Alberto Pozzebon ◽  
Paola Tirello ◽  
Francesco Toffoletto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Generalist Predators ◽  
Predator Species ◽  
Potted Plants ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Orius Majusculus ◽  
Limited Effectiveness ◽  
Pest Outbreaks ◽  
The Impact

Outbreaks of the Nearctic leafhopper Erasmoneura vulnerata represent a threat to vinegrowers in Southern Europe, in particular in North-eastern Italy. The pest outbreaks are frequent in organic vineyards because insecticides labeled for organic viticulture show limited effectiveness towards leafhoppers. On the other hand, the naturally occurring predators and parasitoids of E. vulnerata in vineyards are often not able to keep leafhopper densities at acceptable levels for vine-growers. In this study, we evaluated the potential of two generalist, commercially available predators, Chrysoperla carnea and Orius majusculus, in suppressing E. vulnerata. Laboratory and semi-field experiments were carried out to evaluate both species’ predation capacity on E. vulnerata nymphs. The experiments were conducted on grapevine leaves inside Petri dishes (laboratory) and on potted and caged grapevines (semi-field); in both experiments, the leaves or potted plants were infested with E. vulnerata nymphs prior to predator releases. Both predator species exhibited a remarkable voracity and significantly reduced leafhopper densities in laboratory and semi-field experiments. Therefore, field studies were carried out over two growing seasons in two vineyards. We released 4 O. majusculus adults and 30 C. carnea larvae per m2 of canopy. Predator releases in vineyards reduced leafhopper densities by about 30% compared to the control plots. Results obtained in this study showed that the two predators have a potential to suppress the pest density, but more research is required to define appropriate predator–prey release ratios and release timing. Studies on intraguild interactions and competition with naturally occurring predators are also suggested.

scholarly journals Optimising systemic insecticide use to improve malaria control

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. e001776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah R Meredith ◽  
Luis Furuya-Kanamori ◽  
Laith Yakob
Keyword(s):  
Vector Control ◽  
Malaria Transmission ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Mass Drug Administration ◽  
Companion Animals ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Systemic Insecticide ◽  
Blood Concentrations ◽  
Systemic Insecticides ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundLong-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual sprays have significantly reduced the burden of malaria. However, several hurdles remain before elimination can be achieved: mosquito vectors have developed resistance to public health insecticides, including pyrethroids, and have altered their biting behaviour to avoid these indoor control tools. Systemic insecticides, drugs applied directly to blood hosts to kill mosquitoes that take a blood meal, offer a promising vector control option. To date, most studies focus on repurposing ivermectin, a drug used extensively to treat river blindness. There is concern that overdependence on a single drug will inevitably repeat past experiences with the rapid spread of pyrethroid resistance in malaria vectors. Diversifying the arsenal of systemic insecticides used for mass drug administration would improve this strategy’s sustainability.MethodsHere, a review was conducted to identify systemic insecticide candidates and consolidate their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. The impact of alternative integrated vector control options and different dosing regimens on malaria transmission reduction are illustrated through mathematical model simulation.ResultsThe review identified drugs from four classes commonly used in livestock and companion animals: avermectins, milbemycins, isoxazolines and spinosyns. Simulations predicted that isoxazolines and spinosyns are promising candidates for mass drug administration, as they were predicted to need less frequent application than avermectins and milbemycins to maintain mosquitocidal blood concentrations.ConclusionsThese findings will provide a guide for investigating and applying different systemic insecticides to achieve more effective and sustainable control of malaria transmission.

Addressing the effects of bottom trawling on benthic processes using experimental and field studies in the Baltic Sea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Morys ◽  
Martin Jakobsson ◽  
Mattias Sköld ◽  
Pere Masqué ◽  
Volker Brüchert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Baltic Sea ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Biogeochemical Cycling ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
The Baltic Sea ◽  
Bottom Trawling ◽  
Flux Measurements ◽  
The Baltic ◽  
Benthic Ecosystems ◽  
The Impact

<p>Bottom trawling is one of the most important anthropogenic disturbances affecting marine ecosystems and there has been increased attention to its impacts on seabed habitats as well as the structure and functioning of benthic ecosystems. The impact of bottom trawling is well-known with regard to benthic organisms. However, we still have a poor understanding of its effects on bentho-pelagic coupling and biogeochemical cycling in the sediment. In the Baltic Sea, the study area of the present investigation, there is a particular lack of data.<br>Here, we present new results from field experiments to quantify changes in sediment properties, macrofauna and biogeochemical cycling after the passage of a benthic dredge. To put the results in a broader context, a field survey was conducted in six areas of different commercial trawling intensities in the Bornholm Basin. Acoustic geophysical mapping, isotope profiling, functional categorization of macrofauna and sediment-water nutrient and oxygen flux measurements were used to evaluate the physical disturbance of the seabed. Preliminary results suggest a range of ecological, biogeochemical and physical impacts of trawling in the Baltic Sea, with implications for benthic ecosystem functioning.</p>

scholarly journals Accessing the syndemic of COVID-19 and malaria intervention in Africa

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benyun Shi ◽  
Jinxin Zheng ◽  
Shang Xia ◽  
Shan Lin ◽  
Xinyi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Markov Chain ◽  
Markov Chain Monte Carlo ◽  
Malaria Transmission ◽  
Vectorial Capacity ◽  
Insecticide Treated Nets ◽  
Transmission Potential ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Pharmaceutical Interventions ◽  
Epidemiological Parameters

Abstract Background: The pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused substantial disruptions to health services in the low and middle-income countries with a high burden of other diseases, such as malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on malaria transmission potential in malaria-endemic countries in Africa. Methods: We present a data-driven method to quantify the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), could lead to the change of malaria transmission potential in 2020. First, we adopt a particle Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to estimate epidemiological parameters in each country by fitting the time series of the cumulative number of reported COVID-19 cases. Then, we simulate the epidemic dynamics of COVID-19 under two groups of NPIs: (i) contact restriction and social distancing, and (ii) early identification and isolation of cases. Based on the simulated epidemic curves, we quantify the impact of COVID-19 epidemic and NPIs on the distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Finally, by treating the total number of ITNs available in each country in 2020, we evaluate the negative effects of COVID-19 pandemic on malaria transmission potential based on the notion of vectorial capacity. Results: In this paper, we conduct case studies in four malaria-endemic countries, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Zambia, in Africa. The epidemiological parameters (i.e., the basic reproduction number R_0 and the duration of infection D_I) of COVID-19 in each country are estimated as follows: Ethiopia (R_0=1.57, D_I=5.32), Nigeria (R_0=2.18, D_I=6.58), Tanzania (R_0=2.47, D_I=6.01), and Zambia (R_0=2.12, D_I=6.96). Based on the estimated epidemiological parameters, the epidemic curves simulated under various NPIs indicated that the earlier the interventions are implemented, the better the epidemic is controlled. Moreover, the effect of combined NPIs is better than contact restriction and social distancing only. By treating the total number of ITNs available in each country in 2020 as a baseline, our results show that even with stringent NPIs, malaria transmission potential will remain higher than expected in the second half of 2020. Conclusions: By quantifying the impact of various NPI response to the COVID-19 pandemic on malaria transmission potential, this study provides a way to jointly address the syndemic between COVID-19 and malaria in malaria-endemic countries in Africa. The results suggest that the early intervention of COVID-19 can effectively reduce the scale of the epidemic and mitigate its impact on malaria transmission potential. Keywords : COVID-19 pandemic; Non-pharmaceutical interventions; Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo; Insecticide-treated nets; Vectorial capacity; Malaria transmission potential

scholarly journals Malaria in migrant agricultural workers in western Ethiopia: entomological assessment of malaria transmission risk

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sisay Dugassa Lemma ◽  
Mathew Murphy ◽  
Sheleme Chibsa ◽  
Yehualashet Tadesse ◽  
Gedeon Yohannes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vector Control ◽  
Malaria Transmission ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Transmission Risk ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Residential Housing ◽  
Host Seeking ◽  
Human Landing ◽  
Western Ethiopia

Abstract Background Ethiopia has made great strides in malaria control over the last two decades. However, this progress has not been uniform and one concern has been reported high rates of malaria transmission in large agricultural development areas in western Ethiopia. Improved vector control is one way this transmission might be addressed, but little is known about malaria vectors in this part of the country. Methods To better understand the vector species involved in malaria transmission and their behaviour, human landing collections were conducted in Dangur woreda, Benishangul-Gumuz, between July and December 2017. This period encompasses the months with the highest rain and the peak mosquito population. Mosquitoes were identified to species and tested for the presence of Plasmodium sporozoites. Results The predominant species of the Anopheles collected was Anopheles arabiensis (1,733; i.e. 61.3% of the entire Anopheles), which was also the only species identified with sporozoites (Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax). Anopheles arabiensis was collected as early in the evening as 18:00h-19:00h, and host-seeking continued until 5:00h-6:00h. Nearly equal numbers were collected indoors and outdoors. The calculated entomological inoculation rate for An. arabiensis for the study period was 1.41 infectious bites per month. More An. arabiensis were collected inside and outside worker’s shelters than in fields where workers were working at night. Conclusions Anopheles arabiensis is likely to be the primary vector of malaria in the agricultural development areas studied. High rates of human biting took place inside and outdoor near workers’ residential housing. Improved and targeted vector control in this area might considerably reduce malaria transmission.

scholarly journals Malaria in Migrant Agricultural Workers in Dangur District, Benishangul-gumuz, Ethiopia. Entomological Assessment of Malaria Transmission Risk

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sisay Dugassa Lemma ◽  
Mathew Murphy ◽  
Sheleme Chibsa ◽  
Yehualashet Tadesse ◽  
Gedeon Yohannes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vector Control ◽  
Malaria Transmission ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Transmission Risk ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Residential Housing ◽  
Host Seeking ◽  
Human Landing ◽  
Primary Vector

Abstract Background: Ethiopia has made great strides in malaria control. However, this progress has not been uniform and one concern has been reported high rates of malaria transmission in large agricultural development areas in western Ethiopia. Improved vector control is one way this transmission might be addressed, but little is known about malaria vectors in this part of the country. Methods: To better understand the vector species involved in malaria transmission and their behavior, human landing collections were conducted in Dangur woreda, Benishangul-Gumuz, between July and December 2017. Mosquitoes were identified to species and tested for presence of Plasmodium sporozoites. Results: The predominant species collected was Anopheles arabiensis (61.3% of all Anopheles), which was also the only species identified with sporozoites (P. falciparum and P. vivax). Anopheles arabiensis was collected as early in the evening as 18:00h-19:00h, and host-seeking continued until 5:00h-6:00h. Nearly equal numbers were collected indoors and outdoors. The calculated entomological inoculation rate for An. arabiensis for the study period was 1.41 infectious bites per month. More An. arabiensis were collected inside and outside worker’s shelters than in fields where workers were working at night. Conclusions: An. arabiensis is likely to be the primary vector of malaria in the agricultural development areas studied. High rates of human biting took place inside and outdoor near workers’ residential housing. Improved and targeted vector control in this area might considerably reduce malaria transmission.

scholarly journals Field experiments on social media

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Mosleh ◽  
Gordon Pennycook ◽  
David Gertler Rand
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Media Content ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Online Environment ◽  
Online Behavior ◽  
Practical Advice ◽  
Experimental Approaches ◽  
The Impact

Online behavioral data, such as digital traces from social media, have the potential to allow researchers an unprecedented new window into human behavior in ecologically valid everyday contexts. However, research using such data is often purely observational, limiting its ability to identify causal relationships. Here we review recent innovations in experimental approaches to studying online behavior, with a particular focus on research related to misinformation and political psychology. In hybrid lab-field studies, exposure to social media content can be randomized, and the impact on attitudes and beliefs measured using surveys; or exposure to treatments can be randomized within survey experiments, and their impact observed on subsequent online behavior. In field experiments conducted on social media, randomized treatments can be administered directly to users in the online environment - e.g. via social tie invitations, private messages, or public posts - without revealing that they are part of an experiment, and the impacts on subsequent online behavior observed. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed, along with practical advice and central ethical constraints on such studies.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Efficacy, Impact and Feasibility of Community-based House Screening as a Complementary Malaria Control Intervention in Southern Africa: a Study Protocol for a Household Randomized Trial.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Onyango Sangoro ◽  
Ulrike Fillinger ◽  
Kochelani Saili ◽  
Theresia Estomih Nkya ◽  
Rose Marubu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vector Control ◽  
Malaria Transmission ◽  
Malaria Control ◽  
Malaria Incidence ◽  
Indoor Residual Spraying ◽  
Clinical Malaria ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Transmission Season ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Concerted effort to control malaria has had a substantial impact on transmission of the disease in the past two decades. In areas where reduced malaria transmission is being sustained through insecticide-based vector control interventions, primarily long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), non-insecticidal complementary tools will likely be needed to push towards malaria elimination. Once interruption in local disease transmission is achieved, insecticide-based measures can be scaled down gradually and eventually phased out, saving on costs of sustaining control programmes and mitigating any unintended negative health and environmental impacts posed by insecticides. These non-insecticidal methods could eventually replace insecticidal methods of vector control. House screening, a non-insecticidal method, has a long history in malaria control, but is still not widely adopted in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to add to the evidence-base for this intervention in low transmission settings by assessing the efficacy, impact and feasibility of house screening in areas where LLINs are conventionally used for malaria control. Methods: A two-armed, household randomized clinical trial will be conducted in Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe to evaluate whether combined use of house screens and LLINs affords better protection against clinical malaria in children between 6 months and 13 years compared to the sole use of LLINs. Eight hundred households will be enrolled in each study area, where 400 households will be randomly assigned the intervention, house screening and LLINs while the control households will be provided with LLINs only. Clinical malaria incidence will be estimated by actively following up one child from each household for 6 months over the malaria transmission season. Cross-sectional parasite prevalence will be estimated by testing all participating children for malaria parasites at the beginning and end of each transmission season using rapid diagnostic tests.CDC light traps and pyrethrum spray catches (PSC) will be used to sample adult mosquitoes and evaluate the impact of house screening on indoor mosquito density, species distribution and sporozoite rates.Discussion: This study will contribute epidemiological data on the impact of house screening on malaria transmission and assess the feasibility of its implementation on a programmatic scale. Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered on 11th August 2020. Registration number PACTR202008524310568.

scholarly journals Evaluation of different deployment strategies for larviciding to control malaria: a simulation study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Runge ◽  
Salum Mapua ◽  
Ismail Nambunga ◽  
Thomas A. Smith ◽  
Nakul Chitnis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Malaria Transmission ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Indoor Residual Spraying ◽  
Malaria Prevalence ◽  
Transmission Model ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Relative Reduction ◽  
Insecticide Treated Nets ◽  
Host Seeking ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Larviciding against malaria vectors in Africa has been limited to indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated nets, but is increasingly being considered by some countries as a complementary strategy. However, despite progress towards improved larvicides and new tools for mapping or treating mosquito-breeding sites, little is known about the optimal deployment strategies for larviciding in different transmission and seasonality settings. Methods A malaria transmission model, OpenMalaria, was used to simulate varying larviciding strategies and their impact on host-seeking mosquito densities, entomological inoculation rate (EIR) and malaria prevalence. Variations in coverage, duration, frequency, and timing of larviciding were simulated for three transmission intensities and four transmission seasonality profiles. Malaria transmission was assumed to follow rainfall with a lag of one month. Theoretical sub-Saharan African settings with Anopheles gambiae as the dominant vector were chosen to explore impact. Relative reduction compared to no larviciding was predicted for each indicator during the simulated larviciding period. Results Larviciding immediately reduced the predicted host-seeking mosquito densities and EIRs to a maximum that approached or exceeded the simulated coverage. Reduction in prevalence was delayed by approximately one month. The relative reduction in prevalence was up to four times higher at low than high transmission. Reducing larviciding frequency (i.e., from every 5 to 10 days) resulted in substantial loss in effectiveness (54, 45 and 53% loss of impact for host-seeking mosquito densities, EIR and prevalence, respectively). In seasonal settings the most effective timing of larviciding was during or at the beginning of the rainy season and least impactful during the dry season, assuming larviciding deployment for four months. Conclusion The results highlight the critical role of deployment strategies on the impact of larviciding. Overall, larviciding would be more effective in settings with low and seasonal transmission, and at the beginning and during the peak densities of the target species populations. For maximum impact, implementers should consider the practical ranges of coverage, duration, frequency, and timing of larviciding in their respective contexts. More operational data and improved calibration would enable models to become a practical tool to support malaria control programmes in developing larviciding strategies that account for the diversity of contexts.

scholarly journals Malaria in migrant agricultural workers in western Ethiopia: entomological assessment of malaria transmission risk

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sisay Dugassa ◽  
Mathew Murphy ◽  
Sheleme Chibsa ◽  
Yehualashet Tadesse ◽  
Gedeon Yohannes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vector Control ◽  
Malaria Transmission ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Transmission Risk ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Residential Housing ◽  
Host Seeking ◽  
Human Landing ◽  
Western Ethiopia

Abstract Background Ethiopia has made great strides in malaria control over the last two decades. However, this progress has not been uniform and one concern has been reported high rates of malaria transmission in large agricultural development areas in western Ethiopia. Improved vector control is one way this transmission might be addressed, but little is known about malaria vectors in this part of the country. Methods To better understand the vector species involved in malaria transmission and their behaviour, human landing collections were conducted in Dangur woreda, Benishangul-Gumuz, between July and December 2017. This period encompasses the months with the highest rain and the peak mosquito population. Mosquitoes were identified to species and tested for the presence of Plasmodium sporozoites. Results The predominant species of the Anopheles collected was Anopheles arabiensis (1,733; i.e. 61.3 % of the entire Anopheles), which was also the only species identified with sporozoites (Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax). Anopheles arabiensis was collected as early in the evening as 18:00 h-19:00 h, and host-seeking continued until 5:00 h-6:00 h. Nearly equal numbers were collected indoors and outdoors. The calculated entomological inoculation rate for An. arabiensis for the study period was 1.41 infectious bites per month. More An. arabiensis were collected inside and outside worker’s shelters than in fields where workers were working at night. Conclusions Anopheles arabiensis is likely to be the primary vector of malaria in the agricultural development areas studied. High rates of human biting took place inside and outdoor near workers’ residential housing. Improved and targeted vector control in this area might considerably reduce malaria transmission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document